Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer

(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is an important staging procedure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to demonstrate, through a decision tree model and the incorporation of real costs of each component, that routine FDG-PET imaging as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2005-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1033-1040
Hauptverfasser: Yap, Kelvin K, Yap, Kenneth S K, Byrne, Amanda J, Berlangieri, Salvatore U, Poon, Aurora, Mitchell, Paul, Knight, Simon R, Clarke, Peter C, Harris, Anthony, Tauro, Andrew, Rowe, Christopher C, Scott, Andrew M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1040
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1033
container_title European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 32
creator Yap, Kelvin K
Yap, Kenneth S K
Byrne, Amanda J
Berlangieri, Salvatore U
Poon, Aurora
Mitchell, Paul
Knight, Simon R
Clarke, Peter C
Harris, Anthony
Tauro, Andrew
Rowe, Christopher C
Scott, Andrew M
description (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is an important staging procedure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to demonstrate, through a decision tree model and the incorporation of real costs of each component, that routine FDG-PET imaging as a prelude to curative surgery will reduce requirements for routine mediastinoscopy and overall hospital costs. A decision tree model comparing routine whole-body FDG-PET imaging to routine staging mediastinoscopy was used, with baseline variables of sensitivity, specificity and prevalence of non-operable and metastatic disease obtained from institutional data and a literature review. Costings for hospital admissions for mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy of actual patients with NSCLC were determined. The overall and average cost of managing patients was then calculated over a range of FDG-PET costs to derive projected cost savings to the community. The prevalence of histologically proven mediastinal involvement in patients with NSCLC presenting for surgical assessment at our institution is 20%, and the prevalence of distant metastatic disease is 6%. Based on literature review, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for detection of mediastinal spread are 84% and 89% respectively, and for mediastinoscopy, 81% and 100%. The average cost of mediastinoscopy for NSCLC in our institution is 4,160 AUD, while that of thoracotomy is 15,642 AUD. The cost of an FDG-PET scan is estimated to be 1,500 AUD. Using these figures and the decision tree model, the average cost saving is 2,128 AUDper patient. Routine FDG-PET scanning with selective mediastinoscopy will save 2,128 AUD per patient and will potentially reduce inappropriate surgery. These cost savings remain robust over a wide range of disease prevalence and FDG-PET costs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00259-005-1821-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68591919</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>898999191</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-7f2b7769344f2a46aa32eee2a3f3bde0da89ae246d1697781092f0e8782e70ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc2KFTEQhRtRnHH0AdxIcOEumqS787OUwZ-BAV3oOuSmK3cydCdtKq3ct_PRzOVeFBwCSZH6zqGo03UvOXvLGVPvkDExGsrYSLkWnLJH3SWX3FDFtHn8t1bsonuGeM9Yo7R52l3wUauRK33Z_f6aMdaSE4ElIsZW1LzkfXHr3YH8ivWOIMzgK0xkgSk6rDFl9Hk9EJ-X1ZXWqJmUvLUGPGByCFCwoViJSxPxc0zRu5k0vumB7CBBiBVJyIWsBWheobgafwLB6vYx7ZsHSTlRXNw8Ew_tmrf27V3yUJ53T4KbEV6c36vu-8cP364_09svn26u399S3wtZqQpip5Q0_TAE4QbpXC8AQLg-9LsJ2OS0cSAGOXFplNKcGREYaKUFKAbQX3VvTr5ryT82wGrbvo7DuAR5Qyv1aHg7DXz9H3ift5LabFbwQcpeDmOD-AnyJSMWCHYtcXHlYDmzx2ztKVvbsrXHbC1rmldn423X1vxPcQ6z_wP_cqVa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214663645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Yap, Kelvin K ; Yap, Kenneth S K ; Byrne, Amanda J ; Berlangieri, Salvatore U ; Poon, Aurora ; Mitchell, Paul ; Knight, Simon R ; Clarke, Peter C ; Harris, Anthony ; Tauro, Andrew ; Rowe, Christopher C ; Scott, Andrew M</creator><creatorcontrib>Yap, Kelvin K ; Yap, Kenneth S K ; Byrne, Amanda J ; Berlangieri, Salvatore U ; Poon, Aurora ; Mitchell, Paul ; Knight, Simon R ; Clarke, Peter C ; Harris, Anthony ; Tauro, Andrew ; Rowe, Christopher C ; Scott, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><description>(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is an important staging procedure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to demonstrate, through a decision tree model and the incorporation of real costs of each component, that routine FDG-PET imaging as a prelude to curative surgery will reduce requirements for routine mediastinoscopy and overall hospital costs. A decision tree model comparing routine whole-body FDG-PET imaging to routine staging mediastinoscopy was used, with baseline variables of sensitivity, specificity and prevalence of non-operable and metastatic disease obtained from institutional data and a literature review. Costings for hospital admissions for mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy of actual patients with NSCLC were determined. The overall and average cost of managing patients was then calculated over a range of FDG-PET costs to derive projected cost savings to the community. The prevalence of histologically proven mediastinal involvement in patients with NSCLC presenting for surgical assessment at our institution is 20%, and the prevalence of distant metastatic disease is 6%. Based on literature review, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for detection of mediastinal spread are 84% and 89% respectively, and for mediastinoscopy, 81% and 100%. The average cost of mediastinoscopy for NSCLC in our institution is 4,160 AUD, while that of thoracotomy is 15,642 AUD. The cost of an FDG-PET scan is estimated to be 1,500 AUD. Using these figures and the decision tree model, the average cost saving is 2,128 AUDper patient. Routine FDG-PET scanning with selective mediastinoscopy will save 2,128 AUD per patient and will potentially reduce inappropriate surgery. These cost savings remain robust over a wide range of disease prevalence and FDG-PET costs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-005-1821-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15875178</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Australia ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - economics ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Decision Support Systems, Clinical ; Female ; Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Length of Stay - economics ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - economics ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Mediastinoscopy - economics ; Middle Aged ; Models, Economic ; Neoplasm Staging - economics ; Positron-Emission Tomography - economics ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2005-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1033-1040</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-7f2b7769344f2a46aa32eee2a3f3bde0da89ae246d1697781092f0e8782e70ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-7f2b7769344f2a46aa32eee2a3f3bde0da89ae246d1697781092f0e8782e70ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15875178$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yap, Kelvin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Kenneth S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berlangieri, Salvatore U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Simon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauro, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><title>Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is an important staging procedure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to demonstrate, through a decision tree model and the incorporation of real costs of each component, that routine FDG-PET imaging as a prelude to curative surgery will reduce requirements for routine mediastinoscopy and overall hospital costs. A decision tree model comparing routine whole-body FDG-PET imaging to routine staging mediastinoscopy was used, with baseline variables of sensitivity, specificity and prevalence of non-operable and metastatic disease obtained from institutional data and a literature review. Costings for hospital admissions for mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy of actual patients with NSCLC were determined. The overall and average cost of managing patients was then calculated over a range of FDG-PET costs to derive projected cost savings to the community. The prevalence of histologically proven mediastinal involvement in patients with NSCLC presenting for surgical assessment at our institution is 20%, and the prevalence of distant metastatic disease is 6%. Based on literature review, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for detection of mediastinal spread are 84% and 89% respectively, and for mediastinoscopy, 81% and 100%. The average cost of mediastinoscopy for NSCLC in our institution is 4,160 AUD, while that of thoracotomy is 15,642 AUD. The cost of an FDG-PET scan is estimated to be 1,500 AUD. Using these figures and the decision tree model, the average cost saving is 2,128 AUDper patient. Routine FDG-PET scanning with selective mediastinoscopy will save 2,128 AUD per patient and will potentially reduce inappropriate surgery. These cost savings remain robust over a wide range of disease prevalence and FDG-PET costs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - economics</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - economics</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - economics</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mediastinoscopy - economics</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging - economics</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography - economics</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkc2KFTEQhRtRnHH0AdxIcOEumqS787OUwZ-BAV3oOuSmK3cydCdtKq3ct_PRzOVeFBwCSZH6zqGo03UvOXvLGVPvkDExGsrYSLkWnLJH3SWX3FDFtHn8t1bsonuGeM9Yo7R52l3wUauRK33Z_f6aMdaSE4ElIsZW1LzkfXHr3YH8ivWOIMzgK0xkgSk6rDFl9Hk9EJ-X1ZXWqJmUvLUGPGByCFCwoViJSxPxc0zRu5k0vumB7CBBiBVJyIWsBWheobgafwLB6vYx7ZsHSTlRXNw8Ew_tmrf27V3yUJ53T4KbEV6c36vu-8cP364_09svn26u399S3wtZqQpip5Q0_TAE4QbpXC8AQLg-9LsJ2OS0cSAGOXFplNKcGREYaKUFKAbQX3VvTr5ryT82wGrbvo7DuAR5Qyv1aHg7DXz9H3ift5LabFbwQcpeDmOD-AnyJSMWCHYtcXHlYDmzx2ztKVvbsrXHbC1rmldn423X1vxPcQ6z_wP_cqVa</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Yap, Kelvin K</creator><creator>Yap, Kenneth S K</creator><creator>Byrne, Amanda J</creator><creator>Berlangieri, Salvatore U</creator><creator>Poon, Aurora</creator><creator>Mitchell, Paul</creator><creator>Knight, Simon R</creator><creator>Clarke, Peter C</creator><creator>Harris, Anthony</creator><creator>Tauro, Andrew</creator><creator>Rowe, Christopher C</creator><creator>Scott, Andrew M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer</title><author>Yap, Kelvin K ; Yap, Kenneth S K ; Byrne, Amanda J ; Berlangieri, Salvatore U ; Poon, Aurora ; Mitchell, Paul ; Knight, Simon R ; Clarke, Peter C ; Harris, Anthony ; Tauro, Andrew ; Rowe, Christopher C ; Scott, Andrew M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-7f2b7769344f2a46aa32eee2a3f3bde0da89ae246d1697781092f0e8782e70ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - economics</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Decision Support Systems, Clinical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - economics</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - economics</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mediastinoscopy - economics</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging - economics</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography - economics</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yap, Kelvin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yap, Kenneth S K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byrne, Amanda J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berlangieri, Salvatore U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poon, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Simon R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Peter C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tauro, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Christopher C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Andrew M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yap, Kelvin K</au><au>Yap, Kenneth S K</au><au>Byrne, Amanda J</au><au>Berlangieri, Salvatore U</au><au>Poon, Aurora</au><au>Mitchell, Paul</au><au>Knight, Simon R</au><au>Clarke, Peter C</au><au>Harris, Anthony</au><au>Tauro, Andrew</au><au>Rowe, Christopher C</au><au>Scott, Andrew M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1033</spage><epage>1040</epage><pages>1033-1040</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>(18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging is an important staging procedure in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to demonstrate, through a decision tree model and the incorporation of real costs of each component, that routine FDG-PET imaging as a prelude to curative surgery will reduce requirements for routine mediastinoscopy and overall hospital costs. A decision tree model comparing routine whole-body FDG-PET imaging to routine staging mediastinoscopy was used, with baseline variables of sensitivity, specificity and prevalence of non-operable and metastatic disease obtained from institutional data and a literature review. Costings for hospital admissions for mediastinoscopy and thoracotomy of actual patients with NSCLC were determined. The overall and average cost of managing patients was then calculated over a range of FDG-PET costs to derive projected cost savings to the community. The prevalence of histologically proven mediastinal involvement in patients with NSCLC presenting for surgical assessment at our institution is 20%, and the prevalence of distant metastatic disease is 6%. Based on literature review, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for detection of mediastinal spread are 84% and 89% respectively, and for mediastinoscopy, 81% and 100%. The average cost of mediastinoscopy for NSCLC in our institution is 4,160 AUD, while that of thoracotomy is 15,642 AUD. The cost of an FDG-PET scan is estimated to be 1,500 AUD. Using these figures and the decision tree model, the average cost saving is 2,128 AUDper patient. Routine FDG-PET scanning with selective mediastinoscopy will save 2,128 AUD per patient and will potentially reduce inappropriate surgery. These cost savings remain robust over a wide range of disease prevalence and FDG-PET costs.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15875178</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-005-1821-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-7070
ispartof European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2005-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1033-1040
issn 1619-7070
1619-7089
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68591919
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Australia
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - economics
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - surgery
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Support Systems, Clinical
Female
Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Length of Stay - economics
Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Lung Neoplasms - economics
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Mediastinoscopy - economics
Middle Aged
Models, Economic
Neoplasm Staging - economics
Positron-Emission Tomography - economics
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Positron emission tomography with selected mediastinoscopy compared to routine mediastinoscopy offers cost and clinical outcome benefits for pre-operative staging of non-small cell lung cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T20%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positron%20emission%20tomography%20with%20selected%20mediastinoscopy%20compared%20to%20routine%20mediastinoscopy%20offers%20cost%20and%20clinical%20outcome%20benefits%20for%20pre-operative%20staging%20of%20non-small%20cell%20lung%20cancer&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Yap,%20Kelvin%20K&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1033&rft.epage=1040&rft.pages=1033-1040&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-005-1821-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E898999191%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214663645&rft_id=info:pmid/15875178&rfr_iscdi=true