Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer part...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery 2006-07, Vol.45 (4), p.196-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 196 |
container_title | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Malay, D. Scot Pressman, Martin M. Assili, Amir Kline, Jason T. York, Shane Buren, Ben Heyman, Eugene R. Borowsky, Pam LeMay, Carley |
description | Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P < .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68603848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1067251606001438</els_id><sourcerecordid>68603848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wBzggnziR4I_EcRCXsrRQqYiqFK6W44y1Xpx4sZ1ty-_jh-FoF3HjYs_Yz7z2zFsULwiuCG7Ym021MSpWFGNe4brCuH1UHJOmpiWltH6cY8zbkjaEHxUnMW4wprQTzdPiiHBBBKn5cfH7_D4FpX3Y-gDKoa9rr3_cqR2g2zUEtX1A3yHEOaJrpzT0HhkfUFrn64ynEaaEvEGrdfCT1eg6-Hs7ZplMT0kFdKGitjbZ-BbdQJxdiguu0I2aBj_aXzC8_qtcrvyUgnduOfvg595B-d7ZaVjyz7nU6vwaBHS5rLscWz_lb1jlnhVPjHIRnh_20-Lbxfnt6lN59eXj5ersqtSMNakEzlXf6hY6TbFQlLes1R1nDe1bSpuuB9wIQljdG2yMILTuOm4GyjAxvWgZOy1e7XW3wf-cISY52qjB5WbBz1FywTETtcgg3YM6-BgDGLkNeS7hQRIsF-_kRi7eycU7iWuZvctFLw_qcz_C8K_kYFYG3u0ByD3uLASZhwuThsEG0EkO3v5P_w9mhq5H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68603848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Malay, D. Scot ; Pressman, Martin M. ; Assili, Amir ; Kline, Jason T. ; York, Shane ; Buren, Ben ; Heyman, Eugene R. ; Borowsky, Pam ; LeMay, Carley</creator><creatorcontrib>Malay, D. Scot ; Pressman, Martin M. ; Assili, Amir ; Kline, Jason T. ; York, Shane ; Buren, Ben ; Heyman, Eugene R. ; Borowsky, Pam ; LeMay, Carley</creatorcontrib><description>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P < .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-2516</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-2224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16818146</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Chronic Disease ; Double-Blind Method ; extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) ; Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy ; Female ; Heel ; heel pain ; High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects ; High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthospec ; Pain Management ; Placebos ; Prospective Studies ; proximal plantar fasciitis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2006-07, Vol.45 (4), p.196-210</ispartof><rights>2006 American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818146$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malay, D. Scot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Martin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assili, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buren, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyman, Eugene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowsky, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeMay, Carley</creatorcontrib><title>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</title><title>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P < .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment.</description><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)</subject><subject>Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heel</subject><subject>heel pain</subject><subject>High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects</subject><subject>High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthospec</subject><subject>Pain Management</subject><subject>Placebos</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>proximal plantar fasciitis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1067-2516</issn><issn>1542-2224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEoh_wBzggnziR4I_EcRCXsrRQqYiqFK6W44y1Xpx4sZ1ty-_jh-FoF3HjYs_Yz7z2zFsULwiuCG7Ym021MSpWFGNe4brCuH1UHJOmpiWltH6cY8zbkjaEHxUnMW4wprQTzdPiiHBBBKn5cfH7_D4FpX3Y-gDKoa9rr3_cqR2g2zUEtX1A3yHEOaJrpzT0HhkfUFrn64ynEaaEvEGrdfCT1eg6-Hs7ZplMT0kFdKGitjbZ-BbdQJxdiguu0I2aBj_aXzC8_qtcrvyUgnduOfvg595B-d7ZaVjyz7nU6vwaBHS5rLscWz_lb1jlnhVPjHIRnh_20-Lbxfnt6lN59eXj5ersqtSMNakEzlXf6hY6TbFQlLes1R1nDe1bSpuuB9wIQljdG2yMILTuOm4GyjAxvWgZOy1e7XW3wf-cISY52qjB5WbBz1FywTETtcgg3YM6-BgDGLkNeS7hQRIsF-_kRi7eycU7iWuZvctFLw_qcz_C8K_kYFYG3u0ByD3uLASZhwuThsEG0EkO3v5P_w9mhq5H</recordid><startdate>200607</startdate><enddate>200607</enddate><creator>Malay, D. Scot</creator><creator>Pressman, Martin M.</creator><creator>Assili, Amir</creator><creator>Kline, Jason T.</creator><creator>York, Shane</creator><creator>Buren, Ben</creator><creator>Heyman, Eugene R.