Extent and Predictors of Microbial Hand Contamination in a Tertiary Care Ophthalmic Outpatient Practice

To measure the extent of microbial hand contamination among ophthalmologists during routine clinic practice and examine its association with hand cleansing practices and beliefs, glove use, and patient load. This was a single-masked analysis of resident and transient flora of ophthalmologists before...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2005-10, Vol.46 (10), p.3578-3583
Hauptverfasser: Lam, Robert F, Hui, Mamie, Leung, Dexter Y. L, Chow, Viola C. Y, Lam, Ben N. M, Leung, Gabriel M, Lam, Dennis S. C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3583
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3578
container_title Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
container_volume 46
creator Lam, Robert F
Hui, Mamie
Leung, Dexter Y. L
Chow, Viola C. Y
Lam, Ben N. M
Leung, Gabriel M
Lam, Dennis S. C
description To measure the extent of microbial hand contamination among ophthalmologists during routine clinic practice and examine its association with hand cleansing practices and beliefs, glove use, and patient load. This was a single-masked analysis of resident and transient flora of ophthalmologists before and after patient examination and after handwashing by agar imprints of the dominant hand. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect information concerning subjects' hand cleansing practices and patient load. Of the 108 cultures, 107 (99.1%) were culture positive, yielding 15 separate organisms. Gram-negative bacilli were the most common transient flora, followed by Gram-positive cocci and fungi. Thirty-five (97.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one resident and 8 (22.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one transient organism, before patient contact. Regression models showed alcohol-based hand rub use, transient and resident floral load before patient contact, and patient load collectively accounted for 58.7% of the variance in resident floral load after patient contact. Use of alcohol-based hand rubs was associated with a mean resident floral reduction of 324.4 CFUs (95% confidence interval [CI] = 185.4 to 463.5; P < 0.01) and 31.6 CFUs (95% CI = 1.2 to 62.0; P < 0.05) after patient contact and handwashing, respectively. Handwashing with chlorhexidine was a significant predictor for transient floral load after handwashing (unstandardized beta = -17.2; 95% CI = -10.2 to -24.2; P < 0.01). The extent of contamination with pathogenic organisms after contact with eye outpatients, who have traditionally been perceived as relatively "clean," was of concern. Previously identified risk factors for hand contamination in inpatient settings, such as patient load, only explained a small proportion of variance in microbial load in the ophthalmic outpatient setting.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.05-0216
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68624958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68624958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-b216a836105aacac1d7d71e3731cbc031829fd955b74c6a3e0fd4ef54556419d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0TtPwzAUBWALgaA8NmbkBVgI-MaPpCOqeEmgMsBs3TgONcqj2C6Ff4-jVmLy4E_HOseEnAK7BlDFjRu-wzWTGctB7ZAJSJlnsij5LpkwECpjgokDchjCJ0sEcrZPDkBBqThXE_Jx9xNtHyn2NX31tnYmDj7QoaEvzvihctjSx_FyNvQRO9djdENPXU-RvlkfHfpfOkNv6Xy5iAtsO2fofBWXyY25rx5NdMYek70G22BPtucReb-_e5s9Zs_zh6fZ7XNmuISYVakEllwBk4gGDdRFXYDlBQdTGcahzKdNPZWyKoRRyC1ramEbKaRUAqY1PyIXm9ylH75WNkTduWBs22Jvh1XQqlS5mMoywasNTC1D8LbRS--61EYD0-OwehxWM6nHYRM_2-auqs7W_3i7ZALnW4DBYNt47I0L_64ADnkukrvcuIX7WKydtzp02LYpFvR6vRZqfJ-PH_gH2Z2PHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68624958</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extent and Predictors of Microbial Hand Contamination in a Tertiary Care Ophthalmic Outpatient Practice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lam, Robert F ; Hui, Mamie ; Leung, Dexter Y. L ; Chow, Viola C. Y ; Lam, Ben N. M ; Leung, Gabriel M ; Lam, Dennis S. C</creator><creatorcontrib>Lam, Robert F ; Hui, Mamie ; Leung, Dexter Y. L ; Chow, Viola C. Y ; Lam, Ben N. M ; Leung, Gabriel M ; Lam, Dennis S. C</creatorcontrib><description>To measure the extent of microbial hand contamination among ophthalmologists during routine clinic practice and examine its association with hand cleansing practices and beliefs, glove use, and patient load. This was a single-masked analysis of resident and transient flora of ophthalmologists before and after patient examination and after handwashing by agar imprints of the dominant hand. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect information concerning subjects' hand cleansing practices and patient load. Of the 108 cultures, 107 (99.1%) were culture positive, yielding 15 separate organisms. Gram-negative bacilli were the most common transient flora, followed by Gram-positive cocci and fungi. Thirty-five (97.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one resident and 8 (22.