Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha
Aim To assess the bond strength of the new resin‐based Epiphany–Resilon root canal filling system, and to compare this with bond strengths of different pairings of AH Plus, gutta‐percha, Epiphany and Resilon. Methodology A total of 65 extracted human single‐rooted teeth were used. All teeth were i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International endodontic journal 2006-08, Vol.39 (8), p.643-647 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 647 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 643 |
| container_title | International endodontic journal |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Ungor, M. Onay, E. O. Orucoglu, H. |
| description | Aim To assess the bond strength of the new resin‐based Epiphany–Resilon root canal filling system, and to compare this with bond strengths of different pairings of AH Plus, gutta‐percha, Epiphany and Resilon.
Methodology A total of 65 extracted human single‐rooted teeth were used. All teeth were instrumented using a set of ProTaper rotary instruments. Irrigation was performed with 15 mL of 1.25% NaOCl between each instrument and the smear layer was removed during and after instrumentation with 5 mL of 17% EDTA. The canal spaces were filled with different combinations of core and sealer using lateral condensation, as follows: group 1, AH Plus + gutta‐percha; group 2, AH Plus + Resilon; group 3, Epiphany + Resilon; group 4, Epiphany + gutta‐percha; group 5 (control), gutta‐percha only. Cylinders of root dentine 1.13 (0.06)‐mm long were prepared from the coronal sections of the 65 teeth. The test specimens were subjected to the push‐out test method. After adhesion testing, the remaining sections were examined under a stereomicroscope at × 25 magnification to determine the nature of bond failure. The values of bond strength were analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance (anova) and the post hoc Tukey's test, with significance set at P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01132.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68689380</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68689380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-6f398ed3e712015a19abf2068b7a7b38ab3a681841953cb8a42364d935c652403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFZBXrOrUP7HjILGoqqFTVEGFaLu0nMSZeEji1HbUmVfp0zbpjIYtd-Or63O-K90DACQ4IVOdbxLCBEeU5yShGIsEE8Josn0DFsePt2CBScoQlZKfgA8hbDDGHDPyHpwQITOa8nwBnm_H0CA3Rli4voIhetOvYxO-wtgYuBzs0Oh-h36bYFvXQ9NXrnJ9tCV0RRy9jnaahl2IpoOl6wbtTQWfbGxgZevaTLQIB2297dcBuvpIPIMH5Bm8WMHbdgxQT_vXY4waDcaXjf4I3tW6DebT4T0Fd9-Xfy5X6ObX1fXlxQ0qU8wpEjXLpamYyQjFhGuS66KmWMgi01nBpC6YFpLIlOSclYXUKWUirXLGS8Fpitkp-LLnDt49jiZE1dlQmrbVvXFjUEIKmTM5C-VeWHoXgje1GrzttN8pgtWci9qo-fxqPr-ac1GvuajtZP182DEWnan-GQ9BTIJve8GTbc3uv8Hqevlj7iY_2vvtFMX26Nf-rxIZy7h6-HmlVpQLdn_PJ9gLZnSshw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68689380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ungor, M. ; Onay, E. O. ; Orucoglu, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ungor, M. ; Onay, E. O. ; Orucoglu, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To assess the bond strength of the new resin‐based Epiphany–Resilon root canal filling system, and to compare this with bond strengths of different pairings of AH Plus, gutta‐percha, Epiphany and Resilon.
Methodology A total of 65 extracted human single‐rooted teeth were used. All teeth were instrumented using a set of ProTaper rotary instruments. Irrigation was performed with 15 mL of 1.25% NaOCl between each instrument and the smear layer was removed during and after instrumentation with 5 mL of 17% EDTA. The canal spaces were filled with different combinations of core and sealer using lateral condensation, as follows: group 1, AH Plus + gutta‐percha; group 2, AH Plus + Resilon; group 3, Epiphany + Resilon; group 4, Epiphany + gutta‐percha; group 5 (control), gutta‐percha only. Cylinders of root dentine 1.13 (0.06)‐mm long were prepared from the coronal sections of the 65 teeth. The test specimens were subjected to the push‐out test method. After adhesion testing, the remaining sections were examined under a stereomicroscope at × 25 magnification to determine the nature of bond failure. The values of bond strength were analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance (anova) and the post hoc Tukey's test, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results The respective mean push‐out test values for groups 1–5 were: 2.000 ± 0.369, 1.380 ± 0.154, 1.706 ± 0.340, 2.857 ± 0.523 and 0.078 ± 0.027 MPa. Significant difference (P < 0.001) occurred between the groups. Multiple paired comparisons (Tukey's test) revealed that group 4 (Epiphany + gutta‐percha) had significantly (P < 0.001) greater bonding strength than all the other groups; group 1 (AH Plus + gutta‐percha) had significantly (P < 0.05) greater bonding strength than group 2 (AH Plus + Resilon); and group 5 (control) had significantly (P < 0.05) lower bonding strength than all the other groups. Inspection of the surfaces revealed the bond failure to be mainly adhesive to dentine for all groups.
