Assessment of Bone Structure in Renal Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Phalangeal Qualitative Ultrasound and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry

According to the WHO criteria many renal transplant patients display osteopenia or osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the standard method to assess bone mineral density (BMD), is not always available. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the phalanx is an inexpensive, mobile, and radi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation proceedings 2005-09, Vol.37 (7), p.3112-3115
Hauptverfasser: Pajouhi, M., Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M., Larijani, B., Soltani, A., Sedaghat, M., Hamidi, Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3115
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3112
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 37
creator Pajouhi, M.
Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M.
Larijani, B.
Soltani, A.
Sedaghat, M.
Hamidi, Z.
description According to the WHO criteria many renal transplant patients display osteopenia or osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the standard method to assess bone mineral density (BMD), is not always available. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the phalanx is an inexpensive, mobile, and radiation-free diagnostic alternative. Few data address the correlation of this method with DXA in renal transplant patients. This study assessed the value of QUS compared with DXA to detect changes in bone structure among renal transplant recipients. This cross-sectional study of 42 patients (22 women), of mean age 40.2 ± 11.9 years, mean time since transplantation of 2.8 ± 2.9 years, and mean dialysis time of 8.55 ± 10.26 months, included. DXA for bone mineral densitometry of the hip (neck and total femur) and spine as well as QUS to measure the amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SOS) in the phalanx. Using DXA, osteoporosis was observed in 19% of all patients: 9.5% in femoral neck, 9.5% in total region of the femur, and 9.5% in the spinal region. The sensitivity of Ad-SOS for osteoporosis diagnosis in the above regions were 100%, 75%, and 25%, respectively; its specificity was 45%, 43%, and 37%, respectively. There was no significant relation between the two methods for diagnosis of osteoporosis in any region. QUS of phalanx can be recommended for osteoporosis screening in renal transplant patients. Those suspected of osteoporosis should be examined by additional DXA measurements in order to establish the diagnosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.024
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68673608</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134505008535</els_id><sourcerecordid>68673608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ea85abbe74aad035e315aec5bad75bf82b7669aec43aaed1278e4f1d22b28d7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd1u1DAQhSMEokvhFZCFBHcJ_smP6d2yhRapErC0EnfWxJmAV0kcPE6lfQWeGi-7Ai65sCx7vjkzOifLXgheCC7q17siBphoDt4idoXkvCq4LrgsH2QroRuVy1qqh9mK81LkQpXVWfaEaMfTW5bqcXYmaimUkmqV_VwTIdGIU2S-Z2_9hOxLDIuNS0DmJrbFCQZ2-3vgAInaonWzSzxdsI0fZwiO_HRo_vQdEvENE_95gcFFiO4e2d2Q1iW_TB2DdC5TiX3Nt7Bn65Z8mKPzI8awf5o96mEgfHa6z7O79-9uN9f5zcerD5v1TW5LrmOOoCtoW2xKgI6rCpWoAG3VQtdUba9l29T1m_RTKgDshGw0lr3opGyl7ppenWevjrrJwB8LUjSjI4tD2h39QqbWdaNqrhN4cQRt8EQBezMHN0LYG8HNIQmzM_8mYQ5JGK5NSiI1Pz9NWdox1f60nqxPwMsTAGRh6JOQdfSXa5RouD4IXR45TJ7cOwyGbLLfYucC2mg67_5nn19qO7I5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68673608</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Bone Structure in Renal Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Phalangeal Qualitative Ultrasound and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pajouhi, M. ; Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M. ; Larijani, B. ; Soltani, A. ; Sedaghat, M. ; Hamidi, Z.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pajouhi, M. ; Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M. ; Larijani, B. ; Soltani, A. ; Sedaghat, M. ; Hamidi, Z.</creatorcontrib><description>According to the WHO criteria many renal transplant patients display osteopenia or osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the standard method to assess bone mineral density (BMD), is not always available. