Endoscopic ultrasound: impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer
Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy and long-term survival is poor. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an additional staging modality to assess locoregional extent of this disease. We hypothesized that EUS may improve survival through more effective staging and better optimization of treatm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2005-11, Vol.190 (5), p.682-686 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 686 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 682 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 190 |
creator | Schrager, Jason J. Tarpley, John L. Smalley, Walter E. Austin, Mary T. Pearson, A. Scott |
description | Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy and long-term survival is poor. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an additional staging modality to assess locoregional extent of this disease. We hypothesized that EUS may improve survival through more effective staging and better optimization of treatment.
We performed a retrospective review of all patients presenting with esophageal cancer at our institution from 1993 to 2003 (
n = 97) and compared outcomes between patients who underwent staging EUS and computed tomography (CT) versus CT alone. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Mean survival was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods.
Overall 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival did not differ between the 2 groups (EUS: 92%, 84%, and 80% and CT: 83%, 67%, and 43%, log-rank
P = .1), which held true despite stratification by treatment modality (all
P >.1). The mean survival for the EUS group was 16 ± 3 months and for the CT group, 12 ± 1.5 months (
P = .2). Further analysis by stage showed no difference in survival between the 2 groups (all
P >.1). However, stage 2A and 3 surgical patients had better survival than nonsurgical patients (both
P = .02) irrespective of staging modality. EUS patients were no more likely to receive surgical, neoadjuvant, or definitive chemoradiation than CT patients (all
P >.1).
Overall survival as well as survival by stage did not differ between patients who underwent staging via EUS and CT versus CT alone, and patients staged with EUS were not more likely to receive any one intervention. Irrespective of staging modality, stage 2A and 3 patients who underwent surgical intervention had better survival than those who did not receive an operation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68691376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S000296100500629X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2729528051</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e8bec0ee5b02da1313c8048b200ad286ad19621cbfd8f3080260a3273c87fdb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPATwBFQrBL6kfiBxuEqhaQRmJT1pZj37SOkjjYyaD-ezyaSJVYtCvr2t-9PvcchN4TXBFM-GVfmbFPa7yrKMZNhUWFMX2BdkQKVRIp2Uu0w_mqVJzgC_QmpT6XhNTsNbognFKumNqhw_XkQrJh9rZYhyWaFNbJfSn8OBu7FGEq8h9HfzRD4adiNouHaUnFX7_cF5DCfG_uIL9ZM1mIb9GrzgwJ3m3nHv2-ub69-lEefn3_efXtUNq6VksJsgWLAZoWU2cII8xKXMs2L2Icldw4ojgltu2c7BiWmHJsGBUZE51rBdujz-e5cwx_VkiLHn2yMAxmgrAmzSVXhAmewY__gX1Y45S1aVLXdSOVwuJJCjNCs99Z4x41Z8rGkFKETs_RjyY-ZEifItG93iLRp0g0Fjr7n_s-bNPXdgT32LVlkIFPG2CSNUMXs5c-PXKCNoTyk4CvZw6ytUcPUSeb07DgfAS7aBf8M1L-AZJdq1U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1031210131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopic ultrasound: impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Schrager, Jason J. ; Tarpley, John L. ; Smalley, Walter E. ; Austin, Mary T. ; Pearson, A. Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Schrager, Jason J. ; Tarpley, John L. ; Smalley, Walter E. ; Austin, Mary T. ; Pearson, A. Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy and long-term survival is poor. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an additional staging modality to assess locoregional extent of this disease. We hypothesized that EUS may improve survival through more effective staging and better optimization of treatment.
We performed a retrospective review of all patients presenting with esophageal cancer at our institution from 1993 to 2003 (
n = 97) and compared outcomes between patients who underwent staging EUS and computed tomography (CT) versus CT alone. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Mean survival was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods.