Conclusions The Epiphany–Resilon combination (group 3) was not superior to that of the AH Plus‐gutta percha combination (group 1).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01132.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16872459</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>AH Plus ; bond strength ; Chelating Agents - chemistry ; Dental Bonding ; Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation ; Dentistry ; Edetic Acid - chemistry ; Epiphany ; Epoxy Resins - chemistry ; Gutta-Percha - chemistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; push-out ; Resilon ; Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry ; Root Canal Irrigants - chemistry ; Root Canal Obturation ; Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation ; Root Canal Preparation - methods ; Smear Layer ; Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2006-08, Vol.39 (8), p.643-647</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-6f398ed3e712015a19abf2068b7a7b38ab3a681841953cb8a42364d935c652403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-6f398ed3e712015a19abf2068b7a7b38ab3a681841953cb8a42364d935c652403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2006.01132.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2591.2006.01132.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16872459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ungor, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onay, E. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orucoglu, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Aim To assess the bond strength of the new resin‐based Epiphany–Resilon root canal filling system, and to compare this with bond strengths of different pairings of AH Plus, gutta‐percha, Epiphany and Resilon.
Methodology A total of 65 extracted human single‐rooted teeth were used. All teeth were instrumented using a set of ProTaper rotary instruments. Irrigation was performed with 15 mL of 1.25% NaOCl between each instrument and the smear layer was removed during and after instrumentation with 5 mL of 17% EDTA. The canal spaces were filled with different combinations of core and sealer using lateral condensation, as follows: group 1, AH Plus + gutta‐percha; group 2, AH Plus + Resilon; group 3, Epiphany + Resilon; group 4, Epiphany + gutta‐percha; group 5 (control), gutta‐percha only. Cylinders of root dentine 1.13 (0.06)‐mm long were prepared from the coronal sections of the 65 teeth. The test specimens were subjected to the push‐out test method. After adhesion testing, the remaining sections were examined under a stereomicroscope at × 25 magnification to determine the nature of bond failure. The values of bond strength were analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance (anova) and the post hoc Tukey's test, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results The respective mean push‐out test values for groups 1–5 were: 2.000 ± 0.369, 1.380 ± 0.154, 1.706 ± 0.340, 2.857 ± 0.523 and 0.078 ± 0.027 MPa. Significant difference (P < 0.001) occurred between the groups. Multiple paired comparisons (Tukey's test) revealed that group 4 (Epiphany + gutta‐percha) had significantly (P < 0.001) greater bonding strength than all the other groups; group 1 (AH Plus + gutta‐percha) had significantly (P < 0.05) greater bonding strength than group 2 (AH Plus + Resilon); and group 5 (control) had significantly (P < 0.05) lower bonding strength than all the other groups. Inspection of the surfaces revealed the bond failure to be mainly adhesive to dentine for all groups.