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the phalanx is an inexpensive, mobile, and radiation-free diagnostic alternative. Few data address the correlation of this method with DXA in renal transplant patients. This study assessed the value of QUS compared with DXA to detect changes in bone structure among renal transplant recipients. This cross-sectional study of 42 patients (22 women), of mean age 40.2 ± 11.9 years, mean time since transplantation of 2.8 ± 2.9 years, and mean dialysis time of 8.55 ± 10.26 months, included. DXA for bone mineral densitometry of the hip (neck and total femur) and spine as well as QUS to measure the amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SOS) in the phalanx. Using DXA, osteoporosis was observed in 19% of all patients: 9.5% in femoral neck, 9.5% in total region of the femur, and 9.5% in the spinal region. The sensitivity of Ad-SOS for osteoporosis diagnosis in the above regions were 100%, 75%, and 25%, respectively; its specificity was 45%, 43%, and 37%, respectively. There was no significant relation between the two methods for diagnosis of osteoporosis in any region. QUS of phalanx can be recommended for osteoporosis screening in renal transplant patients. Those suspected of osteoporosis should be examined by additional DXA measurements in order to establish the diagnosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.024</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16213323</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPPA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology ; Calcaneus - anatomy &amp; histology ; Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental immunology ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects ; Kidney Transplantation - physiology ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Osteoporosis - etiology ; Postoperative Complications ; ROC Curve ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Tissue, organ and graft immunology ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2005-09, Vol.37 (7), p.3112-3115</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ea85abbe74aad035e315aec5bad75bf82b7669aec43aaed1278e4f1d22b28d7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ea85abbe74aad035e315aec5bad75bf82b7669aec43aaed1278e4f1d22b28d7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134505008535$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17317084$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16213323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pajouhi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larijani, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedaghat, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamidi, Z.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Bone Structure in Renal Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Phalangeal Qualitative Ultrasound and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>According to the WHO criteria many renal transplant patients display osteopenia or osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the standard method to assess bone mineral density (BMD), is not always available. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the phalanx is an inexpensive, mobile, and radiation-free diagnostic alternative. Few data address the correlation of this method with DXA in renal transplant patients. This study assessed the value of QUS compared with DXA to detect changes in bone structure among renal transplant recipients. This cross-sectional study of 42 patients (22 women), of mean age 40.2 ± 11.9 years, mean time since transplantation of 2.8 ± 2.9 years, and mean dialysis time of 8.55 ± 10.26 months, included. DXA for bone mineral densitometry of the hip (neck and total femur) and spine as well as QUS to measure the amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SOS) in the phalanx. Using DXA, osteoporosis was observed in 19% of all patients: 9.5% in femoral neck, 9.5% in total region of the femur, and 9.5% in the spinal region. The sensitivity of Ad-SOS for osteoporosis diagnosis in the above regions were 100%, 75%, and 25%, respectively; its specificity was 45%, 43%, and 37%, respectively. There was no significant relation between the two methods for diagnosis of osteoporosis in any region. QUS of phalanx can be recommended for osteoporosis screening in renal transplant patients. Those suspected of osteoporosis should be examined by additional DXA measurements in order to establish the diagnosis.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology</subject><subject>Calcaneus - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd1u1DAQhSMEokvhFZCFBHcJ_smP6d2yhRapErC0EnfWxJmAV0kcPE6lfQWeGi-7Ai65sCx7vjkzOifLXgheCC7q17siBphoDt4idoXkvCq4LrgsH2QroRuVy1qqh9mK81LkQpXVWfaEaMfTW5bqcXYmaimUkmqV_VwTIdGIU2S-Z2_9hOxLDIuNS0DmJrbFCQZ2-3vgAInaonWzSzxdsI0fZwiO_HRo_vQdEvENE_95gcFFiO4e2d2Q1iW_TB2DdC5TiX3Nt7Bn65Z8mKPzI8awf5o96mEgfHa6z7O79-9uN9f5zcerD5v1TW5LrmOOoCtoW2xKgI6rCpWoAG3VQtdUba9l29T1m_RTKgDshGw0lr3opGyl7ppenWevjrrJwB8LUjSjI4tD2h39QqbWdaNqrhN4cQRt8EQBezMHN0LYG8HNIQmzM_8mYQ5JGK5NSiI1Pz9NWdox1f60nqxPwMsTAGRh6JOQdfSXa5RouD4IXR45TJ7cOwyGbLLfYucC2mg67_5nn19qO7I5</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Pajouhi, M.