Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis
To determine factors instrumental in achieving a clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients. This study included 205 women undergoing their first ART cycle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for patient demographics, in vitro production data, and factors...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 2005-10, Vol.22 (9-10), p.335-346 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 346 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9-10 |
container_start_page | 335 |
container_title | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Rhodes, Tiffany L McCoy, Thomas P Higdon, 3rd, H Lee Boone, William R |
description | To determine factors instrumental in achieving a clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients.
This study included 205 women undergoing their first ART cycle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for patient demographics, in vitro production data, and factors associated with embryo transfer. Odds ratios (OR) were performed where appropriate.
Our analyses indicated that age (OR: 0.879), specific year in which the cycle was performed (OR: 2.959), and use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (OR: 2.867) altered potential pregnancy rate. In addition, percent fertilization (OR: 1.028), number of embryos transferred (OR: 1.842), type of catheter used to transfer the embryos (OR: 0.377), presence of blood on the catheter (OR .414), and embryologist (OR: 2.338) also altered pregnancy rate.
Our data indicate patients' age, use of the Cook catheter, and presence of blood on the catheter reduce pregnancy rates. Performing ART in 1999, using ICSI, increasing fertilization rate, increasing number of embryos transferred (albeit less desirable when the chance of multiple gestation may occur), and transferring embryos via a particular embryologist, improve pregnancy rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10815-005-6794-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68723475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>926231011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-585defefc694f46e1d81fa3c95fe8e8bcdb57496fc58eece76599ce64b22713b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMotn78AC8SPIgeVpPN5mO9lWJVKAhSzyGbndQt292a7Ar7701tQfDiaYbhmZcZHoQuKLmjhMj7QImiPCGEJ0LmWUIP0JhyyRLJGDmMPeEqIZlQI3QSwooQkquUHaMRFWkmJeVjZGbGdq0P2DgHtquaJTYhVKGDEnvY-Lbs4_QLcAf2o2nrdjngm8nb4hZvPCwb09gBe9NBeMAGr_s6ssZXcYBNY-ohJp2hI2fqAOf7eoreZ4-L6XMyf316mU7miWVcdglXvAQHzoo8c5kAWirqDLM5d6BAFbYsuMxy4SxXABak4HluQWRFmkrKCnaKrne58ejPHkKn11WwUNemgbYPWiiZskzyf0GaS8LUD3j1B1y1vY9vBZ1SIdKUERIhuoOsb0Pw4PTGV2vjB02J3lrSO0s6WtJbS5rGnct9cF-sofzd2Gth383rjn4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216622300</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rhodes, Tiffany L ; McCoy, Thomas P ; Higdon, 3rd, H Lee ; Boone, William R</creator><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Tiffany L ; McCoy, Thomas P ; Higdon, 3rd, H Lee ; Boone, William R</creatorcontrib><description>To determine factors instrumental in achieving a clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients.
This study included 205 women undergoing their first ART cycle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for patient demographics, in vitro production data, and factors associated with embryo transfer. Odds ratios (OR) were performed where appropriate.
Our analyses indicated that age (OR: 0.879), specific year in which the cycle was performed (OR: 2.959), and use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (OR: 2.867) altered potential pregnancy rate. In addition, percent fertilization (OR: 1.028), number of embryos transferred (OR: 1.842), type of catheter used to transfer the embryos (OR: 0.377), presence of blood on the catheter (OR .414), and embryologist (OR: 2.338) also altered pregnancy rate.
Our data indicate patients' age, use of the Cook catheter, and presence of blood on the catheter reduce pregnancy rates. Performing ART in 1999, using ICSI, increasing fertilization rate, increasing number of embryos transferred (albeit less desirable when the chance of multiple gestation may occur), and transferring embryos via a particular embryologist, improve pregnancy rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-0468</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10815-005-6794-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16247715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Age Distribution ; Birth Rate ; Catheters ; Embryo Transfer ; Embryos ; Female ; Humans ; Multivariate Analysis ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy Rate ; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data ; Reproductive technologies ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2005-10, Vol.22 (9-10), p.335-346</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-585defefc694f46e1d81fa3c95fe8e8bcdb57496fc58eece76599ce64b22713b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-585defefc694f46e1d81fa3c95fe8e8bcdb57496fc58eece76599ce64b22713b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16247715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Tiffany L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higdon, 3rd, H Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boone, William R</creatorcontrib><title>Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis</title><title>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</title><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><description>To determine factors instrumental in achieving a clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients.
This study included 205 women undergoing their first ART cycle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for patient demographics, in vitro production data, and factors associated with embryo transfer. Odds ratios (OR) were performed where appropriate.
