Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias

A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Emotion (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2005-09, Vol.5 (3), p.309-318
Hauptverfasser: Phaf, R. Hans, Rotteveel, Mark
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 3
container_start_page 309
container_title Emotion (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 5
creator Phaf, R. Hans
Rotteveel, Mark
description A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68630276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68630276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0FtLHDEUB_BQLPXSfoC-yKIoRZhtTjKTZB7tolbYIkj7HM5kT2RkdrImMwW_fbPuFi_4lIT8zoU_Y1-BT4FL_R0qYQpZlWJaTeVU8voD24NaQgEVqJ18__-_y_ZTuuccSlmXn9guKDDaKLXHvp17T25o_9LkV1iMHQ5t6CfBT27Jhbu-fXr-aDF9Zh89dom-bM8D9ufy4vfsZzG_ubqenc8LLKEeCgJdN0aCkEJzSY1b1EqLpvGqVHkpYZRGj4QCuXGNI0fSl04IdAYXTQPygJ1u-q5ieBgpDXbZJkddhz2FMVlllORCqwyP3sD7MMY-72YVlKUQQlcZwQa5GFKK5O0qtkuMjxa4XWdo1xnZdUa2stLmDHPN4bbx2Cxp8VyxDS2Dky3A5LDzEXvXpmenoaoN19mdbRyu0K7So8M4tK6j5MYYqR8sLcOLqcfv41fqH_9Mk0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614422275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Phaf, R. Hans ; Rotteveel, Mark</creator><contributor>Davidson, Richard J ; Scherer, Klaus R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Phaf, R. Hans ; Rotteveel, Mark ; Davidson, Richard J ; Scherer, Klaus R</creatorcontrib><description>A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-1516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16187866</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMOTCL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Affect ; Affectivity. Emotion ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emotional Content ; Emotional States ; Familiarity ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Processes ; Personality. Affectivity ; Priming ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Semantics ; Stimulus Novelty ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2005-09, Vol.5 (3), p.309-318</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17159807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16187866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Davidson, Richard J</contributor><contributor>Scherer, Klaus R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Phaf, R. Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotteveel, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</title><title>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><description>A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Affectivity. Emotion</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emotional Content</subject><subject>Emotional States</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Stimulus Novelty</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>1528-3542</issn><issn>1931-1516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0FtLHDEUB_BQLPXSfoC-yKIoRZhtTjKTZB7tolbYIkj7HM5kT2RkdrImMwW_fbPuFi_4lIT8zoU_Y1-BT4FL_R0qYQpZlWJaTeVU8voD24NaQgEVqJ18__-_y_ZTuuccSlmXn9guKDDaKLXHvp17T25o_9LkV1iMHQ5t6CfBT27Jhbu-fXr-aDF9Zh89dom-bM8D9ufy4vfsZzG_ubqenc8LLKEeCgJdN0aCkEJzSY1b1EqLpvGqVHkpYZRGj4QCuXGNI0fSl04IdAYXTQPygJ1u-q5ieBgpDXbZJkddhz2FMVlllORCqwyP3sD7MMY-72YVlKUQQlcZwQa5GFKK5O0qtkuMjxa4XWdo1xnZdUa2stLmDHPN4bbx2Cxp8VyxDS2Dky3A5LDzEXvXpmenoaoN19mdbRyu0K7So8M4tK6j5MYYqR8sLcOLqcfv41fqH_9Mk0k</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Phaf, R. Hans</creator><creator>Rotteveel, Mark</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</title><author>Phaf, R. Hans ; Rotteveel, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Affectivity. Emotion</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emotional Content</topic><topic>Emotional States</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Stimulus Novelty</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phaf, R. Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotteveel, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phaf, R. Hans</au><au>Rotteveel, Mark</au><au>Davidson, Richard J</au><au>Scherer, Klaus R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</atitle><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>309-318</pages><issn>1528-3542</issn><eissn>1931-1516</eissn><coden>EMOTCL</coden><abstract>A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16187866</pmid><doi>10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1528-3542
ispartof Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2005-09, Vol.5 (3), p.309-318
issn 1528-3542
1931-1516
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68630276
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Affect
Affectivity. Emotion
Biological and medical sciences
Emotional Content
Emotional States
Familiarity
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Judgment
Learning. Memory
Male
Memory
Mental Processes
Personality. Affectivity
Priming
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Recognition (Psychology)
Semantics
Stimulus Novelty
Word Recognition
title Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20Modulation%20of%20Recognition%20Bias&rft.jtitle=Emotion%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Phaf,%20R.%20Hans&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=309-318&rft.issn=1528-3542&rft.eissn=1931-1516&rft.coden=EMOTCL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68630276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614422275&rft_id=info:pmid/16187866&rfr_iscdi=true