Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data

Model-free analysis is a technique commonly used within the field of NMR spectroscopy to extract atomic resolution, interpretable dynamic information on multiple timescales from the R1, R2, and steady state NOE. Model-free approaches employ two disparate areas of data analysis, the discipline of mat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomolecular NMR 2006-06, Vol.35 (2), p.117-135
Hauptverfasser: d'Auvergne, Edward J, Gooley, Paul R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 2
container_start_page 117
container_title Journal of biomolecular NMR
container_volume 35
creator d'Auvergne, Edward J
Gooley, Paul R
description Model-free analysis is a technique commonly used within the field of NMR spectroscopy to extract atomic resolution, interpretable dynamic information on multiple timescales from the R1, R2, and steady state NOE. Model-free approaches employ two disparate areas of data analysis, the discipline of mathematical optimisation, specifically the minimisation of a chi2 function, and the statistical field of model selection. By searching through a large number of model-free minimisations, which were setup using synthetic relaxation data whereby the true underlying dynamics is known, certain model-free models have been identified to, at times, fail. This has been characterised as either the internal correlation times, tau(e), tau(f), or tau(s), or the global correlation time parameter, local tau(m), heading towards infinity, the result being that the final parameter values are far from the true values. In a number of cases the minimised chi2 value of the failed model is significantly lower than that of all other models and, hence, will be the model which is chosen by model selection techniques. If these models are not removed prior to model selection the final model-free results could be far from the truth. By implementing a series of empirical rules involving inequalities these models can be specifically isolated and removed. Model-free analysis should therefore consist of three distinct steps: model-free minimisation, model-free model elimination, and finally model-free model selection. Failure has also been identified to affect the individual Monte Carlo simulations used within error analysis. Each simulation involves an independent randomised relaxation data set and model-free minimisation, thus simulations suffer from exactly the same types of failure as model-free models. Therefore, to prevent these outliers from causing a significant overestimation of the errors the failed Monte Carlo simulations need to be culled prior to calculating the parameter standard deviations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10858-006-9007-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68599839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418638331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-ab3253d26b6b221f640990484cf9b7d0610c04224acff06f218faa714bb41e533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMozjj6AG4kuHAXPbk2cSeDN3AURNchbRPs0MvYtOjM09uxA4Krcw58_w_nQ-iUwiUFSK4iBS01AVDEDDfZ7KEplQknEoDuoykYJglLuJ6goxiXAGA0U4doQlViaMLFFKWLJvclCa33uNqu2JdFVdSuK5r6Gjtc-y8cO7_CRY27jx008vm6dlWRYVe7ch2LiJuAnxevuPWl-_4twLnr3DE6CK6M_mQ3Z-j97vZt_kCeXu4f5zdPJONMdcSlnEmeM5WqlDEalABjQGiRBZMmOSgKGQjGhMtCABUY1cG5hIo0FdRLzmfoYuxdtc1n72NnqyJmvixd7Zs-WqWlMZqbATz_By6bvh2eiFZryrVMJBsgOkJZ28TY-mBXbVG5dm0p2K19O9q3g327tW83Q-ZsV9ynlc__Ejvd_AeRt381</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>881385752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>d'Auvergne, Edward J ; Gooley, Paul R</creator><creatorcontrib>d'Auvergne, Edward J ; Gooley, Paul R</creatorcontrib><description>Model-free analysis is a technique commonly used within the field of NMR spectroscopy to extract atomic resolution, interpretable dynamic information on multiple timescales from the R1, R2, and steady state NOE. Model-free approaches employ two disparate areas of data analysis, the discipline of mathematical optimisation, specifically the minimisation of a chi2 function, and the statistical field of model selection. By searching through a large number of model-free minimisations, which were setup using synthetic relaxation data whereby the true underlying dynamics is known, certain model-free models have been identified to, at times, fail. This has been characterised as either the internal correlation times, tau(e), tau(f), or tau(s), or the global correlation time parameter, local tau(m), heading towards infinity, the result being that the final parameter values are far from the true values. In a number of cases the minimised chi2 value of the failed model is significantly lower than that of all other models and, hence, will be the model which is chosen by model selection techniques. If these models are not removed prior to model selection the final model-free results could be far from the truth. By implementing a series of empirical rules involving inequalities these models can be specifically isolated and removed. Model-free analysis should therefore consist of three distinct steps: model-free minimisation, model-free model elimination, and finally model-free model selection. Failure has also been identified to affect the individual Monte Carlo simulations used within error analysis. Each simulation involves an independent randomised relaxation data set and model-free minimisation, thus simulations suffer from exactly the same types of failure as model-free models. Therefore, to prevent these outliers from causing a significant overestimation of the errors the failed Monte Carlo simulations need to be culled prior to calculating the parameter standard deviations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-2738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5001</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10858-006-9007-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16791734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods ; Models, Theoretical ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2006-06, Vol.35 (2), p.117-135</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-ab3253d26b6b221f640990484cf9b7d0610c04224acff06f218faa714bb41e533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-ab3253d26b6b221f640990484cf9b7d0610c04224acff06f218faa714bb41e533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16791734$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>d'Auvergne, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooley, Paul R</creatorcontrib><title>Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data</title><title>Journal of biomolecular NMR</title><addtitle>J Biomol NMR</addtitle><description>Model-free analysis