Neodymium: Yttrium aluminum garnet surgical laser versus bipolar electrocoagulation for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs
Objective— To compare use of neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) surgical laser and bipolar electrocoagulation (BEC) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (OVE) in dogs. Study Design— Prospective clinical trial. Animals— Female dogs (n=72). Methods— Laparoscopic OVE by Nd:YAG laser (600 μm optical fib...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary surgery 2005-07, Vol.34 (4), p.353-357 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 357 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 353 |
| container_title | Veterinary surgery |
| container_volume | 34 |
| creator | Nimwegen, S.A. van Swol, C.F.P. van Kirpensteijn, J |
| description | Objective— To compare use of neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) surgical laser and bipolar electrocoagulation (BEC) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (OVE) in dogs.
Study Design— Prospective clinical trial.
Animals— Female dogs (n=72).
Methods— Laparoscopic OVE by Nd:YAG laser (600 μm optical fiber, contact mode) in 36 dogs was compared with laparoscopic OVE by bipolar electro‐coagulating grasping forceps. Dogs were paired (laser, electrocoagulation) matched for breed, age, body weight, obesity, and number of heat cycles. Duration of predetermined surgery times and total surgical time were compared between groups. Occurrence of intra‐ and postoperative complications and their effect on surgical duration were evaluated.
Results— Laser surgery resulted in a higher incidence of intraoperative mesovarial bleeding (12 times; 9 dogs) compared with electrosurgery (4 times; 3 dogs). Use of laser caused a 2 minute delay for transection of the left ovary compared with electrosurgery. Postoperative complication rates and convalescence were similar for both groups.
Conclusions— BEC reduced surgical time and intraoperative mesovarial bleeding compared with laser resection.
Clinical Relevance— Although the laser was effective for laparoscopic OVE, bipolar electrosurgical laparoscopic OVE remained the method of choice. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00054.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68673330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>923817171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-d00e26bb0be65886f654afa410a862230d00adc3200d64eeffba5e083889ef423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCVwCLA7cE_9-EAxKq6BapKoeyFE6Wk0xWXpw4tZOy--3rbVZF4oQP9pP8m6eZeQhhSnKazodtTiVnWSnJz5wRInOSLpHvnqHF08dztCBU0YyLsjxBpzFuE1QKwV-iE6oYZbIkC7S7Bt_sOzt1H_GvcQxJYOOmzvZJbEzoYcRxChtbG4ediRDwPYQ4RVzZwTsTMDiox-BrbzaTM6P1PW59SOxggo-1H2yN_b0JNmG-22Pb48Zv4iv0ojUuwuvje4bWF1--n19mV99WX88_X2W1kEuRNYQAU1VFKlCyKFSrpDCtEZSYQjHGSQJMU_O0hUYJgLatjARS8KIooRWMn6H3s-8Q_N0EcdSdjTU4Z3rwU9SqUEvOOUngu3_ArZ9Cn3rTjEpFaUlpgooZqtNsMUCrh2A7E_aaEn2IRm_1IQF9SEAfotGP0ehdKn1z9J-qDpq_hccsEvBpBv5YB_v_NtY_btaPMhlks4GNI-yeDEz4rdOMS6lvr1f6VlyuLspVoWXi3858a7w2m2CjXt8wQjmhhKu0fv4A5Yy4CQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215611911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neodymium: Yttrium aluminum garnet surgical laser versus bipolar electrocoagulation for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Nimwegen, S.A. van ; Swol, C.F.P. van ; Kirpensteijn, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Nimwegen, S.A. van ; Swol, C.F.P. van ; Kirpensteijn, J</creatorcontrib><description>Objective— To compare use of neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) surgical laser and bipolar electrocoagulation (BEC) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (OVE) in dogs.
Study Design— Prospective clinical trial.
Animals— Female dogs (n=72).
Methods— Laparoscopic OVE by Nd:YAG laser (600 μm optical fiber, contact mode) in 36 dogs was compared with laparoscopic OVE by bipolar electro‐coagulating grasping forceps. Dogs were paired (laser, electrocoagulation) matched for breed, age, body weight, obesity, and number of heat cycles. Duration of predetermined surgery times and total surgical time were compared between groups. Occurrence of intra‐ and postoperative complications and their effect on surgical duration were evaluated.
Results— Laser surgery resulted in a higher incidence of intraoperative mesovarial bleeding (12 times; 9 dogs) compared with electrosurgery (4 times; 3 dogs). Use of laser caused a 2 minute delay for transection of the left ovary compared with electrosurgery. Postoperative complication rates and convalescence were similar for both groups.
Conclusions— BEC reduced surgical time and intraoperative mesovarial bleeding compared with laser resection.
