Comparison and evaluation of analysis procedures for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid in urine

Several extraction and derivatization procedures were evaluated for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid (MEAA) in urine. MEAA is a metabolite and a biomarker for exposure to 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, a glycol ether with widespread use in various industrial applications and the speci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry 2005-09, Vol.383 (2), p.201-209
Hauptverfasser: B'Hymer, Clayton, Butler, Mary Ann, Cheever, Kenneth L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 209
container_issue 2
container_start_page 201
container_title Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry
container_volume 383
creator B'Hymer, Clayton
Butler, Mary Ann
Cheever, Kenneth L
description Several extraction and derivatization procedures were evaluated for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid (MEAA) in urine. MEAA is a metabolite and a biomarker for exposure to 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, a glycol ether with widespread use in various industrial applications and the specific use as an anti-icing additive in the military jet fuel formulation JP-8. Quantification of glycol ether biomarkers is an active area of analytical research. Various sample preparation procedures were evaluated: liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ethyl acetate yielded the highest recovery, and solid-phase extraction (SPE) gave low recovery of MEAA. Two derivatization procedures were thoroughly investigated and validated, namely, silylation of MEAA with N-methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA), and esterification of MEAA using ethanol. Quantification was performed by gas chromatography (GC) with a mass spectrometer as detector and using a polydimethylsiloxane (HP-1) capillary column. Deuterated 2-butoxyacetic acid (d-BAA) was used as an internal standard. Recovery studies of spiked human urine demonstrated the accuracy and precision of both procedures. The limit of detection (LOD) and other figures of merit for both derivatization procedures will be discussed in detail. Applications of these analysis procedures are also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00216-005-0048-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68678432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68678432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e84264204fafc01185fb6c6c08bfba3fda6df1102ad759f34337db5ee98085313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1vGyEQhlHUqHbc_oBeWk5Rcth0gF2Mj5WVLylSDknOaJaFmGp3sWE3qvPrg7VWepgZBt4ZXj2E_GBwxQCWvxMAZ7IAqHKUqng_IXMmmSq4rODL57nkM3KW0l8AVikmv5JZfqgUX6k52a5Dt8XoU-gp9g21b9iOOPjcBpdvsN0nn-g2BmObMdpEXYh02Fi6G7EfvPPmU33Bi84Om_BvP-VLNHbwhqLxDfU9HaPv7Tdy6rBN9vuxLsjLzfXz-q54eLy9X_95KIzgYiisKg_GoXToDDCmKldLIw2o2tUoXIOycYwBx2ZZrZwohVg2dWXtSoGqBBMLcj7tzdZ3o02D7nwytm2xt2FMWiq5VGX-a0HYJDQxpBSt09voO4x7zUAfMOsJs86Y9QGzfs8zP4_Lx7qzzf-JI9cs-DUJHAaNr5mvfnniwARkd2WpuPgAT12Dyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68678432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison and evaluation of analysis procedures for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid in urine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>B'Hymer, Clayton ; Butler, Mary Ann ; Cheever, Kenneth L</creator><creatorcontrib>B'Hymer, Clayton ; Butler, Mary Ann ; Cheever, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><description>Several extraction and derivatization procedures were evaluated for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid (MEAA) in urine. MEAA is a metabolite and a biomarker for exposure to 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, a glycol ether with widespread use in various industrial applications and the specific use as an anti-icing additive in the military jet fuel formulation JP-8. Quantification of glycol ether biomarkers is an active area of analytical research. Various sample preparation procedures were evaluated: liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ethyl acetate yielded the highest recovery, and solid-phase extraction (SPE) gave low recovery of MEAA. Two derivatization procedures were thoroughly investigated and validated, namely, silylation of MEAA with N-methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA), and esterification of MEAA using ethanol. Quantification was performed by gas chromatography (GC) with a mass spectrometer as detector and using a polydimethylsiloxane (HP-1) capillary column. Deuterated 2-butoxyacetic acid (d-BAA) was used as an internal standard. Recovery studies of spiked human urine demonstrated the accuracy and precision of both procedures. The limit of detection (LOD) and other figures of merit for both derivatization procedures will be discussed in detail. Applications of these analysis procedures are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1618-2642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1618-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00216-005-0048-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16158298</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethanol ; Acetamides ; Acetates - urine ; Alkoxyacetic acids ; Biomarkers - urine ; Deuterium - chemistry ; Esterification ; Ethanol - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Ethanol - chemistry ; Fluoroacetates ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Glycol ethers ; Glycolates - chemistry ; Humans ; Organosilicon Compounds - chemistry ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Time Factors ; Trifluoroacetic Acid - chemistry ; Urinary biomarkers ; Urine - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2005-09, Vol.383 (2), p.201-209</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e84264204fafc01185fb6c6c08bfba3fda6df1102ad759f34337db5ee98085313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e84264204fafc01185fb6c6c08bfba3fda6df1102ad759f34337db5ee98085313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16158298$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>B'Hymer, Clayton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheever, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison and evaluation of analysis procedures for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid in urine</title><title>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</title><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><description>Several extraction and derivatization procedures were evaluated for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid (MEAA) in urine. MEAA is a metabolite and a biomarker for exposure to 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, a glycol ether with widespread use in various industrial applications and the specific use as an anti-icing additive in the military jet fuel formulation JP-8. Quantification of glycol ether biomarkers is an active area of analytical research. Various sample preparation procedures were evaluated: liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ethyl acetate yielded the highest recovery, and solid-phase extraction (SPE) gave low recovery of MEAA. Two derivatization procedures were thoroughly investigated and validated, namely, silylation of MEAA with N-methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA), and esterification of MEAA using ethanol. Quantification was performed by gas chromatography (GC) with a mass spectrometer as detector and using a polydimethylsiloxane (HP-1) capillary column. Deuterated 2-butoxyacetic acid (d-BAA) was used as an internal standard. Recovery studies of spiked human urine demonstrated the accuracy and precision of both procedures. The limit of detection (LOD) and other figures of merit for both derivatization procedures will be discussed in detail. Applications of these analysis procedures are also discussed.