Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing
The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanics 2006-01, Vol.39 (10), p.1804-1811 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1811 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1804 |
container_title | Journal of biomechanics |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Tan, Juay-Seng Eng, Janice J. Robinovitch, Stephen N. Warnick, Brady |
description | The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33
m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01
m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27
m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57
m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16
m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52
m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68611224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929005002368</els_id><sourcerecordid>17242178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1LywBwbseZ9I2Te6UxS9Y8MaPy5BOUje1bY5Jz4r_3pRzRPFmYWDg5ZnPl7ErhD0CypfjfuxDnD3d7gVAu98C5QO2Q9XVlagVPGQ7AIGVFhou2JOcRwDomk4_ZhcoAVHVcse-fE0hrzzMB0srv_NTpLAGn7lNnufZTpNPPCx8iOmnTY4PRcl8vbUL7y19_0cbUpx5Xu3iwvLtKXtU1OyfnfMl-_z2zafr99XNx3cfrl_fVNRoXKtaD9r2QA221AxETlhHIPpBNa0tS8raWg8aSAjSrletBNUq2XRADvTQ1pfsxanvIcUfR59XM4dMfprs4uMxG6kkohDNvSB2ohHYqQI-_w8c4zEt5QiDUJetNdayUPJEUYo5Jz-YQwqzTb8KZDaDzGj-GGQ2g8wWuBVendsf-9m7v2VnRwrw6gT48ra74JPJFPxC3oXkaTUuhvtm_Ab9h6SF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034919136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Tan, Juay-Seng ; Eng, Janice J. ; Robinovitch, Stephen N. ; Warnick, Brady</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Juay-Seng ; Eng, Janice J. ; Robinovitch, Stephen N. ; Warnick, Brady</creatorcontrib><description>The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33
m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01
m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27
m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57
m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16
m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52
m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16011836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Distal radius fracture ; Fall direction ; Fall protective responses ; Female ; Fractures, Bone - prevention & control ; Hands ; Humans ; Impact velocity ; Medical research ; Older people ; Studies ; Weight-Bearing - physiology ; Wrist ; Wrist - physiology ; Wrist fracture ; Wrist Injuries - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (10), p.1804-1811</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1034919136?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16011836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Juay-Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Janice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnick, Brady</creatorcontrib><title>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33
m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01
m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27
m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57
m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16
m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52
m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Distal radius fracture</subject><subject>Fall direction</subject><subject>Fall protective responses</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - prevention & control</subject><subject>Hands</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact velocity</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><subject>Wrist - physiology</subject><subject>Wrist fracture</subject><subject>Wrist Injuries - prevention & control</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1LywBwbseZ9I2Te6UxS9Y8MaPy5BOUje1bY5Jz4r_3pRzRPFmYWDg5ZnPl7ErhD0CypfjfuxDnD3d7gVAu98C5QO2Q9XVlagVPGQ7AIGVFhou2JOcRwDomk4_ZhcoAVHVcse-fE0hrzzMB0srv_NTpLAGn7lNnufZTpNPPCx8iOmnTY4PRcl8vbUL7y19_0cbUpx5Xu3iwvLtKXtU1OyfnfMl-_z2zafr99XNx3cfrl_fVNRoXKtaD9r2QA221AxETlhHIPpBNa0tS8raWg8aSAjSrletBNUq2XRADvTQ1pfsxanvIcUfR59XM4dMfprs4uMxG6kkohDNvSB2ohHYqQI-_w8c4zEt5QiDUJetNdayUPJEUYo5Jz-YQwqzTb8KZDaDzGj-GGQ2g8wWuBVendsf-9m7v2VnRwrw6gT48ra74JPJFPxC3oXkaTUuhvtm_Ab9h6SF</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Tan, Juay-Seng</creator><creator>Eng, Janice J.</creator><creator>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</creator><creator>Warnick, Brady</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</title><author>Tan, Juay-Seng ; Eng, Janice J. ; Robinovitch, Stephen N. ; Warnick, Brady</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Distal radius fracture</topic><topic>Fall direction</topic><topic>Fall protective responses</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - prevention & control</topic><topic>Hands</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact velocity</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><topic>Wrist - physiology</topic><topic>Wrist fracture</topic><topic>Wrist Injuries - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Juay-Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Janice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnick, Brady</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Juay-Seng</au><au>Eng, Janice J.</au><au>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</au><au>Warnick, Brady</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1804</spage><epage>1811</epage><pages>1804-1811</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33
m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01
m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27
m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57
m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16
m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52
m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16011836</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9290 |
ispartof | Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (10), p.1804-1811 |
issn | 0021-9290 1873-2380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68611224 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Accidental Falls Adult Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Distal radius fracture Fall direction Fall protective responses Female Fractures, Bone - prevention & control Hands Humans Impact velocity Medical research Older people Studies Weight-Bearing - physiology Wrist Wrist - physiology Wrist fracture Wrist Injuries - prevention & control |
title | Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T10%3A46%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wrist%20impact%20velocities%20are%20smaller%20in%20forward%20falls%20than%20backward%20falls%20from%20standing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Tan,%20Juay-Seng&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1804&rft.epage=1811&rft.pages=1804-1811&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17242178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034919136&rft_id=info:pmid/16011836&rft_els_id=S0021929005002368&rfr_iscdi=true |