The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice

Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Qualitative health research 2005-10, Vol.15 (8), p.1129-1140
Hauptverfasser: Teram, Eli, Schachter, Candice L., Stalker, Carol A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1140
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1129
container_title Qualitative health research
container_volume 15
creator Teram, Eli
Schachter, Candice L.
Stalker, Carol A.
description Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1049732305275882
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68694266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1049732305275882</sage_id><sourcerecordid>906020941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJLhwV82jSVp3MvgCwUHGdckkN2OlbcYkRdz4280wA4IgrvK453whfAidUHJBqVKXlJS14owTwZSoKraF9qkQrFBCqO28z-NiNd9DBzG-EUIU4XwX7VHJGK2qch99zV4BT3QE7HzAD0OCRdCpHRb4LvhxsGBxJnz4xHqweKpDak271Gl1c21S6wf8DBF0MK9X-KZf-g8IK3vStTCkiJPPoTm6x9PgHcSYDd3lg86ygSO043QX4XizHqKX25vZ5L54fLp7mFw_FobXPBXCgSyFdcSpOZkrQrUUTlJFmZVMlkCcJBp45ZQoaykNKGJtbakzQGslgR-i83XuMvj3EWJq-jYa6Do9gB9jIytZl0zK_0HKVa1YmcGzX-CbH0P-W2wYI0zyiqsMkTVkgo8xgGuWoe11-GwoaVYNNr8bzMrpJnec92B_hE1lGSjWQNQL-Hn0z8BvNjWjZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220263837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Teram, Eli ; Schachter, Candice L. ; Stalker, Carol A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Teram, Eli ; Schachter, Candice L. ; Stalker, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><description>Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-7323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-7557</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1049732305275882</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16221884</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QHREEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Action Research ; Adult Children ; Child ; Child Abuse, Sexual ; Child Sexual Abuse ; Female ; Health Services Research ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Methodology (Data Collection) ; Ontario ; Patient Participation ; Physical Therapy Specialty ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Qualitative Methods ; Qualitative research ; Saskatchewan ; Survivors ; Victims</subject><ispartof>Qualitative health research, 2005-10, Vol.15 (8), p.1129-1140</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1049732305275882$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1049732305275882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,21826,27931,27932,31006,33782,43628,43629</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16221884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teram, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachter, Candice L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalker, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</title><title>Qualitative health research</title><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><description>Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.</description><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Adult Children</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Abuse, Sexual</subject><subject>Child Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Methodology (Data Collection)</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Specialty</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Qualitative Methods</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Saskatchewan</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><subject>Victims</subject><issn>1049-7323</issn><issn>1552-7557</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtLxDAURoMovveuJLhwV82jSVp3MvgCwUHGdckkN2OlbcYkRdz4280wA4IgrvK453whfAidUHJBqVKXlJS14owTwZSoKraF9qkQrFBCqO28z-NiNd9DBzG-EUIU4XwX7VHJGK2qch99zV4BT3QE7HzAD0OCRdCpHRb4LvhxsGBxJnz4xHqweKpDak271Gl1c21S6wf8DBF0MK9X-KZf-g8IK3vStTCkiJPPoTm6x9PgHcSYDd3lg86ygSO043QX4XizHqKX25vZ5L54fLp7mFw_FobXPBXCgSyFdcSpOZkrQrUUTlJFmZVMlkCcJBp45ZQoaykNKGJtbakzQGslgR-i83XuMvj3EWJq-jYa6Do9gB9jIytZl0zK_0HKVa1YmcGzX-CbH0P-W2wYI0zyiqsMkTVkgo8xgGuWoe11-GwoaVYNNr8bzMrpJnec92B_hE1lGSjWQNQL-Hn0z8BvNjWjZw</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Teram, Eli</creator><creator>Schachter, Candice L.</creator><creator>Stalker, Carol A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</title><author>Teram, Eli ; Schachter, Candice L. ; Stalker, Carol A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-5fe645df0f7b0b701a65f61712d6264e0f60ae38f754966ce70dd9d1fce1976e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Adult Children</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Abuse, Sexual</topic><topic>Child Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Methodology (Data Collection)</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Specialty</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Qualitative Methods</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Saskatchewan</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><topic>Victims</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teram, Eli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schachter, Candice L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stalker, Carol A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teram, Eli</au><au>Schachter, Candice L.</au><au>Stalker, Carol A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative health research</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Health Res</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1129</spage><epage>1140</epage><pages>1129-1140</pages><issn>1049-7323</issn><eissn>1552-7557</eissn><coden>QHREEM</coden><abstract>Grounded theory and participatory action research methods are distinct approaches to qualitative inquiry. Although grounded theory has been conceptualized in constructivist terms, it has elements of positivist thinking with an image of neutral search for objective truth through rigorous data collection and analysis. Participatory action research is based on a critique of this image and calls for more inclusive research processes. It questions the possibility of objective social sciences and aspires to engage people actively in all stages of generating knowledge. The authors applied both approaches in a project designed to explore the experiences of female survivors of childhood sexual abuse with physical therapy and subsequently develop a handbook on sensitive practice for clinicians that takes into consideration the needs and perspectives of these clients. Building on this experience, they argue that the integration of grounded theory and participatory action research can empower clients to inform professional practice.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16221884</pmid><doi>10.1177/1049732305275882</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-7323
ispartof Qualitative health research, 2005-10, Vol.15 (8), p.1129-1140
issn 1049-7323
1552-7557
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68694266
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Action Research
Adult Children
Child
Child Abuse, Sexual
Child Sexual Abuse
Female
Health Services Research
Health technology assessment
Humans
Interviews as Topic
Methodology (Data Collection)
Ontario
Patient Participation
Physical Therapy Specialty
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Qualitative Methods
Qualitative research
Saskatchewan
Survivors
Victims
title The Case for Integrating Grounded Theory and Participatory Action Research: Empowering Clients to Inform Professional Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T12%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Case%20for%20Integrating%20Grounded%20Theory%20and%20Participatory%20Action%20Research:%20Empowering%20Clients%20to%20Inform%20Professional%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20health%20research&rft.au=Teram,%20Eli&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1129&rft.epage=1140&rft.pages=1129-1140&rft.issn=1049-7323&rft.eissn=1552-7557&rft.coden=QHREEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1049732305275882&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E906020941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220263837&rft_id=info:pmid/16221884&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1049732305275882&rfr_iscdi=true