Wall thickness of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones: Measurements on humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in crows ( Corvus corone cornix) and magpies ( Pica pica)
We studied how the ratio K of the internal to external diameter of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones follows the biomechanical optima derived for tubular bones with minimum mass designed to fulfil various mechanical requirements. We evaluated radiographs of numerous humeri, femora and tibiotar...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2006-01, Vol.39 (11), p.2140-2144 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2144 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2140 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Suhai, Bence Gasparik, Mihály Csorba, Gábor Gerics, Balázs Horváth, Gábor |
description | We studied how the ratio
K of the internal to external diameter of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones follows the biomechanical optima derived for tubular bones with minimum mass designed to fulfil various mechanical requirements. We evaluated radiographs of numerous humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in
Corvus corone cornix and
Pica pica. The
K-values of the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.03
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.79
±
0.02
) in
Corvus are practically the same, while
K of the marrow-filled tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.71
±
0.04
) is significantly smaller. The same is true for the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.02
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.77
±
0.02
) and tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.67
±
0.05
) in
Pica. K in
Corvus is slightly larger than
K in
Pica, but the differences are statistically not significant. The standard deviation Δ
K of the tibiotarsi (
Δ
K
=
0.04
–
0.05
) is approximately two times as large as that of the humeri (
Δ
K
=
0.02
–
0.03
) and femora (
Δ
K
=
0.02
) in both species. Accepting the assumption of earlier authors that the ratio
Q of the marrow to bone density is 0.5, our data show that the marrow-filled tibiotarsi of
Corvus and
Pica are optimized for stiffness, while the marrow-filled femora are far from any optimum. The relative wall thickness
W
=
1
-
K
of the gas-filled avian humeri studied is much larger than the theoretical optimum
W
*
=
1
-
K
*
=
0.07
, and thus these bones are thicker-walled than the optimal gas-filled tubular bone with minimum mass. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.06.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68650768</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929005002873</els_id><sourcerecordid>68650768</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-3e37a7e80a7100307f029799ecbfaceb0e39d45fdc1fbbe03ee38fd17df4272a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAK4wsISFGIuE6TuKYFajiTxoECxBLy3GuW5fELnZS4HV4UlxahMSGzb2b75z7cwi5YlAyYO3TXbnrXZjQbMsKoCmhLYHxW2TFOsGLindwm6wAKlbISsIFuZfSDgBELeRdcsFa6OqGyRX5-VmPI523znzxmBINlm50Kqj2A510jOFbYd044kD1wWlPx-A3tA-ZfUbfoU5LxAn9nIWebpcJo3tCLU4h6t8Ws8tbzjomR52nJtsl-piuQzwsiZoQs9Gxeff9-jxys3d4ZD44o-k-l-v75I7VY8IH535JPr16-XH9prh5__rt-sVNYbis54IjF1pgB1owAA7CQiWFlGh6qw32gFwOdWMHw2zfI3BE3tmBicHWlag0vySPTr77GL4umGY1uWRwHLXHsCTVdm0Dou0y-PAfcBeW6PNuigGvJZMNE5lqT1S-OqWIVu2jyy_9kSF1zFDt1J8M1TFDBa3KGWbh1dl-6Scc_srOoWXg-QnA_I2Dw6iScegNDi6imdUQ3P9m_AIIELIm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034919517</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wall thickness of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones: Measurements on humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in crows ( Corvus corone cornix) and magpies ( Pica pica)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Suhai, Bence ; Gasparik, Mihály ; Csorba, Gábor ; Gerics, Balázs ; Horváth, Gábor</creator><creatorcontrib>Suhai, Bence ; Gasparik, Mihály ; Csorba, Gábor ; Gerics, Balázs ; Horváth, Gábor</creatorcontrib><description>We studied how the ratio
K of the internal to external diameter of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones follows the biomechanical optima derived for tubular bones with minimum mass designed to fulfil various mechanical requirements. We evaluated radiographs of numerous humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in
Corvus corone cornix and
Pica pica. The
K-values of the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.03
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.79
±
0.02
) in
Corvus are practically the same, while
K of the marrow-filled tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.71
±
0.04
) is significantly smaller. The same is true for the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.02
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.77
±
0.02
) and tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.67
±
0.05
) in
Pica. K in
Corvus is slightly larger than
K in
Pica, but the differences are statistically not significant. The standard deviation Δ
K of the tibiotarsi (
Δ
K
=
0.04
–
0.05
) is approximately two times as large as that of the humeri (
Δ
K
=
0.02
–
0.03
) and femora (
Δ
K
=
0.02
) in both species. Accepting the assumption of earlier authors that the ratio
