Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients
The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Alleg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kidney international 2006-07, Vol.70 (2), p.345-350 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 350 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 345 |
container_title | Kidney international |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Souberbielle, J.-C. Boutten, A. Carlier, M.-C. Chevenne, D. Coumaros, G. Lawson-Body, E. Massart, C. Monge, M. Myara, J. Parent, X. Plouvier, E. Houillier, P. |
description | The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.ki.5001606 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68641129</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0085253815519443</els_id><sourcerecordid>1076935341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFL5DAUwPEgis6qR68SPOyt40s6bVNvMqvroKAHPYc0ecGMbTObpAN-eyMzsLCw5BDC-_EIf0IuGMwZlOI6rucfbl4BsBrqAzJjFS8L1lTVIZkBiKrgVSlOyI8Y15DfbQnH5ITVjRB1y2bkbTUmDMWA6d0bulXBqc71Ln1SN9KX1wc6oIpTwAHHdENXw6Z3WiXnR2p9oOkdqVYBqbd0-fiLbvIow3hGjqzqI57v71Pydn_3unwonp5_r5a3T4VeNCwVHdhS287YTjRMsarR-QjbgVFCibopwXJrOCsFtgo70LrlvDYdNwsDylTlKfm527sJ_s-EMcnBRY19r0b0U5S1qBeM8TbDq3_g2k9hzH-TnAGD7xgZFTukg48xoJWb4AYVPiUD-R1bxrX8cHIfO_vL_dKpG9D81fu6GTQ7gLnB1mGQUec-Go0LqJM03v1n9RdHzI3x</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210108691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Souberbielle, J.-C. ; Boutten, A. ; Carlier, M.-C. ; Chevenne, D. ; Coumaros, G. ; Lawson-Body, E. ; Massart, C. ; Monge, M. ; Myara, J. ; Parent, X. ; Plouvier, E. ; Houillier, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, J.-C. ; Boutten, A. ; Carlier, M.-C. ; Chevenne, D. ; Coumaros, G. ; Lawson-Body, E. ; Massart, C. ; Monge, M. ; Myara, J. ; Parent, X. ; Plouvier, E. ; Houillier, P. ; Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</creatorcontrib><description>The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001606</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16788691</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibody Specificity ; assay standardization ; Chemistry, Clinical - standards ; chronic kidney disease ; Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood ; Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; immunoassay ; Immunoassay - standards ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis ; NKF/K-DOQI ; parathyroid hormone ; Parathyroid Hormone - analysis ; Parathyroid Hormone - blood ; Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis ; Peptide Fragments - analysis ; Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis ; Reference Standards ; Reproducibility of Results</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 2006-07, Vol.70 (2), p.345-350</ispartof><rights>2006 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Jul 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16788691$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, M.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevenne, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coumaros, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson-Body, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massart, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myara, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parent, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plouvier, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houillier, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</creatorcontrib><title>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibody Specificity</subject><subject>assay standardization</subject><subject>Chemistry, Clinical - standards</subject><subject>chronic kidney disease</subject><subject>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood</subject><subject>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunoassay</subject><subject>Immunoassay - standards</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</subject><subject>NKF/K-DOQI</subject><subject>parathyroid hormone</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - analysis</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</subject><subject>Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - analysis</subject><subject>Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Reference Standards</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFL5DAUwPEgis6qR68SPOyt40s6bVNvMqvroKAHPYc0ecGMbTObpAN-eyMzsLCw5BDC-_EIf0IuGMwZlOI6rucfbl4BsBrqAzJjFS8L1lTVIZkBiKrgVSlOyI8Y15DfbQnH5ITVjRB1y2bkbTUmDMWA6d0bulXBqc71Ln1SN9KX1wc6oIpTwAHHdENXw6Z3WiXnR2p9oOkdqVYBqbd0-fiLbvIow3hGjqzqI57v71Pydn_3unwonp5_r5a3T4VeNCwVHdhS287YTjRMsarR-QjbgVFCibopwXJrOCsFtgo70LrlvDYdNwsDylTlKfm527sJ_s-EMcnBRY19r0b0U5S1qBeM8TbDq3_g2k9hzH-TnAGD7xgZFTukg48xoJWb4AYVPiUD-R1bxrX8cHIfO_vL_dKpG9D81fu6GTQ7gLnB1mGQUec-Go0LqJM03v1n9RdHzI3x</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Souberbielle, J.-C.</creator><creator>Boutten, A.</creator><creator>Carlier, M.-C.</creator><creator>Chevenne, D.</creator><creator>Coumaros, G.</creator><creator>Lawson-Body, E.</creator><creator>Massart, C.</creator><creator>Monge, M.</creator><creator>Myara, J.</creator><creator>Parent, X.</creator><creator>Plouvier, E.</creator><creator>Houillier, P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</title><author>Souberbielle, J.-C. ; Boutten, A. ; Carlier, M.