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one transient organism, before patient contact. Regression models showed alcohol-based hand rub use, transient and resident floral load before patient contact, and patient load collectively accounted for 58.7% of the variance in resident floral load after patient contact. Use of alcohol-based hand rubs was associated with a mean resident floral reduction of 324.4 CFUs (95% confidence interval [CI] = 185.4 to 463.5; P &lt; 0.01) and 31.6 CFUs (95% CI = 1.2 to 62.0; P &lt; 0.05) after patient contact and handwashing, respectively. Handwashing with chlorhexidine was a significant predictor for transient floral load after handwashing (unstandardized beta = -17.2; 95% CI = -10.2 to -24.2; P &lt; 0.01). The extent of contamination with pathogenic organisms after contact with eye outpatients, who have traditionally been perceived as relatively "clean," was of concern. Previously identified risk factors for hand contamination in inpatient settings, such as patient load, only explained a small proportion of variance in microbial load in the ophthalmic outpatient setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0404</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16186336</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOVSDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rockville, MD: ARVO</publisher><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification ; Biological and medical sciences ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gloves, Protective - utilization ; Hand - microbiology ; Hand Disinfection - standards ; Hong Kong ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Infection Control - methods ; Male ; Ophthalmology - manpower ; Outpatients ; Personnel, Hospital ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science, 2005-10, Vol.46 (10), p.3578-3583</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-b216a836105aacac1d7d71e3731cbc031829fd955b74c6a3e0fd4ef54556419d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17131224$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16186336$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lam, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Mamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Dexter Y. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Viola C. Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Ben N. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Gabriel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Dennis S. C</creatorcontrib><title>Extent and Predictors of Microbial Hand Contamination in a Tertiary Care Ophthalmic Outpatient Practice</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>To measure the extent of microbial hand contamination among ophthalmologists during routine clinic practice and examine its association with hand cleansing practices and beliefs, glove use, and patient load. This was a single-masked analysis of resident and transient flora of ophthalmologists before and after patient examination and after handwashing by agar imprints of the dominant hand. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect information concerning subjects' hand cleansing practices and patient load. Of the 108 cultures, 107 (99.1%) were culture positive, yielding 15 separate organisms. Gram-negative bacilli were the most common transient flora, followed by Gram-positive cocci and fungi. Thirty-five (97.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one resident and 8 (22.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one transient organism, before patient contact. Regression models showed alcohol-based hand rub use, transient and resident floral load before patient contact, and patient load collectively accounted for 58.7% of the variance in resident floral load after patient contact. Use of alcohol-based hand rubs was associated with a mean resident floral reduction of 324.4 CFUs (95% confidence interval [CI] = 185.4 to 463.5; P &lt; 0.01) and 31.6 CFUs (95% CI = 1.2 to 62.0; P &lt; 0.05) after patient contact and handwashing, respectively. Handwashing with chlorhexidine was a significant predictor for transient floral load after handwashing (unstandardized beta = -17.2; 95% CI = -10.2 to -24.2; P &lt; 0.01). The extent of contamination with pathogenic organisms after contact with eye outpatients, who have traditionally been perceived as relatively "clean," was of concern. Previously identified risk factors for hand contamination in inpatient settings, such as patient load, only explained a small proportion of variance in microbial load in the ophthalmic outpatient setting.</description><subject>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gloves, Protective - utilization</subject><subject>Hand - microbiology</subject><subject>Hand Disinfection - standards</subject><subject>Hong Kong</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection Control - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Ophthalmology - manpower</subject><subject>Outpatients</subject><subject>Personnel, Hospital</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0TtPwzAUBWALgaA8NmbkBVgI-MaPpCOqeEmgMsBs3TgONcqj2C6Ff4-jVmLy4E_HOseEnAK7BlDFjRu-wzWTGctB7ZAJSJlnsij5LpkwECpjgokDchjCJ0sEcrZPDkBBqThXE_Jx9xNtHyn2NX31tnYmDj7QoaEvzvihctjSx_FyNvQRO9djdENPXU-RvlkfHfpfOkNv6Xy5iAtsO2fofBWXyY25rx5NdMYek70G22BPtucReb-_e5s9Zs_zh6fZ7XNmuISYVakEllwBk4gGDdRFXYDlBQdTGcahzKdNPZWyKoRRyC1ramEbKaRUAqY1PyIXm9ylH75WNkTduWBs22Jvh1XQqlS5mMoywasNTC1D8LbRS--61EYD0-OwehxWM6nHYRM_2-auqs7W_3i7ZALnW4DBYNt47I0L_64ADnkukrvcuIX7WKydtzp02LYpFvR6vRZqfJ-PH_gH2Z2PHw</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Lam, Robert F</creator><creator>Hui, Mamie</creator><creator>Leung, Dexter Y. L</creator><creator>Chow, Viola C. Y</creator><creator>Lam, Ben N. M</creator><creator>Leung, Gabriel M</creator><creator>Lam, Dennis S. C</creator><general>ARVO</general><general>Association for Research in Vision and Ophtalmology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Extent and