Correlation of lymphoscintigraphy with the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified intraoperatively in patients with breast cancer
Numerous studies have evaluated the benefit of performing lymphoscintigraphy for the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicts the number of radioactive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified during su...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of surgery 2005-10, Vol.190 (4), p.567-569 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 569 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 567 |
container_title | The American journal of surgery |
container_volume | 190 |
creator | Teal, Christine B. Slocum, Jennifer P. Akin, Esma A. Kelly, Tricia A. |
description | Numerous studies have evaluated the benefit of performing lymphoscintigraphy for the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicts the number of radioactive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified during surgery for breast cancer patients.
From October 2001 to June 2004, SLN biopsy was attempted in 112 patients with breast cancer using a combination of blue dye and radioisotope. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 98 of the patients. A lymph node was considered an SLN when it was stained with blue dye, had a blue lymphatic afferent, had increased radioactivity, or was abnormal by palpation.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of radioactive SLN identified intraoperatively in 47 patients. In 44 of the patients who did not have concordance, there were more SLN identified intraoperatively than were seen on lymphoscintigraphy. In the other 8 patients, there were fewer SLN identified intraoperatively than seen on lymphoscintigraphy.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of SLN identified intraoperatively in only 47% of the patients in this study. In a majority of the patients in whom the lymphoscintigraphy was not concordant, the number of SLN identified intraoperatively was underestimated. Thus, although lymphoscintigraphy is beneficial in showing that at least 1 radioactive SLN will be identified intraoperatively, it does not accurately predict the number. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68587712</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961005005465</els_id><sourcerecordid>3107654521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-bfd1bc1eb790cf8aae568dd559f14a7f928f48a6ee5b7645fb70c19d69c4bd7a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2L1TAYhYMoznX0JygB0V2vSW8-mpUMF79gwI2uQ5q8mZvSNjVpR-7eH26uLQy40FWSN897OJyD0EtK9pRQ8a7bm6HLS7rb14TwPRF7QutHaEcbqSraNIfHaEcIqSslKLlCz3LuypNSdniKrqiggqma7tCvY0wJejOHOOLocX8eplPMNoxzuEtmOp3xzzCf8HwCPC5DC-lCZSjfI_QrjsfoIOPgLlMfwOGynUycIBXde-jPZYCnci9AXvXaBCbP2JrRQnqOnnjTZ3ixndfo-8cP346fq9uvn74cb24ry5iaq9Y72loKrVTE-sYY4KJxjnPlKTPSq7rxrDECgLdSMO5bSSxVTijLWifN4Rq9XXWnFH8skGc9hGyh780IcclaNLyRktYFfP0X2MUljcWbpowx3ghR839S5EBrorhUheIrZVPMOYHXUwqDSecC6UuVutNblfpSpSZCkz8eXm3qSzuAe9jauivAmw0w2Zrep5JlyA-cpEpwIQv3fuWgRHsfIOlSL5TcXUhgZ-1i-I-V32KqwpU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1031209579</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of lymphoscintigraphy with the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified intraoperatively in patients with breast cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Teal, Christine B. ; Slocum, Jennifer P. ; Akin, Esma A. ; Kelly, Tricia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Teal, Christine B. ; Slocum, Jennifer P. ; Akin, Esma A. ; Kelly, Tricia A.</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous studies have evaluated the benefit of performing lymphoscintigraphy for the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicts the number of radioactive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified during surgery for breast cancer patients.
From October 2001 to June 2004, SLN biopsy was attempted in 112 patients with breast cancer using a combination of blue dye and radioisotope. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 98 of the patients. A lymph node was considered an SLN when it was stained with blue dye, had a blue lymphatic afferent, had increased radioactivity, or was abnormal by palpation.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of radioactive SLN identified intraoperatively in 47 patients. In 44 of the patients who did not have concordance, there were more SLN identified intraoperatively than were seen on lymphoscintigraphy. In the other 8 patients, there were fewer SLN identified intraoperatively than seen on lymphoscintigraphy.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of SLN identified intraoperatively in only 47% of the patients in this study. In a majority of the patients in whom the lymphoscintigraphy was not concordant, the number of SLN identified intraoperatively was underestimated. Thus, although lymphoscintigraphy is beneficial in showing that at least 1 radioactive SLN will be identified intraoperatively, it does not accurately predict the number.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16164921</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Axilla ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Blue dye ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Cellular biology ; Coloring Agents ; Female ; General aspects ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Intraoperative Period ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic system ; Lymphoscintigraphy ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radioisotope ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Sentinel lymph node ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy ; Studies ; Surgery ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2005-10, Vol.190 (4), p.567-569</ispartof><rights>2005 Excerpta Medica Inc.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-bfd1bc1eb790cf8aae568dd559f14a7f928f48a6ee5b7645fb70c19d69c4bd7a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-bfd1bc1eb790cf8aae568dd559f14a7f928f48a6ee5b7645fb70c19d69c4bd7a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961005005465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17196567$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16164921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teal, Christine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slocum, Jennifer P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akin, Esma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Tricia A.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of lymphoscintigraphy with the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified intraoperatively in patients with breast cancer</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Numerous studies have evaluated the benefit of performing lymphoscintigraphy for the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicts the number of radioactive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified during surgery for breast cancer patients.
