Use of RAPD and AFLP Markers to Identify Inter- and Intraspecific Hybrids of Mentha

Three controlled crosses were carried out involving Mentha arvensis and Mentha spicata [M. spicata CIMAP/C30 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33 (cv. Neera); M. arvensis CIMAP/C18 x CIMAP/C17 (cv. Kalka); and M. arvensis CIMAP/C17 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33]. The parents were subjected to random amplified polymorphi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of heredity 2005-09, Vol.96 (5), p.542-549
Hauptverfasser: Shasany, A. K, Darokar, M. P, Dhawan, S, Gupta, A. K, Gupta, S, Shukla, A. K, Patra, N. K, Khanuja, S. P. S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 549
container_issue 5
container_start_page 542
container_title The Journal of heredity
container_volume 96
creator Shasany, A. K
Darokar, M. P
Dhawan, S
Gupta, A. K
Gupta, S
Shukla, A. K
Patra, N. K
Khanuja, S. P. S
description Three controlled crosses were carried out involving Mentha arvensis and Mentha spicata [M. spicata CIMAP/C30 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33 (cv. Neera); M. arvensis CIMAP/C18 x CIMAP/C17 (cv. Kalka); and M. arvensis CIMAP/C17 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33]. The parents were subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis with 80 primers, and polymorphic primers were tested for detecting coinherited RAPD profiles among the progeny of these crosses. Of 50 seedlings tested from each intraspecific cross, all demonstrated dominant profiles with the selected RAPD primers except the detected hybrid from respective crosses. Coinherited markers could be detected with the primers OPJ 01, MAP 06, OPT 08, and OPO 20 for M. arvensis; OPJ 05, OPJ 14, OPO 19, and OPT 09 for M. spicata; and OPJ 07, OPJ 10, OPJ 11, OPJ 14, and OPO 02 for the cross M. arvensis x M. spicata. In our amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, 40 coinherited marker fragments were identified for the cross involving M. arvensis, 32 for the cross involving M. spicata, and 41 for the interspecific cross between M. arvensis and M. spicata. In all crosses, similarity values between the parents were less than those between the parents and the hybrids. Although RAPD markers are generally considered dominant, it is possible to identify a few codominant markers that behave like restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. This molecular marker system may be helpful in rapidly screening out hybrids in crops where cross-pollination is a problem.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jhered/esi091
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68614864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20435878</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-1080ab55bde8a30d859812ed2aa45cc31ebdf36449cfd0ffc0efae955bd71b1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U2P0zAQBmALgdiycOQKEQduYWf8kdjHqrC0UhdWlCLExXKcMZvSJsVOJfrvSUm1SFw42bKfeaXRy9hzhDcIRlxt7ihSfUWpAYMP2ARlofJSCPGQTQA4z1GBuGBPUtoAACoDj9kFFihUiXzCVutEWReyT9Pbt5lr62x6vbzNblz8QTFlfZctamr7JhyzRdtTzP-Y4Rpd2pNvQuOz-bGKTZ1OKTeDvXNP2aPgtomenc9Ltr5-93k2z5cf3y9m02XupYI-R9DgKqWqmrQTUGtlNHKquXNSeS-QqjqIQkrjQw0heKDgyJwGSqzQi0v2eszdx-7ngVJvd03ytN26lrpDsoUuUOpC_hdykELpUg_w1T9w0x1iOyxh0WjQXAo-oHxEPnYpRQp2H5udi0eLYE-d2LETO3Yy-Bfn0EO1G57v9bmEv4FN6unX_f_QgS1KUSo7__rNKm1g9qFc2S-Dfzn64Drrvscm2fWKAwpA4IZLKX4DAduf3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198082432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of RAPD and AFLP Markers to Identify Inter- and Intraspecific Hybrids of Mentha</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Shasany, A. K ; Darokar, M. P ; Dhawan, S ; Gupta, A. K ; Gupta, S ; Shukla, A. K ; Patra, N. K ; Khanuja, S. P. S</creator><creatorcontrib>Shasany, A. K ; Darokar, M. P ; Dhawan, S ; Gupta, A. K ; Gupta, S ; Shukla, A. K ; Patra, N. K ; Khanuja, S. P. S</creatorcontrib><description>Three controlled crosses were carried out involving Mentha arvensis and Mentha spicata [M. spicata CIMAP/C30 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33 (cv. Neera); M. arvensis CIMAP/C18 x CIMAP/C17 (cv. Kalka); and M. arvensis CIMAP/C17 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33]. The parents were subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis with 80 primers, and polymorphic primers were tested for detecting coinherited RAPD profiles among the progeny of these crosses. Of 50 seedlings tested from each intraspecific cross, all demonstrated dominant profiles with the selected RAPD primers except the detected hybrid from respective crosses. Coinherited markers could be detected with the primers OPJ 01, MAP 06, OPT 08, and OPO 20 for M. arvensis; OPJ 05, OPJ 14, OPO 19, and OPT 09 for M. spicata; and OPJ 07, OPJ 10, OPJ 11, OPJ 14, and OPO 02 for the cross M. arvensis x M. spicata. In our amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, 40 coinherited marker fragments were identified for the cross involving M. arvensis, 32 for the cross involving M. spicata, and 41 for the interspecific cross between M. arvensis and M. spicata. In all crosses, similarity values between the parents were less than those between the parents and the hybrids. Although RAPD markers are generally considered dominant, it is possible to identify a few codominant markers that behave like restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. This