Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions

Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical biochemistry 2006-08, Vol.355 (2), p.224-231
Hauptverfasser: Lynch, Jessica L., deSilva, Christopher J.S., Peeva, Violet K., Swanson, Nigel R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 231
container_issue 2
container_start_page 224
container_title Analytical biochemistry
container_volume 355
creator Lynch, Jessica L.
deSilva, Christopher J.S.
Peeva, Violet K.
Swanson, Nigel R.
description Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68691258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003269706003277</els_id><sourcerecordid>19452000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQRi0EYruFOyfkE7eUsZ048d5QtcBKK3FZztbEHiOXJO7aCaj_nlStxAlxGmn0zZPmfYy9E7ATIPTHww77nQTQO6h30MgXbCPA6AoUmJdsAwCqktq0N-y2lAOAEHWjX7MboVvV6g42rOzTeMQcS5p4CtylcaTsIg78mFNPfMCehjj94D_jXHhImY_R5YQ54-mOP6XfmH3hzwsOcT5xLGXJODniOPkVNpVYZprc6czOhG6O6-4NexVwKPT2Orfs--f7p_3X6vHbl4f9p8fKqdbMlWwBVW86DFJIakh535EJOkjv-151Mjjf1Mr0LRnZqca1FGoDAQEpYA1qyz5cuOsrzwuV2Y6xOBoGnCgtxepOGyGb7r9BYepGnmVuGVyCq4JSMgV7zHHEfLIC7LkRe7DY23MjFmq7NrKevL-yl34k__fgWsEauLsEaFXxK1K2xcXVGfmYyc3Wp_hv-h8fi53J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19452000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lynch, Jessica L. ; deSilva, Christopher J.S. ; Peeva, Violet K. ; Swanson, Nigel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Jessica L. ; deSilva, Christopher J.S. ; Peeva, Violet K. ; Swanson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><description>Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16737680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Apoptosis - genetics ; Apoptosis - physiology ; Cell Line ; Commercial kits ; DNA Replication ; DNA, Complementary - analysis ; DNA, Complementary - chemistry ; DNA, Complementary - metabolism ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling - methods ; Gene Expression Profiling - standards ; Humans ; Labeling ; Microarray ; Microarray Analysis - methods ; Microarray Analysis - standards ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards ; Probe ; Quality Control ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Analytical biochemistry, 2006-08, Vol.355 (2), p.224-231</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269706003277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16737680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeva, Violet K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</title><title>Analytical biochemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Biochem</addtitle><description>Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use.</description><subject>Apoptosis - genetics</subject><subject>Apoptosis - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Commercial kits</subject><subject>DNA Replication</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - metabolism</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Microarray</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis - standards</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards</subject><subject>Probe</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0003-2697</issn><issn>1096-0309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQRi0EYruFOyfkE7eUsZ048d5QtcBKK3FZztbEHiOXJO7aCaj_nlStxAlxGmn0zZPmfYy9E7ATIPTHww77nQTQO6h30MgXbCPA6AoUmJdsAwCqktq0N-y2lAOAEHWjX7MboVvV6g42rOzTeMQcS5p4CtylcaTsIg78mFNPfMCehjj94D_jXHhImY_R5YQ54-mOP6XfmH3hzwsOcT5xLGXJODniOPkVNpVYZprc6czOhG6O6-4NexVwKPT2Orfs--f7p_3X6vHbl4f9p8fKqdbMlWwBVW86DFJIakh535EJOkjv-151Mjjf1Mr0LRnZqca1FGoDAQEpYA1qyz5cuOsrzwuV2Y6xOBoGnCgtxepOGyGb7r9BYepGnmVuGVyCq4JSMgV7zHHEfLIC7LkRe7DY23MjFmq7NrKevL-yl34k__fgWsEauLsEaFXxK1K2xcXVGfmYyc3Wp_hv-h8fi53J</recordid><startdate>20060815</startdate><enddate>20060815</enddate><creator>Lynch, Jessica L.</creator><creator>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</creator><creator>Peeva, Violet K.</creator><creator>Swanson, Nigel R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060815</creationdate><title>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</title><author>Lynch, Jessica L. ; deSilva, Christopher J.S. ; Peeva, Violet K. ; Swanson, Nigel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Apoptosis - genetics</topic><topic>Apoptosis - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Commercial kits</topic><topic>DNA Replication</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - metabolism</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Microarray</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis - standards</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards</topic><topic>Probe</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeva, Violet K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lynch, Jessica L.</au><au>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</au><au>Peeva, Violet K.</au><au>Swanson, Nigel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</atitle><jtitle>Analytical biochemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Anal Biochem</addtitle><date>2006-08-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>355</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>224-231</pages><issn>0003-2697</issn><eissn>1096-0309</eissn><abstract>Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16737680</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2697
ispartof Analytical biochemistry, 2006-08, Vol.355 (2), p.224-231
issn 0003-2697
1096-0309
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68691258
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Apoptosis - genetics
Apoptosis - physiology
Cell Line
Commercial kits
DNA Replication
DNA, Complementary - analysis
DNA, Complementary - chemistry
DNA, Complementary - metabolism
Gene expression
Gene Expression Profiling - methods
Gene Expression Profiling - standards
Humans
Labeling
Microarray
Microarray Analysis - methods
Microarray Analysis - standards
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods
Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards
Probe
Quality Control
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20commercial%20probe%20labeling%20kits%20for%20microarray:%20Towards%20quality%20assurance%20and%20consistency%20of%20reactions&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20biochemistry&rft.au=Lynch,%20Jessica%20L.&rft.date=2006-08-15&rft.volume=355&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=224-231&rft.issn=0003-2697&rft.eissn=1096-0309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19452000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19452000&rft_id=info:pmid/16737680&rft_els_id=S0003269706003277&rfr_iscdi=true