Intraoperative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures

OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to compare intraoperative fluoroscopic stress testing, static radiographs, and biomechanical criteria for the diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic instability associated with external rotation type ankle fractures. DESIGN:Prospective, consecutive series. SET...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2005-10, Vol.19 (9), p.604-609
Hauptverfasser: Jenkinson, Richard J, Sanders, David W, Macleod, Mark D, Domonkos, Andrea, Lydestadt, Jeanette
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 609
container_issue 9
container_start_page 604
container_title Journal of orthopaedic trauma
container_volume 19
creator Jenkinson, Richard J
Sanders, David W
Macleod, Mark D
Domonkos, Andrea
Lydestadt, Jeanette
description OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to compare intraoperative fluoroscopic stress testing, static radiographs, and biomechanical criteria for the diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic instability associated with external rotation type ankle fractures. DESIGN:Prospective, consecutive series. SETTING:Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Thirty-eight skeletally mature patients with unstable unilateral external rotation ankle fractures were prospectively recruited. INTERVENTION:Before surgery, the treating surgeon detailed the operative treatment plan, including need for syndesmotic fixation. In pronation-external rotation injuries, biomechanical criteria were applied to predict syndesmotic instability. Ankles were examined using intraoperative fluoroscopic external rotation stress tests. The contralateral uninjured limb was used as a control. A 7.2-Nm force was applied for the external rotation stress examination. Stress testing was performed after lateral malleolar fixation and repeated after medial and syndesmotic fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The incidence of syndesmotic instability was determined based on radiographic clear space measurements and compared with previously published criteria. RESULTS:Intraoperative fluoroscopy detected unpredicted syndesmotic instability in 37% of ankles. In supination-external rotation (OTA 44B) injuries, unpredicted syndesmosis instability was found in 10 of 30 patients (33%). In pronation-external rotation injuries (OTA 44C), 4 of 7 patients (57%) were associated with syndesmosis disruption not predicted by biomechanical criteria. In bimalleolar fractures, syndesmosis fixation improved stability compared with rigid bimalleolar fixation alone (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative radiographs and biomechanical criteria are unable to routinely predict the presence or absence of syndesmosis instability. Rigid bimalleolar fixation was frequently not sufficient to stabilize syndesmotic disruption. Intraoperative stress fluoroscopy is a valuable tool for detection of unstable syndesmotic injuries.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.bot.0000177114.13263.12
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68729707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68729707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-3c43c3327065daee3e0fd2274fd3233e42cc8c00e293dc2d9479f4a2a5b1c21c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFVCEBLcEz9iJE25VaWGlSkhAz5bXmdC0Xnuxk5a-Pc7uSjsHj0b6_hnpM2MfgFfAO_WZQ7UJU8VzgVIAsgKBjagAX7AV1AJKxA5eshVvO17WQnRn7E1K95lvOeJrdgYNSiW4XLHbtZ-iCTuKZhofqfg6mj8-pDEVYSh-Pfue0nY_rv39HEdKxeiLq38TRW9c8TNMORZ8ceEfHBXX0dhpjpTesleDcYneHfs5u72--n35vbz58W19eXFTWsGVLIWVwgqBijd1b4gE8aFHVHLoBQpBEq1tLeeEnegt9p1U3SANmnoDFsGKc_bpsHcXw9-Z0qS3Y7LknPEU5qSbVmGnuMrglwNoY0gp0qB3cdya-KyB60Wq5qCzVH2SqvdSNWAOvz9emTdb6k_Ro8UMfDwCJlnjhmi8HdOJU6g62bSZkwfuKbhsMD24-YmiviPjprv96RqW31v6MpXLI8V_joGQsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68729707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Jenkinson, Richard J ; Sanders, David W ; Macleod, Mark D ; Domonkos, Andrea ; Lydestadt, Jeanette</creator><creatorcontrib>Jenkinson, Richard J ; Sanders, David W ; Macleod, Mark D ; Domonkos, Andrea ; Lydestadt, Jeanette</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to compare intraoperative fluoroscopic stress testing, static radiographs, and biomechanical criteria for the diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic instability associated with external rotation type ankle fractures. DESIGN:Prospective, consecutive series. SETTING:Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Thirty-eight skeletally mature patients with unstable unilateral external rotation ankle fractures were prospectively recruited. INTERVENTION:Before surgery, the treating surgeon detailed the operative treatment plan, including need for syndesmotic fixation. In pronation-external rotation injuries, biomechanical criteria were applied to predict syndesmotic instability. Ankles were examined using intraoperative fluoroscopic external rotation stress tests. The contralateral uninjured limb was used as a control. A 7.2-Nm force was applied for the external rotation stress examination. Stress testing was performed after lateral malleolar fixation and repeated after medial and syndesmotic fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The incidence of syndesmotic instability was determined based on