molecular marker system may be helpful in rapidly screening out hybrids in crops where cross-pollination is a problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1503</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-8505</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esi091</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16135712</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOHEA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>amplified fragment length polymorphism ; Breeding - methods ; codominance ; Crops ; crossing ; DNA Primers ; genetic markers ; Genetics ; Hybridization ; Hybridization, Genetic ; inheritance (genetics) ; Inheritance Patterns - genetics ; interspecific hybridization ; Mentha ; Mentha - genetics ; Mentha arvensis ; Mentha spicata ; Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques ; Polymorphism ; Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length ; Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><ispartof>The Journal of heredity, 2005-09, Vol.96 (5), p.542-549</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-1080ab55bde8a30d859812ed2aa45cc31ebdf36449cfd0ffc0efae955bd71b1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-1080ab55bde8a30d859812ed2aa45cc31ebdf36449cfd0ffc0efae955bd71b1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16135712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shasany, A. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darokar, M. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhawan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, A. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shukla, A. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, N. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanuja, S. P. S</creatorcontrib><title>Use of RAPD and AFLP Markers to Identify Inter- and Intraspecific Hybrids of Mentha</title><title>The Journal of heredity</title><addtitle>J Hered</addtitle><description>Three controlled crosses were carried out involving Mentha arvensis and Mentha spicata [M. spicata CIMAP/C30 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33 (cv. Neera); M. arvensis CIMAP/C18 x CIMAP/C17 (cv. Kalka); and M. arvensis CIMAP/C17 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33]. The parents were subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis with 80 primers, and polymorphic primers were tested for detecting coinherited RAPD profiles among the progeny of these crosses. Of 50 seedlings tested from each intraspecific cross, all demonstrated dominant profiles with the selected RAPD primers except the detected hybrid from respective crosses. Coinherited markers could be detected with the primers OPJ 01, MAP 06, OPT 08, and OPO 20 for M. arvensis; OPJ 05, OPJ 14, OPO 19, and OPT 09 for M. spicata; and OPJ 07, OPJ 10, OPJ 11, OPJ 14, and OPO 02 for the cross M. arvensis x M. spicata. In our amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, 40 coinherited marker fragments were identified for the cross involving M. arvensis, 32 for the cross involving M. spicata, and 41 for the interspecific cross between M. arvensis and M. spicata. In all crosses, similarity values between the parents were less than those between the parents and the hybrids. Although RAPD markers are generally considered dominant, it is possible to identify a few codominant markers that behave like restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. This molecular marker system may be helpful in rapidly screening out hybrids in crops where cross-pollination is a problem.</description><subject>amplified fragment length polymorphism</subject><subject>Breeding - methods</subject><subject>codominance</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>crossing</subject><subject>DNA Primers</subject><subject>genetic markers</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Hybridization, Genetic</subject><subject>inheritance (genetics)</subject><subject>Inheritance Patterns - genetics</subject><subject>interspecific hybridization</subject><subject>Mentha</subject><subject>Mentha - genetics</subject><subject>Mentha arvensis</subject><subject>Mentha spicata</subject><subject>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques</subject><subject>Polymorphism</subject><subject>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</subject><subject>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</subject><issn>0022-1503</issn><issn>1465-7333</issn><issn>1471-8505</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U2P0zAQBmALgdiycOQKEQduYWf8kdjHqrC0UhdWlCLExXKcMZvSJsVOJfrvSUm1SFw42bKfeaXRy9hzhDcIRlxt7ihSfUWpAYMP2ARlofJSCPGQTQA4z1GBuGBPUtoAACoDj9kFFihUiXzCVutEWReyT9Pbt5lr62x6vbzNblz8QTFlfZctamr7JhyzRdtTzP-Y4Rpd2pNvQuOz-bGKTZ1OKTeDvXNP2aPgtomenc9Ltr5-93k2z5cf3y9m02XupYI-R9DgKqWqmrQTUGtlNHKquXNSeS-QqjqIQkrjQw0heKDgyJwGSqzQi0v2eszdx-7ngVJvd03ytN26lrpDsoUuUOpC_hdykELpUg_w1T9w0x1iOyxh0WjQXAo-oHxEPnYpRQp2H5udi0eLYE-d2LETO3Yy-Bfn0EO1G57v9bmEv4FN6unX_f_QgS1KUSo7__rNKm1g9qFc2S-Dfzn64Drrvscm2fWKAwpA4IZLKX4DAduf3w</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Shasany, A. K</creator><creator>Darokar, M. P</creator><creator>Dhawan, S</creator><creator>Gupta, A. K</creator><creator>Gupta, S</creator><creator>Shukla, A. K</creator><creator>Patra, N. K</creator><creator>Khanuja, S. P. S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>Use of RAPD and AFLP Markers to Identify Inter- and Intraspecific Hybrids of Mentha</title><author>Shasany, A. K ; Darokar, M. P ; Dhawan, S ; Gupta, A. K ; Gupta, S ; Shukla, A. K ; Patra, N. K ; Khanuja, S. P. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-1080ab55bde8a30d859812ed2aa45cc31ebdf36449cfd0ffc0efae955bd71b1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>amplified fragment length polymorphism</topic><topic>Breeding - methods</topic><topic>codominance</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>crossing</topic><topic>DNA Primers</topic><topic>genetic markers</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Hybridization, Genetic</topic><topic>inheritance (genetics)</topic><topic>Inheritance Patterns - genetics</topic><topic>interspecific hybridization</topic><topic>Mentha</topic><topic>Mentha - genetics</topic><topic>Mentha arvensis</topic><topic>Mentha spicata</topic><topic>Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques</topic><topic>Polymorphism</topic><topic>Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length</topic><topic>Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shasany, A. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darokar, M. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhawan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, A. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shukla, A. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patra, N. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanuja, S. P. S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of heredity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shasany, A. K</au><au>Darokar, M. P</au><au>Dhawan, S</au><au>Gupta, A. K</au><au>Gupta, S</au><au>Shukla, A. K</au><au>Patra, N. K</au><au>Khanuja, S. P. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of RAPD and AFLP Markers to Identify Inter- and Intraspecific Hybrids of Mentha</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of heredity</jtitle><addtitle>J Hered</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>542</spage><epage>549</epage><pages>542-549</pages><issn>0022-1503</issn><eissn>1465-7333</eissn><eissn>1471-8505</eissn><coden>JOHEA8</coden><abstract>Three controlled crosses were carried out involving Mentha arvensis and Mentha spicata [M. spicata CIMAP/C30 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33 (cv. Neera); M. arvensis CIMAP/C18 x CIMAP/C17 (cv. Kalka); and M. arvensis CIMAP/C17 x M. spicata CIMAP/C33]. The parents were subjected to random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis with 80 primers, and polymorphic primers were tested for detecting coinherited RAPD profiles among the progeny of these crosses. Of 50 seedlings tested from each intraspecific cross, all demonstrated dominant profiles with the selected RAPD primers except the detected hybrid from respective crosses. Coinherited markers could be detected with the primers OPJ 01, MAP 06, OPT 08, and OPO 20 for M. arvensis; OPJ 05, OPJ 14, OPO 19, and OPT 09 for M. spicata; and OPJ 07, OPJ 10, OPJ 11, OPJ 14, and OPO 02 for the cross M. arvensis x M. spicata. In our amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, 40 coinherited marker fragments were identified for the cross involving M. arvensis, 32 for the cross involving M. spicata, and 41 for the interspecific cross between M. arvensis and M. spicata. In all crosses, similarity values between the parents were less than those between the parents and the hybrids. Although RAPD markers are generally considered dominant, it is possible to identify a few codominant markers that behave like restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers. This molecular marker system may be helpful in rapidly screening out hybrids in crops where cross-pollination is a problem.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16135712</pmid><doi>10.1093/jhered/esi091</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1503
ispartof The Journal of heredity, 2005-09, Vol.96 (5), p.542-549
issn 0022-1503
1465-7333
1471-8505
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68614864
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects amplified fragment length polymorphism
Breeding - methods
codominance
Crops
crossing
DNA Primers
genetic markers
Genetics
Hybridization
Hybridization, Genetic
inheritance (genetics)
Inheritance Patterns - genetics
interspecific hybridization
Mentha
Mentha - genetics
Mentha arvensis
Mentha spicata
Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques
Polymorphism
Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
title Use of RAPD and AFLP Markers to Identify Inter- and Intraspecific Hybrids of Mentha
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T17%3A50%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20RAPD%20and%20AFLP%20Markers%20to%20Identify%20Inter-%20and%20Intraspecific%20Hybrids%20of%20Mentha&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20heredity&rft.au=Shasany,%20A.%20K&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=542&rft.epage=549&rft.pages=542-549&rft.issn=0022-1503&rft.eissn=1465-7333&rft.coden=JOHEA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jhered/esi091&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20435878%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198082432&rft_id=info:pmid/16135712&rfr_iscdi=true