Comparison of cerebral magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram findings in pre-eclamptic and eclamptic women
Objective: To compare the cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in pre‐eclamptic and eclamptic pregnant women. Methods: A total of 38 pregnant women with mild pre‐eclampsia (n = 15), severe pre‐eclampsia (n = 11) and eclampsia (n = 12) were included in this study...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2005-10, Vol.45 (5), p.384-390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 390 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 384 |
container_title | Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A. DINÇ, Gülseren OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen DINÇ, Hasan BOZKAYA, Hasan |
description | Objective: To compare the cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in pre‐eclamptic and eclamptic pregnant women.
Methods: A total of 38 pregnant women with mild pre‐eclampsia (n = 15), severe pre‐eclampsia (n = 11) and eclampsia (n = 12) were included in this study. Cranial MR without contrast and EEG were performed in these women on admission or within 3 days of onset. Follow‐up control MR or EEG evaluations were performed 4–6 weeks postpartum in women with MR or EEG abnormalities in the initial examination. To compare differences, X2 test, Fisher exact or Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used.
Results: Abnormal cranial MR findings were found in one (6%) pre‐eclamptic woman, in four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women, and in 11 (92%) eclamptic women. Cranial MR findings were consistent with ischaemia in 15 (39%) patients and haemorrhage in one (3%) case. Two (5%) severe pre‐eclamptic women showed cerebral infarction during the follow‐up period. MR and EEG abnormalities were totally resolved in 88% of cases. The MR findings of 12 (71%) patients were located in the occipital lobes followed by the parietal lobes in six (40%) cases. Three (20%) mild pre‐eclamptic women, four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women and 10 (83%) eclamptic women had abnormal EEGs. The EEG changes were totally resolved in 13 of 14 (93%) patients after the first month. In one patient with cerebral haemorrhage, the EEG changes lasted for a duration of 6 months.
Conclusions: A correlation between EEG abnormalities and MR findings was found in this study. The combined use of MR and EEG may help to determine the prognosis for these patients, but the interictal EEG findings recorded in eclampsia were non‐specific. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00453.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68598309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68598309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-390b0b61ed85a789e91edab2d449d6bc9c7b1fcb911c0d60c451fc80f3cb9c363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1u2zAQhImgQeImeYWAp96kkqZEkUAvidG6LYwGzQ-SG0FRK5euRCqkjThvXyo23Gt44c7ufLvAIIQpyWl6n1c5LSqZial4yqeElDkhRcny7RGaHAYf0ISkdiY456foY4wrQqgsaXGCTimnVTKyCRpmvh90sNE77FtsIEAddId7vXSwtgYHSCPtDGDtGgwdmHXwkPTwR3d-GXSPW-sa65YRW4eHABmYTvfDCL8hB_Xie3Dn6LjVXYSL_X-GHr59vZ99zxY38x-zq0VmioqwjElSk5pTaESpKyFBplLX06YoZMNrI01V09bUklJDGk5MUSYpSMtSzzDOztCn3d4h-OcNxLXqbTTQddqB30TFRSkFIzIZxc5ogo8xQKuGYHsdXhUlakxbrdQYqhpDVWPa6i1ttU3o5f7Gpu6h-Q_u402GLzvDi-3g9d2L1dXPm1QkPNvhNq5he8B1-Kt4xapSPf6aq_vrxfXd9Pdc3bJ_YQagSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68598309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cerebral magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram findings in pre-eclamptic and eclamptic women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A. ; DINÇ, Gülseren ; OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen ; DINÇ, Hasan ; BOZKAYA, Hasan</creator><creatorcontrib>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A. ; DINÇ, Gülseren ; OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen ; DINÇ, Hasan ; BOZKAYA, Hasan</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To compare the cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in pre‐eclamptic and eclamptic pregnant women.
Methods: A total of 38 pregnant women with mild pre‐eclampsia (n = 15), severe pre‐eclampsia (n = 11) and eclampsia (n = 12) were included in this study. Cranial MR without contrast and EEG were performed in these women on admission or within 3 days of onset. Follow‐up control MR or EEG evaluations were performed 4–6 weeks postpartum in women with MR or EEG abnormalities in the initial examination. To compare differences, X2 test, Fisher exact or Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used.