radiographic clear space measurements and compared with previously published criteria. RESULTS:Intraoperative fluoroscopy detected unpredicted syndesmotic instability in 37% of ankles. In supination-external rotation (OTA 44B) injuries, unpredicted syndesmosis instability was found in 10 of 30 patients (33%). In pronation-external rotation injuries (OTA 44C), 4 of 7 patients (57%) were associated with syndesmosis disruption not predicted by biomechanical criteria. In bimalleolar fractures, syndesmosis fixation improved stability compared with rigid bimalleolar fixation alone (P &lt; 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative radiographs and biomechanical criteria are unable to routinely predict the presence or absence of syndesmosis instability. Rigid bimalleolar fixation was frequently not sufficient to stabilize syndesmotic disruption. Intraoperative stress fluoroscopy is a valuable tool for detection of unstable syndesmotic injuries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-5339</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-2291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000177114.13263.12</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16247304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Ankle Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Ankle Injuries - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging ; Fractures, Bone - surgery ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Intraoperative Care - methods ; Ligaments, Articular - injuries ; Ligaments, Articular - surgery ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Physical Examination - methods ; Prognosis ; Radiography ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotation ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2005-10, Vol.19 (9), p.604-609</ispartof><rights>2005 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-3c43c3327065daee3e0fd2274fd3233e42cc8c00e293dc2d9479f4a2a5b1c21c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-3c43c3327065daee3e0fd2274fd3233e42cc8c00e293dc2d9479f4a2a5b1c21c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17279468$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16247304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jenkinson, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macleod, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domonkos, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lydestadt, Jeanette</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</title><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to compare intraoperative fluoroscopic stress testing, static radiographs, and biomechanical criteria for the diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic instability associated with external rotation type ankle fractures. DESIGN:Prospective, consecutive series. SETTING:Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Thirty-eight skeletally mature patients with unstable unilateral external rotation ankle fractures were prospectively recruited. INTERVENTION:Before surgery, the treating surgeon detailed the operative treatment plan, including need for syndesmotic fixation. In pronation-external rotation injuries, biomechanical criteria were applied to predict syndesmotic instability. Ankles were examined using intraoperative fluoroscopic external rotation stress tests. The contralateral uninjured limb was used as a control. A 7.2-Nm force was applied for the external rotation stress examination. Stress testing was performed after lateral malleolar fixation and repeated after medial and syndesmotic fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The incidence of syndesmotic instability was determined based on radiographic clear space measurements and compared with previously published criteria. RESULTS:Intraoperative fluoroscopy detected unpredicted syndesmotic instability in 37% of ankles. In supination-external rotation (OTA 44B) injuries, unpredicted syndesmosis instability was found in 10 of 30 patients (33%). In pronation-external rotation injuries (OTA 44C), 4 of 7 patients (57%) were associated with syndesmosis disruption not predicted by biomechanical criteria. In bimalleolar fractures, syndesmosis fixation improved stability compared with rigid bimalleolar fixation alone (P &lt; 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative radiographs and biomechanical criteria are unable to routinely predict the presence or absence of syndesmosis instability. Rigid bimalleolar fixation was frequently not sufficient to stabilize syndesmotic disruption. Intraoperative stress fluoroscopy is a valuable tool for detection of unstable syndesmotic injuries.