Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?

Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kidney international 2005-10, Vol.68 (4), p.1808-1814
Hauptverfasser: Saigal, Christopher S., Joyce, Geoffrey, Timilsina, Anga R., the Urologic Diseases in America Project
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1814
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1808
container_title Kidney international
container_volume 68
creator Saigal, Christopher S.
Joyce, Geoffrey
Timilsina, Anga R.
the Urologic Diseases in America Project
description Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance. This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics. More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000. The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68590896</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S008525381551034X</els_id><sourcerecordid>982727011</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdFr1TAUxoM43N3mvyBB0LfWpG3S1BeZc-pgsJf5HNL0xOXaJjVJZfe_N7UXB754IBw-8juHw_chhCkpaa53-5Kyqi5oy1hZEcLK_LqufHyGdn8_nqMdIYIVFavFKTqLcU-y7mryAp1STnnDmdihH59sAJ2wcgO2btiE9jFF7A12MD8EP9r0YFW0MRMZxDDNoz_AgGc_L6NK1rv3-G6efUiLs-mAjQ94sBFUBDwpp77DBC59uEAnRo0RXh77Ofr2-fr-6mtxe_fl5uryttBN26Wir6FnphO6Z7qloqOrAmC0N6BBMW0IFwNpBRgKVTVA0zccWNfznndNXdfn6O22dw7-5wIxyclGDeOoHPglSi5Yl53gGXz9D7j3S3D5NllRQimveJshsUE6-BgDGDkHO6lwkJTINQ25l6vpcjVdrmnIP2nIxzz66rh_6ScYngaP9mfgzRFQUavRBOW0jU9cS-uWEJq5jxsH2bZfFoKM2oLTsAUmB2__f81v9ZSqlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>210116267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Saigal, Christopher S. ; Joyce, Geoffrey ; Timilsina, Anga R. ; the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creator><creatorcontrib>Saigal, Christopher S. ; Joyce, Geoffrey ; Timilsina, Anga R. ; the Urologic Diseases in America Project ; Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><description>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance. This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics. More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000. The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0085-2538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16164658</identifier><identifier>CODEN: KDYIA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; costs ; Disease Management ; economics ; Employment - economics ; Female ; Health Expenditures ; Humans ; Insurance, Health - economics ; Kidney Calculi - economics ; Kidney Calculi - epidemiology ; kidney stones ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; nephrolithiasis ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Prevalence ; Sick Leave - economics ; Urinary lithiasis</subject><ispartof>Kidney international, 2005-10, Vol.68 (4), p.1808-1814</ispartof><rights>2005 International Society of Nephrology</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17137001$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16164658$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saigal, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timilsina, Anga R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><title>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</title><title>Kidney international</title><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><description>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance. This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics. More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000. The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>costs</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>economics</subject><subject>Employment - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Expenditures</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insurance, Health - economics</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - economics</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - epidemiology</subject><subject>kidney stones</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nephrolithiasis</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Sick Leave - economics</subject><subject>Urinary lithiasis</subject><issn>0085-2538</issn><issn>1523-1755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdFr1TAUxoM43N3mvyBB0LfWpG3S1BeZc-pgsJf5HNL0xOXaJjVJZfe_N7UXB754IBw-8juHw_chhCkpaa53-5Kyqi5oy1hZEcLK_LqufHyGdn8_nqMdIYIVFavFKTqLcU-y7mryAp1STnnDmdihH59sAJ2wcgO2btiE9jFF7A12MD8EP9r0YFW0MRMZxDDNoz_AgGc_L6NK1rv3-G6efUiLs-mAjQ94sBFUBDwpp77DBC59uEAnRo0RXh77Ofr2-fr-6mtxe_fl5uryttBN26Wir6FnphO6Z7qloqOrAmC0N6BBMW0IFwNpBRgKVTVA0zccWNfznndNXdfn6O22dw7-5wIxyclGDeOoHPglSi5Yl53gGXz9D7j3S3D5NllRQimveJshsUE6-BgDGDkHO6lwkJTINQ25l6vpcjVdrmnIP2nIxzz66rh_6ScYngaP9mfgzRFQUavRBOW0jU9cS-uWEJq5jxsH2bZfFoKM2oLTsAUmB2__f81v9ZSqlQ</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Saigal, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Joyce, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Timilsina, Anga R.