The value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy with SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible

To appraise the value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy using SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible (COM). In a prospective study the pattern of tracer uptake was investigated using 2 diagnostic methods in 42 patients. Results were compare...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2006-09, Vol.35 (9), p.809-816
Hauptverfasser: Hakim, S.G., Bruecker, C.W.R., Jacobsen, H.Ch, Hermes, D., Lauer, I., Eckerle, S., Froehlich, A., Sieg, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 816
container_issue 9
container_start_page 809
container_title International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 35
creator Hakim, S.G.
Bruecker, C.W.R.
Jacobsen, H.Ch
Hermes, D.
Lauer, I.
Eckerle, S.
Froehlich, A.
Sieg, P.
description To appraise the value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy using SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible (COM). In a prospective study the pattern of tracer uptake was investigated using 2 diagnostic methods in 42 patients. Results were compared with histology and radiographs as well as clinical and laboratory parameters. The use of FDG-PET in the primary diagnosis of COM resulted in a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 77.7%. The sensitivity of SPECT was 84% and the specificity 33.3%. During the follow-up period of these patients the sensitivity of SPECT increased to 93.7%, while the specificity decreased (6.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for this follow-up group were 62.5 and 80%, respectively. Because of its high sensitivity, SPECT is vastly superior to other diagnostic methods in initiating treatment. In the follow-up period it might be replaced by FDG-PET, which reflects the disease course better and indicates the time of clinical remission.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68664965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502706001937</els_id><sourcerecordid>68664965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-f8c5b4716813ed6f8e19bc6de2037568405cba9f156845789b0f5d74446415433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURSMEokPhB1ggb2CX8BwnTiyxQdNpqVSJSgxry3FeOh4ldrCTVvMd_DAOE6m7ruzFOdd-7ybJRwoZBcq_HjNzdEOWA_AMWAa5eJVsKBMiBcjhdbIBATQtIa8uknchHAFAsLp6m1xQXucCGN8kf_cHJI-qn5G4jlxf3aT3uz1RtiWNs0iCNnYyD16NhxN5MtOB_LrfbffEWDJFcfRmUP5EWqMerAsm_Dc71_fuKZ3HJXJUk0E7hbOtD95Zo4kLE7rhhL2ZohSxJW2Isml6fJ-86VQf8MN6Xia_r3f77Y_07ufN7fb7XapZXUxpV-uyKao4C2XY8q5GKhrNW8yBVSWvCyh1o0RHl3tZ1aKBrmyroih4QcuCscvkyzl39O7PjGGSgwka-15ZdHOQvOa8ELyMYH4GtXcheOzkOrikIJcq5FEuVcilCglMxiqi9GlNn5sB22dl3X0EPq-AClr1nVdWm_DMVULkebG8_u3MYdzFo0EvYytoNbbGo55k68xL__gHh5WnzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68664965</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy with SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Hakim, S.G. ; Bruecker, C.W.R. ; Jacobsen, H.Ch ; Hermes, D. ; Lauer, I. ; Eckerle, S. ; Froehlich, A. ; Sieg, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hakim, S.G. ; Bruecker, C.W.R. ; Jacobsen, H.Ch ; Hermes, D. ; Lauer, I. ; Eckerle, S. ; Froehlich, A. ; Sieg, P.</creatorcontrib><description>To appraise the value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy using SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible (COM). In a prospective study the pattern of tracer uptake was investigated using 2 diagnostic methods in 42 patients. Results were compared with histology and radiographs as well as clinical and laboratory parameters. The use of FDG-PET in the primary diagnosis of COM resulted in a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 77.7%. The sensitivity of SPECT was 84% and the specificity 33.3%. During the follow-up period of these patients the sensitivity of SPECT increased to 93.7%, while the specificity decreased (6.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for this follow-up group were 62.5 and 80%, respectively. Because of its high sensitivity, SPECT is vastly superior to other diagnostic methods in initiating treatment. In the follow-up period it might be replaced by FDG-PET, which reflects the disease course better and indicates the time of clinical remission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16829036</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJOSE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bacterial arthritis and osteitis ; Bacterial diseases ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Dentistry ; diagnosis ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 ; follow-up ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; mandible ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Mandible - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; osteomyelitis ; Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging ; Osteomyelitis - surgery ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; PET ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prospective Studies ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; SPECT ; Time Factors ; Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2006-09, Vol.35 (9), p.809-816</ispartof><rights>2006 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-f8c5b4716813ed6f8e19bc6de2037568405cba9f156845789b0f5d74446415433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-f8c5b4716813ed6f8e19bc6de2037568405cba9f156845789b0f5d74446415433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17992245$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16829036$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hakim, S.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruecker, C.W.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, H.Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermes, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerle, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froehlich, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, P.</creatorcontrib><title>The value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy with SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>To appraise the value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy using SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible (COM). In a prospective study the pattern of tracer uptake was investigated using 2 diagnostic methods in 42 patients. Results were compared with histology and radiographs as well as clinical and laboratory parameters. The use of FDG-PET in the primary diagnosis of COM resulted in a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 77.7%. The sensitivity of SPECT was 84% and the specificity 33.3%. During the follow-up period of these patients the sensitivity of SPECT increased to 93.7%, while the specificity decreased (6.