From October 2001 to June 2004, SLN biopsy was attempted in 112 patients with breast cancer using a combination of blue dye and radioisotope. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 98 of the patients. A lymph node was considered an SLN when it was stained with blue dye, had a blue lymphatic afferent, had increased radioactivity, or was abnormal by palpation.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of radioactive SLN identified intraoperatively in 47 patients. In 44 of the patients who did not have concordance, there were more SLN identified intraoperatively than were seen on lymphoscintigraphy. In the other 8 patients, there were fewer SLN identified intraoperatively than seen on lymphoscintigraphy.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of SLN identified intraoperatively in only 47% of the patients in this study. In a majority of the patients in whom the lymphoscintigraphy was not concordant, the number of SLN identified intraoperatively was underestimated. Thus, although lymphoscintigraphy is beneficial in showing that at least 1 radioactive SLN will be identified intraoperatively, it does not accurately predict the number.</description><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Blue dye</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>Coloring Agents</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraoperative Period</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Lymphoscintigraphy</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radioisotope</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Sentinel lymph node</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2L1TAYhYMoznX0JygB0V2vSW8-mpUMF79gwI2uQ5q8mZvSNjVpR-7eH26uLQy40FWSN897OJyD0EtK9pRQ8a7bm6HLS7rb14TwPRF7QutHaEcbqSraNIfHaEcIqSslKLlCz3LuypNSdniKrqiggqma7tCvY0wJejOHOOLocX8eplPMNoxzuEtmOp3xzzCf8HwCPC5DC-lCZSjfI_QrjsfoIOPgLlMfwOGynUycIBXde-jPZYCnci9AXvXaBCbP2JrRQnqOnnjTZ3ixndfo-8cP346fq9uvn74cb24ry5iaq9Y72loKrVTE-sYY4KJxjnPlKTPSq7rxrDECgLdSMO5bSSxVTijLWifN4Rq9XXWnFH8skGc9hGyh780IcclaNLyRktYFfP0X2MUljcWbpowx3ghR839S5EBrorhUheIrZVPMOYHXUwqDSecC6UuVutNblfpSpSZCkz8eXm3qSzuAe9jauivAmw0w2Zrep5JlyA-cpEpwIQv3fuWgRHsfIOlSL5TcXUhgZ-1i-I-V32KqwpU</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Teal, Christine B.</creator><creator>Slocum, Jennifer P.</creator><creator>Akin, Esma A.</creator><creator>Kelly, Tricia A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Correlation of lymphoscintigraphy with the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified intraoperatively in patients with breast cancer</title><author>Teal, Christine B. ; Slocum, Jennifer P. ; Akin, Esma A. ; Kelly, Tricia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c449t-bfd1bc1eb790cf8aae568dd559f14a7f928f48a6ee5b7645fb70c19d69c4bd7a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Blue dye</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>Coloring Agents</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraoperative Period</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Lymphoscintigraphy</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radioisotope</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Sentinel lymph node</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teal, Christine B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slocum, Jennifer P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akin, Esma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Tricia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teal, Christine B.</au><au>Slocum, Jennifer P.</au><au>Akin, Esma A.</au><au>Kelly, Tricia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of lymphoscintigraphy with the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified intraoperatively in patients with breast cancer</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>190</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>567</spage><epage>569</epage><pages>567-569</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Numerous studies have evaluated the benefit of performing lymphoscintigraphy for the sentinel lymph node procedure in breast cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicts the number of radioactive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) identified during surgery for breast cancer patients.
From October 2001 to June 2004, SLN biopsy was attempted in 112 patients with breast cancer using a combination of blue dye and radioisotope. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 98 of the patients. A lymph node was considered an SLN when it was stained with blue dye, had a blue lymphatic afferent, had increased radioactivity, or was abnormal by palpation.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of radioactive SLN identified intraoperatively in 47 patients. In 44 of the patients who did not have concordance, there were more SLN identified intraoperatively than were seen on lymphoscintigraphy. In the other 8 patients, there were fewer SLN identified intraoperatively than seen on lymphoscintigraphy.
Lymphoscintigraphy accurately predicted the number of SLN identified intraoperatively in only 47% of the patients in this study. In a majority of the patients in whom the lymphoscintigraphy was not concordant, the number of SLN identified intraoperatively was underestimated. Thus, although lymphoscintigraphy is beneficial in showing that at least 1 radioactive SLN will be identified intraoperatively, it does not accurately predict the number.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16164921</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.012</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9610 |
ispartof | The American journal of surgery, 2005-10, Vol.190 (4), p.567-569 |
issn | 0002-9610 1879-1883 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68587712 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Axilla Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Blue dye Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - pathology Cellular biology Coloring Agents Female General aspects Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Intraoperative Period Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging Lymph Nodes - pathology Lymphatic system Lymphoscintigraphy Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Predictive Value of Tests Radioisotope Radionuclide Imaging Radiopharmaceuticals Sentinel lymph node Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Studies Surgery Tumors |
title | Correlation of lymphoscintigraphy with the number of sentinel lymph nodes identified intraoperatively in patients with breast cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A40%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20lymphoscintigraphy%20with%20the%20number%20of%20sentinel%20lymph%20nodes%20identified%20intraoperatively%20in%20patients%20with%20breast%20cancer&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Teal,%20Christine%20B.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=190&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=567&rft.epage=569&rft.pages=567-569&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3107654521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1031209579&rft_id=info:pmid/16164921&rft_els_id=S0002961005005465&rfr_iscdi=true |