Practice-based Electronic Billing Systems and Their Impact on Immunization Registries

Many providers rely on electronic billing systems to report information to immunization registries. If billing data fail to capture some administered immunizations, the registry will not reflect a child's true immunization status. Our objective was to assess differences between immunizations ad...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of public health management and practice 2005-11, Vol.11 (6), p.493-499
Hauptverfasser: Kolasa, Maureen S., Cherry, Janet E., Chilkatowsky, Andrew P., Reyes, David P., Lutz, James P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 6
container_start_page 493
container_title Journal of public health management and practice
container_volume 11
creator Kolasa, Maureen S.
Cherry, Janet E.
Chilkatowsky, Andrew P.
Reyes, David P.
Lutz, James P.
description Many providers rely on electronic billing systems to report information to immunization registries. If billing data fail to capture some administered immunizations, the registry will not reflect a child's true immunization status. Our objective was to assess differences between immunizations administered and immunizations reported to a registry from electronic billing systems. Philadelphia's Department of Public Health conducted chart audits in 45 providers serving 50 or more children aged 7-35 months and using electronic billing systems to report data to Philadelphia's immunization registry in 2001-2003. Chart records were compared to registry records to identify immunizations administered in these practices but not reported to the registry. The study practices administered 256,969 immunizations to 20,611 children. Of these 256,969 administered immunizations, 62,213 (24%) were not in the registry. The electronic billing systems submitted data for all administered immunizations for 69% of immunization visits, some but not all for 11% of visits, and none for 20% of visits. Immunizations administered but not billed cost these providers up to $980,477 in lost revenue from administrative fees alone. Improvement of billing data quality would result in more complete registries, higher reported immunization coverage rates, and recovered revenue for immunization providers.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00124784-200511000-00004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68687196</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44971612</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44971612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-6d00d4f13719f1407dbf2d5f9f2f4537239a00f4daec8f2ef73d5894097408073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1PAjEQhhujEUR_gmZP3lanX9vuUQkqCYlG4bwp2xZL9gPbcsBfbxXUw2RmMu_7TvIglGG4wVCKWwBMmJAsJwAcYwDIUwE7QkPMOeQcCDlOMwiZs4KXA3QWwjq5KGf4FA1wQQgjkg7R4sWrOrra5EsVjM4mjamj7ztXZ_euaVy3yt52IZo2ZKrT2fzdOJ9N200yZX2XpnbbuU8VXVpezcqF6J0J5-jEqiaYi0MfocXDZD5-ymfPj9Px3SyvKeUxLzSAZhZTgUuLGQi9tERzW1piGaeC0FIBWKaVqaUlxgqquSxZQsBAgqAjdL3P3fj-Y2tCrFoXatM0qjP9NlSFLGTKLpJQ7oW170PwxlYb71rldxWG6htp9Yu0-kNa_SBN1qvDj-2yNfrfeGCYBJd7wTrE3v_dGSsFLjChX-KNep8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68687196</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practice-based Electronic Billing Systems and Their Impact on Immunization Registries</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kolasa, Maureen S. ; Cherry, Janet E. ; Chilkatowsky, Andrew P. ; Reyes, David P. ; Lutz, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolasa, Maureen S. ; Cherry, Janet E. ; Chilkatowsky, Andrew P. ; Reyes, David P. ; Lutz, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>Many providers rely on electronic billing systems to report information to immunization registries. If billing data fail to capture some administered immunizations, the registry will not reflect a child's true immunization status. Our objective was to assess differences between immunizations administered and immunizations reported to a registry from electronic billing systems. Philadelphia's Department of Public Health conducted chart audits in 45 providers serving 50 or more children aged 7-35 months and using electronic billing systems to report data to Philadelphia's immunization registry in 2001-2003. Chart records were compared to registry records to identify immunizations administered in these practices but not reported to the registry. The study practices administered 256,969 immunizations to 20,611 children. Of these 256,969 administered immunizations, 62,213 (24%) were not in the registry. The electronic billing systems submitted data for all administered immunizations for 69% of immunization visits, some but not all for 11% of visits, and none for 20% of visits. Immunizations administered but not billed cost these providers up to $980,477 in lost revenue from administrative fees alone. Improvement of billing data quality would result in more complete registries, higher reported immunization coverage rates, and recovered revenue for immunization providers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-4659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-5022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200511000-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16224283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Accounts Payable and Receivable ; Child, Preschool ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Immunization Programs ; Infant ; Office Automation ; Philadelphia ; Practice Management, Medical - economics ; Practice Management, Medical - organization &amp; administration ; Registries</subject><ispartof>Journal of public health management and practice, 2005-11, Vol.11 (6), p.493-499</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-6d00d4f13719f1407dbf2d5f9f2f4537239a00f4daec8f2ef73d5894097408073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-6d00d4f13719f1407dbf2d5f9f2f4537239a00f4daec8f2ef73d5894097408073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44971612$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44971612$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16224283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolasa, Maureen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilkatowsky, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>Practice-based Electronic Billing Systems and Their Impact on Immunization Registries</title><title>Journal of public health management and practice</title><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><description>Many providers rely on electronic billing systems to report information to immunization registries. If billing data fail to capture some administered immunizations, the registry will not reflect a child's true immunization