Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials

Using a transparent motion paradigm, [Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., & Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137–151; Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & P...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vision research (Oxford) 2005-11, Vol.45 (24), p.3004-3014
Hauptverfasser: Khoe, W., Mitchell, J.F., Reynolds, J.H., Hillyard, S.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3014
container_issue 24
container_start_page 3004
container_title Vision research (Oxford)
container_volume 45
creator Khoe, W.
Mitchell, J.F.
Reynolds, J.H.
Hillyard, S.A.
description Using a transparent motion paradigm, [Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., & Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137–151; Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion, Journal of Experimental Psychological: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 488–505] found that when attention is endogenously directed to one surface, observers can more reliably report the direction of a brief translation of the cued than the uncued surface. Using a similar design [Reynolds, J. H., Alborzian, S., & Stoner, G. R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces, Vision Research, 43, 59–66] found that even in the absence of an endogenous cue, the first translation acted as a potent exogenous cue that impaired the observer’s ability to discriminate a subsequent translation of the other surface. We investigated the neural basis of this exogenous cueing effect by recording visual event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by translations of the cued and uncued surfaces. Subjects were given the task of judging whether or not the first and second translations were identical in direction, and their performance was impaired when the second translation occurred on the uncued, as compared to the cued surface. The posterior C1 (75–110 ms) and N1 (160–210 ms) components of the ERP elicited by the second translation of the cued surface were larger than those elicited by translation of the uncued surface. These behavioral and ERP cueing effects were present even when the two surfaces were identical in color and thus could not be attributed to attention-related modulations of the gain of color channels. These findings provide evidence that exogenous cueing results in preferential selection of the cued surface at both early and intermediate stages of visual-cortical processing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68653418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0042698905003706</els_id><sourcerecordid>68653418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-2175b7304e7fc69a46281243330958120b38a03da6ee36352a089428fce87eff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQQC0EokvhHyCUC9wSxp9xLkioKrRSJS5wtrzOBHmVxMFOVvTfd5ZdqTfkw4ztNyPPM2PvOTQcuPl8aI6xZCyNANANqAYEf8F23La21kaZl2wHoERtOttdsTelHACg1aJ7za644Vqa1u7YdPs3_cY5baXy64rzGtPsx6rgiOGUV2mo1uznsvhMt1XZFsxxWlLBnjZ58AFLNaV-G_1KGfo8PlZ4JLbOeDrrqyX9a-zH8pa9Gijgu0u8Zr--3f68uasffny_v_n6UAcNYq0Fb_W-laCwHYLpvDLCcqGklNBpymAvrQfZe4MojdTCg-2UsENA2-IwyGv26dx3yenPhmV1UywBx9HPSKM6Y42WilsC1RkMORWyObiFpvP50XFwJ83u4M6a3UmzA-VIM5V9uPTf9hP2z0UXrwR8vAC-BD8OZDDE8sy1tKzUxH05c0g2jhGzKyHiHLCPmT7A9Sn-_yVPzVafsw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68653418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Khoe, W. ; Mitchell, J.F. ; Reynolds, J.H. ; Hillyard, S.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Khoe, W. ; Mitchell, J.F. ; Reynolds, J.H. ; Hillyard, S.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Using a transparent motion paradigm, [Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., &amp; Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137–151; Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., &amp; Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion, Journal of Experimental Psychological: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 488–505] found that when attention is endogenously directed to one surface, observers can more reliably report the direction of a brief translation of the cued than the uncued surface. Using a similar design [Reynolds, J. H., Alborzian, S., &amp; Stoner, G. R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces, Vision Research, 43, 59–66] found that even in the absence of an endogenous cue, the first translation acted as a potent exogenous cue that impaired the observer’s ability to discriminate a subsequent translation of the other surface. We investigated the neural basis of this exogenous cueing effect by recording visual event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by translations of the cued and uncued surfaces. Subjects were given the task of judging whether or not the first and second translations were identical in direction, and their performance was impaired when the second translation occurred on the uncued, as compared to the cued surface. The posterior C1 (75–110 ms) and N1 (160–210 ms) components of the ERP elicited by the second translation of the cued surface were larger than those elicited by translation of the uncued surface. These behavioral and ERP cueing effects were present even when the two surfaces were identical in color and thus could not be attributed to attention-related modulations of the gain of color channels. These findings provide evidence that exogenous cueing results in preferential selection of the cued surface at both early and intermediate stages of visual-cortical processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-6989</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5646</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16153678</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VISRAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Attention - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cues ; Electrophysiology ; Evoked Potentials ; Evoked-potential ; Extrastriate cortex ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Object ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Striate cortex ; Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><ispartof>Vision research (Oxford), 2005-11, Vol.45 (24), p.3004-3014</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-2175b7304e7fc69a46281243330958120b38a03da6ee36352a089428fce87eff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-2175b7304e7fc69a46281243330958120b38a03da6ee36352a089428fce87eff3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17171835$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16153678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khoe, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillyard, S.