Results: Abnormal cranial MR findings were found in one (6%) pre‐eclamptic woman, in four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women, and in 11 (92%) eclamptic women. Cranial MR findings were consistent with ischaemia in 15 (39%) patients and haemorrhage in one (3%) case. Two (5%) severe pre‐eclamptic women showed cerebral infarction during the follow‐up period. MR and EEG abnormalities were totally resolved in 88% of cases. The MR findings of 12 (71%) patients were located in the occipital lobes followed by the parietal lobes in six (40%) cases. Three (20%) mild pre‐eclamptic women, four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women and 10 (83%) eclamptic women had abnormal EEGs. The EEG changes were totally resolved in 13 of 14 (93%) patients after the first month. In one patient with cerebral haemorrhage, the EEG changes lasted for a duration of 6 months.
Conclusions: A correlation between EEG abnormalities and MR findings was found in this study. The combined use of MR and EEG may help to determine the prognosis for these patients, but the interictal EEG findings recorded in eclampsia were non‐specific.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-828X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00453.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16171473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>550 Swanston Street (PO Box 378) Carlton South, Victoria 3053 Australia: Blackwell Science Pty</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brain Edema - diagnosis ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Disease Progression ; eclampsia ; Eclampsia - diagnosis ; electroencephalogram ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Female ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Maternal Age ; pre-eclampsia ; Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Probability ; Prospective Studies ; Seizures - diagnosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Severity of Illness Index ; Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><ispartof>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2005-10, Vol.45 (5), p.384-390</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-390b0b61ed85a789e91edab2d449d6bc9c7b1fcb911c0d60c451fc80f3cb9c363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-390b0b61ed85a789e91edab2d449d6bc9c7b1fcb911c0d60c451fc80f3cb9c363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1479-828X.2005.00453.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1479-828X.2005.00453.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16171473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINÇ, Gülseren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINÇ, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOZKAYA, Hasan</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cerebral magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram findings in pre-eclamptic and eclamptic women</title><title>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Objective: To compare the cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in pre‐eclamptic and eclamptic pregnant women.
Methods: A total of 38 pregnant women with mild pre‐eclampsia (n = 15), severe pre‐eclampsia (n = 11) and eclampsia (n = 12) were included in this study. Cranial MR without contrast and EEG were performed in these women on admission or within 3 days of onset. Follow‐up control MR or EEG evaluations were performed 4–6 weeks postpartum in women with MR or EEG abnormalities in the initial examination. To compare differences, X2 test, Fisher exact or Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used.
Results: Abnormal cranial MR findings were found in one (6%) pre‐eclamptic woman, in four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women, and in 11 (92%) eclamptic women. Cranial MR findings were consistent with ischaemia in 15 (39%) patients and haemorrhage in one (3%) case. Two (5%) severe pre‐eclamptic women showed cerebral infarction during the follow‐up period. MR and EEG abnormalities were totally resolved in 88% of cases. The MR findings of 12 (71%) patients were located in the occipital lobes followed by the parietal lobes in six (40%) cases. Three (20%) mild pre‐eclamptic women, four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women and 10 (83%) eclamptic women had abnormal EEGs. The EEG changes were totally resolved in 13 of 14 (93%) patients after the first month. In one patient with cerebral haemorrhage, the EEG changes lasted for a duration of 6 months.
Conclusions: A correlation between EEG abnormalities and MR findings was found in this study. The combined use of MR and EEG may help to determine the prognosis for these patients, but the interictal EEG findings recorded in eclampsia were non‐specific.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brain Edema - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>eclampsia</subject><subject>Eclampsia - diagnosis</subject><subject>electroencephalogram</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>pre-eclampsia</subject><subject>Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Seizures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><issn>0004-8666</issn><issn>1479-828X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM1u2zAQhImgQeImeYWAp96kkqZEkUAvidG6LYwGzQ-SG0FRK5euRCqkjThvXyo23Gt44c7ufLvAIIQpyWl6n1c5LSqZial4yqeElDkhRcny7RGaHAYf0ISkdiY456foY4wrQqgsaXGCTimnVTKyCRpmvh90sNE77FtsIEAddId7vXSwtgYHSCPtDGDtGgwdmHXwkPTwR3d-GXSPW-sa65YRW4eHABmYTvfDCL8hB_Xie3Dn6LjVXYSL_X-GHr59vZ99zxY38x-zq0VmioqwjElSk5pTaESpKyFBplLX06YoZMNrI01V09bUklJDGk5MUSYpSMtSzzDOztCn3d4h-OcNxLXqbTTQddqB30TFRSkFIzIZxc5ogo8xQKuGYHsdXhUlakxbrdQYqhpDVWPa6i1ttU3o5f7Gpu6h-Q_u402GLzvDi-3g9d2L1dXPm1QkPNvhNq5he8B1-Kt4xapSPf6aq_vrxfXd9Pdc3bJ_YQagSg</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A.