Our analyses indicated that age (OR: 0.879), specific year in which the cycle was performed (OR: 2.959), and use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (OR: 2.867) altered potential pregnancy rate. In addition, percent fertilization (OR: 1.028), number of embryos transferred (OR: 1.842), type of catheter used to transfer the embryos (OR: 0.377), presence of blood on the catheter (OR .414), and embryologist (OR: 2.338) also altered pregnancy rate.
Our data indicate patients' age, use of the Cook catheter, and presence of blood on the catheter reduce pregnancy rates. Performing ART in 1999, using ICSI, increasing fertilization rate, increasing number of embryos transferred (albeit less desirable when the chance of multiple gestation may occur), and transferring embryos via a particular embryologist, improve pregnancy rates.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Embryos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reproductive technologies</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1058-0468</issn><issn>1573-7330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMotn78AC8SPIgeVpPN5mO9lWJVKAhSzyGbndQt292a7Ar7701tQfDiaYbhmZcZHoQuKLmjhMj7QImiPCGEJ0LmWUIP0JhyyRLJGDmMPeEqIZlQI3QSwooQkquUHaMRFWkmJeVjZGbGdq0P2DgHtquaJTYhVKGDEnvY-Lbs4_QLcAf2o2nrdjngm8nb4hZvPCwb09gBe9NBeMAGr_s6ssZXcYBNY-ohJp2hI2fqAOf7eoreZ4-L6XMyf316mU7miWVcdglXvAQHzoo8c5kAWirqDLM5d6BAFbYsuMxy4SxXABak4HluQWRFmkrKCnaKrne58ejPHkKn11WwUNemgbYPWiiZskzyf0GaS8LUD3j1B1y1vY9vBZ1SIdKUERIhuoOsb0Pw4PTGV2vjB02J3lrSO0s6WtJbS5rGnct9cF-sofzd2Gth383rjn4</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Rhodes, Tiffany L</creator><creator>McCoy, Thomas P</creator><creator>Higdon, 3rd, H Lee</creator><creator>Boone, William R</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis</title><author>Rhodes, Tiffany L ; McCoy, Thomas P ; Higdon, 3rd, H Lee ; Boone, William R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-585defefc694f46e1d81fa3c95fe8e8bcdb57496fc58eece76599ce64b22713b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Embryos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reproductive technologies</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Tiffany L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoy, Thomas P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higdon, 3rd, H Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boone, William R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhodes, Tiffany L</au><au>McCoy, Thomas P</au><au>Higdon, 3rd, H Lee</au><au>Boone, William R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics</jtitle><addtitle>J Assist Reprod Genet</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9-10</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>335-346</pages><issn>1058-0468</issn><eissn>1573-7330</eissn><abstract>To determine factors instrumental in achieving a clinical pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients.
This study included 205 women undergoing their first ART cycle. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for patient demographics, in vitro production data, and factors associated with embryo transfer. Odds ratios (OR) were performed where appropriate.
Our analyses indicated that age (OR: 0.879), specific year in which the cycle was performed (OR: 2.959), and use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (OR: 2.867) altered potential pregnancy rate. In addition, percent fertilization (OR: 1.028), number of embryos transferred (OR: 1.842), type of catheter used to transfer the embryos (OR: 0.377), presence of blood on the catheter (OR .414), and embryologist (OR: 2.338) also altered pregnancy rate.
Our data indicate patients' age, use of the Cook catheter, and presence of blood on the catheter reduce pregnancy rates. Performing ART in 1999, using ICSI, increasing fertilization rate, increasing number of embryos transferred (albeit less desirable when the chance of multiple gestation may occur), and transferring embryos via a particular embryologist, improve pregnancy rates.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16247715</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10815-005-6794-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-0468 |
ispartof | Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2005-10, Vol.22 (9-10), p.335-346 |
issn | 1058-0468 1573-7330 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68723475 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Age Age Distribution Birth Rate Catheters Embryo Transfer Embryos Female Humans Multivariate Analysis Obstetrics Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy Rate Reproductive Techniques, Assisted - statistics & numerical data Reproductive technologies Uterus |
title | Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T15%3A27%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20affecting%20assisted%20reproductive%20technology%20(ART)%20pregnancy%20rates:%20a%20multivariate%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20assisted%20reproduction%20and%20genetics&rft.au=Rhodes,%20Tiffany%20L&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=335-346&rft.issn=1058-0468&rft.eissn=1573-7330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10815-005-6794-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E926231011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216622300&rft_id=info:pmid/16247715&rfr_iscdi=true |