Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data

The impact of different comorbidity ascertainment lookback periods on modeling posthospitalization mortality and readmission was examined. Index cases comprised medical ( n = 326,456) and procedural ( n = 349,686) patients with a hospital admission from 1990–1996. Administrative hospital data were e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2006-09, Vol.59 (9), p.940-946
Hauptverfasser: Preen, David B., Holman, C.D'Arcy J., Spilsbury, Katrina, Semmens, James B., Brameld, Kate J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 946
container_issue 9
container_start_page 940
container_title Journal of clinical epidemiology
container_volume 59
creator Preen, David B.
Holman, C.D'Arcy J.
Spilsbury, Katrina
Semmens, James B.
Brameld, Kate J.
description The impact of different comorbidity ascertainment lookback periods on modeling posthospitalization mortality and readmission was examined. Index cases comprised medical ( n = 326,456) and procedural ( n = 349,686) patients with a hospital admission from 1990–1996. Administrative hospital data were extracted for 102 comorbidities, ascertained at index admission and for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year lookback periods. Deaths and readmissions were identified within 12 months and 30 days of separation, respectively. Hierarchically nested and nonnested Cox regressions as well as Receiver Operator Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) were used to determine model-fit and predictive ability of lookback period models. The 1-year lookback period provided the best model-fit for both patient groups when modeling mortality. A similar model-fit was seen at index admission for procedural but not medical patients. The superior readmission model employed 5 years of lookback for both patient groups. With one exception, all lookback period models were superior to those abstracting comorbidity from index admission only. Similar results were evident from ROC-AUC, although greater predictive ability was seen with modeling of mortality (0.847–0.923) compared with readmission (0.593–0.681). The explanatory power of regression models, when adjusting for comorbidity, is influenced by length of lookback, outcome investigated and clinical subgroup. Shorter periods (∼1 year) appear appropriate for modeling posthospitalization mortality, whereas longer lookback periods are superior for readmission outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68724895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895435606000588</els_id><sourcerecordid>2734476761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-cd8f3cc23d74b11940ca597076c2cc00ae1d8b13e11c87dc4c200b1270e39433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhL1SRENwSPLaTODdQBQVpJS69W8540jpN4sXOVuq_x9FuVYkLpznMN09v3mPsCngFHJovYzXi5Bc6-EpwXlcgKg7yFduBbnVZdwJesx3XXV0qWTcX7F1KI-fQ8rZ-yy6gyRsN7Y75PS13630RhgLDHGLvnV-fiimEh97iQ3Gg6IMr7DAQruSKSHeRUvJhKebgaNqAIcTZLkibiHWzX3xao139IxX3ZKes7uxq37M3g50SfTjPS3b74_vt9c9y__vm1_W3fYlKqLVEpweJKKRrVQ_QKY627rLvBgUi55bA6R4kAaBuHSrM__cgWk6yU1Jess8n2UMMf46UVjP7hDRNdqFwTKbRrVD5-wx-_AccwzEu2ZoBLiVopSVkqjlRGENKkQZziH628SlDZmvCjOa5CbM1YUCY3EQ-vDrLH_uZ3MvZOfoMfDoDNqGdhpgj9OmF07xpRL1xX08c5dAePUWT0FOO2_mYOzEu-P95-Qu606tY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1033184831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Preen, David B. ; Holman, C.D'Arcy J. ; Spilsbury, Katrina ; Semmens, James B. ; Brameld, Kate J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Preen, David B. ; Holman, C.D'Arcy J. ; Spilsbury, Katrina ; Semmens, James B. ; Brameld, Kate J.</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of different comorbidity ascertainment lookback periods on modeling posthospitalization mortality and readmission was examined. Index cases comprised medical ( n = 326,456) and procedural ( n = 349,686) patients with a hospital admission from 1990–1996. Administrative hospital data were extracted for 102 comorbidities, ascertained at index admission and for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year lookback periods. Deaths and readmissions were identified within 12 months and 30 days of separation, respectively. Hierarchically nested and nonnested Cox regressions as well as Receiver Operator Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) were used to determine model-fit and predictive ability of lookback period models. The 1-year lookback period provided the best model-fit for both patient groups when modeling mortality. A similar model-fit was seen at index admission for procedural but not medical patients. The superior readmission model employed 5 years of lookback for both patient groups. With one exception, all lookback period models were superior to those abstracting comorbidity from index admission only. Similar results were evident from ROC-AUC, although greater predictive ability was seen with modeling of mortality (0.847–0.923) compared with readmission (0.593–0.681). The explanatory power of regression models, when adjusting for comorbidity, is influenced by length of lookback, outcome investigated and clinical subgroup. Shorter periods (∼1 year) appear appropriate for modeling posthospitalization mortality, whereas longer lookback periods are superior for readmission outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16895817</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cohort Studies ; Comorbidity ; Comorbidity adjustment ; Epidemiology ; Gender ; General aspects ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospital readmission ; Hospitalization ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Methodology ; Models, Statistical ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Patient Readmission ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Record linkage ; Regression Analysis ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical modeling ; Statistics ; Studies ; Time ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2006-09, Vol.59 (9), p.940-946</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-cd8f3cc23d74b11940ca597076c2cc00ae1d8b13e11c87dc4c200b1270e39433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-cd8f3cc23d74b11940ca597076c2cc00ae1d8b13e11c87dc4c200b1270e39433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895435606000588$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18066257$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16895817$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Preen, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, C.D'Arcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spilsbury, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semmens, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brameld, Kate J.