Predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic agents in malignancy
Key Points The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy prolongs patient survival in specific types of cancer. Objective response is a poor estimate of probable benefit from the addition of anti- vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) therapy in colorectal cancer. The cost and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Cancer 2006-08, Vol.6 (8), p.626-635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 635 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 626 |
container_title | Nature reviews. Cancer |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Jubb, Adrian M. Oates, Adam J. Holden, Scott Koeppen, Hartmut |
description | Key Points
The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy prolongs patient survival in specific types of cancer.
Objective response is a poor estimate of probable benefit from the addition of anti- vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) therapy in colorectal cancer.
The cost and choice of cancer therapy are increasing dramatically. Therefore, a high likelihood of benefit is needed to justify the use of a targeted anti-angiogenic agent.
Anti-angiogenic therapies induce a number of biological and physiological changes in preclinical models of cancer. Similar observations have been reported in human disease, and might function as early indicators of survival benefit.
Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy has been noted in human and animal models. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance will be essential when choosing second-line therapies.
The optimal biological dose of anti-angiogenic therapy is likely to be lower than the maximum tolerated dose used for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Biomarkers could be needed to guide adequate dose selection and maximize potential benefit.
A better understanding of the mechanism of anti-angiogenic therapy is essential to guide the development of biomarkers, drug choice and dosage, and improve survival.
Biomarkers used in determining the response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. Which anti-angiogenic biomarkers might prove useful for identifying initial drug choice, appropriate dosing, early clinical benefit, emerging resistance and second-line treatments?
A high probability of benefit is desirable to justify the choice of anti-angiogenic therapy from an ever-expanding list of expensive new anticancer agents. However, biomarkers of response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. This discussion will focus on both preclinical and clinical research to identify biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapies that can inform dosing, early clinical benefit, initial drug choice, emerging resistance and second-line treatments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/nrc1946 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68669172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A185616784</galeid><sourcerecordid>A185616784</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a273fa25ce105c37248811dc29a58b79825c92e11e70c26b550c327586b9c3ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9rFTEQxYMotlbxG8iiUH3Zmtls_oEvpbQqFPRBwbeQzZ3dpuwmNck-9Nub671YWwTJw4TMb85wcgh5CfQEKFPvQ3Kge_GIHEIv-xakUI__3PmPA_Is52tKQYCEp-QAhGJSSzgkH74m3HhXfJiaAQOOvjRjiktjQ_GtDZOPEwbvGltLyY0PzWJnPwUb3O1z8mS0c8YX-3pEvl-cfzv71F5--fj57PSydZz1pbWdZKPtuEOg3DHZ9UoBbFynLVeD1Kq2dIcAKKnrxMA5dayTXIlBO4YjOyLHO92bFH-umItZfHY4zzZgXLMRSggNsvsvCJpRSlVfwdcPwOu4plBNmLqY6h64qNCbHTTZGY0PYyzJuq2iOQXFBQj5W-rkH1Q9G1y8i9svre_3Bo7_GrhCO5erHOe1-BjyffDtDnQp5pxwNDfJLzbdGqBmG7vZx17JV3s767Dg5o7b51yBdzsg11aYMN35faj1Cxn1sNs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>275094156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic agents in malignancy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><creator>Jubb, Adrian M. ; Oates, Adam J. ; Holden, Scott ; Koeppen, Hartmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Jubb, Adrian M. ; Oates, Adam J. ; Holden, Scott ; Koeppen, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><description>Key Points
The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy prolongs patient survival in specific types of cancer.
Objective response is a poor estimate of probable benefit from the addition of anti- vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) therapy in colorectal cancer.
The cost and choice of cancer therapy are increasing dramatically. Therefore, a high likelihood of benefit is needed to justify the use of a targeted anti-angiogenic agent.
Anti-angiogenic therapies induce a number of biological and physiological changes in preclinical models of cancer. Similar observations have been reported in human disease, and might function as early indicators of survival benefit.
Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy has been noted in human and animal models. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance will be essential when choosing second-line therapies.