</creator><creator>Borowsky, Pam</creator><creator>LeMay, Carley</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200607</creationdate><title>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</title><author>Malay, D. Scot ; Pressman, Martin M. ; Assili, Amir ; Kline, Jason T. ; York, Shane ; Buren, Ben ; Heyman, Eugene R. ; Borowsky, Pam ; LeMay, Carley</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-e66ab7c7e9c208a26737c96352b72259be0581134bf0ff8124996fd2301fb8733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT)</topic><topic>Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heel</topic><topic>heel pain</topic><topic>High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects</topic><topic>High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthospec</topic><topic>Pain Management</topic><topic>Placebos</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>proximal plantar fasciitis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malay, D. Scot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pressman, Martin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assili, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kline, Jason T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>York, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buren, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyman, Eugene R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borowsky, Pam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LeMay, Carley</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malay, D. Scot</au><au>Pressman, Martin M.</au><au>Assili, Amir</au><au>Kline, Jason T.</au><au>York, Shane</au><au>Buren, Ben</au><au>Heyman, Eugene R.</au><au>Borowsky, Pam</au><au>LeMay, Carley</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2006-07</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>196-210</pages><issn>1067-2516</issn><eissn>1542-2224</eissn><abstract>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of recalcitrant proximal plantar fasciitis. The objective of this investigation was to compare the outcomes of participants treated with a new ESWT device with those treated with placebo. A total of 172 volunteer participants were randomized in a 2:1 active-to-placebo ratio in this prospective, double-blind, multicenter trial conducted between October 2003 and December 2004. ESWT (n = 115) or placebo control (n = 57) was administered on a single occasion without local or systemic anesthesia or sedation, after which follow-up was undertaken. The primary outcomes were the blind assessor’s objective, and the participant’s subjective assessments of heel pain during the first 3 months of follow-up. Participants were also followed up to 1 year to identify any adverse outcomes that may have been related to the shockwave device. On the visual analog scale, the blind assessor’s objective assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 2.51 in the shockwave group and 1.57 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P = .045). On the visual analog scale, the participant’s self-assessment of heel pain displayed a mean reduction of 3.39 in the shockwave group and 1.78 in the placebo group; this difference was statistically significant (
P < .001). No serious adverse events were observed at any time. It was concluded that ESWT was both efficacious and safe for participants with chronic proximal plantar fasciitis that had been unresponsive to exhaustive conservative treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16818146</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1067-2516 |
ispartof | The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 2006-07, Vol.45 (4), p.196-210 |
issn | 1067-2516 1542-2224 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68603848 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Chronic Disease Double-Blind Method extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) Fasciitis, Plantar - therapy Female Heel heel pain High-Energy Shock Waves - adverse effects High-Energy Shock Waves - therapeutic use Humans Male Middle Aged Orthospec Pain Management Placebos Prospective Studies proximal plantar fasciitis Treatment Outcome |
title | Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Chronic Proximal Plantar Fasciitis: Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blinded, Multicenter Intervention Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A44%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extracorporeal%20Shockwave%20Therapy%20Versus%20Placebo%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Chronic%20Proximal%20Plantar%20Fasciitis:%20Results%20of%20a%20Randomized,%20Placebo-Controlled,%20Double-Blinded,%20Multicenter%20Intervention%20Trial&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Malay,%20D.%20Scot&rft.date=2006-07&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=196-210&rft.issn=1067-2516&rft.eissn=1542-2224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jfas.2006.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68603848%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68603848&rft_id=info:pmid/16818146&rft_els_id=S1067251606001438&rfr_iscdi=true |