The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Production of Misinformation Effects
Recent research has indicated a link between retrieval-induced forgetting and the production of misinformation effects ( J. Saunders & M. D. MacLeod, 2002 ). The mechanism underlying this relationship, however, remains unclear. In an attempt to clarify this issue, the authors presented 150 parti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2005-09, Vol.31 (5), p.964-979 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 979 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 964 |
| container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | MacLeod, Malcolm D Saunders, Jo |
| description | Recent research has indicated a link between retrieval-induced forgetting and the production of misinformation effects (
J. Saunders & M. D. MacLeod, 2002
). The mechanism underlying this relationship, however, remains unclear. In an attempt to clarify this issue, the authors presented 150 participants with misinformation under conditions designed to promote the activation of inhibitory control during the retrieval of information about a target event. A modified retrieval practice paradigm that used the independent probe method pioneered by
M. C. Anderson and B. A. Spellman (1995)
revealed that misinformation effects emerged only where misinformation had been introduced about items that had been subject to 1st-order, 2nd-order, or cross-category inhibition. By contrast, misinformation effects failed to emerge where inhibitory processing had not been activated. These findings are discussed in terms of inhibitory control, memory malleability, and their implications for the interviewing of eyewitnesses. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.964 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68729251</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ734714</ericid><sourcerecordid>68729251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-774d5525c6905045aac73f83ddc7febdf89ce8e71da4c7025cca6d676eaa6aef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d1rFDEQAPAgir1W_wERWaT1RfbM98ejHNfaUlGkPodcNqEpu5szyYL33zfrHa2KmJdA5jeTYQaAVwguESTiA8RCtoIosiRoyZaK0ydggRRRLcKSPQWLB3AEjnO-g_Mh8jk4QhxTKShbgKubW9d8i71rom8ux9uwCSWmXbOKY0mxb8LYlCq-pthNtoQ4zu5zyGH0MQ3m18vae2dLfgGeedNn9_Jwn4Dv5-ub1af2-svF5erjdWuoQKUVgnaMYWa5ggxSZowVxEvSdVZ4t-m8VNZJJ1BnqBWwQmt4xwV3xnDjPDkB7_Z1tyn-mFwuegjZur43o4tT1lwKrDBDFb79C97FKY21N80RpVgqhf-HMKKE12qyIrxHNsWck_N6m8Jg0k4jqOdd6HnUeh61JkgzXXdRk94cKk-bwXWPKYfhV3B2ACZb0_tkRhvyoxOYCKFgda_3zqVgH8LrK0HqQOd_3u_DZmv0Nu-sSSXY3mU7peTGon_2w-9dnf5b_8nuAbQqte8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614428992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Production of Misinformation Effects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>MacLeod, Malcolm D ; Saunders, Jo</creator><contributor>Nelson, Thomas O ; Masson, Michael E. J</contributor><creatorcontrib>MacLeod, Malcolm D ; Saunders, Jo ; Nelson, Thomas O ; Masson, Michael E. J</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research has indicated a link between retrieval-induced forgetting and the production of misinformation effects (
J. Saunders & M. D. MacLeod, 2002
). The mechanism underlying this relationship, however, remains unclear. In an attempt to clarify this issue, the authors presented 150 participants with misinformation under conditions designed to promote the activation of inhibitory control during the retrieval of information about a target event. A modified retrieval practice paradigm that used the independent probe method pioneered by
M. C. Anderson and B. A. Spellman (1995)
revealed that misinformation effects emerged only where misinformation had been introduced about items that had been subject to 1st-order, 2nd-order, or cross-category inhibition. By contrast, misinformation effects failed to emerge where inhibitory processing had not been activated. These findings are discussed in terms of inhibitory control, memory malleability, and their implications for the interviewing of eyewitnesses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.964</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16248745</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Processes ; Communication ; Correlation ; Cues ; Effects ; False information ; Female ; Forgetting ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Human Information Storage ; Humans ; Hypothesis Testing ; Information ; Information Retrieval ; Inhibition ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Item Analysis ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Misconceptions ; Misinformation ; Psychological Studies ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recall (Psychology) ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Retroactive Inhibition</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2005-09, Vol.31 (5), p.964-979</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Sep 2005</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-774d5525c6905045aac73f83ddc7febdf89ce8e71da4c7025cca6d676eaa6aef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-774d5525c6905045aac73f83ddc7febdf89ce8e71da4c7025cca6d676eaa6aef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ734714$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17237790$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16248745$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Nelson, Thomas O</contributor><contributor>Masson, Michael E. J</contributor><creatorcontrib>MacLeod, Malcolm D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Jo</creatorcontrib><title>The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Production of Misinformation Effects</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Recent research has indicated a link between retrieval-induced forgetting and the production of misinformation effects (
J. Saunders & M. D. MacLeod, 2002
). The mechanism underlying this relationship, however, remains unclear. In an attempt to clarify this issue, the authors presented 150 participants with misinformation under conditions designed to promote the activation of inhibitory control during the retrieval of information about a target event. A modified retrieval practice paradigm that used the independent probe method pioneered by