The optimal biological dose of anti-angiogenic therapy is likely to be lower than the maximum tolerated dose used for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Biomarkers could be needed to guide adequate dose selection and maximize potential benefit.
A better understanding of the mechanism of anti-angiogenic therapy is essential to guide the development of biomarkers, drug choice and dosage, and improve survival.
Biomarkers used in determining the response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. Which anti-angiogenic biomarkers might prove useful for identifying initial drug choice, appropriate dosing, early clinical benefit, emerging resistance and second-line treatments?
A high probability of benefit is desirable to justify the choice of anti-angiogenic therapy from an ever-expanding list of expensive new anticancer agents. However, biomarkers of response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. This discussion will focus on both preclinical and clinical research to identify biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapies that can inform dosing, early clinical benefit, initial drug choice, emerging resistance and second-line treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1474-175X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-1768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/nrc1946</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16837971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Antimitotic agents ; Antineoplastic agents ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cancer ; Cancer Research ; Diagnosis ; Dosage and administration ; Drug therapy ; Humans ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - metabolism ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Physiological aspects ; Predictive Value of Tests ; review-article ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews. Cancer, 2006-08, Vol.6 (8), p.626-635</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2006</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2006 Nature Publishing Group</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a273fa25ce105c37248811dc29a58b79825c92e11e70c26b550c327586b9c3ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a273fa25ce105c37248811dc29a58b79825c92e11e70c26b550c327586b9c3ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/nrc1946$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/nrc1946$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16837971$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jubb, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koeppen, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic agents in malignancy</title><title>Nature reviews. Cancer</title><addtitle>Nat Rev Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Cancer</addtitle><description>Key Points
The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy prolongs patient survival in specific types of cancer.
Objective response is a poor estimate of probable benefit from the addition of anti- vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) therapy in colorectal cancer.
The cost and choice of cancer therapy are increasing dramatically. Therefore, a high likelihood of benefit is needed to justify the use of a targeted anti-angiogenic agent.
Anti-angiogenic therapies induce a number of biological and physiological changes in preclinical models of cancer. Similar observations have been reported in human disease, and might function as early indicators of survival benefit.
Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy has been noted in human and animal models. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance will be essential when choosing second-line therapies.
The optimal biological dose of anti-angiogenic therapy is likely to be lower than the maximum tolerated dose used for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Biomarkers could be needed to guide adequate dose selection and maximize potential benefit.
A better understanding of the mechanism of anti-angiogenic therapy is essential to guide the development of biomarkers, drug choice and dosage, and improve survival.
Biomarkers used in determining the response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. Which anti-angiogenic biomarkers might prove useful for identifying initial drug choice, appropriate dosing, early clinical benefit, emerging resistance and second-line treatments?
A high probability of benefit is desirable to justify the choice of anti-angiogenic therapy from an ever-expanding list of expensive new anticancer agents. However, biomarkers of response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. This discussion will focus on both preclinical and clinical research to identify biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapies that can inform dosing, early clinical benefit, initial drug choice, emerging resistance and second-line treatments.</description><subject>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antimitotic agents</subject><subject>Antineoplastic agents</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer Research</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>review-article</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><issn>1474-175X</issn><issn>1474-1768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9rFTEQxYMotlbxG8iiUH3Zmtls_oEvpbQqFPRBwbeQzZ3dpuwmNck-9Nub671YWwTJw4TMb85wcgh5CfQEKFPvQ3Kge_GIHEIv-xakUI__3PmPA_Is52tKQYCEp-QAhGJSSzgkH74m3HhXfJiaAQOOvjRjiktjQ_GtDZOPEwbvGltLyY0PzWJnPwUb3O1z8mS0c8YX-3pEvl-cfzv71F5--fj57PSydZz1pbWdZKPtuEOg3DHZ9UoBbFynLVeD1Kq2dIcAKKnrxMA5dayTXIlBO4YjOyLHO92bFH-umItZfHY4zzZgXLMRSggNsvsvCJpRSlVfwdcPwOu4plBNmLqY6h64qNCbHTTZGY0PYyzJuq2iOQXFBQj5W-rkH1Q9G1y8i9svre_3Bo7_GrhCO5erHOe1-BjyffDtDnQp5pxwNDfJLzbdGqBmG7vZx17JV3s767Dg5o7b51yBdzsg11aYMN35faj1Cxn1sNs</recordid><startdate>20060801</startdate><enddate>20060801</enddate><creator>Jubb, Adrian M.