</creatorcontrib><title>Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>The impact of different comorbidity ascertainment lookback periods on modeling posthospitalization mortality and readmission was examined. Index cases comprised medical ( n = 326,456) and procedural ( n = 349,686) patients with a hospital admission from 1990–1996. Administrative hospital data were extracted for 102 comorbidities, ascertained at index admission and for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year lookback periods. Deaths and readmissions were identified within 12 months and 30 days of separation, respectively. Hierarchically nested and nonnested Cox regressions as well as Receiver Operator Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) were used to determine model-fit and predictive ability of lookback period models. The 1-year lookback period provided the best model-fit for both patient groups when modeling mortality. A similar model-fit was seen at index admission for procedural but not medical patients. The superior readmission model employed 5 years of lookback for both patient groups. With one exception, all lookback period models were superior to those abstracting comorbidity from index admission only. Similar results were evident from ROC-AUC, although greater predictive ability was seen with modeling of mortality (0.847–0.923) compared with readmission (0.593–0.681). The explanatory power of regression models, when adjusting for comorbidity, is influenced by length of lookback, outcome investigated and clinical subgroup. Shorter periods (∼1 year) appear appropriate for modeling posthospitalization mortality, whereas longer lookback periods are superior for readmission outcomes.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Comorbidity adjustment</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Hospital readmission</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Record linkage</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical modeling</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhL1SRENwSPLaTODdQBQVpJS69W8540jpN4sXOVuq_x9FuVYkLpznMN09v3mPsCngFHJovYzXi5Bc6-EpwXlcgKg7yFduBbnVZdwJesx3XXV0qWTcX7F1KI-fQ8rZ-yy6gyRsN7Y75PS13630RhgLDHGLvnV-fiimEh97iQ3Gg6IMr7DAQruSKSHeRUvJhKebgaNqAIcTZLkibiHWzX3xao139IxX3ZKes7uxq37M3g50SfTjPS3b74_vt9c9y__vm1_W3fYlKqLVEpweJKKRrVQ_QKY627rLvBgUi55bA6R4kAaBuHSrM__cgWk6yU1Jess8n2UMMf46UVjP7hDRNdqFwTKbRrVD5-wx-_AccwzEu2ZoBLiVopSVkqjlRGENKkQZziH628SlDZmvCjOa5CbM1YUCY3EQ-vDrLH_uZ3MvZOfoMfDoDNqGdhpgj9OmF07xpRL1xX08c5dAePUWT0FOO2_mYOzEu-P95-Qu606tY</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Preen, David B.</creator><creator>Holman, C.D'Arcy J.</creator><creator>Spilsbury, Katrina</creator><creator>Semmens, James B.</creator><creator>Brameld, Kate J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data</title><author>Preen, David B. ; Holman, C.D'Arcy J. ; Spilsbury, Katrina ; Semmens, James B. ; Brameld, Kate J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-cd8f3cc23d74b11940ca597076c2cc00ae1d8b13e11c87dc4c200b1270e39433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Comorbidity adjustment</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Hospital readmission</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Record linkage</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical modeling</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Preen, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, C.D'Arcy J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spilsbury, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Semmens, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brameld, Kate J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Preen, David B.</au><au>Holman, C.D'Arcy J.</au><au>Spilsbury, Katrina</au><au>Semmens, James B.</au><au>Brameld, Kate J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>940</spage><epage>946</epage><pages>940-946</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>The impact of different comorbidity ascertainment lookback periods on modeling posthospitalization mortality and readmission was examined. Index cases comprised medical ( n = 326,456) and procedural ( n = 349,686) patients with a hospital admission from 1990–1996. Administrative hospital data were extracted for 102 comorbidities, ascertained at index admission and for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year lookback periods. Deaths and readmissions were identified within 12 months and 30 days of separation, respectively. Hierarchically nested and nonnested Cox regressions as well as Receiver Operator Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC-AUC) were used to determine model-fit and predictive ability of lookback period models. The 1-year lookback period provided the best model-fit for both patient groups when modeling mortality. A similar model-fit was seen at index admission for procedural but not medical patients. The superior readmission model employed 5 years of lookback for both patient groups. With one exception, all lookback period models were superior to those abstracting comorbidity from index admission only. Similar results were evident from ROC-AUC, although greater predictive ability was seen with modeling of mortality (0.847–0.923) compared with readmission (0.593–0.681). The explanatory power of regression models, when adjusting for comorbidity, is influenced by length of lookback, outcome investigated and clinical subgroup. Shorter periods (∼1 year) appear appropriate for modeling posthospitalization mortality, whereas longer lookback periods are superior for readmission outcomes.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16895817</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.013</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0895-4356
ispartof Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2006-09, Vol.59 (9), p.940-946
issn 0895-4356
1878-5921
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68724895
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cohort Studies
Comorbidity
Comorbidity adjustment
Epidemiology
Gender
General aspects
Hospital Mortality
Hospital readmission
Hospitalization
Hospitals
Humans
Medical sciences
Methodology
Models, Statistical
Morbidity
Mortality
Patient Readmission
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Record linkage
Regression Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Statistical modeling
Statistics
Studies
Time
Treatment Outcome
title Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A00%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Length%20of%20comorbidity%20lookback%20period%20affected%20regression%20model%20performance%20of%20administrative%20health%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Preen,%20David%20B.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=940&rft.epage=946&rft.pages=940-946&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2734476761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1033184831&rft_id=info:pmid/16895817&rft_els_id=S0895435606000588&rfr_iscdi=true