Agreement of Rebound Tonometer in Measuring Intraocular Pressure With Three Types of Applanation Tonometers

To evaluate the agreement of iCare rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer, and the influence of the central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements made with these four tonometers in 45 (12 control...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of ophthalmology 2006-08, Vol.142 (2), p.332-334
Hauptverfasser: Nakamura, Makoto, Darhad, Urtogtah, Tatsumi, Yasuko, Fujioka, Miyuki, Kusuhara, Azusa, Maeda, Hidetaka, Negi, Akira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 334
container_issue 2
container_start_page 332
container_title American journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 142
creator Nakamura, Makoto
Darhad, Urtogtah
Tatsumi, Yasuko
Fujioka, Miyuki
Kusuhara, Azusa
Maeda, Hidetaka
Negi, Akira
description To evaluate the agreement of iCare rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer, and the influence of the central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements made with these four tonometers in 45 (12 control and 33 glaucomatous or ocular hypertensive) eyes. Clinically relevant experimental study. Tonometer intermethod agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The relations of CCT with absolute IOP values and intertonometer differences were analyzed by linear regression. The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) in IOP readings between iCare and GAT, Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer were 1.40 ± 4.29, 0.00 ± 4.78, and 2.22 ± 4.19 mm Hg, respectively. All tonometries had a marked association with CCT. As the CCT got thicker, iCare considerably overestimated GAT and Tonopen XL. Although influenced by CCT, iCare agrees well with applanation tonometers.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68688966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002939406003308</els_id><sourcerecordid>3556380981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e4109ba828ab530085ffe2a89337eb8163e0302b5f1d3b216a03d9bf33f41f4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozp3RH-BGAuLsWvPRpgmuLoMfAyOKXHEZ0vZkJrVNatIK8-9NuRcuuHAVTnjOw8t5EXpFSUkJFe-G0gyhZISIkrCS8PoJ2lHZqIJKRZ-iHSGEFYqr6gJdpjTkUTRV8xxdUCEbUTO-Q7_29xFgAr_gYPF3aMPqe3wIPkywQMTO4y9g0hqdv8e3fokmdOtoIv4WIeVvwD_d8oAPD9mCD48zpM2zn-fReLO44M-u9AI9s2ZM8PL0XqEfHz8cbj4Xd18_3d7s74quUmIpoKJEtUYyadqaEyJra4EZqThvoJVUcCCcsLa2tOcto8IQ3qvWcm4raquWX6Hro3eO4fcKadGTSx2MORKENWkhhZRKiAy--Qccwhp9zqapqCpVkYZuFD1SXQwpRbB6jm4y8VFTorce9KBzD3rrQROmcw955_XJvLYT9OeN0-Ez8PYEmNSZ0UbjO5fOnCSMSLGJ3h85yAf74yDq1DnwHfQuQrfoPrj_xPgLKq2leA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1644940716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agreement of Rebound Tonometer in Measuring Intraocular Pressure With Three Types of Applanation Tonometers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Nakamura, Makoto ; Darhad, Urtogtah ; Tatsumi, Yasuko ; Fujioka, Miyuki ; Kusuhara, Azusa ; Maeda, Hidetaka ; Negi, Akira</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Makoto ; Darhad, Urtogtah ; Tatsumi, Yasuko ; Fujioka, Miyuki ; Kusuhara, Azusa ; Maeda, Hidetaka ; Negi, Akira</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the agreement of iCare rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer, and the influence of the central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements made with these four tonometers in 45 (12 control and 33 glaucomatous or ocular hypertensive) eyes. Clinically relevant experimental study. Tonometer intermethod agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The relations of CCT with absolute IOP values and intertonometer differences were analyzed by linear regression. The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) in IOP readings between iCare and GAT, Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer were 1.40 ± 4.29, 0.00 ± 4.78, and 2.22 ± 4.19 mm Hg, respectively. All tonometries had a marked association with CCT. As the CCT got thicker, iCare considerably overestimated GAT and Tonopen XL. Although influenced by CCT, iCare agrees well with applanation tonometers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16876523</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOPAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Agreements ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cornea - pathology ; Female ; Glaucoma ; Glaucoma - physiopathology ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure - physiology ; Male ; Medical research ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology ; Ophthalmology ; Regression analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation ; Tonometry, Ocular - methods</subject><ispartof>American journal of ophthalmology, 2006-08, Vol.142 (2), p.332-334</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e4109ba828ab530085ffe2a89337eb8163e0302b5f1d3b216a03d9bf33f41f4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e4109ba828ab530085ffe2a89337eb8163e0302b5f1d3b216a03d9bf33f41f4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18020865$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16876523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darhad, Urtogtah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatsumi, Yasuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujioka, Miyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusuhara, Azusa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Hidetaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negi, Akira</creatorcontrib><title>Agreement of Rebound Tonometer in Measuring Intraocular Pressure With Three Types of Applanation Tonometers</title><title>American journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To evaluate the agreement of iCare rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer, and the influence of the central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements made with these four tonometers in 45 (12 control and 33 glaucomatous or ocular hypertensive) eyes. Clinically relevant experimental study. Tonometer intermethod agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The relations of CCT with absolute IOP values and intertonometer differences were analyzed by linear regression. The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) in IOP readings between iCare and GAT, Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer were 1.40 ± 4.29, 0.00 ± 4.78, and 2.22 ± 4.19 mm Hg, respectively. All tonometries had a marked association with CCT. As the CCT got thicker, iCare considerably overestimated GAT and Tonopen XL. Although influenced by CCT, iCare agrees well with applanation tonometers.