</creator><creator>Oates, Adam J.</creator><creator>Holden, Scott</creator><creator>Koeppen, Hartmut</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060801</creationdate><title>Predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic agents in malignancy</title><author>Jubb, Adrian M. ; Oates, Adam J. ; Holden, Scott ; Koeppen, Hartmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-a273fa25ce105c37248811dc29a58b79825c92e11e70c26b550c327586b9c3ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antimitotic agents</topic><topic>Antineoplastic agents</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer Research</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>review-article</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jubb, Adrian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oates, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holden, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koeppen, Hartmut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews. Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jubb, Adrian M.</au><au>Oates, Adam J.</au><au>Holden, Scott</au><au>Koeppen, Hartmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic agents in malignancy</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews. Cancer</jtitle><stitle>Nat Rev Cancer</stitle><addtitle>Nat Rev Cancer</addtitle><date>2006-08-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>626</spage><epage>635</epage><pages>626-635</pages><issn>1474-175X</issn><eissn>1474-1768</eissn><abstract>Key Points
The addition of anti-angiogenic agents to cytotoxic chemotherapy prolongs patient survival in specific types of cancer.
Objective response is a poor estimate of probable benefit from the addition of anti- vascular-endothelial-growth-factor (VEGF) therapy in colorectal cancer.
The cost and choice of cancer therapy are increasing dramatically. Therefore, a high likelihood of benefit is needed to justify the use of a targeted anti-angiogenic agent.
Anti-angiogenic therapies induce a number of biological and physiological changes in preclinical models of cancer. Similar observations have been reported in human disease, and might function as early indicators of survival benefit.
Resistance to anti-VEGF therapy has been noted in human and animal models. Understanding the mechanisms of resistance will be essential when choosing second-line therapies.
The optimal biological dose of anti-angiogenic therapy is likely to be lower than the maximum tolerated dose used for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Biomarkers could be needed to guide adequate dose selection and maximize potential benefit.
A better understanding of the mechanism of anti-angiogenic therapy is essential to guide the development of biomarkers, drug choice and dosage, and improve survival.
Biomarkers used in determining the response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. Which anti-angiogenic biomarkers might prove useful for identifying initial drug choice, appropriate dosing, early clinical benefit, emerging resistance and second-line treatments?
A high probability of benefit is desirable to justify the choice of anti-angiogenic therapy from an ever-expanding list of expensive new anticancer agents. However, biomarkers of response to cytotoxic agents are not optimal for predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic drugs. This discussion will focus on both preclinical and clinical research to identify biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapies that can inform dosing, early clinical benefit, initial drug choice, emerging resistance and second-line treatments.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>16837971</pmid><doi>10.1038/nrc1946</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1474-175X |
ispartof | Nature reviews. Cancer, 2006-08, Vol.6 (8), p.626-635 |
issn | 1474-175X 1474-1768 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68669172 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Journals; Springer Nature - Connect here FIRST to enable access |
subjects | Angiogenesis Inhibitors - therapeutic use Antimitotic agents Antineoplastic agents Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cancer Cancer Research Diagnosis Dosage and administration Drug therapy Humans Neoplasms - drug therapy Neoplasms - metabolism Neoplasms - pathology Physiological aspects Predictive Value of Tests review-article Treatment Outcome Vascular endothelial growth factor |
title | Predicting benefit from anti-angiogenic agents in malignancy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T00%3A53%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20benefit%20from%20anti-angiogenic%20agents%20in%20malignancy&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews.%20Cancer&rft.au=Jubb,%20Adrian%20M.&rft.date=2006-08-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=626&rft.epage=635&rft.pages=626-635&rft.issn=1474-175X&rft.eissn=1474-1768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/nrc1946&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA185616784%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=275094156&rft_id=info:pmid/16837971&rft_galeid=A185616784&rfr_iscdi=true |