Overall 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival did not differ between the 2 groups (EUS: 92%, 84%, and 80% and CT: 83%, 67%, and 43%, log-rank
P = .1), which held true despite stratification by treatment modality (all
P >.1). The mean survival for the EUS group was 16 ± 3 months and for the CT group, 12 ± 1.5 months (
P = .2). Further analysis by stage showed no difference in survival between the 2 groups (all
P >.1). However, stage 2A and 3 surgical patients had better survival than nonsurgical patients (both
P = .02) irrespective of staging modality. EUS patients were no more likely to receive surgical, neoadjuvant, or definitive chemoradiation than CT patients (all
P >.1).
Overall survival as well as survival by stage did not differ between patients who underwent staging via EUS and CT versus CT alone, and patients staged with EUS were not more likely to receive any one intervention. Irrespective of staging modality, stage 2A and 3 patients who underwent surgical intervention had better survival than those who did not receive an operation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16226939</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenocarcinoma - mortality ; Adenocarcinoma - pathology ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Chemotherapy ; Decision making ; Endoscopic ultrasound ; Endoscopy ; Endosonography ; Esophageal cancer ; Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality ; Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology ; Esophagus ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; General aspects ; Humans ; Locoregional disease ; Lymphatic system ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical imaging ; Medical prognosis ; Medical sciences ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; Neoadjuvant chemoradiation ; Patients ; Radiation therapy ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Survival Rate - trends ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tumors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2005-11, Vol.190 (5), p.682-686</ispartof><rights>2005 Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e8bec0ee5b02da1313c8048b200ad286ad19621cbfd8f3080260a3273c87fdb73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e8bec0ee5b02da1313c8048b200ad286ad19621cbfd8f3080260a3273c87fdb73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296100500629X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17251261$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16226939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schrager, Jason J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarpley, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smalley, Walter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Mary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, A. Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopic ultrasound: impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy and long-term survival is poor. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an additional staging modality to assess locoregional extent of this disease. We hypothesized that EUS may improve survival through more effective staging and better optimization of treatment.
We performed a retrospective review of all patients presenting with esophageal cancer at our institution from 1993 to 2003 (
n = 97) and compared outcomes between patients who underwent staging EUS and computed tomography (CT) versus CT alone. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Mean survival was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods.
Overall 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival did not differ between the 2 groups (EUS: 92%, 84%, and 80% and CT: 83%, 67%, and 43%, log-rank
P = .1), which held true despite stratification by treatment modality (all
P >.1). The mean survival for the EUS group was 16 ± 3 months and for the CT group, 12 ± 1.5 months (
P = .2). Further analysis by stage showed no difference in survival between the 2 groups (all
P >.1). However, stage 2A and 3 surgical patients had better survival than nonsurgical patients (both
P = .02) irrespective of staging modality. EUS patients were no more likely to receive surgical, neoadjuvant, or definitive chemoradiation than CT patients (all
P >.1).