is a technique commonly used within the field of NMR spectroscopy to extract atomic resolution, interpretable dynamic information on multiple timescales from the R1, R2, and steady state NOE. Model-free approaches employ two disparate areas of data analysis, the discipline of mathematical optimisation, specifically the minimisation of a chi2 function, and the statistical field of model selection. By searching through a large number of model-free minimisations, which were setup using synthetic relaxation data whereby the true underlying dynamics is known, certain model-free models have been identified to, at times, fail. This has been characterised as either the internal correlation times, tau(e), tau(f), or tau(s), or the global correlation time parameter, local tau(m), heading towards infinity, the result being that the final parameter values are far from the true values. In a number of cases the minimised chi2 value of the failed model is significantly lower than that of all other models and, hence, will be the model which is chosen by model selection techniques. If these models are not removed prior to model selection the final model-free results could be far from the truth. By implementing a series of empirical rules involving inequalities these models can be specifically isolated and removed. Model-free analysis should therefore consist of three distinct steps: model-free minimisation, model-free model elimination, and finally model-free model selection. Failure has also been identified to affect the individual Monte Carlo simulations used within error analysis. Each simulation involves an independent randomised relaxation data set and model-free minimisation, thus simulations suffer from exactly the same types of failure as model-free models. Therefore, to prevent these outliers from causing a significant overestimation of the errors the failed Monte Carlo simulations need to be culled prior to calculating the parameter standard deviations.</description><subject>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0925-2738</issn><issn>1573-5001</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMtKxDAUhoMozjj6AG4kuHAXPbk2cSeDN3AURNchbRPs0MvYtOjM09uxA4Krcw58_w_nQ-iUwiUFSK4iBS01AVDEDDfZ7KEplQknEoDuoykYJglLuJ6goxiXAGA0U4doQlViaMLFFKWLJvclCa33uNqu2JdFVdSuK5r6Gjtc-y8cO7_CRY27jx008vm6dlWRYVe7ch2LiJuAnxevuPWl-_4twLnr3DE6CK6M_mQ3Z-j97vZt_kCeXu4f5zdPJONMdcSlnEmeM5WqlDEalABjQGiRBZMmOSgKGQjGhMtCABUY1cG5hIo0FdRLzmfoYuxdtc1n72NnqyJmvixd7Zs-WqWlMZqbATz_By6bvh2eiFZryrVMJBsgOkJZ28TY-mBXbVG5dm0p2K19O9q3g327tW83Q-ZsV9ynlc__Ejvd_AeRt381</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>d'Auvergne, Edward J</creator><creator>Gooley, Paul R</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data</title><author>d'Auvergne, Edward J ; Gooley, Paul R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-ab3253d26b6b221f640990484cf9b7d0610c04224acff06f218faa714bb41e533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>d'Auvergne, Edward J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooley, Paul R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomolecular NMR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>d'Auvergne, Edward J</au><au>Gooley, Paul R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomolecular NMR</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomol NMR</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>117-135</pages><issn>0925-2738</issn><eissn>1573-5001</eissn><abstract>Model-free analysis is a technique commonly used within the field of NMR spectroscopy to extract atomic resolution, interpretable dynamic information on multiple timescales from the R1, R2, and steady state NOE. Model-free approaches employ two disparate areas of data analysis, the discipline of mathematical optimisation, specifically the minimisation of a chi2 function, and the statistical field of model selection. By searching through a large number of model-free minimisations, which were setup using synthetic relaxation data whereby the true underlying dynamics is known, certain model-free models have been identified to, at times, fail. This has been characterised as either the internal correlation times, tau(e), tau(f), or tau(s), or the global correlation time parameter, local tau(m), heading towards infinity, the result being that the final parameter values are far from the true values. In a number of cases the minimised chi2 value of the failed model is significantly lower than that of all other models and, hence, will be the model which is chosen by model selection techniques. If these models are not removed prior to model selection the final model-free results could be far from the truth. By implementing a series of empirical rules involving inequalities these models can be specifically isolated and removed. Model-free analysis should therefore consist of three distinct steps: model-free minimisation, model-free model elimination, and finally model-free model selection. Failure has also been identified to affect the individual Monte Carlo simulations used within error analysis. Each simulation involves an independent randomised relaxation data set and model-free minimisation, thus simulations suffer from exactly the same types of failure as model-free models. Therefore, to prevent these outliers from causing a significant overestimation of the errors the failed Monte Carlo simulations need to be culled prior to calculating the parameter standard deviations.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16791734</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10858-006-9007-z</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-2738
ispartof Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2006-06, Vol.35 (2), p.117-135
issn 0925-2738
1573-5001
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68599839
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy - methods
Models, Theoretical
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo simulation
Studies
title Model-free model elimination: a new step in the model-free dynamic analysis of NMR relaxation data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T21%3A50%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Model-free%20model%20elimination:%20a%20new%20step%20in%20the%20model-free%20dynamic%20analysis%20of%20NMR%20relaxation%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomolecular%20NMR&rft.au=d'Auvergne,%20Edward%20J&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=117-135&rft.issn=0925-2738&rft.eissn=1573-5001&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10858-006-9007-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418638331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=881385752&rft_id=info:pmid/16791734&rfr_iscdi=true