Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2006-07, Vol.45 (4), p.196-210
Hauptverfasser: Malay, D. Scot, Pressman, Martin M., Assili, Amir, Kline, Jason T., York, Shane, Buren, Ben, Heyman, Eugene R., Borowsky, Pam, LeMay, Carley
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 4
container_start_page 196
container_title The Journal of foot and ankle surgery
container_volume 45
creator Malay, D. Scot
Pressman, Martin M.
Assili, Amir
Kline, Jason T.
York, Shane
Buren, Ben
Heyman, Eugene R.
Borowsky, Pam
LeMay, Carley
description Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P < .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68603848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1067251606001438</els_id><sourcerecordid>68603848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wBzggnziR4I_EcRCXsrRQqYiqFK6W44y1Xpx4sZ1ty-_jh-FoF3HjYs_Yz7z2zFsULwiuCG7Ym021MSpWFGNe4brCuH1UHJOmpiWltH6cY8zbkjaEHxUnMW4wprQTzdPiiHBBBKn5cfH7_D4FpX3Y-gDKoa9rr3_cqR2g2zUEtX1A3yHEOaJrpzT0HhkfUFrn64ynEaaEvEGrdfCT1eg6-Hs7ZplMT0kFdKGitjbZ-BbdQJxdiguu0I2aBj_aXzC8_qtcrvyUgnduOfvg595B-d7ZaVjyz7nU6vwaBHS5rLscWz_lb1jlnhVPjHIRnh_20-Lbxfnt6lN59eXj5ersqtSMNakEzlXf6hY6TbFQlLes1R1nDe1bSpuuB9wIQljdG2yMILTuOm4GyjAxvWgZOy1e7XW3wf-cISY52qjB5WbBz1FywTETtcgg3YM6-BgDGLkNeS7hQRIsF-_kRi7eycU7iWuZvctFLw_qcz_C8K_kYFYG3u0ByD3uLASZhwuThsEG0EkO3v5P_w9mhq5H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68603848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Malay, D. Scot ; Pressman, Martin M. ; Assili, Amir ; Kline, Jason T. ; York, Shane ; Buren, Ben ; Heyman, Eugene R. ; Borowsky, Pam ; LeMay, Carley</creator><creatorcontrib>Malay, D. Scot ; Pressman, Martin M. ; Assili, Amir ; Kline, Jason T. ; York, Shane ; Buren, Ben ; Heyman, Eugene R. ; Borowsky, Pam ; LeMay, Carley</creatorcontrib><description>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P &lt; .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16818146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Chronic Disease ; Double-Blind Method ; extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) ; Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy ; Female ; Heel ; heel pain ; High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects ; High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthospec ; Pain Management ; Placebos ; Prospective Studies ; proximal plantar fasciitis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2006-07, Vol.45 (4), p.196-210</ispartof><rights>2006 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malay, D. Scot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Martin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assili, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buren, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyman, Eugene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowsky, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeMay, Carley</creatorcontrib><title>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</title><title>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P &lt; .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment.</description><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)</subject><subject>Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heel</subject><subject>heel pain</subject><subject>High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects</subject><subject>High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthospec</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>proximal plantar fasciitis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1067-2516</issn><issn>1542-2224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wBzggnziR4I_EcRCXsrRQqYiqFK6W44y1Xpx4sZ1ty-_jh-FoF3HjYs_Yz7z2zFsULwiuCG7Ym021MSpWFGNe4brCuH1UHJOmpiWltH6cY8zbkjaEHxUnMW4wprQTzdPiiHBBBKn5cfH7_D4FpX3Y-gDKoa9rr3_cqR2g2zUEtX1A3yHEOaJrpzT0HhkfUFrn64ynEaaEvEGrdfCT1eg6-Hs7ZplMT0kFdKGitjbZ-BbdQJxdiguu0I2aBj_aXzC8_qtcrvyUgnduOfvg595B-d7ZaVjyz7nU6vwaBHS5rLscWz_lb1jlnhVPjHIRnh_20-Lbxfnt6lN59eXj5ersqtSMNakEzlXf6hY6TbFQlLes1R1nDe1bSpuuB9wIQljdG2yMILTuOm4GyjAxvWgZOy1e7XW3wf-cISY52qjB5WbBz1FywTETtcgg3YM6-BgDGLkNeS7hQRIsF-_kRi7eycU7iWuZvctFLw_qcz_C8K_kYFYG3u0ByD3uLASZhwuThsEG0EkO3v5P_w9mhq5H</recordid><startdate>200607</startdate><enddate>200607</enddate><creator>Malay, D. Scot</creator><creator>Pressman, Martin M.</creator><creator>Assili, Amir</creator><creator>Kline, Jason T.</creator><creator>York, Shane</creator><creator>Buren, Ben</creator><creator>Heyman, Eugene R.</creator><creator>Borowsky, Pam</creator><creator>LeMay, Carley</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200607</creationdate><title>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</title><author>Malay, D. Scot ; Pressman, Martin M. ; Assili, Amir ; Kline, Jason T. ; York, Shane ; Buren, Ben ; Heyman, Eugene R. ; Borowsky, Pam ; LeMay, Carley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)</topic><topic>Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heel</topic><topic>heel pain</topic><topic>High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects</topic><topic>High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthospec</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>proximal plantar fasciitis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malay, D. Scot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Martin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assili, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buren, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyman, Eugene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowsky, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeMay, Carley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malay, D. Scot</au><au>Pressman, Martin M.</au><au>Assili, Amir</au><au>Kline, Jason T.</au><au>York, Shane</au><au>Buren, Ben</au><au>Heyman, Eugene R.</au><au>Borowsky, Pam</au><au>LeMay, Carley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2006-07</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>196-210</pages><issn>1067-2516</issn><eissn>1542-2224</eissn><abstract>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant ( P &lt; .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16818146</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-2516
ispartof The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2006-07, Vol.45 (4), p.196-210
issn 1067-2516
1542-2224
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68603848
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Chronic Disease
Double-Blind Method
extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)
Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy
Female
Heel
heel pain
High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects
High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Orthospec
Pain Management
Placebos
Prospective Studies
proximal plantar fasciitis
Treatment Outcome
title Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A44%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extracorporeal%20Shockwave%20Therapy%20Versus%20Placebo%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Chronic%20Proximal%20Plantar%20Fasciitis:%20Results%20of%20a%20Randomized,%20Placebo-Controlled,%20Double-Blinded,%20Multicenter%20Intervention%20Trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Malay,%20D.%20Scot&rft.date=2006-07&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=196-210&rft.issn=1067-2516&rft.eissn=1542-2224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68603848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68603848&rft_id=info:pmid/16818146&rft_els_id=S1067251606001438&rfr_iscdi=true