</description><subject>2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethanol</subject><subject>Acetamides</subject><subject>Acetates - urine</subject><subject>Alkoxyacetic acids</subject><subject>Biomarkers - urine</subject><subject>Deuterium - chemistry</subject><subject>Esterification</subject><subject>Ethanol - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Ethanol - chemistry</subject><subject>Fluoroacetates</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Glycol ethers</subject><subject>Glycolates - chemistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Organosilicon Compounds - chemistry</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trifluoroacetic Acid - chemistry</subject><subject>Urinary biomarkers</subject><subject>Urine - chemistry</subject><issn>1618-2642</issn><issn>1618-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1vGyEQhlHUqHbc_oBeWk5Rcth0gF2Mj5WVLylSDknOaJaFmGp3sWE3qvPrg7VWepgZBt4ZXj2E_GBwxQCWvxMAZ7IAqHKUqng_IXMmmSq4rODL57nkM3KW0l8AVikmv5JZfqgUX6k52a5Dt8XoU-gp9g21b9iOOPjcBpdvsN0nn-g2BmObMdpEXYh02Fi6G7EfvPPmU33Bi84Om_BvP-VLNHbwhqLxDfU9HaPv7Tdy6rBN9vuxLsjLzfXz-q54eLy9X_95KIzgYiisKg_GoXToDDCmKldLIw2o2tUoXIOycYwBx2ZZrZwohVg2dWXtSoGqBBMLcj7tzdZ3o02D7nwytm2xt2FMWiq5VGX-a0HYJDQxpBSt09voO4x7zUAfMOsJs86Y9QGzfs8zP4_Lx7qzzf-JI9cs-DUJHAaNr5mvfnniwARkd2WpuPgAT12Dyg</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>B'Hymer, Clayton</creator><creator>Butler, Mary Ann</creator><creator>Cheever, Kenneth L</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Comparison and evaluation of analysis procedures for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid in urine</title><author>B'Hymer, Clayton ; Butler, Mary Ann ; Cheever, Kenneth L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-e84264204fafc01185fb6c6c08bfba3fda6df1102ad759f34337db5ee98085313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethanol</topic><topic>Acetamides</topic><topic>Acetates - urine</topic><topic>Alkoxyacetic acids</topic><topic>Biomarkers - urine</topic><topic>Deuterium - chemistry</topic><topic>Esterification</topic><topic>Ethanol - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Ethanol - chemistry</topic><topic>Fluoroacetates</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Glycol ethers</topic><topic>Glycolates - chemistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Organosilicon Compounds - chemistry</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trifluoroacetic Acid - chemistry</topic><topic>Urinary biomarkers</topic><topic>Urine - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>B'Hymer, Clayton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Mary Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheever, Kenneth L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>B'Hymer, Clayton</au><au>Butler, Mary Ann</au><au>Cheever, Kenneth L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison and evaluation of analysis procedures for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid in urine</atitle><jtitle>Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Anal Bioanal Chem</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>383</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>201</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>201-209</pages><issn>1618-2642</issn><eissn>1618-2650</eissn><abstract>Several extraction and derivatization procedures were evaluated for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid (MEAA) in urine. MEAA is a metabolite and a biomarker for exposure to 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol, a glycol ether with widespread use in various industrial applications and the specific use as an anti-icing additive in the military jet fuel formulation JP-8. Quantification of glycol ether biomarkers is an active area of analytical research. Various sample preparation procedures were evaluated: liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) using ethyl acetate yielded the highest recovery, and solid-phase extraction (SPE) gave low recovery of MEAA. Two derivatization procedures were thoroughly investigated and validated, namely, silylation of MEAA with N-methyl-N-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MTBSTFA), and esterification of MEAA using ethanol. Quantification was performed by gas chromatography (GC) with a mass spectrometer as detector and using a polydimethylsiloxane (HP-1) capillary column. Deuterated 2-butoxyacetic acid (d-BAA) was used as an internal standard. Recovery studies of spiked human urine demonstrated the accuracy and precision of both procedures. The limit of detection (LOD) and other figures of merit for both derivatization procedures will be discussed in detail. Applications of these analysis procedures are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>16158298</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00216-005-0048-z</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1618-2642
ispartof Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2005-09, Vol.383 (2), p.201-209
issn 1618-2642
1618-2650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68678432
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects 2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethanol
Acetamides
Acetates - urine
Alkoxyacetic acids
Biomarkers - urine
Deuterium - chemistry
Esterification
Ethanol - analogs & derivatives
Ethanol - chemistry
Fluoroacetates
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry - methods
Glycol ethers
Glycolates - chemistry
Humans
Organosilicon Compounds - chemistry
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Time Factors
Trifluoroacetic Acid - chemistry
Urinary biomarkers
Urine - chemistry
title Comparison and evaluation of analysis procedures for the quantification of (2-methoxyethoxy)acetic acid in urine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A44%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20and%20evaluation%20of%20analysis%20procedures%20for%20the%20quantification%20of%20(2-methoxyethoxy)acetic%20acid%20in%20urine&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20and%20bioanalytical%20chemistry&rft.au=B'Hymer,%20Clayton&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=383&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=201-209&rft.issn=1618-2642&rft.eissn=1618-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00216-005-0048-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68678432%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68678432&rft_id=info:pmid/16158298&rfr_iscdi=true