status. Our objective was to assess differences between immunizations administered and immunizations reported to a registry from electronic billing systems. Philadelphia's Department of Public Health conducted chart audits in 45 providers serving 50 or more children aged 7-35 months and using electronic billing systems to report data to Philadelphia's immunization registry in 2001-2003. Chart records were compared to registry records to identify immunizations administered in these practices but not reported to the registry. The study practices administered 256,969 immunizations to 20,611 children. Of these 256,969 administered immunizations, 62,213 (24%) were not in the registry. The electronic billing systems submitted data for all administered immunizations for 69% of immunization visits, some but not all for 11% of visits, and none for 20% of visits. Immunizations administered but not billed cost these providers up to $980,477 in lost revenue from administrative fees alone. Improvement of billing data quality would result in more complete registries, higher reported immunization coverage rates, and recovered revenue for immunization providers.</description><subject>Accounts Payable and Receivable</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization Programs</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Office Automation</subject><subject>Philadelphia</subject><subject>Practice Management, Medical - economics</subject><subject>Practice Management, Medical - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Registries</subject><issn>1078-4659</issn><issn>1550-5022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1PAjEQhhujEUR_gmZP3lanX9vuUQkqCYlG4bwp2xZL9gPbcsBfbxXUw2RmMu_7TvIglGG4wVCKWwBMmJAsJwAcYwDIUwE7QkPMOeQcCDlOMwiZs4KXA3QWwjq5KGf4FA1wQQgjkg7R4sWrOrra5EsVjM4mjamj7ztXZ_euaVy3yt52IZo2ZKrT2fzdOJ9N200yZX2XpnbbuU8VXVpezcqF6J0J5-jEqiaYi0MfocXDZD5-ymfPj9Px3SyvKeUxLzSAZhZTgUuLGQi9tERzW1piGaeC0FIBWKaVqaUlxgqquSxZQsBAgqAjdL3P3fj-Y2tCrFoXatM0qjP9NlSFLGTKLpJQ7oW170PwxlYb71rldxWG6htp9Yu0-kNa_SBN1qvDj-2yNfrfeGCYBJd7wTrE3v_dGSsFLjChX-KNep8</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Kolasa, Maureen S.</creator><creator>Cherry, Janet E.</creator><creator>Chilkatowsky, Andrew P.</creator><creator>Reyes, David P.</creator><creator>Lutz, James P.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Practice-based Electronic Billing Systems and Their Impact on Immunization Registries</title><author>Kolasa, Maureen S. ; Cherry, Janet E. ; Chilkatowsky, Andrew P. ; Reyes, David P. ; Lutz, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-6d00d4f13719f1407dbf2d5f9f2f4537239a00f4daec8f2ef73d5894097408073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Accounts Payable and Receivable</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization Programs</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Office Automation</topic><topic>Philadelphia</topic><topic>Practice Management, Medical - economics</topic><topic>Practice Management, Medical - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Registries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolasa, Maureen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherry, Janet E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilkatowsky, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes, David P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lutz, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolasa, Maureen S.</au><au>Cherry, Janet E.</au><au>Chilkatowsky, Andrew P.</au><au>Reyes, David P.</au><au>Lutz, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practice-based Electronic Billing Systems and Their Impact on Immunization Registries</atitle><jtitle>Journal of public health management and practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Public Health Manag Pract</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>493-499</pages><issn>1078-4659</issn><eissn>1550-5022</eissn><abstract>Many providers rely on electronic billing systems to report information to immunization registries. If billing data fail to capture some administered immunizations, the registry will not reflect a child's true immunization status. Our objective was to assess differences between immunizations administered and immunizations reported to a registry from electronic billing systems. Philadelphia's Department of Public Health conducted chart audits in 45 providers serving 50 or more children aged 7-35 months and using electronic billing systems to report data to Philadelphia's immunization registry in 2001-2003. Chart records were compared to registry records to identify immunizations administered in these practices but not reported to the registry. The study practices administered 256,969 immunizations to 20,611 children. Of these 256,969 administered immunizations, 62,213 (24%) were not in the registry. The electronic billing systems submitted data for all administered immunizations for 69% of immunization visits, some but not all for 11% of visits, and none for 20% of visits. Immunizations administered but not billed cost these providers up to $980,477 in lost revenue from administrative fees alone. Improvement of billing data quality would result in more complete registries, higher reported immunization coverage rates, and recovered revenue for immunization providers.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16224283</pmid><doi>10.1097/00124784-200511000-00004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-4659
ispartof Journal of public health management and practice, 2005-11, Vol.11 (6), p.493-499
issn 1078-4659
1550-5022
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68687196
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE
subjects Accounts Payable and Receivable
Child, Preschool
Health technology assessment
Humans
Immunization Programs
Infant
Office Automation
Philadelphia
Practice Management, Medical - economics
Practice Management, Medical - organization & administration
Registries
title Practice-based Electronic Billing Systems and Their Impact on Immunization Registries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A12%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practice-based%20Electronic%20Billing%20Systems%20and%20Their%20Impact%20on%20Immunization%20Registries&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20public%20health%20management%20and%20practice&rft.au=Kolasa,%20Maureen%20S.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=493-499&rft.issn=1078-4659&rft.eissn=1550-5022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00124784-200511000-00004&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44971612%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68687196&rft_id=info:pmid/16224283&rft_jstor_id=44971612&rfr_iscdi=true