Q of the marrow to bone density is 0.5, our data show that the marrow-filled tibiotarsi of
Corvus and
Pica are optimized for stiffness, while the marrow-filled femora are far from any optimum. The relative wall thickness
W
=
1
-
K
of the gas-filled avian humeri studied is much larger than the theoretical optimum
W
*
=
1
-
K
*
=
0.07
, and thus these bones are thicker-walled than the optimal gas-filled tubular bone with minimum mass.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.06.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16084519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Animal behavior ; Animals ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Black-billed magpie ( Pica pica) ; Bone density ; Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology ; Bone mechanics ; Crows - anatomy & histology ; Femur ; Femur - anatomy & histology ; Gas- and marrow-filled tubular bones ; Gases ; Hooded crow ( Corvus corone cornix) ; Humerus ; Humerus - anatomy & histology ; Hypotheses ; Optimum structure ; Songbirds - anatomy & histology ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Tibia - anatomy & histology ; Tibiotarsus ; Wall thickness]]></subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (11), p.2140-2144</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-3e37a7e80a7100307f029799ecbfaceb0e39d45fdc1fbbe03ee38fd17df4272a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-3e37a7e80a7100307f029799ecbfaceb0e39d45fdc1fbbe03ee38fd17df4272a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929005002873$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suhai, Bence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparik, Mihály</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csorba, Gábor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerics, Balázs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horváth, Gábor</creatorcontrib><title>Wall thickness of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones: Measurements on humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in crows ( Corvus corone cornix) and magpies ( Pica pica)</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>We studied how the ratio
K of the internal to external diameter of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones follows the biomechanical optima derived for tubular bones with minimum mass designed to fulfil various mechanical requirements. We evaluated radiographs of numerous humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in
Corvus corone cornix and
Pica pica. The
K-values of the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.03
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.79
±
0.02
) in
Corvus are practically the same, while
K of the marrow-filled tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.71
±
0.04
) is significantly smaller. The same is true for the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.02
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.77
±
0.02
) and tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.67
±
0.05
) in
Pica. K in
Corvus is slightly larger than
K in
Pica, but the differences are statistically not significant. The standard deviation Δ
K of the tibiotarsi (
Δ
K
=
0.04
–
0.05
) is approximately two times as large as that of the humeri (
Δ
K
=
0.02
–
0.03
) and femora (
Δ
K
=
0.02
) in both species. Accepting the assumption of earlier authors that the ratio
Q of the marrow to bone density is 0.5, our data show that the marrow-filled tibiotarsi of
Corvus and
Pica are optimized for stiffness, while the marrow-filled femora are far from any optimum. The relative wall thickness
W
=
1
-
K
of the gas-filled avian humeri studied is much larger than the theoretical optimum
W
*
=
1
-
K
*
=
0.07
, and thus these bones are thicker-walled than the optimal gas-filled tubular bone with minimum mass.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Black-billed magpie ( Pica pica)</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Bone mechanics</subject><subject>Crows - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Femur - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Gas- and marrow-filled tubular bones</subject><subject>Gases</subject><subject>Hooded crow ( Corvus corone cornix)</subject><subject>Humerus</subject><subject>Humerus - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Optimum structure</subject><subject>Songbirds - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tibia - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Tibiotarsus</subject><subject>Wall thickness</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAK4wsISFGIuE6TuKYFajiTxoECxBLy3GuW5fELnZS4HV4UlxahMSGzb2b75z7cwi5YlAyYO3TXbnrXZjQbMsKoCmhLYHxW2TFOsGLindwm6wAKlbISsIFuZfSDgBELeRdcsFa6OqGyRX5-VmPI523znzxmBINlm50Kqj2A510jOFbYd044kD1wWlPx-A3tA-ZfUbfoU5LxAn9nIWebpcJo3tCLU4h6t8Ws8tbzjomR52nJtsl-piuQzwsiZoQs9Gxeff9-jxys3d4ZD44o-k-l-v75I7VY8IH535JPr16-XH9prh5__rt-sVNYbis54IjF1pgB1owAA7CQiWFlGh6qw32gFwOdWMHw2zfI3BE3tmBicHWlag0vySPTr77GL4umGY1uWRwHLXHsCTVdm0Dou0y-PAfcBeW6PNuigGvJZMNE5lqT1S-OqWIVu2jyy_9kSF1zFDt1J8M1TFDBa3KGWbh1dl-6Scc_srOoWXg-QnA_I2Dw6iScegNDi6imdUQ3P9m_AIIELIm</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Suhai, Bence</creator><creator>Gasparik, Mihály</creator><creator>Csorba, Gábor</creator><creator>Gerics, Balázs</creator><creator>Horváth, Gábor</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Wall