</creator><creator>Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M.</creator><creator>Larijani, B.</creator><creator>Soltani, A.</creator><creator>Sedaghat, M.</creator><creator>Hamidi, Z.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Assessment of Bone Structure in Renal Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Phalangeal Qualitative Ultrasound and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry</title><author>Pajouhi, M. ; Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M. ; Larijani, B. ; Soltani, A. ; Sedaghat, M. ; Hamidi, Z.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-ea85abbe74aad035e315aec5bad75bf82b7669aec43aaed1278e4f1d22b28d7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology</topic><topic>Calcaneus - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pajouhi, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larijani, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltani, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sedaghat, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamidi, Z.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pajouhi, M.</au><au>Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M.</au><au>Larijani, B.</au><au>Soltani, A.</au><au>Sedaghat, M.</au><au>Hamidi, Z.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Bone Structure in Renal Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Phalangeal Qualitative Ultrasound and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3112</spage><epage>3115</epage><pages>3112-3115</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><coden>TRPPA8</coden><abstract>According to the WHO criteria many renal transplant patients display osteopenia or osteoporosis. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the standard method to assess bone mineral density (BMD), is not always available. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the phalanx is an inexpensive, mobile, and radiation-free diagnostic alternative. Few data address the correlation of this method with DXA in renal transplant patients. This study assessed the value of QUS compared with DXA to detect changes in bone structure among renal transplant recipients. This cross-sectional study of 42 patients (22 women), of mean age 40.2 ± 11.9 years, mean time since transplantation of 2.8 ± 2.9 years, and mean dialysis time of 8.55 ± 10.26 months, included. DXA for bone mineral densitometry of the hip (neck and total femur) and spine as well as QUS to measure the amplitude-dependent speed of sound (Ad-SOS) in the phalanx. Using DXA, osteoporosis was observed in 19% of all patients: 9.5% in femoral neck, 9.5% in total region of the femur, and 9.5% in the spinal region. The sensitivity of Ad-SOS for osteoporosis diagnosis in the above regions were 100%, 75%, and 25%, respectively; its specificity was 45%, 43%, and 37%, respectively. There was no significant relation between the two methods for diagnosis of osteoporosis in any region. QUS of phalanx can be recommended for osteoporosis screening in renal transplant patients. Those suspected of osteoporosis should be examined by additional DXA measurements in order to establish the diagnosis.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16213323</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.024</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2005-09, Vol.37 (7), p.3112-3115
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68673608
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Body Mass Index
Bone Diseases, Metabolic - etiology
Calcaneus - anatomy & histology
Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundamental immunology
Humans
Kidney Transplantation - adverse effects
Kidney Transplantation - physiology
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Osteoporosis - etiology
Postoperative Complications
ROC Curve
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Tissue, organ and graft immunology
Ultrasonography
title Assessment of Bone Structure in Renal Transplant Recipients: Comparison of Phalangeal Qualitative Ultrasound and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T00%3A52%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Bone%20Structure%20in%20Renal%20Transplant%20Recipients:%20Comparison%20of%20Phalangeal%20Qualitative%20Ultrasound%20and%20Dual%20X-Ray%20Absorptiometry&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Pajouhi,%20M.&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3112&rft.epage=3115&rft.pages=3112-3115&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft.coden=TRPPA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68673608%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68673608&rft_id=info:pmid/16213323&rft_els_id=S0041134505008535&rfr_iscdi=true