Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?
Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Kidney international 2005-10, Vol.68 (4), p.1808-1814 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1814 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1808 |
container_title | Kidney international |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Saigal, Christopher S. Joyce, Geoffrey Timilsina, Anga R. the Urologic Diseases in America Project |
description | Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?
More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance.
This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics.
More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000.
The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68590896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S008525381551034X</els_id><sourcerecordid>982727011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFr1TAUxoM43N3mvyBB0LfWpG3S1BeZc-pgsJf5HNL0xOXaJjVJZfe_N7UXB754IBw-8juHw_chhCkpaa53-5Kyqi5oy1hZEcLK_LqufHyGdn8_nqMdIYIVFavFKTqLcU-y7mryAp1STnnDmdihH59sAJ2wcgO2btiE9jFF7A12MD8EP9r0YFW0MRMZxDDNoz_AgGc_L6NK1rv3-G6efUiLs-mAjQ94sBFUBDwpp77DBC59uEAnRo0RXh77Ofr2-fr-6mtxe_fl5uryttBN26Wir6FnphO6Z7qloqOrAmC0N6BBMW0IFwNpBRgKVTVA0zccWNfznndNXdfn6O22dw7-5wIxyclGDeOoHPglSi5Yl53gGXz9D7j3S3D5NllRQimveJshsUE6-BgDGDkHO6lwkJTINQ25l6vpcjVdrmnIP2nIxzz66rh_6ScYngaP9mfgzRFQUavRBOW0jU9cS-uWEJq5jxsH2bZfFoKM2oLTsAUmB2__f81v9ZSqlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210116267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saigal, Christopher S. ; Joyce, Geoffrey ; Timilsina, Anga R. ; the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creator><creatorcontrib>Saigal, Christopher S. ; Joyce, Geoffrey ; Timilsina, Anga R. ; the Urologic Diseases in America Project ; Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><description>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?
More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance.
This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics.
More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000.
The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16164658</identifier><identifier>CODEN: KDYIA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; costs ; Disease Management ; economics ; Employment - economics ; Female ; Health Expenditures ; Humans ; Insurance, Health - economics ; Kidney Calculi - economics ; Kidney Calculi - epidemiology ; kidney stones ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; nephrolithiasis ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Prevalence ; Sick Leave - economics ; Urinary lithiasis</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 2005-10, Vol.68 (4), p.1808-1814</ispartof><rights>2005 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17137001$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16164658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saigal, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timilsina, Anga R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><title>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?
More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance.
This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics.
More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000.
The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>economics</subject><subject>Employment - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - economics</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - economics</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - epidemiology</subject><subject>kidney stones</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nephrolithiasis</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Sick Leave - economics</subject><subject>Urinary lithiasis</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdFr1TAUxoM43N3mvyBB0LfWpG3S1BeZc-pgsJf5HNL0xOXaJjVJZfe_N7UXB754IBw-8juHw_chhCkpaa53-5Kyqi5oy1hZEcLK_LqufHyGdn8_nqMdIYIVFavFKTqLcU-y7mryAp1STnnDmdihH59sAJ2wcgO2btiE9jFF7A12MD8EP9r0YFW0MRMZxDDNoz_AgGc_L6NK1rv3-G6efUiLs-mAjQ94sBFUBDwpp77DBC59uEAnRo0RXh77Ofr2-fr-6mtxe_fl5uryttBN26Wir6FnphO6Z7qloqOrAmC0N6BBMW0IFwNpBRgKVTVA0zccWNfznndNXdfn6O22dw7-5wIxyclGDeOoHPglSi5Yl53gGXz9D7j3S3D5NllRQimveJshsUE6-BgDGDkHO6lwkJTINQ25l6vpcjVdrmnIP2nIxzz66rh_6ScYngaP9mfgzRFQUavRBOW0jU9cS-uWEJq5jxsH2bZfFoKM2oLTsAUmB2__f81v9ZSqlQ</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Saigal, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Joyce, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Timilsina, Anga R.</creator><creator>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</title><author>Saigal, Christopher S. ; Joyce, Geoffrey ; Timilsina, Anga R. ; the Urologic Diseases in America Project</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>economics</topic><topic>Employment - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - economics</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - economics</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - epidemiology</topic><topic>kidney stones</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nephrolithiasis</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Sick Leave - economics</topic><topic>Urinary lithiasis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saigal, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timilsina, Anga R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saigal, Christopher S.</au><au>Joyce, Geoffrey</au><au>Timilsina, Anga R.</au><au>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</au><aucorp>Urologic Diseases in America Project</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1808</spage><epage>1814</epage><pages>1808-1814</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><coden>KDYIA5</coden><abstract>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?
More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance.
This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics.
More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000.
The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16164658</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0085-2538 |
ispartof | Kidney international, 2005-10, Vol.68 (4), p.1808-1814 |
issn | 0085-2538 1523-1755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68590896 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Cost-Benefit Analysis costs Disease Management economics Employment - economics Female Health Expenditures Humans Insurance, Health - economics Kidney Calculi - economics Kidney Calculi - epidemiology kidney stones Male Medical sciences Middle Aged nephrolithiasis Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Prevalence Sick Leave - economics Urinary lithiasis |
title | Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20and%20indirect%20costs%20of%20nephrolithiasis%20in%20an%20employed%20population:%20Opportunity%20for%20disease%20management?&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Saigal,%20Christopher%20S.&rft.aucorp=Urologic%20Diseases%20in%20America%20Project&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1814&rft.pages=1808-1814&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft.coden=KDYIA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E982727011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210116267&rft_id=info:pmid/16164658&rft_els_id=S008525381551034X&rfr_iscdi=true |