thickness of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones: Measurements on humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in crows ( Corvus corone cornix) and magpies ( Pica pica)</title><author>Suhai, Bence ; Gasparik, Mihály ; Csorba, Gábor ; Gerics, Balázs ; Horváth, Gábor</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-3e37a7e80a7100307f029799ecbfaceb0e39d45fdc1fbbe03ee38fd17df4272a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Black-billed magpie ( Pica pica)</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Bone mechanics</topic><topic>Crows - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Femur - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Gas- and marrow-filled tubular bones</topic><topic>Gases</topic><topic>Hooded crow ( Corvus corone cornix)</topic><topic>Humerus</topic><topic>Humerus - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Optimum structure</topic><topic>Songbirds - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tibia - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Tibiotarsus</topic><topic>Wall thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suhai, Bence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparik, Mihály</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csorba, Gábor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerics, Balázs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horváth, Gábor</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suhai, Bence</au><au>Gasparik, Mihály</au><au>Csorba, Gábor</au><au>Gerics, Balázs</au><au>Horváth, Gábor</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wall thickness of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones: Measurements on humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in crows ( Corvus corone cornix) and magpies ( Pica pica)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2140</spage><epage>2144</epage><pages>2140-2144</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>We studied how the ratio
K of the internal to external diameter of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones follows the biomechanical optima derived for tubular bones with minimum mass designed to fulfil various mechanical requirements. We evaluated radiographs of numerous humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in
Corvus corone cornix and
Pica pica. The
K-values of the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.03
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.79
±
0.02
) in
Corvus are practically the same, while
K of the marrow-filled tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.71
±
0.04
) is significantly smaller. The same is true for the gas-filled humerus (
K
=
0.78
±
0.02
) and the marrow-filled femur (
K
=
0.77
±
0.02
) and tibiotarsus (
K
=
0.67
±
0.05
) in
Pica. K in
Corvus is slightly larger than
K in
Pica, but the differences are statistically not significant. The standard deviation Δ
K of the tibiotarsi (
Δ
K
=
0.04
–
0.05
) is approximately two times as large as that of the humeri (
Δ
K
=
0.02
–
0.03
) and femora (
Δ
K
=
0.02
) in both species. Accepting the assumption of earlier authors that the ratio
Q of the marrow to bone density is 0.5, our data show that the marrow-filled tibiotarsi of
Corvus and
Pica are optimized for stiffness, while the marrow-filled femora are far from any optimum. The relative wall thickness
W
=
1
-
K
of the gas-filled avian humeri studied is much larger than the theoretical optimum
W
*
=
1
-
K
*
=
0.07
, and thus these bones are thicker-walled than the optimal gas-filled tubular bone with minimum mass.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16084519</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.06.013</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (11), p.2140-2144 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68650768 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Animal behavior Animals Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Black-billed magpie ( Pica pica) Bone density Bone Marrow - anatomy & histology Bone mechanics Crows - anatomy & histology Femur Femur - anatomy & histology Gas- and marrow-filled tubular bones Gases Hooded crow ( Corvus corone cornix) Humerus Humerus - anatomy & histology Hypotheses Optimum structure Songbirds - anatomy & histology Standard deviation Studies Tibia - anatomy & histology Tibiotarsus Wall thickness |
title | Wall thickness of gas- and marrow-filled avian long bones: Measurements on humeri, femora and tibiotarsi in crows ( Corvus corone cornix) and magpies ( Pica pica) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T02%3A32%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wall%20thickness%20of%20gas-%20and%20marrow-filled%20avian%20long%20bones:%20Measurements%20on%20humeri,%20femora%20and%20tibiotarsi%20in%20crows%20(%20Corvus%20corone%20cornix)%20and%20magpies%20(%20Pica%20pica)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Suhai,%20Bence&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2140&rft.epage=2144&rft.pages=2140-2144&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.06.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68650768%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034919517&rft_id=info:pmid/16084519&rft_els_id=S0021929005002873&rfr_iscdi=true |