Patterns of Practice in Mental Health Courts: A National Survey
Mental health courts (MHCs) represent an important new development at the interface of the criminal justice and mental health systems. MHCs are criminal courts for persons with mental illness that were in part created to divert this population from jail/prison into community treatment. MHCs are prol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Law and human behavior 2006-06, Vol.30 (3), p.347-362 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 362 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 347 |
container_title | Law and human behavior |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Redlich, Allison D Steadman, Henry J Monahan, John Robbins, Pamela Clark Petrila, John |
description | Mental health courts (MHCs) represent an important new development at the interface of the criminal justice and mental health systems. MHCs are criminal courts for persons with mental illness that were in part created to divert this population from jail/prison into community treatment. MHCs are proliferating rapidly despite limited knowledge regarding their characteristics or their efficacy. We surveyed the entire population of adult MHCs in the United States, n = 90. In the past 8 years, MHCs have been created in 34 states, with an aggregate current caseload of 7,560 clients in MHCs nationally. Most courts (92%) reported using jail as a sanction for noncompliance, if only rarely. Further, jail sanction use was significantly predicted by increased judicial supervision and number of felons in the court. Implications for MHCs and social monitoring are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10979-006-9036-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68583375</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4499479</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4499479</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-801faf8ba7a72f2f92c7c6cd18d053cf35beead8f75afed0882809beed4d89743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLHDEQx4NY9LR-AEFkEelLu3WyyWaSRznaWlD0oQXfQi6b4B17u2eShfPbm2MPRRFhIDDzm8mfHyHHFH5SALyIFBSqEkCUCpgo1ztkQmtkpRD0fpdMgHIskQHuk4MYFwCgJNR7ZJ8KxDrXhPy4Mym50MWi98VdMDbNrSvmXXHjumTa4sqZNj0U034IKX4lX7xpozvavofk_-9f_6ZX5fXtn7_Ty-vScKZSKYF64-XMoMHKV15VFq2wDZUN1Mx6Vs-cM430WBvvGpCykqByr-GNVMjZIfk23l2F_nFwMenlPFrXtqZz_RC1kLVkDOsMnr0DFzlol7NpRbmQErj6DKqAUyGRb76kI2RDH2NwXq_CfGnCk6agN7L1KFtn2XojW6_zzun28DBbuuZ1Y2s3AycjsIipDy9zzpXiuAn2fRybldGr-GRNyPZbF-0QQtav24eZZqCZZhwzff4x_RZ7BivjnmA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204168744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patterns of Practice in Mental Health Courts: A National Survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Redlich, Allison D ; Steadman, Henry J ; Monahan, John ; Robbins, Pamela Clark ; Petrila, John</creator><contributor>Wiener, Richard L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Redlich, Allison D ; Steadman, Henry J ; Monahan, John ; Robbins, Pamela Clark ; Petrila, John ; Wiener, Richard L</creatorcontrib><description>Mental health courts (MHCs) represent an important new development at the interface of the criminal justice and mental health systems. MHCs are criminal courts for persons with mental illness that were in part created to divert this population from jail/prison into community treatment. MHCs are proliferating rapidly despite limited knowledge regarding their characteristics or their efficacy. We surveyed the entire population of adult MHCs in the United States, n = 90. In the past 8 years, MHCs have been created in 34 states, with an aggregate current caseload of 7,560 clients in MHCs nationally. Most courts (92%) reported using jail as a sanction for noncompliance, if only rarely. Further, jail sanction use was significantly predicted by increased judicial supervision and number of felons in the court. Implications for MHCs and social monitoring are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-7307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-661X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10979-006-9036-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16775775</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer</publisher><subject>Adjudication ; Community Facilities ; Convictions ; Court hearings & proceedings ; Courts ; Criminal Justice ; Criminal Offenders ; Criminal sanctions ; Criminal sentences ; Defendants ; Disorders ; Effectiveness ; Felons ; Health surveys ; Human ; Humans ; Imprisonment ; Jails ; Judges & magistrates ; Medical treatment ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Health ; Mental health care ; Mental health law ; Mental Health Services - organization & administration ; Mental illness ; Mentally Ill Offenders ; Noncompliance ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration ; Prisons ; Problem solving ; Sanctions ; Studies ; Substance abuse treatment ; Supervision ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States</subject><ispartof>Law and human behavior, 2006-06, Vol.30 (3), p.347-362</ispartof><rights>2006 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2006 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2006 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-801faf8ba7a72f2f92c7c6cd18d053cf35beead8f75afed0882809beed4d89743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-801faf8ba7a72f2f92c7c6cd18d053cf35beead8f75afed0882809beed4d89743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27926,27927</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16775775$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Wiener, Richard L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Redlich, Allison D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steadman, Henry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Pamela Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrila, John</creatorcontrib><title>Patterns of Practice in Mental Health Courts: A National Survey</title><title>Law and human behavior</title><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><description>Mental health courts (MHCs) represent an important new development at the interface of the criminal justice and mental health systems. MHCs are criminal courts for persons with mental illness that were in part created to divert this population from jail/prison into community treatment. MHCs are proliferating rapidly despite limited knowledge regarding their characteristics or their efficacy. We surveyed the entire population of adult MHCs in the United States, n = 90. In the past 8 years, MHCs have been created in 34 states, with an aggregate current caseload of 7,560 clients in MHCs nationally. Most courts (92%) reported using jail as a sanction for noncompliance, if only rarely. Further, jail sanction use was significantly predicted by increased judicial supervision and number of felons in the court. Implications for MHCs and social monitoring are discussed.</description><subject>Adjudication</subject><subject>Community Facilities</subject><subject>Convictions</subject><subject>Court hearings & proceedings</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Criminal Offenders</subject><subject>Criminal sanctions</subject><subject>Criminal sentences</subject><subject>Defendants</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Felons</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imprisonment</subject><subject>Jails</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental Health</subject><subject>Mental health care</subject><subject>Mental health law</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Mental illness</subject><subject>Mentally Ill Offenders</subject><subject>Noncompliance</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration</subject><subject>Prisons</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Supervision</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0147-7307</issn><issn>1573-661X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLHDEQx4NY9LR-AEFkEelLu3WyyWaSRznaWlD0oQXfQi6b4B17u2eShfPbm2MPRRFhIDDzm8mfHyHHFH5SALyIFBSqEkCUCpgo1ztkQmtkpRD0fpdMgHIskQHuk4MYFwCgJNR7ZJ8KxDrXhPy4Mym50MWi98VdMDbNrSvmXXHjumTa4sqZNj0U034IKX4lX7xpozvavofk_-9f_6ZX5fXtn7_Ty-vScKZSKYF64-XMoMHKV15VFq2wDZUN1Mx6Vs-cM430WBvvGpCykqByr-GNVMjZIfk23l2F_nFwMenlPFrXtqZz_RC1kLVkDOsMnr0DFzlol7NpRbmQErj6DKqAUyGRb76kI2RDH2NwXq_CfGnCk6agN7L1KFtn2XojW6_zzun28DBbuuZ1Y2s3AycjsIipDy9zzpXiuAn2fRybldGr-GRNyPZbF-0QQtav24eZZqCZZhwzff4x_RZ7BivjnmA</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Redlich, Allison D</creator><creator>Steadman, