Two different intra-corneal inlay surgical technique in rabbit eyes
To compare two different surgical techniques of intracorneal lens implantation. To determine the incidence of corneal and lens complications in two groups of rabbits subjected to such surgery. The first group (7 rabbits) initially had a keratectomy performed with the microkeratome following which th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología 2005-10, Vol.80 (10), p.581-587 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | spa |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 587 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 581 |
| container_title | Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología |
| container_volume | 80 |
| creator | Martínez-Soroa, I Mendicute-del-Barrio, J Asensio-Huerga, A B Madarieta-Pardo, I Alava-Marquínez, J I Garagorri-Gantxegi, N Aldazábal-Amas, P |
| description | To compare two different surgical techniques of intracorneal lens implantation. To determine the incidence of corneal and lens complications in two groups of rabbits subjected to such surgery.
The first group (7 rabbits) initially had a keratectomy performed with the microkeratome following which the corneal flap was sutured to the stromal layer. In the second group (7 rabbits), a pocket-shaped stromal dissection was performed manually. Both groups of rabbits had a secondary lens implantation in the corneal inlay. The follow up period was of 2 months duration.
The incidence of corneal edema in the first month was higher in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (14.3%) (p = 0.0155); during the second month, the incidence was 42.9% in group 1 and 28.6% in group 2 (p= 0.2927). Flap dislocation and retraction of the flap was seen in 4 of the 7 rabbits in group 1, whereas no complication of this type was observed in the manual pocket group (group 2). The incidence of lens subluxation was 28.6% in group 1 and 0% in group 2. Finally, there was a 71.4% (5/7) loss of the intracorneal lens in the rabbits treated with the microkeratome (group 1) while only 1 of 7 rabbits (14.3%) lost the lens in group 2 (P = 0.0155).
Eyes in which the corneal pocket shape was made by manual stromal dissection had a higher stability of the lens and less post-operative corneal complications. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68717919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68717919</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p545-8fc2abebf14bb0d544560152a3bece8219288f852ce8483d39ed87ae6b754ba33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhHNQ3HX1L0hP3grNZ5OjLH7Bwl56L2_SNxrpl0mL9N8bcD0NDzMMM1dkX3ElS6UM3ZHblL6qSnBu9A3ZUcWEpEbuybH5mYoueI8Rx6UI4xKhdFMcEfpMPWxFWuNHcBkXdJ9j-F4xG0UEa8NS4Ibpjlx76BPeX_RAmpfn5vhWns6v78enUzlLIUvtHQOL1lNhbdVJIaSqqGTALTrUjBqmtdeSZRCad9xgp2tAZWspLHB-II9_tXOc8oi0tENIDvseRpzW1Cpd09pQk4MPl-BqB-zaOYYB4tb-v-a_wO1S5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68717919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two different intra-corneal inlay surgical technique in rabbit eyes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Martínez-Soroa, I ; Mendicute-del-Barrio, J ; Asensio-Huerga, A B ; Madarieta-Pardo, I ; Alava-Marquínez, J I ; Garagorri-Gantxegi, N ; Aldazábal-Amas, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Soroa, I ; Mendicute-del-Barrio, J ; Asensio-Huerga, A B ; Madarieta-Pardo, I ; Alava-Marquínez, J I ; Garagorri-Gantxegi, N ; Aldazábal-Amas, P</creatorcontrib><description>To compare two different surgical techniques of intracorneal lens implantation. To determine the incidence of corneal and lens complications in two groups of rabbits subjected to such surgery.
The first group (7 rabbits) initially had a keratectomy performed with the microkeratome following which the corneal flap was sutured to the stromal layer. In the second group (7 rabbits), a pocket-shaped stromal dissection was performed manually. Both groups of rabbits had a secondary lens implantation in the corneal inlay. The follow up period was of 2 months duration.
The incidence of corneal edema in the first month was higher in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (14.3%) (p = 0.0155); during the second month, the incidence was 42.9% in group 1 and 28.6% in group 2 (p= 0.2927). Flap dislocation and retraction of the flap was seen in 4 of the 7 rabbits in group 1, whereas no complication of this type was observed in the manual pocket group (group 2). The incidence of lens subluxation was 28.6% in group 1 and 0% in group 2. Finally, there was a 71.4% (5/7) loss of the intracorneal lens in the rabbits treated with the microkeratome (group 1) while only 1 of 7 rabbits (14.3%) lost the lens in group 2 (P = 0.0155).
Eyes in which the corneal pocket shape was made by manual stromal dissection had a higher stability of the lens and less post-operative corneal complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0365-6691</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16245195</identifier><language>spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><subject>Animals ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular - adverse effects ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Rabbits</subject><ispartof>Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, 2005-10, Vol.80 (10), p.581-587</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16245195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Soroa, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendicute-del-Barrio, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asensio-Huerga, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madarieta-Pardo, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alava-Marquínez, J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garagorri-Gantxegi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldazábal-Amas, P</creatorcontrib><title>Two different intra-corneal inlay surgical technique in rabbit eyes</title><title>Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología</title><addtitle>Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol</addtitle><description>To compare two different surgical techniques of intracorneal lens implantation. To determine the incidence of corneal and lens complications in two groups of rabbits subjected to such surgery.
