Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions
Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Analytical biochemistry 2006-08, Vol.355 (2), p.224-231 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 231 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 224 |
container_title | Analytical biochemistry |
container_volume | 355 |
creator | Lynch, Jessica L. deSilva, Christopher J.S. Peeva, Violet K. Swanson, Nigel R. |
description | Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68691258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003269706003277</els_id><sourcerecordid>19452000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQRi0EYruFOyfkE7eUsZ048d5QtcBKK3FZztbEHiOXJO7aCaj_nlStxAlxGmn0zZPmfYy9E7ATIPTHww77nQTQO6h30MgXbCPA6AoUmJdsAwCqktq0N-y2lAOAEHWjX7MboVvV6g42rOzTeMQcS5p4CtylcaTsIg78mFNPfMCehjj94D_jXHhImY_R5YQ54-mOP6XfmH3hzwsOcT5xLGXJODniOPkVNpVYZprc6czOhG6O6-4NexVwKPT2Orfs--f7p_3X6vHbl4f9p8fKqdbMlWwBVW86DFJIakh535EJOkjv-151Mjjf1Mr0LRnZqca1FGoDAQEpYA1qyz5cuOsrzwuV2Y6xOBoGnCgtxepOGyGb7r9BYepGnmVuGVyCq4JSMgV7zHHEfLIC7LkRe7DY23MjFmq7NrKevL-yl34k__fgWsEauLsEaFXxK1K2xcXVGfmYyc3Wp_hv-h8fi53J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19452000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Lynch, Jessica L. ; deSilva, Christopher J.S. ; Peeva, Violet K. ; Swanson, Nigel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Jessica L. ; deSilva, Christopher J.S. ; Peeva, Violet K. ; Swanson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><description>Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16737680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Apoptosis - genetics ; Apoptosis - physiology ; Cell Line ; Commercial kits ; DNA Replication ; DNA, Complementary - analysis ; DNA, Complementary - chemistry ; DNA, Complementary - metabolism ; Gene expression ; Gene Expression Profiling - methods ; Gene Expression Profiling - standards ; Humans ; Labeling ; Microarray ; Microarray Analysis - methods ; Microarray Analysis - standards ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods ; Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards ; Probe ; Quality Control ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Analytical biochemistry, 2006-08, Vol.355 (2), p.224-231</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269706003277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16737680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeva, Violet K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</title><title>Analytical biochemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Biochem</addtitle><description>Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use.</description><subject>Apoptosis - genetics</subject><subject>Apoptosis - physiology</subject><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Commercial kits</subject><subject>DNA Replication</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - chemistry</subject><subject>DNA, Complementary - metabolism</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</subject><subject>Gene Expression Profiling - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labeling</subject><subject>Microarray</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis - standards</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards</subject><subject>Probe</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0003-2697</issn><issn>1096-0309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQRi0EYruFOyfkE7eUsZ048d5QtcBKK3FZztbEHiOXJO7aCaj_nlStxAlxGmn0zZPmfYy9E7ATIPTHww77nQTQO6h30MgXbCPA6AoUmJdsAwCqktq0N-y2lAOAEHWjX7MboVvV6g42rOzTeMQcS5p4CtylcaTsIg78mFNPfMCehjj94D_jXHhImY_R5YQ54-mOP6XfmH3hzwsOcT5xLGXJODniOPkVNpVYZprc6czOhG6O6-4NexVwKPT2Orfs--f7p_3X6vHbl4f9p8fKqdbMlWwBVW86DFJIakh535EJOkjv-151Mjjf1Mr0LRnZqca1FGoDAQEpYA1qyz5cuOsrzwuV2Y6xOBoGnCgtxepOGyGb7r9BYepGnmVuGVyCq4JSMgV7zHHEfLIC7LkRe7DY23MjFmq7NrKevL-yl34k__fgWsEauLsEaFXxK1K2xcXVGfmYyc3Wp_hv-h8fi53J</recordid><startdate>20060815</startdate><enddate>20060815</enddate><creator>Lynch, Jessica L.</creator><creator>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</creator><creator>Peeva, Violet K.</creator><creator>Swanson, Nigel R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060815</creationdate><title>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</title><author>Lynch, Jessica L. ; deSilva, Christopher J.S. ; Peeva, Violet K. ; Swanson, Nigel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-270a3b98af212e5e3dd8e9f6f2ddbb382fcd5439b7e92835c7ef490fa0aefa403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Apoptosis - genetics</topic><topic>Apoptosis - physiology</topic><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Commercial kits</topic><topic>DNA Replication</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - chemistry</topic><topic>DNA, Complementary - metabolism</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - methods</topic><topic>Gene Expression Profiling - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labeling</topic><topic>Microarray</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis - standards</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards</topic><topic>Probe</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Jessica L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peeva, Violet K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lynch, Jessica L.</au><au>deSilva, Christopher J.S.</au><au>Peeva, Violet K.</au><au>Swanson, Nigel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions</atitle><jtitle>Analytical biochemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Anal Biochem</addtitle><date>2006-08-15</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>355</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>224</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>224-231</pages><issn>0003-2697</issn><eissn>1096-0309</eissn><abstract>Microarray technology is readily available to scientists interested in gene expression. Commensurate with this availability is the growing market in accessory products offering convenience but potentially variable performance. Here we evaluate seven commercial kits for probe labeling against a human apoptosis oligonucleotide array. All kits were found to label probes successfully using the manufacturers’ instructions. The Stratagene Fairplay Microarray Labeling Kit was the most sensitive, with an overall call rate of 74% and the lowest rate of indeterminant calls for the HEK and HepG2 cell lines. The Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System showed the most reproducible gene expression pattern and the least technical variation, both in terms of signal strength and between replicates on each array. The Promega Pronto! Plus System showed the least dye bias however, a higher level of variation between replicates was observed. Pairwise comparisons revealed that the Promega Pronto! Plus System and Invitrogen SuperScript Indirect cDNA Labeling System had the most similarity in their patterns of gene expression. Results obtained suggest variability in the performance of commercial kits between different manufacturers. This study supports the need to conduct comparative evaluations of commercial microarray probe labeling kits and the need for validation prior to use.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16737680</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-2697 |
ispartof | Analytical biochemistry, 2006-08, Vol.355 (2), p.224-231 |
issn | 0003-2697 1096-0309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68691258 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Apoptosis - genetics Apoptosis - physiology Cell Line Commercial kits DNA Replication DNA, Complementary - analysis DNA, Complementary - chemistry DNA, Complementary - metabolism Gene expression Gene Expression Profiling - methods Gene Expression Profiling - standards Humans Labeling Microarray Microarray Analysis - methods Microarray Analysis - standards Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - methods Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis - standards Probe Quality Control Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Comparison of commercial probe labeling kits for microarray: Towards quality assurance and consistency of reactions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T19%3A32%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20commercial%20probe%20labeling%20kits%20for%20microarray:%20Towards%20quality%20assurance%20and%20consistency%20of%20reactions&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20biochemistry&rft.au=Lynch,%20Jessica%20L.&rft.date=2006-08-15&rft.volume=355&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=224&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=224-231&rft.issn=0003-2697&rft.eissn=1096-0309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ab.2006.04.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19452000%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19452000&rft_id=info:pmid/16737680&rft_els_id=S0003269706003277&rfr_iscdi=true |