M. C. Anderson and B. A. Spellman (1995)
revealed that misinformation effects emerged only where misinformation had been introduced about items that had been subject to 1st-order, 2nd-order, or cross-category inhibition. By contrast, misinformation effects failed to emerge where inhibitory processing had not been activated. These findings are discussed in terms of inhibitory control, memory malleability, and their implications for the interviewing of eyewitnesses.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Effects</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forgetting</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Human Information Storage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothesis Testing</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Information Retrieval</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Item Analysis</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Misconceptions</subject><subject>Misinformation</subject><subject>Psychological Studies</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recall (Psychology)</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Retroactive Inhibition</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d1rFDEQAPAgir1W_wERWaT1RfbM98ejHNfaUlGkPodcNqEpu5szyYL33zfrHa2KmJdA5jeTYQaAVwguESTiA8RCtoIosiRoyZaK0ydggRRRLcKSPQWLB3AEjnO-g_Mh8jk4QhxTKShbgKubW9d8i71rom8ux9uwCSWmXbOKY0mxb8LYlCq-pthNtoQ4zu5zyGH0MQ3m18vae2dLfgGeedNn9_Jwn4Dv5-ub1af2-svF5erjdWuoQKUVgnaMYWa5ggxSZowVxEvSdVZ4t-m8VNZJJ1BnqBWwQmt4xwV3xnDjPDkB7_Z1tyn-mFwuegjZur43o4tT1lwKrDBDFb79C97FKY21N80RpVgqhf-HMKKE12qyIrxHNsWck_N6m8Jg0k4jqOdd6HnUeh61JkgzXXdRk94cKk-bwXWPKYfhV3B2ACZb0_tkRhvyoxOYCKFgda_3zqVgH8LrK0HqQOd_3u_DZmv0Nu-sSSXY3mU7peTGon_2w-9dnf5b_8nuAbQqte8</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>MacLeod, Malcolm D</creator><creator>Saunders, Jo</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Production of Misinformation Effects</title><author>MacLeod, Malcolm D ; Saunders, Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a471t-774d5525c6905045aac73f83ddc7febdf89ce8e71da4c7025cca6d676eaa6aef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Effects</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forgetting</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Human Information Storage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothesis Testing</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Information Retrieval</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Item Analysis</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Misconceptions</topic><topic>Misinformation</topic><topic>Psychological Studies</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recall (Psychology)</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Retroactive Inhibition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacLeod, Malcolm D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacLeod, Malcolm D</au><au>Saunders, Jo</au><au>Nelson, Thomas O</au><au>Masson, Michael E. J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ734714</ericid><atitle>The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Production of Misinformation Effects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>964</spage><epage>979</epage><pages>964-979</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Recent research has indicated a link between retrieval-induced forgetting and the production of misinformation effects (
J. Saunders & M. D. MacLeod, 2002
). The mechanism underlying this relationship, however, remains unclear. In an attempt to clarify this issue, the authors presented 150 participants with misinformation under conditions designed to promote the activation of inhibitory control during the retrieval of information about a target event. A modified retrieval practice paradigm that used the independent probe method pioneered by
M. C. Anderson and B. A. Spellman (1995)
revealed that misinformation effects emerged only where misinformation had been introduced about items that had been subject to 1st-order, 2nd-order, or cross-category inhibition. By contrast, misinformation effects failed to emerge where inhibitory processing had not been activated. These findings are discussed in terms of inhibitory control, memory malleability, and their implications for the interviewing of eyewitnesses.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16248745</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.964</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
| ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2005-09, Vol.31 (5), p.964-979 |
| issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68729251 |
| source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Processes Communication Correlation Cues Effects False information Female Forgetting Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Human Information Storage Humans Hypothesis Testing Information Information Retrieval Inhibition Inhibition (Psychology) Item Analysis Learning. Memory Male Memory Mental Recall Misconceptions Misinformation Psychological Studies Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recall (Psychology) Recognition (Psychology) Retroactive Inhibition |
| title | The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Production of Misinformation Effects |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T04%3A19%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Role%20of%20Inhibitory%20Control%20in%20the%20Production%20of%20Misinformation%20Effects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=MacLeod,%20Malcolm%20D&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=964&rft.epage=979&rft.pages=964-979&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.964&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68729251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614428992&rft_id=info:pmid/16248745&rft_ericid=EJ734714&rfr_iscdi=true |