Predictors of Microbial Hand Contamination in a Tertiary Care Ophthalmic Outpatient Practice</title><author>Lam, Robert F ; Hui, Mamie ; Leung, Dexter Y. L ; Chow, Viola C. Y ; Lam, Ben N. M ; Leung, Gabriel M ; Lam, Dennis S. C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-b216a836105aacac1d7d71e3731cbc031829fd955b74c6a3e0fd4ef54556419d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Bacteria - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Cross Infection - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gloves, Protective - utilization</topic><topic>Hand - microbiology</topic><topic>Hand Disinfection - standards</topic><topic>Hong Kong</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection Control - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Ophthalmology - manpower</topic><topic>Outpatients</topic><topic>Personnel, Hospital</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lam, Robert F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Mamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Dexter Y. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Viola C. Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Ben N. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Gabriel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Dennis S. C</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lam, Robert F</au><au>Hui, Mamie</au><au>Leung, Dexter Y. L</au><au>Chow, Viola C. Y</au><au>Lam, Ben N. M</au><au>Leung, Gabriel M</au><au>Lam, Dennis S. C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extent and Predictors of Microbial Hand Contamination in a Tertiary Care Ophthalmic Outpatient Practice</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3578</spage><epage>3583</epage><pages>3578-3583</pages><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><coden>IOVSDA</coden><abstract>To measure the extent of microbial hand contamination among ophthalmologists during routine clinic practice and examine its association with hand cleansing practices and beliefs, glove use, and patient load. This was a single-masked analysis of resident and transient flora of ophthalmologists before and after patient examination and after handwashing by agar imprints of the dominant hand. Standardized questionnaires were used to collect information concerning subjects' hand cleansing practices and patient load. Of the 108 cultures, 107 (99.1%) were culture positive, yielding 15 separate organisms. Gram-negative bacilli were the most common transient flora, followed by Gram-positive cocci and fungi. Thirty-five (97.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one resident and 8 (22.2%) ophthalmologists were culture positive for at least one transient organism, before patient contact. Regression models showed alcohol-based hand rub use, transient and resident floral load before patient contact, and patient load collectively accounted for 58.7% of the variance in resident floral load after patient contact. Use of alcohol-based hand rubs was associated with a mean resident floral reduction of 324.4 CFUs (95% confidence interval [CI] = 185.4 to 463.5; P &lt; 0.01) and 31.6 CFUs (95% CI = 1.2 to 62.0; P &lt; 0.05) after patient contact and handwashing, respectively. Handwashing with chlorhexidine was a significant predictor for transient floral load after handwashing (unstandardized beta = -17.2; 95% CI = -10.2 to -24.2; P &lt; 0.01). The extent of contamination with pathogenic organisms after contact with eye outpatients, who have traditionally been perceived as relatively "clean," was of concern. Previously identified risk factors for hand contamination in inpatient settings, such as patient load, only explained a small proportion of variance in microbial load in the ophthalmic outpatient setting.</abstract><cop>Rockville, MD</cop><pub>ARVO</pub><pmid>16186336</pmid><doi>10.1167/iovs.05-0216</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-0404
ispartof Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2005-10, Vol.46 (10), p.3578-3583
issn 0146-0404
1552-5783
1552-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68624958
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Bacteria - isolation & purification
Biological and medical sciences
Colony Count, Microbial
Cross Infection - prevention & control
Cross-Sectional Studies
Eye and associated structures. Visual pathways and centers. Vision
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gloves, Protective - utilization
Hand - microbiology
Hand Disinfection - standards
Hong Kong
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Infection Control - methods
Male
Ophthalmology - manpower
Outpatients
Personnel, Hospital
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Extent and Predictors of Microbial Hand Contamination in a Tertiary Care Ophthalmic Outpatient Practice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A09%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extent%20and%20Predictors%20of%20Microbial%20Hand%20Contamination%20in%20a%20Tertiary%20Care%20Ophthalmic%20Outpatient%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Lam,%20Robert%20F&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3578&rft.epage=3583&rft.pages=3578-3583&rft.issn=0146-0404&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft.coden=IOVSDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/iovs.05-0216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68624958%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68624958&rft_id=info:pmid/16186336&rfr_iscdi=true