Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients

The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Alleg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney international 2006-07, Vol.70 (2), p.345-350
Hauptverfasser: Souberbielle, J.-C., Boutten, A., Carlier, M.-C., Chevenne, D., Coumaros, G., Lawson-Body, E., Massart, C., Monge, M., Myara, J., Parent, X., Plouvier, E., Houillier, P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 350
container_issue 2
container_start_page 345
container_title Kidney international
container_volume 70
creator Souberbielle, J.-C.
Boutten, A.
Carlier, M.-C.
Chevenne, D.
Coumaros, G.
Lawson-Body, E.
Massart, C.
Monge, M.
Myara, J.
Parent, X.
Plouvier, E.
Houillier, P.
description The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/sj.ki.5001606
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68641129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0085253815519443</els_id><sourcerecordid>1076935341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFL5DAUwPEgis6qR68SPOyt40s6bVNvMqvroKAHPYc0ecGMbTObpAN-eyMzsLCw5BDC-_EIf0IuGMwZlOI6rucfbl4BsBrqAzJjFS8L1lTVIZkBiKrgVSlOyI8Y15DfbQnH5ITVjRB1y2bkbTUmDMWA6d0bulXBqc71Ln1SN9KX1wc6oIpTwAHHdENXw6Z3WiXnR2p9oOkdqVYBqbd0-fiLbvIow3hGjqzqI57v71Pydn_3unwonp5_r5a3T4VeNCwVHdhS287YTjRMsarR-QjbgVFCibopwXJrOCsFtgo70LrlvDYdNwsDylTlKfm527sJ_s-EMcnBRY19r0b0U5S1qBeM8TbDq3_g2k9hzH-TnAGD7xgZFTukg48xoJWb4AYVPiUD-R1bxrX8cHIfO_vL_dKpG9D81fu6GTQ7gLnB1mGQUec-Go0LqJM03v1n9RdHzI3x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210108691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Souberbielle, J.-C. ; Boutten, A. ; Carlier, M.-C. ; Chevenne, D. ; Coumaros, G. ; Lawson-Body, E. ; Massart, C. ; Monge, M. ; Myara, J. ; Parent, X. ; Plouvier, E. ; Houillier, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, J.-C. ; Boutten, A. ; Carlier, M.-C. ; Chevenne, D. ; Coumaros, G. ; Lawson-Body, E. ; Massart, C. ; Monge, M. ; Myara, J. ; Parent, X. ; Plouvier, E. ; Houillier, P. ; Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</creatorcontrib><description>The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001606</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16788691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibody Specificity ; assay standardization ; Chemistry, Clinical - standards ; chronic kidney disease ; Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood ; Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; immunoassay ; Immunoassay - standards ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis ; NKF/K-DOQI ; parathyroid hormone ; Parathyroid Hormone - analysis ; Parathyroid Hormone - blood ; Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis ; Peptide Fragments - analysis ; Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 2006-07, Vol.70 (2), p.345-350</ispartof><rights>2006 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16788691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, M.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevenne, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coumaros, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson-Body, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massart, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myara, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parent, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plouvier, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houillier, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibody Specificity</subject><subject>assay standardization</subject><subject>Chemistry, Clinical - standards</subject><subject>chronic kidney disease</subject><subject>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood</subject><subject>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunoassay</subject><subject>Immunoassay - standards</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>NKF/K-DOQI</subject><subject>parathyroid hormone</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - analysis</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - analysis</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFL5DAUwPEgis6qR68SPOyt40s6bVNvMqvroKAHPYc0ecGMbTObpAN-eyMzsLCw5BDC-_EIf0IuGMwZlOI6rucfbl4BsBrqAzJjFS8L1lTVIZkBiKrgVSlOyI8Y15DfbQnH5ITVjRB1y2bkbTUmDMWA6d0bulXBqc71Ln1SN9KX1wc6oIpTwAHHdENXw6Z3WiXnR2p9oOkdqVYBqbd0-fiLbvIow3hGjqzqI57v71Pydn_3unwonp5_r5a3T4VeNCwVHdhS287YTjRMsarR-QjbgVFCibopwXJrOCsFtgo70LrlvDYdNwsDylTlKfm527sJ_s-EMcnBRY19r0b0U5S1qBeM8TbDq3_g2k9hzH-TnAGD7xgZFTukg48xoJWb4AYVPiUD-R1bxrX8cHIfO_vL_dKpG9D81fu6GTQ7gLnB1mGQUec-Go0LqJM03v1n9RdHzI3x</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Souberbielle, J.-C.</creator><creator>Boutten, A.</creator><creator>Carlier, M.-C.</creator><creator>Chevenne, D.</creator><creator>Coumaros, G.</creator><creator>Lawson-Body, E.</creator><creator>Massart, C.</creator><creator>Monge, M.</creator><creator>Myara, J.</creator><creator>Parent, X.</creator><creator>Plouvier, E.</creator><creator>Houillier, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</title><author>Souberbielle, J.-C. ; Boutten, A. ; Carlier, M.-C. ; Chevenne, D. ; Coumaros, G. ; Lawson-Body, E. ; Massart, C. ; Monge, M. ; Myara, J. ; Parent, X. ; Plouvier, E. ; Houillier, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibody Specificity</topic><topic>assay standardization</topic><topic>Chemistry, Clinical - standards</topic><topic>chronic kidney disease</topic><topic>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood</topic><topic>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunoassay</topic><topic>Immunoassay - standards</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>NKF/K-DOQI</topic><topic>parathyroid hormone</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - analysis</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - analysis</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, M.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevenne, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coumaros, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson-Body, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massart, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myara, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parent, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plouvier, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houillier, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Souberbielle, J.-C.</au><au>Boutten, A.</au><au>Carlier, M.-C.</au><au>Chevenne, D.</au><au>Coumaros, G.</au><au>Lawson-Body, E.</au><au>Massart, C.</au><au>Monge, M.</au><au>Myara, J.</au><au>Parent, X.</au><au>Plouvier, E.</au><au>Houillier, P.</au><aucorp>Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>345-350</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><abstract>The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16788691</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.ki.5001606</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0085-2538
ispartof Kidney international, 2006-07, Vol.70 (2), p.345-350
issn 0085-2538
1523-1755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68641129
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Antibody Specificity
assay standardization
Chemistry, Clinical - standards
chronic kidney disease
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood
Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
immunoassay
Immunoassay - standards
Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood
Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis
NKF/K-DOQI
parathyroid hormone
Parathyroid Hormone - analysis
Parathyroid Hormone - blood
Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis
Peptide Fragments - analysis
Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
title Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A08%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-method%20variability%20in%20PTH%20measurement:%20Implication%20for%20the%20care%20of%20CKD%20patients&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Souberbielle,%20J.-C.&rft.aucorp=Working%20group%20on%20PTH%20and%20vitamin%20D,%20Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20Fran%C3%A7aise%20de%20Biologie%20Clinique%20(SFBC)&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=345-350&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.ki.5001606&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1076935341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210108691&rft_id=info:pmid/16788691&rft_els_id=S0085253815519443&rfr_iscdi=true