Overall survival as well as survival by stage did not differ between patients who underwent staging via EUS and CT versus CT alone, and patients staged with EUS were not more likely to receive any one intervention. Irrespective of staging modality, stage 2A and 3 patients who underwent surgical intervention had better survival than those who did not receive an operation.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Endoscopic ultrasound</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Endosonography</subject><subject>Esophageal cancer</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Locoregional disease</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant chemoradiation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Survival Rate - trends</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAUhS0EosPATwBFQrBL6kfiBxuEqhaQRmJT1pZj37SOkjjYyaD-ezyaSJVYtCvr2t-9PvcchN4TXBFM-GVfmbFPa7yrKMZNhUWFMX2BdkQKVRIp2Uu0w_mqVJzgC_QmpT6XhNTsNbognFKumNqhw_XkQrJh9rZYhyWaFNbJfSn8OBu7FGEq8h9HfzRD4adiNouHaUnFX7_cF5DCfG_uIL9ZM1mIb9GrzgwJ3m3nHv2-ub69-lEefn3_efXtUNq6VksJsgWLAZoWU2cII8xKXMs2L2Icldw4ojgltu2c7BiWmHJsGBUZE51rBdujz-e5cwx_VkiLHn2yMAxmgrAmzSVXhAmewY__gX1Y45S1aVLXdSOVwuJJCjNCs99Z4x41Z8rGkFKETs_RjyY-ZEifItG93iLRp0g0Fjr7n_s-bNPXdgT32LVlkIFPG2CSNUMXs5c-PXKCNoTyk4CvZw6ytUcPUSeb07DgfAS7aBf8M1L-AZJdq1U</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Schrager, Jason J.</creator><creator>Tarpley, John L.</creator><creator>Smalley, Walter E.</creator><creator>Austin, Mary T.</creator><creator>Pearson, A. Scott</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Endoscopic ultrasound: impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer</title><author>Schrager, Jason J. ; Tarpley, John L. ; Smalley, Walter E. ; Austin, Mary T. ; Pearson, A. Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-e8bec0ee5b02da1313c8048b200ad286ad19621cbfd8f3080260a3273c87fdb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Endoscopic ultrasound</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Endosonography</topic><topic>Esophageal cancer</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Locoregional disease</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant chemoradiation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Survival Rate - trends</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schrager, Jason J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarpley, John L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smalley, Walter E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austin, Mary T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, A. Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schrager, Jason J.</au><au>Tarpley, John L.</au><au>Smalley, Walter E.</au><au>Austin, Mary T.</au><au>Pearson, A. Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopic ultrasound: impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>190</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>682</spage><epage>686</epage><pages>682-686</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Esophageal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy and long-term survival is poor. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is an additional staging modality to assess locoregional extent of this disease. We hypothesized that EUS may improve survival through more effective staging and better optimization of treatment.
We performed a retrospective review of all patients presenting with esophageal cancer at our institution from 1993 to 2003 (
n = 97) and compared outcomes between patients who underwent staging EUS and computed tomography (CT) versus CT alone. Survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Mean survival was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods.
Overall 3-, 6-, and 12-month survival did not differ between the 2 groups (EUS: 92%, 84%, and 80% and CT: 83%, 67%, and 43%, log-rank
P = .1), which held true despite stratification by treatment modality (all
P >.1). The mean survival for the EUS group was 16 ± 3 months and for the CT group, 12 ± 1.5 months (
P = .2). Further analysis by stage showed no difference in survival between the 2 groups (all
P >.1). However, stage 2A and 3 surgical patients had better survival than nonsurgical patients (both
P = .02) irrespective of staging modality. EUS patients were no more likely to receive surgical, neoadjuvant, or definitive chemoradiation than CT patients (all
P >.1).
Overall survival as well as survival by stage did not differ between patients who underwent staging via EUS and CT versus CT alone, and patients staged with EUS were not more likely to receive any one intervention. Irrespective of staging modality, stage 2A and 3 patients who underwent surgical intervention had better survival than those who did not receive an operation.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16226939</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.002</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2005-11, Vol.190 (5), p.682-686 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68691376 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging Adenocarcinoma - mortality Adenocarcinoma - pathology Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cancer therapies Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Chemotherapy Decision making Endoscopic ultrasound Endoscopy Endosonography Esophageal cancer Esophageal Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Esophageal Neoplasms - mortality Esophageal Neoplasms - pathology Esophagus Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen General aspects Humans Locoregional disease Lymphatic system Medical diagnosis Medical imaging Medical prognosis Medical sciences Metastasis Middle Aged Mortality Neoadjuvant chemoradiation Patients Radiation therapy Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Severity of Illness Index Survival Rate - trends Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tumors Ultrasonic imaging Variance analysis |
title | Endoscopic ultrasound: impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A40%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopic%20ultrasound:%20impact%20on%20survival%20in%20patients%20with%20esophageal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Schrager,%20Jason%20J.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=190&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=682&rft.epage=686&rft.pages=682-686&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2729528051%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1031210131&rft_id=info:pmid/16226939&rft_els_id=S000296100500629X&rfr_iscdi=true |