The first group (7 rabbits) initially had a keratectomy performed with the microkeratome following which the corneal flap was sutured to the stromal layer. In the second group (7 rabbits), a pocket-shaped stromal dissection was performed manually. Both groups of rabbits had a secondary lens implantation in the corneal inlay. The follow up period was of 2 months duration.
The incidence of corneal edema in the first month was higher in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (14.3%) (p = 0.0155); during the second month, the incidence was 42.9% in group 1 and 28.6% in group 2 (p= 0.2927). Flap dislocation and retraction of the flap was seen in 4 of the 7 rabbits in group 1, whereas no complication of this type was observed in the manual pocket group (group 2). The incidence of lens subluxation was 28.6% in group 1 and 0% in group 2. Finally, there was a 71.4% (5/7) loss of the intracorneal lens in the rabbits treated with the microkeratome (group 1) while only 1 of 7 rabbits (14.3%) lost the lens in group 2 (P = 0.0155).
Eyes in which the corneal pocket shape was made by manual stromal dissection had a higher stability of the lens and less post-operative corneal complications.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><issn>0365-6691</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j01LxDAYhHNQ3HX1L0hP3grNZ5OjLH7Bwl56L2_SNxrpl0mL9N8bcD0NDzMMM1dkX3ElS6UM3ZHblL6qSnBu9A3ZUcWEpEbuybH5mYoueI8Rx6UI4xKhdFMcEfpMPWxFWuNHcBkXdJ9j-F4xG0UEa8NS4Ibpjlx76BPeX_RAmpfn5vhWns6v78enUzlLIUvtHQOL1lNhbdVJIaSqqGTALTrUjBqmtdeSZRCad9xgp2tAZWspLHB-II9_tXOc8oi0tENIDvseRpzW1Cpd09pQk4MPl-BqB-zaOYYB4tb-v-a_wO1S5w</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Martínez-Soroa, I</creator><creator>Mendicute-del-Barrio, J</creator><creator>Asensio-Huerga, A B</creator><creator>Madarieta-Pardo, I</creator><creator>Alava-Marquínez, J I</creator><creator>Garagorri-Gantxegi, N</creator><creator>Aldazábal-Amas, P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Two different intra-corneal inlay surgical technique in rabbit eyes</title><author>Martínez-Soroa, I ; Mendicute-del-Barrio, J ; Asensio-Huerga, A B ; Madarieta-Pardo, I ; Alava-Marquínez, J I ; Garagorri-Gantxegi, N ; Aldazábal-Amas, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p545-8fc2abebf14bb0d544560152a3bece8219288f852ce8483d39ed87ae6b754ba33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>spa</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Soroa, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendicute-del-Barrio, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asensio-Huerga, A B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madarieta-Pardo, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alava-Marquínez, J I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garagorri-Gantxegi, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aldazábal-Amas, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez-Soroa, I</au><au>Mendicute-del-Barrio, J</au><au>Asensio-Huerga, A B</au><au>Madarieta-Pardo, I</au><au>Alava-Marquínez, J I</au><au>Garagorri-Gantxegi, N</au><au>Aldazábal-Amas, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two different intra-corneal inlay surgical technique in rabbit eyes</atitle><jtitle>Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>581</spage><epage>587</epage><pages>581-587</pages><issn>0365-6691</issn><abstract>To compare two different surgical techniques of intracorneal lens implantation. To determine the incidence of corneal and lens complications in two groups of rabbits subjected to such surgery.
The first group (7 rabbits) initially had a keratectomy performed with the microkeratome following which the corneal flap was sutured to the stromal layer. In the second group (7 rabbits), a pocket-shaped stromal dissection was performed manually. Both groups of rabbits had a secondary lens implantation in the corneal inlay. The follow up period was of 2 months duration.
The incidence of corneal edema in the first month was higher in group 1 (71.4%) than in group 2 (14.3%) (p = 0.0155); during the second month, the incidence was 42.9% in group 1 and 28.6% in group 2 (p= 0.2927). Flap dislocation and retraction of the flap was seen in 4 of the 7 rabbits in group 1, whereas no complication of this type was observed in the manual pocket group (group 2). The incidence of lens subluxation was 28.6% in group 1 and 0% in group 2. Finally, there was a 71.4% (5/7) loss of the intracorneal lens in the rabbits treated with the microkeratome (group 1) while only 1 of 7 rabbits (14.3%) lost the lens in group 2 (P = 0.0155).
Eyes in which the corneal pocket shape was made by manual stromal dissection had a higher stability of the lens and less post-operative corneal complications.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>16245195</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0365-6691 |
| ispartof | Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, 2005-10, Vol.80 (10), p.581-587 |
| issn | 0365-6691 |
| language | spa |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68717919 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Animals Lens Implantation, Intraocular - adverse effects Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Rabbits |
| title | Two different intra-corneal inlay surgical technique in rabbit eyes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T02%3A52%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20different%20intra-corneal%20inlay%20surgical%20technique%20in%20rabbit%20eyes&rft.jtitle=Archivos%20de%20la%20Sociedad%20Espa%C3%B1ola%20de%20Oftalmolog%C3%ADa&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez-Soroa,%20I&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=581&rft.epage=587&rft.pages=581-587&rft.issn=0365-6691&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68717919%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68717919&rft_id=info:pmid/16245195&rfr_iscdi=true |