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials</title><title>Vision research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><description>Using a transparent motion paradigm, [Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., &amp; Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137–151; Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., &amp; Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion, Journal of Experimental Psychological: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 488–505] found that when attention is endogenously directed to one surface, observers can more reliably report the direction of a brief translation of the cued than the uncued surface. Using a similar design [Reynolds, J. H., Alborzian, S., &amp; Stoner, G. R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces, Vision Research, 43, 59–66] found that even in the absence of an endogenous cue, the first translation acted as a potent exogenous cue that impaired the observer’s ability to discriminate a subsequent translation of the other surface. We investigated the neural basis of this exogenous cueing effect by recording visual event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by translations of the cued and uncued surfaces. Subjects were given the task of judging whether or not the first and second translations were identical in direction, and their performance was impaired when the second translation occurred on the uncued, as compared to the cued surface. The posterior C1 (75–110 ms) and N1 (160–210 ms) components of the ERP elicited by the second translation of the cued surface were larger than those elicited by translation of the uncued surface. These behavioral and ERP cueing effects were present even when the two surfaces were identical in color and thus could not be attributed to attention-related modulations of the gain of color channels. These findings provide evidence that exogenous cueing results in preferential selection of the cued surface at both early and intermediate stages of visual-cortical processing.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials</subject><subject>Evoked-potential</subject><subject>Extrastriate cortex</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Object</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Striate cortex</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><issn>0042-6989</issn><issn>1878-5646</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQQC0EokvhHyCUC9wSxp9xLkioKrRSJS5wtrzOBHmVxMFOVvTfd5ZdqTfkw4ztNyPPM2PvOTQcuPl8aI6xZCyNANANqAYEf8F23La21kaZl2wHoERtOttdsTelHACg1aJ7za644Vqa1u7YdPs3_cY5baXy64rzGtPsx6rgiOGUV2mo1uznsvhMt1XZFsxxWlLBnjZ58AFLNaV-G_1KGfo8PlZ4JLbOeDrrqyX9a-zH8pa9Gijgu0u8Zr--3f68uasffny_v_n6UAcNYq0Fb_W-laCwHYLpvDLCcqGklNBpymAvrQfZe4MojdTCg-2UsENA2-IwyGv26dx3yenPhmV1UywBx9HPSKM6Y42WilsC1RkMORWyObiFpvP50XFwJ83u4M6a3UmzA-VIM5V9uPTf9hP2z0UXrwR8vAC-BD8OZDDE8sy1tKzUxH05c0g2jhGzKyHiHLCPmT7A9Sn-_yVPzVafsw</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Khoe, W.</creator><creator>Mitchell, J.F.</creator><creator>Reynolds, J.H.</creator><creator>Hillyard, S.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials</title><author>Khoe, W. ; Mitchell, J.F. ; Reynolds, J.H. ; Hillyard, S.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c502t-2175b7304e7fc69a46281243330958120b38a03da6ee36352a089428fce87eff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials</topic><topic>Evoked-potential</topic><topic>Extrastriate cortex</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Object</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Striate cortex</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khoe, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillyard, S.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khoe, W.</au><au>Mitchell, J.F.</au><au>Reynolds, J.H.</au><au>Hillyard, S.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials</atitle><jtitle>Vision research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Vision Res</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>3004</spage><epage>3014</epage><pages>3004-3014</pages><issn>0042-6989</issn><eissn>1878-5646</eissn><coden>VISRAM</coden><abstract>Using a transparent motion paradigm, [Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V., &amp; Pinilla, T. (1998). Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 137–151; Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., &amp; Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion, Journal of Experimental Psychological: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 488–505] found that when attention is endogenously directed to one surface, observers can more reliably report the direction of a brief translation of the cued than the uncued surface. Using a similar design [Reynolds, J. H., Alborzian, S., &amp; Stoner, G. R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces, Vision Research, 43, 59–66] found that even in the absence of an endogenous cue, the first translation acted as a potent exogenous cue that impaired the observer’s ability to discriminate a subsequent translation of the other surface. We investigated the neural basis of this exogenous cueing effect by recording visual event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited by translations of the cued and uncued surfaces. Subjects were given the task of judging whether or not the first and second translations were identical in direction, and their performance was impaired when the second translation occurred on the uncued, as compared to the cued surface. The posterior C1 (75–110 ms) and N1 (160–210 ms) components of the ERP elicited by the second translation of the cued surface were larger than those elicited by translation of the uncued surface. These behavioral and ERP cueing effects were present even when the two surfaces were identical in color and thus could not be attributed to attention-related modulations of the gain of color channels. These findings provide evidence that exogenous cueing results in preferential selection of the cued surface at both early and intermediate stages of visual-cortical processing.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16153678</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.021</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-6989
ispartof Vision research (Oxford), 2005-11, Vol.45 (24), p.3004-3014
issn 0042-6989
1878-5646
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68653418
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Attention
Attention - physiology
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Cues
Electrophysiology
Evoked Potentials
Evoked-potential
Extrastriate cortex
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Motion Perception - physiology
Object
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Striate cortex
Visual Cortex - physiology
title Exogenous attentional selection of transparent superimposed surfaces modulates early event-related potentials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A51%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exogenous%20attentional%20selection%20of%20transparent%20superimposed%20surfaces%20modulates%20early%20event-related%20potentials&rft.jtitle=Vision%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Khoe,%20W.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=3004&rft.epage=3014&rft.pages=3004-3014&rft.issn=0042-6989&rft.eissn=1878-5646&rft.coden=VISRAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.visres.2005.04.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68653418%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68653418&rft_id=info:pmid/16153678&rft_els_id=S0042698905003706&rfr_iscdi=true