Clinical Relevance— Although the laser was effective for laparoscopic OVE, bipolar electrosurgical laparoscopic OVE remained the method of choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-3499</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-950X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00054.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16212590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>animal age ; animal health ; Animals ; blood coagulation ; body weight ; clinical trials ; Comparative studies ; complications ; dog ; dog breeds ; Dogs ; Dogs - surgery ; duration ; electric current ; electrocoagulation ; Electrocoagulation - methods ; Electrocoagulation - veterinary ; estrous cycle ; Female ; females ; Hemorrhage ; Hemorrhage - epidemiology ; Hemorrhage - veterinary ; Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Intraoperative Complications - veterinary ; laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Laparoscopy - veterinary ; Laser Therapy - methods ; Laser Therapy - veterinary ; Lasers ; Medical procedures ; mesovarial hemorrhage ; Nd:YAG laser ; obesity ; ovariectomy ; Ovariectomy - methods ; Ovariectomy - veterinary ; postoperative complications ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - veterinary ; Prospective Studies ; Random Allocation ; Reproductive system ; Surgery ; surgical time ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Veterinary surgery, 2005-07, Vol.34 (4), p.353-357</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 by The American College of Veterinary Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-d00e26bb0be65886f654afa410a862230d00adc3200d64eeffba5e083889ef423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-d00e26bb0be65886f654afa410a862230d00adc3200d64eeffba5e083889ef423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1532-950X.2005.00054.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1532-950X.2005.00054.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16212590$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nimwegen, S.A. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swol, C.F.P. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirpensteijn, J</creatorcontrib><title>Neodymium: Yttrium aluminum garnet surgical laser versus bipolar electrocoagulation for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs</title><title>Veterinary surgery</title><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><description>Objective— To compare use of neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) surgical laser and bipolar electrocoagulation (BEC) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (OVE) in dogs.
Study Design— Prospective clinical trial.
Animals— Female dogs (n=72).
Methods— Laparoscopic OVE by Nd:YAG laser (600 μm optical fiber, contact mode) in 36 dogs was compared with laparoscopic OVE by bipolar electro‐coagulating grasping forceps. Dogs were paired (laser, electrocoagulation) matched for breed, age, body weight, obesity, and number of heat cycles. Duration of predetermined surgery times and total surgical time were compared between groups. Occurrence of intra‐ and postoperative complications and their effect on surgical duration were evaluated.
Results— Laser surgery resulted in a higher incidence of intraoperative mesovarial bleeding (12 times; 9 dogs) compared with electrosurgery (4 times; 3 dogs). Use of laser caused a 2 minute delay for transection of the left ovary compared with electrosurgery. Postoperative complication rates and convalescence were similar for both groups.
Conclusions— BEC reduced surgical time and intraoperative mesovarial bleeding compared with laser resection.
Clinical Relevance— Although the laser was effective for laparoscopic OVE, bipolar electrosurgical laparoscopic OVE remained the method of choice.</description><subject>animal age</subject><subject>animal health</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>blood coagulation</subject><subject>body weight</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>dog</subject><subject>dog breeds</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Dogs - surgery</subject><subject>duration</subject><subject>electric current</subject><subject>electrocoagulation</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation - veterinary</subject><subject>estrous cycle</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>females</subject><subject>Hemorrhage</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - veterinary</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Intraoperative Complications - veterinary</subject><subject>laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - veterinary</subject><subject>Laser Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Laser Therapy - veterinary</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medical procedures</subject><subject>mesovarial hemorrhage</subject><subject>Nd:YAG laser</subject><subject>obesity</subject><subject>ovariectomy</subject><subject>Ovariectomy - methods</subject><subject>Ovariectomy - veterinary</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - veterinary</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Reproductive system</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>surgical time</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0161-3499</issn><issn>1532-950X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxS0EotvCVwCLA7cE_9-EAxKq6BapKoeyFE6Wk0xWXpw4tZOy--3rbVZF4oQP9pP8m6eZeQhhSnKazodtTiVnWSnJz5wRInOSLpHvnqHF08dztCBU0YyLsjxBpzFuE1QKwV-iE6oYZbIkC7S7Bt_sOzt1H_GvcQxJYOOmzvZJbEzoYcRxChtbG4ediRDwPYQ4RVzZwTsTMDiox-BrbzaTM6P1PW59SOxggo-1H2yN_b0JNmG-22Pb48Zv4iv0ojUuwuvje4bWF1--n19mV99WX88_X2W1kEuRNYQAU1VFKlCyKFSrpDCtEZSYQjHGSQJMU_O0hUYJgLatjARS8KIooRWMn6H3s-8Q_N0EcdSdjTU4Z3rwU9SqUEvOOUngu3_ArZ9Cn3rTjEpFaUlpgooZqtNsMUCrh2A7E_aaEn2IRm_1IQF9SEAfotGP0ehdKn1z9J-qDpq_hccsEvBpBv5YB_v_NtY_btaPMhlks4GNI-yeDEz4rdOMS6lvr1f6VlyuLspVoWXi3858a7w2m2CjXt8wQjmhhKu0fv4A5Yy4CQ</recordid><startdate>200507</startdate><enddate>200507</enddate><creator>Nimwegen, S.A. van</creator><creator>Swol, C.F.P. van</creator><creator>Kirpensteijn, J</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200507</creationdate><title>Neodymium: Yttrium aluminum garnet surgical laser versus bipolar electrocoagulation for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs</title><author>Nimwegen, S.A. van ; Swol, C.F.P. van ; Kirpensteijn, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4574-d00e26bb0be65886f654afa410a862230d00adc3200d64eeffba5e083889ef423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>animal age</topic><topic>animal health</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>blood coagulation</topic><topic>body weight</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>dog</topic><topic>dog breeds</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Dogs - surgery</topic><topic>duration</topic><topic>electric current</topic><topic>electrocoagulation</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation - veterinary</topic><topic>estrous cycle</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>females</topic><topic>Hemorrhage</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - veterinary</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Intraoperative Complications - veterinary</topic><topic>laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - veterinary</topic><topic>Laser Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Laser Therapy - veterinary</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medical procedures</topic><topic>mesovarial hemorrhage</topic><topic>Nd:YAG laser</topic><topic>obesity</topic><topic>ovariectomy</topic><topic>Ovariectomy - methods</topic><topic>Ovariectomy - veterinary</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - veterinary</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Reproductive system</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>surgical time</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nimwegen, S.A. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swol, C.F.P. van</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirpensteijn, J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nimwegen, S.A. van</au><au>Swol, C.F.P. van</au><au>Kirpensteijn, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neodymium: Yttrium aluminum garnet surgical laser versus bipolar electrocoagulation for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Surg</addtitle><date>2005-07</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>353</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>353-357</pages><issn>0161-3499</issn><eissn>1532-950X</eissn><abstract>Objective— To compare use of neodymium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) surgical laser and bipolar electrocoagulation (BEC) for laparoscopic ovariectomy (OVE) in dogs.
Study Design— Prospective clinical trial.
Animals— Female dogs (n=72).
Methods— Laparoscopic OVE by Nd:YAG laser (600 μm optical fiber, contact mode) in 36 dogs was compared with laparoscopic OVE by bipolar electro‐coagulating grasping forceps. Dogs were paired (laser, electrocoagulation) matched for breed, age, body weight, obesity, and number of heat cycles. Duration of predetermined surgery times and total surgical time were compared between groups. Occurrence of intra‐ and postoperative complications and their effect on surgical duration were evaluated.
Results— Laser surgery resulted in a higher incidence of intraoperative mesovarial bleeding (12 times; 9 dogs) compared with electrosurgery (4 times; 3 dogs). Use of laser caused a 2 minute delay for transection of the left ovary compared with electrosurgery. Postoperative complication rates and convalescence were similar for both groups.
Conclusions— BEC reduced surgical time and intraoperative mesovarial bleeding compared with laser resection.
Clinical Relevance— Although the laser was effective for laparoscopic OVE, bipolar electrosurgical laparoscopic OVE remained the method of choice.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>16212590</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00054.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0161-3499 |
| ispartof | Veterinary surgery, 2005-07, Vol.34 (4), p.353-357 |
| issn | 0161-3499 1532-950X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68673330 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
| subjects | animal age animal health Animals blood coagulation body weight clinical trials Comparative studies complications dog dog breeds Dogs Dogs - surgery duration electric current electrocoagulation Electrocoagulation - methods Electrocoagulation - veterinary estrous cycle Female females Hemorrhage Hemorrhage - epidemiology Hemorrhage - veterinary Intraoperative Complications - epidemiology Intraoperative Complications - veterinary laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods Laparoscopy - veterinary Laser Therapy - methods Laser Therapy - veterinary Lasers Medical procedures mesovarial hemorrhage Nd:YAG laser obesity ovariectomy Ovariectomy - methods Ovariectomy - veterinary postoperative complications Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - veterinary Prospective Studies Random Allocation Reproductive system Surgery surgical time Time Factors |
| title | Neodymium: Yttrium aluminum garnet surgical laser versus bipolar electrocoagulation for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A05%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neodymium:%20Yttrium%20aluminum%20garnet%20surgical%20laser%20versus%20bipolar%20electrocoagulation%20for%20laparoscopic%20ovariectomy%20in%20dogs&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20surgery&rft.au=Nimwegen,%20S.A.%20van&rft.date=2005-07&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=353&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=353-357&rft.issn=0161-3499&rft.eissn=1532-950X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2005.00054.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E923817171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215611911&rft_id=info:pmid/16212590&rfr_iscdi=true |