Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia
Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pediatric orthopaedics 2005-09, Vol.25 (5), p.635-640 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 640 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Journal of pediatric orthopaedics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Charlton, Michael Costello, Richard Mooney, James F Podeszwa, David A |
description | Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68649173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68649173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1u3CAUhVHVqpmkfYUKVWp3di_mx6a7NMn0R5GyyGSNMIaahjEueDTN24d0Rho2LPjOvYcPoY8EagKy_QKk7udYQzlEkI6yWnCgTW34K7QinMqq4S28RitoWlKJVnZn6DznPwVvKaNv0VmJSSmZWKGHy-kxWPwr-mnB33zcWjPqyZuM1zGEuPfTb7xJesp29vP4lK0O-N4ku8dr_08vPk44OryMFl_7vJTHje-9fofeOB2yfX-8L9DD-mZz9aO6vfv-8-rytjJUNrwaQA6UttIaJ51jsgcQrOv0AFRITjU44oQl3DRDD0IYQ1gnBKdArCOd0_QCfT7MnVP8u7N5UVufjQ1BTzbushKdYLJ8uoBfD6BJMedknZqT3-r0pAioF6kKiCpS1Umq-i9VGV7CH45bdv3WDqfo0WIBPh0BnY0OrvgyPp-4Fop3LgvHDtw-hsWm_Bh2e5vUWKQuY2nQMEJlVzUAHGQpUr2U4fQZ7zWQYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68649173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Charlton, Michael ; Costello, Richard ; Mooney, James F ; Podeszwa, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Michael ; Costello, Richard ; Mooney, James F ; Podeszwa, David A</creatorcontrib><description>Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-6798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-2570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16199946</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPORDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ankle Joint - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics. Biorheology ; Bone Screws ; Cadaver ; Child, Preschool ; Epiphyses - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Medical sciences ; Pressure ; Tibial Fractures - surgery ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics, 2005-09, Vol.25 (5), p.635-640</ispartof><rights>2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17073459$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16199946$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, James F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podeszwa, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</title><title>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Orthop</addtitle><description>Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics. Biorheology</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Epiphyses - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0271-6798</issn><issn>1539-2570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1u3CAUhVHVqpmkfYUKVWp3di_mx6a7NMn0R5GyyGSNMIaahjEueDTN24d0Rho2LPjOvYcPoY8EagKy_QKk7udYQzlEkI6yWnCgTW34K7QinMqq4S28RitoWlKJVnZn6DznPwVvKaNv0VmJSSmZWKGHy-kxWPwr-mnB33zcWjPqyZuM1zGEuPfTb7xJesp29vP4lK0O-N4ku8dr_08vPk44OryMFl_7vJTHje-9fofeOB2yfX-8L9DD-mZz9aO6vfv-8-rytjJUNrwaQA6UttIaJ51jsgcQrOv0AFRITjU44oQl3DRDD0IYQ1gnBKdArCOd0_QCfT7MnVP8u7N5UVufjQ1BTzbushKdYLJ8uoBfD6BJMedknZqT3-r0pAioF6kKiCpS1Umq-i9VGV7CH45bdv3WDqfo0WIBPh0BnY0OrvgyPp-4Fop3LgvHDtw-hsWm_Bh2e5vUWKQuY2nQMEJlVzUAHGQpUr2U4fQZ7zWQYA</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Charlton, Michael</creator><creator>Costello, Richard</creator><creator>Mooney, James F</creator><creator>Podeszwa, David A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</title><author>Charlton, Michael ; Costello, Richard ; Mooney, James F ; Podeszwa, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics. Biorheology</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Epiphyses - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, James F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podeszwa, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charlton, Michael</au><au>Costello, Richard</au><au>Mooney, James F</au><au>Podeszwa, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Orthop</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>635-640</pages><issn>0271-6798</issn><eissn>1539-2570</eissn><coden>JPORDO</coden><abstract>Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16199946</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0271-6798 |
ispartof | Journal of pediatric orthopaedics, 2005-09, Vol.25 (5), p.635-640 |
issn | 0271-6798 1539-2570 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68649173 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Ankle Joint - physiology Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics. Biorheology Bone Screws Cadaver Child, Preschool Epiphyses - surgery Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine Medical sciences Pressure Tibial Fractures - surgery Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents |
title | Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ankle%20Joint%20Biomechanics%20Following%20Transepiphyseal%20Screw%20Fixation%20of%20the%20Distal%20Tibia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Charlton,%20Michael&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=635-640&rft.issn=0271-6798&rft.eissn=1539-2570&rft.coden=JPORDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68649173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68649173&rft_id=info:pmid/16199946&rfr_iscdi=true |