Effects of lifestyle and risk factors on bone mineral density in a cohort of Italian women: suggestion for a new decision rule
In this study the authors analyzed the role of risk factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis in a cohort of Italian women and evaluated predictive values of decision rules for early identification of osteoporotic women. Furthermore, the authors investigated the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Calcified tissue international 2005-08, Vol.77 (2), p.72-78 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 78 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Calcified tissue international |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | D'Amelio, P Tamone, C Pluviano, F Di Stefano, M Isaia, G |
description | In this study the authors analyzed the role of risk factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis in a cohort of Italian women and evaluated predictive values of decision rules for early identification of osteoporotic women. Furthermore, the authors investigated the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in this population. Women who underwent bone densitometry were asked to answer a questionnaire about the common risk factors for osteoporosis. Patients were classified as nonosteoporotic, nonosteopenic, and osteoporotic. Risk factors were compared among the groups by use of analysis of variance (ANOVA). National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommendation, Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instruments (ORAIs), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tools (OST) score, and weight criterion were applied to this population. The authors proposed a new decision rule based on a new score. A total of 525 women received the questionnaire: 47.4% women were osteoporotic, 32.2% were osteopenic, and 20.4% nonosteoporotic. Risk factors that differed significantly between these groups were: age, age at menarche, postmenopausal period, and body mass index (BMI); the aforementioned risk factors appear to be significant predictors of bone density (BMD) in linear regression model. The incidence of secondary osteoporosis was 13%. In conclusion, the authors (1) confirmed the role played by nonmodifiable risk factors in determining BMD; (2) showed that the use of NOF guidelines, ORAI, OST score, and weight criterion is not satisfactory in our cohort; (3) suggested a new score, based upon the features that were significantly different between patients and controls; and (4) demonstrated the relatively high prevalence of secondary osteoporosis and suggest a primary screening for secondary osteoporosis in all patients with low BMD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00223-004-0253-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68728836</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>926197891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7f82cb5c238cee4f8d929b7913dfa04ada8d2955b89655e0e7fa2c4239ec02023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFqFTEUhoMo9rb6AG4kuHA39iSZSTLupFRbKHRjobuQyZzU1JmkJjOUu_HZzXAvCG5cBU6-_-MkPyHvGHxiAOq8AHAuGoC2Ad6JRrwgO9YK3oDm6iXZAVOs6aW6PyGnpTwCsFZK-ZqcMAldr5Tckd-X3qNbCk2eTsFjWfYTUhtHmkP5Sb11S8r1NtIhRaRziJjtREeMJSx7GiK11KUfKS-b4XqxU7CRPqcZ42da1oeHagw17VOuZMTnGnWhbKO8TviGvPJ2Kvj2eJ6Ru6-X3y-umpvbb9cXX24aJzq1NMpr7obOcaEdYuv12PN-UD0To7fQ2tHqkfddN-hedh0CKm-5a7no0QEHLs7Ix4P3Kadfa93JzKE4nCYbMa3FSK241kL-F2SK118VuoIf_gEf05pjfYThTIBUoDcbO0Aup1IyevOUw2zz3jAwW4XmUKGpFZqtQiNq5v1RvA4zjn8Tx87EH-nLl2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213067086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of lifestyle and risk factors on bone mineral density in a cohort of Italian women: suggestion for a new decision rule</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>D'Amelio, P ; Tamone, C ; Pluviano, F ; Di Stefano, M ; Isaia, G</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Amelio, P ; Tamone, C ; Pluviano, F ; Di Stefano, M ; Isaia, G</creatorcontrib><description>In this study the authors analyzed the role of risk factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis in a cohort of Italian women and evaluated predictive values of decision rules for early identification of osteoporotic women. Furthermore, the authors investigated the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in this population. Women who underwent bone densitometry were asked to answer a questionnaire about the common risk factors for osteoporosis. Patients were classified as nonosteoporotic, nonosteopenic, and osteoporotic. Risk factors were compared among the groups by use of analysis of variance (ANOVA). National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommendation, Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instruments (ORAIs), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tools (OST) score, and weight criterion were applied to this population. The authors proposed a new decision rule based on a new score. A total of 525 women received the questionnaire: 