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Ankle Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ankle Injuries - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - injuries</subject><subject>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physical Examination - methods</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0890-5339</issn><issn>1531-2291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhFVCEBLcEz9iJE25VaWGlSkhAz5bXmdC0Xnuxk5a-Pc7uSjsHj0b6_hnpM2MfgFfAO_WZQ7UJU8VzgVIAsgKBjagAX7AV1AJKxA5eshVvO17WQnRn7E1K95lvOeJrdgYNSiW4XLHbtZ-iCTuKZhofqfg6mj8-pDEVYSh-Pfue0nY_rv39HEdKxeiLq38TRW9c8TNMORZ8ceEfHBXX0dhpjpTesleDcYneHfs5u72--n35vbz58W19eXFTWsGVLIWVwgqBijd1b4gE8aFHVHLoBQpBEq1tLeeEnegt9p1U3SANmnoDFsGKc_bpsHcXw9-Z0qS3Y7LknPEU5qSbVmGnuMrglwNoY0gp0qB3cdya-KyB60Wq5qCzVH2SqvdSNWAOvz9emTdb6k_Ro8UMfDwCJlnjhmi8HdOJU6g62bSZkwfuKbhsMD24-YmiviPjprv96RqW31v6MpXLI8V_joGQsg</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Jenkinson, Richard J</creator><creator>Sanders, David W</creator><creator>Macleod, Mark D</creator><creator>Domonkos, Andrea</creator><creator>Lydestadt, Jeanette</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures</title><author>Jenkinson, Richard J ; Sanders, David W ; Macleod, Mark D ; Domonkos, Andrea ; Lydestadt, Jeanette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-3c43c3327065daee3e0fd2274fd3233e42cc8c00e293dc2d9479f4a2a5b1c21c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Ankle Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ankle Injuries - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - injuries</topic><topic>Ligaments, Articular - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physical Examination - methods</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jenkinson, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macleod, Mark D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domonkos, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lydestadt, Jeanette</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jenkinson, Richard J</au><au>Sanders, David W</au><au>Macleod, Mark D</au><au>Domonkos, Andrea</au><au>Lydestadt, Jeanette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic trauma</jtitle><addtitle>J Orthop Trauma</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>609</epage><pages>604-609</pages><issn>0890-5339</issn><eissn>1531-2291</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE:This study was designed to compare intraoperative fluoroscopic stress testing, static radiographs, and biomechanical criteria for the diagnosis of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic instability associated with external rotation type ankle fractures. DESIGN:Prospective, consecutive series. SETTING:Academic level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS:Thirty-eight skeletally mature patients with unstable unilateral external rotation ankle fractures were prospectively recruited. INTERVENTION:Before surgery, the treating surgeon detailed the operative treatment plan, including need for syndesmotic fixation. In pronation-external rotation injuries, biomechanical criteria were applied to predict syndesmotic instability. Ankles were examined using intraoperative fluoroscopic external rotation stress tests. The contralateral uninjured limb was used as a control. A 7.2-Nm force was applied for the external rotation stress examination. Stress testing was performed after lateral malleolar fixation and repeated after medial and syndesmotic fixation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The incidence of syndesmotic instability was determined based on radiographic clear space measurements and compared with previously published criteria. RESULTS:Intraoperative fluoroscopy detected unpredicted syndesmotic instability in 37% of ankles. In supination-external rotation (OTA 44B) injuries, unpredicted syndesmosis instability was found in 10 of 30 patients (33%). In pronation-external rotation injuries (OTA 44C), 4 of 7 patients (57%) were associated with syndesmosis disruption not predicted by biomechanical criteria. In bimalleolar fractures, syndesmosis fixation improved stability compared with rigid bimalleolar fixation alone (P &lt; 0.01). CONCLUSIONS:Preoperative radiographs and biomechanical criteria are unable to routinely predict the presence or absence of syndesmosis instability. Rigid bimalleolar fixation was frequently not sufficient to stabilize syndesmotic disruption. Intraoperative stress fluoroscopy is a valuable tool for detection of unstable syndesmotic injuries.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16247304</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.bot.0000177114.13263.12</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-5339
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic trauma, 2005-10, Vol.19 (9), p.604-609
issn 0890-5339
1531-2291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68729707
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Ankle Injuries - diagnostic imaging
Ankle Injuries - surgery
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging
Fractures, Bone - surgery
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Intraoperative Care - methods
Ligaments, Articular - injuries
Ligaments, Articular - surgery
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Physical Examination - methods
Prognosis
Radiography
Reproducibility of Results
Rotation
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title Intraoperative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A07%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Diagnosis%20of%20Syndesmosis%20Injuries%20in%20External%20Rotation%20Ankle%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20trauma&rft.au=Jenkinson,%20Richard%20J&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=609&rft.pages=604-609&rft.issn=0890-5339&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.bot.0000177114.13263.12&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68729707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68729707&rft_id=info:pmid/16247304&rfr_iscdi=true