Conclusions The Epiphany–Resilon combination (group 3) was not superior to that of the AH Plus‐gutta percha combination (group 1).</description><subject>AH Plus</subject><subject>bond strength</subject><subject>Chelating Agents - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Bonding</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Edetic Acid - chemistry</subject><subject>Epiphany</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>push-out</subject><subject>Resilon</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>Root Canal Irrigants - chemistry</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Smear Layer</subject><subject>Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EokPhFZBXrOrUP7HjILGoqqFTVEGFaLu0nMSZeEji1HbUmVfp0zbpjIYtd-Or63O-K90DACQ4IVOdbxLCBEeU5yShGIsEE8Josn0DFsePt2CBScoQlZKfgA8hbDDGHDPyHpwQITOa8nwBnm_H0CA3Rli4voIhetOvYxO-wtgYuBzs0Oh-h36bYFvXQ9NXrnJ9tCV0RRy9jnaahl2IpoOl6wbtTQWfbGxgZevaTLQIB2297dcBuvpIPIMH5Bm8WMHbdgxQT_vXY4waDcaXjf4I3tW6DebT4T0Fd9-Xfy5X6ObX1fXlxQ0qU8wpEjXLpamYyQjFhGuS66KmWMgi01nBpC6YFpLIlOSclYXUKWUirXLGS8Fpitkp-LLnDt49jiZE1dlQmrbVvXFjUEIKmTM5C-VeWHoXgje1GrzttN8pgtWci9qo-fxqPr-ac1GvuajtZP182DEWnan-GQ9BTIJve8GTbc3uv8Hqevlj7iY_2vvtFMX26Nf-rxIZy7h6-HmlVpQLdn_PJ9gLZnSshw</recordid><startdate>200608</startdate><enddate>200608</enddate><creator>Ungor, M.</creator><creator>Onay, E. O.</creator><creator>Orucoglu, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200608</creationdate><title>Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha</title><author>Ungor, M. ; Onay, E. O. ; Orucoglu, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4052-6f398ed3e712015a19abf2068b7a7b38ab3a681841953cb8a42364d935c652403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>AH Plus</topic><topic>bond strength</topic><topic>Chelating Agents - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Bonding</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Edetic Acid - chemistry</topic><topic>Epiphany</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>push-out</topic><topic>Resilon</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>Root Canal Irrigants - chemistry</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Smear Layer</topic><topic>Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ungor, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onay, E. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orucoglu, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ungor, M.</au><au>Onay, E. O.</au><au>Orucoglu, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2006-08</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>643</spage><epage>647</epage><pages>643-647</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Aim To assess the bond strength of the new resin‐based Epiphany–Resilon root canal filling system, and to compare this with bond strengths of different pairings of AH Plus, gutta‐percha, Epiphany and Resilon.
Methodology A total of 65 extracted human single‐rooted teeth were used. All teeth were instrumented using a set of ProTaper rotary instruments. Irrigation was performed with 15 mL of 1.25% NaOCl between each instrument and the smear layer was removed during and after instrumentation with 5 mL of 17% EDTA. The canal spaces were filled with different combinations of core and sealer using lateral condensation, as follows: group 1, AH Plus + gutta‐percha; group 2, AH Plus + Resilon; group 3, Epiphany + Resilon; group 4, Epiphany + gutta‐percha; group 5 (control), gutta‐percha only. Cylinders of root dentine 1.13 (0.06)‐mm long were prepared from the coronal sections of the 65 teeth. The test specimens were subjected to the push‐out test method. After adhesion testing, the remaining sections were examined under a stereomicroscope at × 25 magnification to determine the nature of bond failure. The values of bond strength were analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance (anova) and the post hoc Tukey's test, with significance set at P < 0.05.
Results The respective mean push‐out test values for groups 1–5 were: 2.000 ± 0.369, 1.380 ± 0.154, 1.706 ± 0.340, 2.857 ± 0.523 and 0.078 ± 0.027 MPa. Significant difference (P < 0.001) occurred between the groups. Multiple paired comparisons (Tukey's test) revealed that group 4 (Epiphany + gutta‐percha) had significantly (P < 0.001) greater bonding strength than all the other groups; group 1 (AH Plus + gutta‐percha) had significantly (P < 0.05) greater bonding strength than group 2 (AH Plus + Resilon); and group 5 (control) had significantly (P < 0.05) lower bonding strength than all the other groups. Inspection of the surfaces revealed the bond failure to be mainly adhesive to dentine for all groups.
Conclusions The Epiphany–Resilon combination (group 3) was not superior to that of the AH Plus‐gutta percha combination (group 1).</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16872459</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01132.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0143-2885 |
| ispartof | International endodontic journal, 2006-08, Vol.39 (8), p.643-647 |
| issn | 0143-2885 1365-2591 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68689380 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | AH Plus bond strength Chelating Agents - chemistry Dental Bonding Dental Stress Analysis - instrumentation Dentistry Edetic Acid - chemistry Epiphany Epoxy Resins - chemistry Gutta-Percha - chemistry Humans Materials Testing push-out Resilon Root Canal Filling Materials - chemistry Root Canal Irrigants - chemistry Root Canal Obturation Root Canal Preparation - instrumentation Root Canal Preparation - methods Smear Layer Sodium Hypochlorite - chemistry Stress, Mechanical |
| title | Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T22%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Push-out%20bond%20strengths:%20the%20Epiphany-Resilon%20endodontic%20obturation%20system%20compared%20with%20different%20pairings%20of%20Epiphany,%20Resilon,%20AH%20Plus%20and%20gutta-percha&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Ungor,%20M.&rft.date=2006-08&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=643&rft.epage=647&rft.pages=643-647&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01132.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68689380%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68689380&rft_id=info:pmid/16872459&rfr_iscdi=true |