</creator><creator>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Nature Publishing</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</title><author>Saigal, Christopher S. ; Joyce, Geoffrey ; Timilsina, Anga R. ; the Urologic Diseases in America Project</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-b3eb5f98cb5c71891b5f9ee51bfecea5cf068d078ef1e22de4b46e59b6b694333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>costs</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>economics</topic><topic>Employment - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Expenditures</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insurance, Health - economics</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - economics</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - epidemiology</topic><topic>kidney stones</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nephrolithiasis</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Sick Leave - economics</topic><topic>Urinary lithiasis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saigal, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timilsina, Anga R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urologic Diseases in America Project</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saigal, Christopher S.</au><au>Joyce, Geoffrey</au><au>Timilsina, Anga R.</au><au>the Urologic Diseases in America Project</au><aucorp>Urologic Diseases in America Project</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?</atitle><jtitle>Kidney international</jtitle><addtitle>Kidney Int</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1808</spage><epage>1814</epage><pages>1808-1814</pages><issn>0085-2538</issn><eissn>1523-1755</eissn><coden>KDYIA5</coden><abstract>Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management? More than 5% of the United States population has been diagnosed with nephrolithiasis and about one half of (first-time) stone formers will have a recurrence within 5 years. The prevalence of nephrolithiasis is concentrated among working age adults, yet little prior work has examined the economic burden of the disease on employers and their employees. We sought to estimate the direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis for working age adults (18-64) with employer-provided insurance. This was an observational study using retrospective claims data. Detailed medical and pharmacy claims from 25 large employers and absentee data from a subset of firms were used to estimate the direct and indirect costs associated with nephrolithiasis in a privately insured, nonelderly population. Multivariate regression models were used to predict health care expenditures for persons with and without the condition, controlling for differences in patient (health status) and plan characteristics. More than 1% of working-age adults were treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000. Prevalence was considerably higher among men and employees age 55 to 64. About one third of employees treated for nephrolithiasis in 2000 missed work due to the condition, with an average work loss for the entire treated population of 19 hours per person. Conditional on receiving treatment, the incremental costs of nephrolithiasis were $3,494 per person in 2000. The direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiaisis are substantial among working-age adults. Interventions that prevent recurrence among known stone formers may be a cost-effective component of disease management programs.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16164658</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0085-2538
ispartof Kidney international, 2005-10, Vol.68 (4), p.1808-1814
issn 0085-2538
1523-1755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68590896
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cost-Benefit Analysis
costs
Disease Management
economics
Employment - economics
Female
Health Expenditures
Humans
Insurance, Health - economics
Kidney Calculi - economics
Kidney Calculi - epidemiology
kidney stones
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
nephrolithiasis
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
Prevalence
Sick Leave - economics
Urinary lithiasis
title Direct and indirect costs of nephrolithiasis in an employed population: Opportunity for disease management?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A12%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20and%20indirect%20costs%20of%20nephrolithiasis%20in%20an%20employed%20population:%20Opportunity%20for%20disease%20management?&rft.jtitle=Kidney%20international&rft.au=Saigal,%20Christopher%20S.&rft.aucorp=Urologic%20Diseases%20in%20America%20Project&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1808&rft.epage=1814&rft.pages=1808-1814&rft.issn=0085-2538&rft.eissn=1523-1755&rft.coden=KDYIA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00599.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E982727011%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=210116267&rft_id=info:pmid/16164658&rft_els_id=S008525381551034X&rfr_iscdi=true