47.4% women were osteoporotic, 32.2% were osteopenic, and 20.4% nonosteoporotic. Risk factors that differed significantly between these groups were: age, age at menarche, postmenopausal period, and body mass index (BMI); the aforementioned risk factors appear to be significant predictors of bone density (BMD) in linear regression model. The incidence of secondary osteoporosis was 13%. In conclusion, the authors (1) confirmed the role played by nonmodifiable risk factors in determining BMD; (2) showed that the use of NOF guidelines, ORAI, OST score, and weight criterion is not satisfactory in our cohort; (3) suggested a new score, based upon the features that were significantly different between patients and controls; and (4) demonstrated the relatively high prevalence of secondary osteoporosis and suggest a primary screening for secondary osteoporosis in all patients with low BMD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-967X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00223-004-0253-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16059776</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bone Density ; Cohort Studies ; Decision Theory ; Early Diagnosis ; Female ; Humans ; Italy - epidemiology ; Life Style ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - etiology ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Calcified tissue international, 2005-08, Vol.77 (2), p.72-78</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7f82cb5c238cee4f8d929b7913dfa04ada8d2955b89655e0e7fa2c4239ec02023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7f82cb5c238cee4f8d929b7913dfa04ada8d2955b89655e0e7fa2c4239ec02023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16059776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Amelio, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamone, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pluviano, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Stefano, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaia, G</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of lifestyle and risk factors on bone mineral density in a cohort of Italian women: suggestion for a new decision rule</title><title>Calcified tissue international</title><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><description>In this study the authors analyzed the role of risk factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis in a cohort of Italian women and evaluated predictive values of decision rules for early identification of osteoporotic women. Furthermore, the authors investigated the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in this population. Women who underwent bone densitometry were asked to answer a questionnaire about the common risk factors for osteoporosis. Patients were classified as nonosteoporotic, nonosteopenic, and osteoporotic. Risk factors were compared among the groups by use of analysis of variance (ANOVA). National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommendation, Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instruments (ORAIs), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tools (OST) score, and weight criterion were applied to this population. The authors proposed a new decision rule based on a new score. A total of 525 women received the questionnaire: 47.4% women were osteoporotic, 32.2% were osteopenic, and 20.4% nonosteoporotic. Risk factors that differed significantly between these groups were: age, age at menarche, postmenopausal period, and body mass index (BMI); the aforementioned risk factors appear to be significant predictors of bone density (BMD) in linear regression model. The incidence of secondary osteoporosis was 13%. In conclusion, the authors (1) confirmed the role played by nonmodifiable risk factors in determining BMD; (2) showed that the use of NOF guidelines, ORAI, OST score, and weight criterion is not satisfactory in our cohort; (3) suggested a new score, based upon the features that were significantly different between patients and controls; and (4) demonstrated the relatively high prevalence of secondary osteoporosis and suggest a primary screening for secondary osteoporosis in all patients with low BMD.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Decision Theory</subject><subject>Early Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy - epidemiology</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - etiology</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0171-967X</issn><issn>1432-0827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFqFTEUhoMo9rb6AG4kuHA39iSZSTLupFRbKHRjobuQyZzU1JmkJjOUu_HZzXAvCG5cBU6-_-MkPyHvGHxiAOq8AHAuGoC2Ad6JRrwgO9YK3oDm6iXZAVOs6aW6PyGnpTwCsFZK-ZqcMAldr5Tckd-X3qNbCk2eTsFjWfYTUhtHmkP5Sb11S8r1NtIhRaRziJjtREeMJSx7GiK11KUfKS-b4XqxU7CRPqcZ42da1oeHagw17VOuZMTnGnWhbKO8TviGvPJ2Kvj2eJ6Ru6-X3y-umpvbb9cXX24aJzq1NMpr7obOcaEdYuv12PN-UD0To7fQ2tHqkfddN-hedh0CKm-5a7no0QEHLs7Ix4P3Kadfa93JzKE4nCYbMa3FSK241kL-F2SK118VuoIf_gEf05pjfYThTIBUoDcbO0Aup1IyevOUw2zz3jAwW4XmUKGpFZqtQiNq5v1RvA4zjn8Tx87EH-nLl2Y</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>D'Amelio, P</creator><creator>Tamone, C</creator><creator>Pluviano, F</creator><creator>Di