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for this follow-up group were 62.5 and 80%, respectively. Because of its high sensitivity, SPECT is vastly superior to other diagnostic methods in initiating treatment. In the follow-up period it might be replaced by FDG-PET, which reflects the disease course better and indicates the time of clinical remission.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bacterial arthritis and osteitis</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>diagnosis</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</subject><subject>follow-up</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>mandible</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>osteomyelitis</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteomyelitis - surgery</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>SPECT</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFu1DAURSMEokPhB1ggb2CX8BwnTiyxQdNpqVSJSgxry3FeOh4ldrCTVvMd_DAOE6m7ruzFOdd-7ybJRwoZBcq_HjNzdEOWA_AMWAa5eJVsKBMiBcjhdbIBATQtIa8uknchHAFAsLp6m1xQXucCGN8kf_cHJI-qn5G4jlxf3aT3uz1RtiWNs0iCNnYyD16NhxN5MtOB_LrfbffEWDJFcfRmUP5EWqMerAsm_Dc71_fuKZ3HJXJUk0E7hbOtD95Zo4kLE7rhhL2ZohSxJW2Isml6fJ-86VQf8MN6Xia_r3f77Y_07ufN7fb7XapZXUxpV-uyKao4C2XY8q5GKhrNW8yBVSWvCyh1o0RHl3tZ1aKBrmyroih4QcuCscvkyzl39O7PjGGSgwka-15ZdHOQvOa8ELyMYH4GtXcheOzkOrikIJcq5FEuVcilCglMxiqi9GlNn5sB22dl3X0EPq-AClr1nVdWm_DMVULkebG8_u3MYdzFo0EvYytoNbbGo55k68xL__gHh5WnzQ</recordid><startdate>20060901</startdate><enddate>20060901</enddate><creator>Hakim, S.G.</creator><creator>Bruecker, C.W.R.</creator><creator>Jacobsen, H.Ch</creator><creator>Hermes, D.</creator><creator>Lauer, I.</creator><creator>Eckerle, S.</creator><creator>Froehlich, A.</creator><creator>Sieg, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060901</creationdate><title>The value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy with SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible</title><author>Hakim, S.G. ; Bruecker, C.W.R. ; Jacobsen, H.Ch ; Hermes, D. ; Lauer, I. ; Eckerle, S. ; Froehlich, A. ; Sieg, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-f8c5b4716813ed6f8e19bc6de2037568405cba9f156845789b0f5d74446415433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bacterial arthritis and osteitis</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>diagnosis</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Fluorodeoxyglucose F18</topic><topic>follow-up</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>mandible</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>osteomyelitis</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteomyelitis - surgery</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>SPECT</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hakim, S.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruecker, C.W.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsen, H.Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermes, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauer, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerle, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Froehlich, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sieg, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hakim, S.G.</au><au>Bruecker, C.W.R.</au><au>Jacobsen, H.Ch</au><au>Hermes, D.</au><au>Lauer, I.</au><au>Eckerle, S.</au><au>Froehlich, A.</au><au>Sieg, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy with SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2006-09-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>809</spage><epage>816</epage><pages>809-816</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><coden>IJOSE9</coden><abstract>To appraise the value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy using SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible (COM). In a prospective study the pattern of tracer uptake was investigated using 2 diagnostic methods in 42 patients. Results were compared with histology and radiographs as well as clinical and laboratory parameters. The use of FDG-PET in the primary diagnosis of COM resulted in a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 77.7%. The sensitivity of SPECT was 84% and the specificity 33.3%. During the follow-up period of these patients the sensitivity of SPECT increased to 93.7%, while the specificity decreased (6.6%). The sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for this follow-up group were 62.5 and 80%, respectively. Because of its high sensitivity, SPECT is vastly superior to other diagnostic methods in initiating treatment. In the follow-up period it might be replaced by FDG-PET, which reflects the disease course better and indicates the time of clinical remission.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16829036</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.029</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0901-5027
ispartof International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2006-09, Vol.35 (9), p.809-816
issn 0901-5027
1399-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68664965
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bacterial arthritis and osteitis
Bacterial diseases
Biological and medical sciences
Chronic Disease
Dentistry
diagnosis
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
follow-up
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
mandible
Mandible - diagnostic imaging
Mandible - surgery
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
osteomyelitis
Osteomyelitis - diagnostic imaging
Osteomyelitis - surgery
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology
PET
Positron-Emission Tomography
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Radiopharmaceuticals
Sensitivity and Specificity
SPECT
Time Factors
Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
title The value of FDG-PET and bone scintigraphy with SPECT in the primary diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic osteomyelitis of the mandible
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A01%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20value%20of%20FDG-PET%20and%20bone%20scintigraphy%20with%20SPECT%20in%20the%20primary%20diagnosis%20and%20follow-up%20of%20patients%20with%20chronic%20osteomyelitis%20of%20the%20mandible&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Hakim,%20S.G.&rft.date=2006-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=809&rft.epage=816&rft.pages=809-816&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft.coden=IJOSE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68664965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68664965&rft_id=info:pmid/16829036&rft_els_id=S0901502706001937&rfr_iscdi=true