The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice
Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative health research 2005-10, Vol.15 (8), p.1129-1140 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1140 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1129 |
container_title | Qualitative health research |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Teram, Eli Schachter, Candice L. Stalker, Carol A. |
description | Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1049732305275882 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68694266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1049732305275882</sage_id><sourcerecordid>906020941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJLhwV82jSVp3MvgCwUHGdckkN2OlbcYkRdz4280wA4IgrvK453whfAidUHJBqVKXlJS14owTwZSoKraF9qkQrFBCqO28z-NiNd9DBzG-EUIU4XwX7VHJGK2qch99zV4BT3QE7HzAD0OCRdCpHRb4LvhxsGBxJnz4xHqweKpDak271Gl1c21S6wf8DBF0MK9X-KZf-g8IK3vStTCkiJPPoTm6x9PgHcSYDd3lg86ygSO043QX4XizHqKX25vZ5L54fLp7mFw_FobXPBXCgSyFdcSpOZkrQrUUTlJFmZVMlkCcJBp45ZQoaykNKGJtbakzQGslgR-i83XuMvj3EWJq-jYa6Do9gB9jIytZl0zK_0HKVa1YmcGzX-CbH0P-W2wYI0zyiqsMkTVkgo8xgGuWoe11-GwoaVYNNr8bzMrpJnec92B_hE1lGSjWQNQL-Hn0z8BvNjWjZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220263837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Teram, Eli ; Schachter, Candice L. ; Stalker, Carol A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Teram, Eli ; Schachter, Candice L. ; Stalker, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><description>Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049732305275882</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16221884</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QHREEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Action Research ; Adult Children ; Child ; Child Abuse, Sexual ; Child Sexual Abuse ; Female ; Health Services Research ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Ontario ; Patient Participation ; Physical Therapy Specialty ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Qualitative Methods ; Qualitative research ; Saskatchewan ; Survivors ; Victims</subject><ispartof>Qualitative health research, 2005-10, Vol.15 (8), p.1129-1140</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049732305275882$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732305275882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21826,27931,27932,31006,33782,43628,43629</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16221884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teram, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachter, Candice L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalker, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</title><title>Qualitative health research</title><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><description>Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.</description><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Adult Children</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual</subject><subject>Child Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Specialty</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Qualitative Methods</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Saskatchewan</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>1049-7323</issn><issn>1552-7557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJLhwV82jSVp3MvgCwUHGdckkN2OlbcYkRdz4280wA4IgrvK453whfAidUHJBqVKXlJS14owTwZSoKraF9qkQrFBCqO28z-NiNd9DBzG-EUIU4XwX7VHJGK2qch99zV4BT3QE7HzAD0OCRdCpHRb4LvhxsGBxJnz4xHqweKpDak271Gl1c21S6wf8DBF0MK9X-KZf-g8IK3vStTCkiJPPoTm6x9PgHcSYDd3lg86ygSO043QX4XizHqKX25vZ5L54fLp7mFw_FobXPBXCgSyFdcSpOZkrQrUUTlJFmZVMlkCcJBp45ZQoaykNKGJtbakzQGslgR-i83XuMvj3EWJq-jYa6Do9gB9jIytZl0zK_0HKVa1YmcGzX-CbH0P-W2wYI0zyiqsMkTVkgo8xgGuWoe11-GwoaVYNNr8bzMrpJnec92B_hE1lGSjWQNQL-Hn0z8BvNjWjZw</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Teram, Eli</creator><creator>Schachter, Candice L.</creator><creator>Stalker, Carol A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</title><author>Teram, Eli ; Schachter, Candice L. ; Stalker, Carol A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Adult Children</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual</topic><topic>Child Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Specialty</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Qualitative Methods</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Saskatchewan</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teram, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachter, Candice L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalker, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teram, Eli</au><au>Schachter, Candice L.</au><au>Stalker, Carol A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1140</epage><pages>1129-1140</pages><issn>1049-7323</issn><eissn>1552-7557</eissn><coden>QHREEM</coden><abstract>Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16221884</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049732305275882</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-7323 |
ispartof | Qualitative health research, 2005-10, Vol.15 (8), p.1129-1140 |
issn | 1049-7323 1552-7557 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68694266 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Action Research Adult Children Child Child Abuse, Sexual Child Sexual Abuse Female Health Services Research Health technology assessment Humans Interviews as Topic Methodology (Data Collection) Ontario Patient Participation Physical Therapy Specialty Practice Patterns, Physicians Qualitative Methods Qualitative research Saskatchewan Survivors Victims |
title | The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T12%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Case%20for%20Integrating%20Grounded%20Theory%20and%20Participatory%20Action%20Research:%20Empowering%20Clients%20to%20Inform%20Professional%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20health%20research&rft.au=Teram,%20Eli&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1140&rft.pages=1129-1140&rft.issn=1049-7323&rft.eissn=1552-7557&rft.coden=QHREEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049732305275882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E906020941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220263837&rft_id=info:pmid/16221884&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049732305275882&rfr_iscdi=true |