-C. ; Chevenne, D. ; Coumaros, G. ; Lawson-Body, E. ; Massart, C. ; Monge, M. ; Myara, J. ; Parent, X. ; Plouvier, E. ; Houillier, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c471t-b0f3cfbdfb871a157c7c78fb0da8a86730f2fd2138e9aeb0cc9226db2d4d0ad53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibody Specificity</topic><topic>assay standardization</topic><topic>Chemistry, Clinical - standards</topic><topic>chronic kidney disease</topic><topic>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood</topic><topic>Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunoassay</topic><topic>Immunoassay - standards</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis</topic><topic>NKF/K-DOQI</topic><topic>parathyroid hormone</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - analysis</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - blood</topic><topic>Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - analysis</topic><topic>Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Reference Standards</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Souberbielle, J.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutten, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlier, M.-C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevenne, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coumaros, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson-Body, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massart, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myara, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parent, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plouvier, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houillier, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Souberbielle, J.-C.</au><au>Boutten, A.</au><au>Carlier, M.-C.</au><au>Chevenne, D.</au><au>Coumaros, G.</au><au>Lawson-Body, E.</au><au>Massart, C.</au><au>Monge, M.</au><au>Myara, J.</au><au>Parent, X.</au><au>Plouvier, E.</au><au>Houillier, P.</au><aucorp>Working group on PTH and vitamin D, Société Française de Biologie Clinique (SFBC)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>345-350</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><abstract>The National Kidney Foundation/Kidney-Dialysis Outcome Quality Initiative guidelines recommend to maintain the serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentration between 150 and 300 ng/l in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 patients. As these limits were derived from studies that used the Allegro intact PTH assay, we aimed to evaluate whether they were applicable to other PTH assays. We compared the PTH concentrations measured with 15 commercial immunoassays in 47 serum pools from dialysis patients, using the Allegro intact PTH assay as the reference. We also evaluated the recovery of graded amounts of synthetic 1–84 and 7–84 PTH added separately to a serum pool. Although the assays were highly correlated, the concentrations differed from one assay to another. The median bias between the tested assays and the Allegro intact PTH assay ranged from -44.9 to 123.0%. When the PTH concentrations were 150 or 300 ng/l with the Allegro intact PTH assay, they ranged with other assays from 83 to 323 ng/l and from 160 to 638 ng/l, respectively. The tested assays recognized 7–84 PTH with various cross-reactivities, whereas a given amount of 1–84 PTH was recovered differently by these assays. We found important inter-method variability in PTH results owing to both antibody specificity and standardization reasons. The unacceptable consequence is that opposite therapeutic attitudes may be reached in a single patient depending on the PTH assay used. We propose to use assay-specific decision limits for CKD patients, or to apply a correcting factor to the PTH results obtained with a given assay.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16788691</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.ki.5001606</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0085-2538 |
ispartof | Kidney international, 2006-07, Vol.70 (2), p.345-350 |
issn | 0085-2538 1523-1755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68641129 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Antibody Specificity assay standardization Chemistry, Clinical - standards chronic kidney disease Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - blood Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder - diagnosis Evaluation Studies as Topic Humans immunoassay Immunoassay - standards Kidney Failure, Chronic - blood Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnosis NKF/K-DOQI parathyroid hormone Parathyroid Hormone - analysis Parathyroid Hormone - blood Parathyroid Hormone - chemical synthesis Peptide Fragments - analysis Peptide Fragments - chemical synthesis Reference Standards Reproducibility of Results |
title | Inter-method variability in PTH measurement: Implication for the care of CKD patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T05%3A08%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inter-method%20variability%20in%20PTH%20measurement:%20Implication%20for%20the%20care%20of%20CKD%20patients&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Souberbielle,%20J.-C.&rft.aucorp=Working%20group%20on%20PTH%20and%20vitamin%20D,%20Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9%20Fran%C3%A7aise%20de%20Biologie%20Clinique%20(SFBC)&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=345-350&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.ki.5001606&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1076935341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210108691&rft_id=info:pmid/16788691&rft_els_id=S0085253815519443&rfr_iscdi=true |