Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization

To describe the impact on patients and physicians at a managed care organization (MCO) of a direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC-ad) campaign concerning testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Observational study. In 2003, we mailed a 30-item questionnaire to 750 randomly chosen female members of Kais...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of managed care 2005-10, Vol.11 (10), p.601-608
Hauptverfasser: Mouchawar, Judy, Laurion, Suzanne, Ritzwoller, Debra P, Ellis, Jennifer, Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna, Hensley-Alford, Sharon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 608
container_issue 10
container_start_page 601
container_title The American journal of managed care
container_volume 11
creator Mouchawar, Judy
Laurion, Suzanne
Ritzwoller, Debra P
Ellis, Jennifer
Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna
Hensley-Alford, Sharon
description To describe the impact on patients and physicians at a managed care organization (MCO) of a direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC-ad) campaign concerning testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Observational study. In 2003, we mailed a 30-item questionnaire to 750 randomly chosen female members of Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) aged 25 to 54 years, and 100 female KPCO members with a history of breast cancer genetic referral. We mailed a 7-item questionnaire to 180 randomly chosen KPCO primary care providers. Of 394 patient respondents, 245 (62%) reported exposure to the DTC-ad of whom 63% reported that the DTC-ad caused no anxiety at all. A high level of perceived breast cancer risk and being of Hispanic ethnicity each were independently associated with reported anxiety due to the DTC-ad (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35, 7.73, and adjusted OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 1.48, 11.83, respectively). Greater knowledge was seen among respondents exposed to the DTC-ad than among those reporting no exposure (P = .015). Of the physician respondents, 84% reported that the DTC-ad caused no strain on the doctor-patient relationship, and nearly 80% reported no effect on daily clinical practice. Genetic referrals soared more than 200% compared with the prior year, when there was no advertising. The DTC-ad had a marked impact on genetic services, but little apparent negative impact on patients or primary care providers at an MCO.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68699341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68699341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-5172453801dda23d85ef44ec8b7b3b37f70a3a2939e05541600ed4363fbd62243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhHMA0VJ4BeQTt0iO7TgJt6riT6rEBc7Rxt60RokdbAdU3of3xEA5rTTzzUg7J9myoHWdU8bEIjsP4ZVSLmshz7JFIRlnlBbL7GsdAoZg7I4oZ6N37-iDgYFo41HFPLo86WEe0RPQyYzmF-6dJ3v0qE0EfyCdRwiRKLAqgRFDTNANSaqKJuVJ791IPtyIloDVJO7ReDLtD8EoA8k3SScjWNihTjUeifM7sOYTfvIX2WkPQ8DL411lL3e3z5uHfPt0_7hZb_OJ0SbmZVExUfKaFloD47ousRcCVd1VHe941VcUOLCGN0jLUhSSUtSCS953WqaZ-Cq7_uudvHub0xftaILCYQCLbg6trGXTcFEk8OoIzt2Iup28GdMO7f-w_BvRlHfW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68699341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Mouchawar, Judy ; Laurion, Suzanne ; Ritzwoller, Debra P ; Ellis, Jennifer ; Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna ; Hensley-Alford, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Mouchawar, Judy ; Laurion, Suzanne ; Ritzwoller, Debra P ; Ellis, Jennifer ; Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna ; Hensley-Alford, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>To describe the impact on patients and physicians at a managed care organization (MCO) of a direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC-ad) campaign concerning testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Observational study. In 2003, we mailed a 30-item questionnaire to 750 randomly chosen female members of Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) aged 25 to 54 years, and 100 female KPCO members with a history of breast cancer genetic referral. We mailed a 7-item questionnaire to 180 randomly chosen KPCO primary care providers. Of 394 patient respondents, 245 (62%) reported exposure to the DTC-ad of whom 63% reported that the DTC-ad caused no anxiety at all. A high level of perceived breast cancer risk and being of Hispanic ethnicity each were independently associated with reported anxiety due to the DTC-ad (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35, 7.73, and adjusted OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 1.48, 11.83, respectively). Greater knowledge was seen among respondents exposed to the DTC-ad than among those reporting no exposure (P = .015). Of the physician respondents, 84% reported that the DTC-ad caused no strain on the doctor-patient relationship, and nearly 80% reported no effect on daily clinical practice. Genetic referrals soared more than 200% compared with the prior year, when there was no advertising. The DTC-ad had a marked impact on genetic services, but little apparent negative impact on patients or primary care providers at an MCO.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-0224</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16232001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Advertising as Topic ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Colorado ; Female ; Genes, BRCA1 ; Genes, BRCA2 ; Genetic Predisposition to Disease ; Genetic Testing ; Health administration ; Humans ; Managed Care Programs ; Middle Aged ; Physicians - psychology ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The American journal of managed care, 2005-10, Vol.11 (10), p.601-608</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16232001$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mouchawar, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurion, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritzwoller, Debra P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley-Alford, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization</title><title>The American journal of managed care</title><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><description>To describe the impact on patients and physicians at a managed care organization (MCO) of a direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC-ad) campaign concerning testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Observational study. In 