Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias
A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Emotion (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2005-09, Vol.5 (3), p.309-318 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 318 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | Emotion (Washington, D.C.) |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Phaf, R. Hans Rotteveel, Mark |
description | A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68630276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68630276</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0FtLHDEUB_BQLPXSfoC-yKIoRZhtTjKTZB7tolbYIkj7HM5kT2RkdrImMwW_fbPuFi_4lIT8zoU_Y1-BT4FL_R0qYQpZlWJaTeVU8voD24NaQgEVqJ18__-_y_ZTuuccSlmXn9guKDDaKLXHvp17T25o_9LkV1iMHQ5t6CfBT27Jhbu-fXr-aDF9Zh89dom-bM8D9ufy4vfsZzG_ubqenc8LLKEeCgJdN0aCkEJzSY1b1EqLpvGqVHkpYZRGj4QCuXGNI0fSl04IdAYXTQPygJ1u-q5ieBgpDXbZJkddhz2FMVlllORCqwyP3sD7MMY-72YVlKUQQlcZwQa5GFKK5O0qtkuMjxa4XWdo1xnZdUa2stLmDHPN4bbx2Cxp8VyxDS2Dky3A5LDzEXvXpmenoaoN19mdbRyu0K7So8M4tK6j5MYYqR8sLcOLqcfv41fqH_9Mk0k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614422275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Phaf, R. Hans ; Rotteveel, Mark</creator><contributor>Davidson, Richard J ; Scherer, Klaus R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Phaf, R. Hans ; Rotteveel, Mark ; Davidson, Richard J ; Scherer, Klaus R</creatorcontrib><description>A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-3542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-1516</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16187866</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMOTCL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Affect ; Affectivity. Emotion ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emotional Content ; Emotional States ; Familiarity ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Learning. Memory ; Male ; Memory ; Mental Processes ; Personality. Affectivity ; Priming ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Semantics ; Stimulus Novelty ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2005-09, Vol.5 (3), p.309-318</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17159807$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16187866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Davidson, Richard J</contributor><contributor>Scherer, Klaus R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Phaf, R. Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotteveel, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</title><title>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</title><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><description>A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Affectivity. Emotion</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emotional Content</subject><subject>Emotional States</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Processes</subject><subject>Personality. Affectivity</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Stimulus Novelty</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>1528-3542</issn><issn>1931-1516</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0FtLHDEUB_BQLPXSfoC-yKIoRZhtTjKTZB7tolbYIkj7HM5kT2RkdrImMwW_fbPuFi_4lIT8zoU_Y1-BT4FL_R0qYQpZlWJaTeVU8voD24NaQgEVqJ18__-_y_ZTuuccSlmXn9guKDDaKLXHvp17T25o_9LkV1iMHQ5t6CfBT27Jhbu-fXr-aDF9Zh89dom-bM8D9ufy4vfsZzG_ubqenc8LLKEeCgJdN0aCkEJzSY1b1EqLpvGqVHkpYZRGj4QCuXGNI0fSl04IdAYXTQPygJ1u-q5ieBgpDXbZJkddhz2FMVlllORCqwyP3sD7MMY-72YVlKUQQlcZwQa5GFKK5O0qtkuMjxa4XWdo1xnZdUa2stLmDHPN4bbx2Cxp8VyxDS2Dky3A5LDzEXvXpmenoaoN19mdbRyu0K7So8M4tK6j5MYYqR8sLcOLqcfv41fqH_9Mk0k</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Phaf, R. Hans</creator><creator>Rotteveel, Mark</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</title><author>Phaf, R. Hans ; Rotteveel, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a419t-e179b831232703ebcd9672bbf6465162867afaea2a08cbcece3f4c22ac8adbb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Affectivity. Emotion</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emotional Content</topic><topic>Emotional States</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Processes</topic><topic>Personality. Affectivity</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Stimulus Novelty</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phaf, R. Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotteveel, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phaf, R. Hans</au><au>Rotteveel, Mark</au><au>Davidson, Richard J</au><au>Scherer, Klaus R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias</atitle><jtitle>Emotion (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><addtitle>Emotion</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>309-318</pages><issn>1528-3542</issn><eissn>1931-1516</eissn><coden>EMOTCL</coden><abstract>A correspondence of processing on the familiarity-novelty and positive-negative dimensions, particularly in the earliest processing stages, is proposed. Familiarity manipulations should, therefore, not only influence affective evaluations (e.g., the mere exposure effect), but affective manipulations should also bias familiarity judgments (e.g., in recognition). In Experiment 1, both previously presented and new recognition test words were primed by matching, nonmatching, positive, or negative context words. In Experiment 2, more diffuse affective states were induced during recognition test trials by contracting facial muscles that corresponded to positive and negative expressions. Particularly when participants were less aware of the familiarity and affective manipulations, corresponding effects were found. Positive affect led to a more liberal recognition bias, and negative affect led to more cautious tendencies.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16187866</pmid><doi>10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1528-3542 |
ispartof | Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2005-09, Vol.5 (3), p.309-318 |
issn | 1528-3542 1931-1516 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68630276 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Affect Affectivity. Emotion Biological and medical sciences Emotional Content Emotional States Familiarity Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Judgment Learning. Memory Male Memory Mental Processes Personality. Affectivity Priming Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Recognition (Psychology) Semantics Stimulus Novelty Word Recognition |
title | Affective Modulation of Recognition Bias |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T17%3A35%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affective%20Modulation%20of%20Recognition%20Bias&rft.jtitle=Emotion%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Phaf,%20R.%20Hans&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=309-318&rft.issn=1528-3542&rft.eissn=1931-1516&rft.coden=EMOTCL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.309&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68630276%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614422275&rft_id=info:pmid/16187866&rfr_iscdi=true |