Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing

The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomechanics 2006-01, Vol.39 (10), p.1804-1811
Hauptverfasser: Tan, Juay-Seng, Eng, Janice J., Robinovitch, Stephen N., Warnick, Brady
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1811
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1804
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 39
creator Tan, Juay-Seng
Eng, Janice J.
Robinovitch, Stephen N.
Warnick, Brady
description The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33 m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01 m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27 m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57 m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16 m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52 m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68611224</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929005002368</els_id><sourcerecordid>17242178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1LywBwbseZ9I2Te6UxS9Y8MaPy5BOUje1bY5Jz4r_3pRzRPFmYWDg5ZnPl7ErhD0CypfjfuxDnD3d7gVAu98C5QO2Q9XVlagVPGQ7AIGVFhou2JOcRwDomk4_ZhcoAVHVcse-fE0hrzzMB0srv_NTpLAGn7lNnufZTpNPPCx8iOmnTY4PRcl8vbUL7y19_0cbUpx5Xu3iwvLtKXtU1OyfnfMl-_z2zafr99XNx3cfrl_fVNRoXKtaD9r2QA221AxETlhHIPpBNa0tS8raWg8aSAjSrletBNUq2XRADvTQ1pfsxanvIcUfR59XM4dMfprs4uMxG6kkohDNvSB2ohHYqQI-_w8c4zEt5QiDUJetNdayUPJEUYo5Jz-YQwqzTb8KZDaDzGj-GGQ2g8wWuBVendsf-9m7v2VnRwrw6gT48ra74JPJFPxC3oXkaTUuhvtm_Ab9h6SF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034919136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Tan, Juay-Seng ; Eng, Janice J. ; Robinovitch, Stephen N. ; Warnick, Brady</creator><creatorcontrib>Tan, Juay-Seng ; Eng, Janice J. ; Robinovitch, Stephen N. ; Warnick, Brady</creatorcontrib><description>The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33 m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01 m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27 m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57 m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16 m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52 m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16011836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidental Falls ; Adult ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Distal radius fracture ; Fall direction ; Fall protective responses ; Female ; Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control ; Hands ; Humans ; Impact velocity ; Medical research ; Older people ; Studies ; Weight-Bearing - physiology ; Wrist ; Wrist - physiology ; Wrist fracture ; Wrist Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (10), p.1804-1811</ispartof><rights>2006 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1034919136?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16011836$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tan, Juay-Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Janice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnick, Brady</creatorcontrib><title>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33 m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01 m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27 m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57 m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16 m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52 m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.</description><subject>Accidental Falls</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Distal radius fracture</subject><subject>Fall direction</subject><subject>Fall protective responses</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Hands</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impact velocity</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><subject>Wrist - physiology</subject><subject>Wrist fracture</subject><subject>Wrist Injuries - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7nH1LywBwbseZ9I2Te6UxS9Y8MaPy5BOUje1bY5Jz4r_3pRzRPFmYWDg5ZnPl7ErhD0CypfjfuxDnD3d7gVAu98C5QO2Q9XVlagVPGQ7AIGVFhou2JOcRwDomk4_ZhcoAVHVcse-fE0hrzzMB0srv_NTpLAGn7lNnufZTpNPPCx8iOmnTY4PRcl8vbUL7y19_0cbUpx5Xu3iwvLtKXtU1OyfnfMl-_z2zafr99XNx3cfrl_fVNRoXKtaD9r2QA221AxETlhHIPpBNa0tS8raWg8aSAjSrletBNUq2XRADvTQ1pfsxanvIcUfR59XM4dMfprs4uMxG6kkohDNvSB2ohHYqQI-_w8c4zEt5QiDUJetNdayUPJEUYo5Jz-YQwqzTb8KZDaDzGj-GGQ2g8wWuBVendsf-9m7v2VnRwrw6gT48ra74JPJFPxC3oXkaTUuhvtm_Ab9h6SF</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Tan, Juay-Seng</creator><creator>Eng, Janice J.</creator><creator>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</creator><creator>Warnick, Brady</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</title><author>Tan, Juay-Seng ; Eng, Janice J. ; Robinovitch, Stephen N. ; Warnick, Brady</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-39f9ab0c415c4fccd2adc02bf845a16063aae090c22c9db85608586470cd09f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Accidental Falls</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Distal radius fracture</topic><topic>Fall direction</topic><topic>Fall protective responses</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures, Bone - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Hands</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impact velocity</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><topic>Wrist - physiology</topic><topic>Wrist fracture</topic><topic>Wrist Injuries - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tan, Juay-Seng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eng, Janice J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warnick, Brady</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tan, Juay-Seng</au><au>Eng, Janice J.</au><au>Robinovitch, Stephen N.</au><au>Warnick, Brady</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1804</spage><epage>1811</epage><pages>1804-1811</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33 m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01 m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27 m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57 m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16 m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52 m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16011836</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2006-01, Vol.39 (10), p.1804-1811
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68611224
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Accidental Falls
Adult
Biomechanical Phenomena
Biomechanics
Distal radius fracture
Fall direction
Fall protective responses
Female
Fractures, Bone - prevention & control
Hands
Humans
Impact velocity
Medical research
Older people
Studies
Weight-Bearing - physiology
Wrist
Wrist - physiology
Wrist fracture
Wrist Injuries - prevention & control
title Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T10%3A46%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wrist%20impact%20velocities%20are%20smaller%20in%20forward%20falls%20than%20backward%20falls%20from%20standing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Tan,%20Juay-Seng&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1804&rft.epage=1811&rft.pages=1804-1811&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17242178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034919136&rft_id=info:pmid/16011836&rft_els_id=S0021929005002368&rfr_iscdi=true