2003, we mailed a 30-item questionnaire to 750 randomly chosen female members of Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) aged 25 to 54 years, and 100 female KPCO members with a history of breast cancer genetic referral. We mailed a 7-item questionnaire to 180 randomly chosen KPCO primary care providers. Of 394 patient respondents, 245 (62%) reported exposure to the DTC-ad of whom 63% reported that the DTC-ad caused no anxiety at all. A high level of perceived breast cancer risk and being of Hispanic ethnicity each were independently associated with reported anxiety due to the DTC-ad (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35, 7.73, and adjusted OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 1.48, 11.83, respectively). Greater knowledge was seen among respondents exposed to the DTC-ad than among those reporting no exposure (P = .015). Of the physician respondents, 84% reported that the DTC-ad caused no strain on the doctor-patient relationship, and nearly 80% reported no effect on daily clinical practice. Genetic referrals soared more than 200% compared with the prior year, when there was no advertising. The DTC-ad had a marked impact on genetic services, but little apparent negative impact on patients or primary care providers at an MCO.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Advertising as Topic</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA1</subject><subject>Genes, BRCA2</subject><subject>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</subject><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1088-0224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kM1OwzAQhHMA0VJ4BeQTt0iO7TgJt6riT6rEBc7Rxt60RokdbAdU3of3xEA5rTTzzUg7J9myoHWdU8bEIjsP4ZVSLmshz7JFIRlnlBbL7GsdAoZg7I4oZ6N37-iDgYFo41HFPLo86WEe0RPQyYzmF-6dJ3v0qE0EfyCdRwiRKLAqgRFDTNANSaqKJuVJ791IPtyIloDVJO7ReDLtD8EoA8k3SScjWNihTjUeifM7sOYTfvIX2WkPQ8DL411lL3e3z5uHfPt0_7hZb_OJ0SbmZVExUfKaFloD47ousRcCVd1VHe941VcUOLCGN0jLUhSSUtSCS953WqaZ-Cq7_uudvHub0xftaILCYQCLbg6trGXTcFEk8OoIzt2Iup28GdMO7f-w_BvRlHfW</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Mouchawar, Judy</creator><creator>Laurion, Suzanne</creator><creator>Ritzwoller, Debra P</creator><creator>Ellis, Jennifer</creator><creator>Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna</creator><creator>Hensley-Alford, Sharon</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization</title><author>Mouchawar, Judy ; Laurion, Suzanne ; Ritzwoller, Debra P ; Ellis, Jennifer ; Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna ; Hensley-Alford, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-5172453801dda23d85ef44ec8b7b3b37f70a3a2939e05541600ed4363fbd62243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Advertising as Topic</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA1</topic><topic>Genes, BRCA2</topic><topic>Genetic Predisposition to Disease</topic><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mouchawar, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laurion, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritzwoller, Debra P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hensley-Alford, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mouchawar, Judy</au><au>Laurion, Suzanne</au><au>Ritzwoller, Debra P</au><au>Ellis, Jennifer</au><au>Kulchak-Rahm, Alanna</au><au>Hensley-Alford, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of managed care</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Manag Care</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>601</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>601-608</pages><issn>1088-0224</issn><abstract>To describe the impact on patients and physicians at a managed care organization (MCO) of a direct-to-consumer advertising (DTC-ad) campaign concerning testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Observational study. In 2003, we mailed a 30-item questionnaire to 750 randomly chosen female members of Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) aged 25 to 54 years, and 100 female KPCO members with a history of breast cancer genetic referral. We mailed a 7-item questionnaire to 180 randomly chosen KPCO primary care providers. Of 394 patient respondents, 245 (62%) reported exposure to the DTC-ad of whom 63% reported that the DTC-ad caused no anxiety at all. A high level of perceived breast cancer risk and being of Hispanic ethnicity each were independently associated with reported anxiety due to the DTC-ad (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35, 7.73, and adjusted OR = 4.19, 95% CI = 1.48, 11.83, respectively). Greater knowledge was seen among respondents exposed to the DTC-ad than among those reporting no exposure (P = .015). Of the physician respondents, 84% reported that the DTC-ad caused no strain on the doctor-patient relationship, and nearly 80% reported no effect on daily clinical practice. Genetic referrals soared more than 200% compared with the prior year, when there was no advertising. The DTC-ad had a marked impact on genetic services, but little apparent negative impact on patients or primary care providers at an MCO.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16232001</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-0224
ispartof The American journal of managed care, 2005-10, Vol.11 (10), p.601-608
issn 1088-0224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68699341
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Advertising as Topic
Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Colorado
Female
Genes, BRCA1
Genes, BRCA2
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Genetic Testing
Health administration
Humans
Managed Care Programs
Middle Aged
Physicians - psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Assessing controversial direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing: reactions from women and their physicians in a managed care organization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A39%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20controversial%20direct-to-consumer%20advertising%20for%20hereditary%20breast%20cancer%20testing:%20reactions%20from%20women%20and%20their%20physicians%20in%20a%20managed%20care%20organization&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20managed%20care&rft.au=Mouchawar,%20Judy&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=601&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=601-608&rft.issn=1088-0224&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E68699341%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68699341&rft_id=info:pmid/16232001&rfr_iscdi=true