Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia

Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pediatric orthopaedics 2005-09, Vol.25 (5), p.635-640
Hauptverfasser: Charlton, Michael, Costello, Richard, Mooney, James F, Podeszwa, David A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 640
container_issue 5
container_start_page 635
container_title Journal of pediatric orthopaedics
container_volume 25
creator Charlton, Michael
Costello, Richard
Mooney, James F
Podeszwa, David A
description Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68649173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68649173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1u3CAUhVHVqpmkfYUKVWp3di_mx6a7NMn0R5GyyGSNMIaahjEueDTN24d0Rho2LPjOvYcPoY8EagKy_QKk7udYQzlEkI6yWnCgTW34K7QinMqq4S28RitoWlKJVnZn6DznPwVvKaNv0VmJSSmZWKGHy-kxWPwr-mnB33zcWjPqyZuM1zGEuPfTb7xJesp29vP4lK0O-N4ku8dr_08vPk44OryMFl_7vJTHje-9fofeOB2yfX-8L9DD-mZz9aO6vfv-8-rytjJUNrwaQA6UttIaJ51jsgcQrOv0AFRITjU44oQl3DRDD0IYQ1gnBKdArCOd0_QCfT7MnVP8u7N5UVufjQ1BTzbushKdYLJ8uoBfD6BJMedknZqT3-r0pAioF6kKiCpS1Umq-i9VGV7CH45bdv3WDqfo0WIBPh0BnY0OrvgyPp-4Fop3LgvHDtw-hsWm_Bh2e5vUWKQuY2nQMEJlVzUAHGQpUr2U4fQZ7zWQYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68649173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Charlton, Michael ; Costello, Richard ; Mooney, James F ; Podeszwa, David A</creator><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Michael ; Costello, Richard ; Mooney, James F ; Podeszwa, David A</creatorcontrib><description>Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-6798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-2570</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16199946</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPORDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ankle Joint - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics. Biorheology ; Bone Screws ; Cadaver ; Child, Preschool ; Epiphyses - surgery ; Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine ; Medical sciences ; Pressure ; Tibial Fractures - surgery ; Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics ; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><ispartof>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics, 2005-09, Vol.25 (5), p.635-640</ispartof><rights>2005 Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17073459$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16199946$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, James F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podeszwa, David A</creatorcontrib><title>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</title><title>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</title><addtitle>J Pediatr Orthop</addtitle><description>Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics. Biorheology</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Epiphyses - surgery</subject><subject>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Tibial Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</subject><subject>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</subject><issn>0271-6798</issn><issn>1539-2570</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkM1u3CAUhVHVqpmkfYUKVWp3di_mx6a7NMn0R5GyyGSNMIaahjEueDTN24d0Rho2LPjOvYcPoY8EagKy_QKk7udYQzlEkI6yWnCgTW34K7QinMqq4S28RitoWlKJVnZn6DznPwVvKaNv0VmJSSmZWKGHy-kxWPwr-mnB33zcWjPqyZuM1zGEuPfTb7xJesp29vP4lK0O-N4ku8dr_08vPk44OryMFl_7vJTHje-9fofeOB2yfX-8L9DD-mZz9aO6vfv-8-rytjJUNrwaQA6UttIaJ51jsgcQrOv0AFRITjU44oQl3DRDD0IYQ1gnBKdArCOd0_QCfT7MnVP8u7N5UVufjQ1BTzbushKdYLJ8uoBfD6BJMedknZqT3-r0pAioF6kKiCpS1Umq-i9VGV7CH45bdv3WDqfo0WIBPh0BnY0OrvgyPp-4Fop3LgvHDtw-hsWm_Bh2e5vUWKQuY2nQMEJlVzUAHGQpUr2U4fQZ7zWQYA</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Charlton, Michael</creator><creator>Costello, Richard</creator><creator>Mooney, James F</creator><creator>Podeszwa, David A</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</title><author>Charlton, Michael ; Costello, Richard ; Mooney, James F ; Podeszwa, David A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3925-d09d3379ecf9ff49b006488ad036953a0f1f6e15c2db066cc148665301ef18fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics. Biorheology</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Epiphyses - surgery</topic><topic>Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Tibial Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics</topic><topic>Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charlton, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costello, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mooney, James F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podeszwa, David A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charlton, Michael</au><au>Costello, Richard</au><au>Mooney, James F</au><au>Podeszwa, David A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pediatric orthopaedics</jtitle><addtitle>J Pediatr Orthop</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>640</epage><pages>635-640</pages><issn>0271-6798</issn><eissn>1539-2570</eissn><coden>JPORDO</coden><abstract>Transepiphyseal screws have traditionally been removed after fixation of pediatric ankle fractures due to concerns about increased forces and contact pressures within the tibiotalar joint secondary to the implant. No study has assessed pressure across the ankle joint after such fixation. Seven adult and two pediatric cadaveric ankles underwent axial loading in a uniaxial material test machine. Each was tested before fixation (control), after fixation (screw in place), and after removal (after screw removal). Three sequential test runs at three loading conditions (approximate body weight, twice body weight, and five times body weight) were performed to simulate forces of standing and ambulation. Total force, peak contact pressure, and contact area were measured with an intra-articular sensor. After screw placement, all loads caused a significant increase in total force versus control. Peak contact pressures after placement also increased significantly. Screw removal subsequently led to a net decrease in force and peak pressure values. Total contact area was unchanged. Concerns regarding subchondral screws in the distal tibia appear warranted. Findings in this study support implant removal following union of such fractures.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins, Inc</pub><pmid>16199946</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-6798
ispartof Journal of pediatric orthopaedics, 2005-09, Vol.25 (5), p.635-640
issn 0271-6798
1539-2570
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68649173
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Ankle Joint - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomechanics. Biorheology
Bone Screws
Cadaver
Child, Preschool
Epiphyses - surgery
Fracture Fixation, Internal - methods
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine
Medical sciences
Pressure
Tibial Fractures - surgery
Tissues, organs and organisms biophysics
Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents
title Ankle Joint Biomechanics Following Transepiphyseal Screw Fixation of the Distal Tibia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ankle%20Joint%20Biomechanics%20Following%20Transepiphyseal%20Screw%20Fixation%20of%20the%20Distal%20Tibia&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pediatric%20orthopaedics&rft.au=Charlton,%20Michael&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=640&rft.pages=635-640&rft.issn=0271-6798&rft.eissn=1539-2570&rft.coden=JPORDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.bpo.0000161834.65032.c5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68649173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68649173&rft_id=info:pmid/16199946&rfr_iscdi=true