Stefano, M</creator><creator>Isaia, G</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>Effects of lifestyle and risk factors on bone mineral density in a cohort of Italian women: suggestion for a new decision rule</title><author>D'Amelio, P ; Tamone, C ; Pluviano, F ; Di Stefano, M ; Isaia, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7f82cb5c238cee4f8d929b7913dfa04ada8d2955b89655e0e7fa2c4239ec02023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Decision Theory</topic><topic>Early Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy - epidemiology</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - etiology</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Amelio, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamone, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pluviano, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Stefano, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaia, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Amelio, P</au><au>Tamone, C</au><au>Pluviano, F</au><au>Di Stefano, M</au><au>Isaia, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of lifestyle and risk factors on bone mineral density in a cohort of Italian women: suggestion for a new decision rule</atitle><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>78</epage><pages>72-78</pages><issn>0171-967X</issn><eissn>1432-0827</eissn><abstract>In this study the authors analyzed the role of risk factors in postmenopausal osteoporosis in a cohort of Italian women and evaluated predictive values of decision rules for early identification of osteoporotic women. Furthermore, the authors investigated the prevalence of secondary osteoporosis in this population. Women who underwent bone densitometry were asked to answer a questionnaire about the common risk factors for osteoporosis. Patients were classified as nonosteoporotic, nonosteopenic, and osteoporotic. Risk factors were compared among the groups by use of analysis of variance (ANOVA). National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommendation, Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instruments (ORAIs), Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tools (OST) score, and weight criterion were applied to this population. The authors proposed a new decision rule based on a new score. A total of 525 women received the questionnaire: 47.4% women were osteoporotic, 32.2% were osteopenic, and 20.4% nonosteoporotic. Risk factors that differed significantly between these groups were: age, age at menarche, postmenopausal period, and body mass index (BMI); the aforementioned risk factors appear to be significant predictors of bone density (BMD) in linear regression model. The incidence of secondary osteoporosis was 13%. In conclusion, the authors (1) confirmed the role played by nonmodifiable risk factors in determining BMD; (2) showed that the use of NOF guidelines, ORAI, OST score, and weight criterion is not satisfactory in our cohort; (3) suggested a new score, based upon the features that were significantly different between patients and controls; and (4) demonstrated the relatively high prevalence of secondary osteoporosis and suggest a primary screening for secondary osteoporosis in all patients with low BMD.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16059776</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00223-004-0253-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-967X |
ispartof | Calcified tissue international, 2005-08, Vol.77 (2), p.72-78 |
issn | 0171-967X 1432-0827 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68728836 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Aged Bone Density Cohort Studies Decision Theory Early Diagnosis Female Humans Italy - epidemiology Life Style Middle Aged Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - epidemiology Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - etiology Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - metabolism Prevalence Risk Factors Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Effects of lifestyle and risk factors on bone mineral density in a cohort of Italian women: suggestion for a new decision rule |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A09%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20lifestyle%20and%20risk%20factors%20on%20bone%20mineral%20density%20in%20a%20cohort%20of%20Italian%20women:%20suggestion%20for%20a%20new%20decision%20rule&rft.jtitle=Calcified%20tissue%20international&rft.au=D'Amelio,%20P&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=78&rft.pages=72-78&rft.issn=0171-967X&rft.eissn=1432-0827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00223-004-0253-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E926197891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213067086&rft_id=info:pmid/16059776&rfr_iscdi=true |