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cornea - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Glaucoma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tonometry, Ocular - methods</subject><issn>0002-9394</issn><issn>1879-1891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2L1TAUhoMozp3RH-BGAuLsWvPRpgmuLoMfAyOKXHEZ0vZkJrVNatIK8-9NuRcuuHAVTnjOw8t5EXpFSUkJFe-G0gyhZISIkrCS8PoJ2lHZqIJKRZ-iHSGEFYqr6gJdpjTkUTRV8xxdUCEbUTO-Q7_29xFgAr_gYPF3aMPqe3wIPkywQMTO4y9g0hqdv8e3fokmdOtoIv4WIeVvwD_d8oAPD9mCD48zpM2zn-fReLO44M-u9AI9s2ZM8PL0XqEfHz8cbj4Xd18_3d7s74quUmIpoKJEtUYyadqaEyJra4EZqThvoJVUcCCcsLa2tOcto8IQ3qvWcm4raquWX6Hro3eO4fcKadGTSx2MORKENWkhhZRKiAy--Qccwhp9zqapqCpVkYZuFD1SXQwpRbB6jm4y8VFTorce9KBzD3rrQROmcw955_XJvLYT9OeN0-Ez8PYEmNSZ0UbjO5fOnCSMSLGJ3h85yAf74yDq1DnwHfQuQrfoPrj_xPgLKq2leA</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Nakamura, Makoto</creator><creator>Darhad, Urtogtah</creator><creator>Tatsumi, Yasuko</creator><creator>Fujioka, Miyuki</creator><creator>Kusuhara, Azusa</creator><creator>Maeda, Hidetaka</creator><creator>Negi, Akira</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Agreement of Rebound Tonometer in Measuring Intraocular Pressure With Three Types of Applanation Tonometers</title><author>Nakamura, Makoto ; Darhad, Urtogtah ; Tatsumi, Yasuko ; Fujioka, Miyuki ; Kusuhara, Azusa ; Maeda, Hidetaka ; Negi, Akira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-e4109ba828ab530085ffe2a89337eb8163e0302b5f1d3b216a03d9bf33f41f4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cornea - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Glaucoma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraocular Pressure - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tonometry, Ocular - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Makoto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darhad, Urtogtah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tatsumi, Yasuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujioka, Miyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusuhara, Azusa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maeda, Hidetaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negi, Akira</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakamura, Makoto</au><au>Darhad, Urtogtah</au><au>Tatsumi, Yasuko</au><au>Fujioka, Miyuki</au><au>Kusuhara, Azusa</au><au>Maeda, Hidetaka</au><au>Negi, Akira</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agreement of Rebound Tonometer in Measuring Intraocular Pressure With Three Types of Applanation Tonometers</atitle><jtitle>American journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>332</spage><epage>334</epage><pages>332-334</pages><issn>0002-9394</issn><eissn>1879-1891</eissn><coden>AJOPAA</coden><abstract>To evaluate the agreement of iCare rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer, and the influence of the central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements made with these four tonometers in 45 (12 control and 33 glaucomatous or ocular hypertensive) eyes. Clinically relevant experimental study. Tonometer intermethod agreement was assessed by the Bland-Altman method. The relations of CCT with absolute IOP values and intertonometer differences were analyzed by linear regression. The mean differences (95% limits of agreement) in IOP readings between iCare and GAT, Tonopen XL, and noncontact tonometer were 1.40 ± 4.29, 0.00 ± 4.78, and 2.22 ± 4.19 mm Hg, respectively. All tonometries had a marked association with CCT. As the CCT got thicker, iCare considerably overestimated GAT and Tonopen XL. Although influenced by CCT, iCare agrees well with applanation tonometers.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16876523</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9394
ispartof American journal of ophthalmology, 2006-08, Vol.142 (2), p.332-334
issn 0002-9394
1879-1891
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68688966
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Agreements
Biological and medical sciences
Cornea - pathology
Female
Glaucoma
Glaucoma - physiopathology
Humans
Intraocular Pressure - physiology
Male
Medical research
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Ocular Hypertension - physiopathology
Ophthalmology
Regression analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Tonometry, Ocular - instrumentation
Tonometry, Ocular - methods
title Agreement of Rebound Tonometer in Measuring Intraocular Pressure With Three Types of Applanation Tonometers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A06%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agreement%20of%20Rebound%20Tonometer%20in%20Measuring%20Intraocular%20Pressure%20With%20Three%20Types%20of%20Applanation%20Tonometers&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Nakamura,%20Makoto&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=332&rft.epage=334&rft.pages=332-334&rft.issn=0002-9394&rft.eissn=1879-1891&rft.coden=AJOPAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3556380981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1644940716&rft_id=info:pmid/16876523&rft_els_id=S0002939406003308&rfr_iscdi=true