</creator><creator>DINÇ, Gülseren</creator><creator>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen</creator><creator>DINÇ, Hasan</creator><creator>BOZKAYA, Hasan</creator><general>Blackwell Science Pty</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Comparison of cerebral magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram findings in pre-eclamptic and eclamptic women</title><author>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A. ; DINÇ, Gülseren ; OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen ; DINÇ, Hasan ; BOZKAYA, Hasan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-390b0b61ed85a789e91edab2d449d6bc9c7b1fcb911c0d60c451fc80f3cb9c363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brain Edema - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>eclampsia</topic><topic>Eclampsia - diagnosis</topic><topic>electroencephalogram</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>pre-eclampsia</topic><topic>Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Seizures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINÇ, Gülseren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DINÇ, Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BOZKAYA, Hasan</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Mehmet A.</au><au>DINÇ, Gülseren</au><au>OSMANAĞAOĞLU, Selen</au><au>DINÇ, Hasan</au><au>BOZKAYA, Hasan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cerebral magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram findings in pre-eclamptic and eclamptic women</atitle><jtitle>Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>384</spage><epage>390</epage><pages>384-390</pages><issn>0004-8666</issn><eissn>1479-828X</eissn><abstract>Objective: To compare the cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) and electroencephalogram (EEG) findings in pre‐eclamptic and eclamptic pregnant women.
Methods: A total of 38 pregnant women with mild pre‐eclampsia (n = 15), severe pre‐eclampsia (n = 11) and eclampsia (n = 12) were included in this study. Cranial MR without contrast and EEG were performed in these women on admission or within 3 days of onset. Follow‐up control MR or EEG evaluations were performed 4–6 weeks postpartum in women with MR or EEG abnormalities in the initial examination. To compare differences, X2 test, Fisher exact or Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used.
Results: Abnormal cranial MR findings were found in one (6%) pre‐eclamptic woman, in four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women, and in 11 (92%) eclamptic women. Cranial MR findings were consistent with ischaemia in 15 (39%) patients and haemorrhage in one (3%) case. Two (5%) severe pre‐eclamptic women showed cerebral infarction during the follow‐up period. MR and EEG abnormalities were totally resolved in 88% of cases. The MR findings of 12 (71%) patients were located in the occipital lobes followed by the parietal lobes in six (40%) cases. Three (20%) mild pre‐eclamptic women, four (36%) severe pre‐eclamptic women and 10 (83%) eclamptic women had abnormal EEGs. The EEG changes were totally resolved in 13 of 14 (93%) patients after the first month. In one patient with cerebral haemorrhage, the EEG changes lasted for a duration of 6 months.
Conclusions: A correlation between EEG abnormalities and MR findings was found in this study. The combined use of MR and EEG may help to determine the prognosis for these patients, but the interictal EEG findings recorded in eclampsia were non‐specific.</abstract><cop>550 Swanston Street (PO Box 378) Carlton South, Victoria 3053 Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Pty</pub><pmid>16171473</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00453.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-8666 |
ispartof | Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2005-10, Vol.45 (5), p.384-390 |
issn | 0004-8666 1479-828X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68598309 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Brain Edema - diagnosis Chi-Square Distribution Disease Progression eclampsia Eclampsia - diagnosis electroencephalogram Electroencephalography - methods Female Gestational Age Humans magnetic resonance Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Maternal Age pre-eclampsia Pre-Eclampsia - diagnosis Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Probability Prospective Studies Seizures - diagnosis Sensitivity and Specificity Severity of Illness Index Statistics, Nonparametric |
title | Comparison of cerebral magnetic resonance and electroencephalogram findings in pre-eclamptic and eclamptic women |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T23%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cerebral%20magnetic%20resonance%20and%20electroencephalogram%20findings%20in%20pre-eclamptic%20and%20eclamptic%20women&rft.jtitle=Australian%20&%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=OSMANA%C4%9EAO%C4%9ELU,%20Mehmet%20A.&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=384&rft.epage=390&rft.pages=384-390&rft.issn=0004-8666&rft.eissn=1479-828X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2005.00453.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68598309%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68598309&rft_id=info:pmid/16171473&rfr_iscdi=true |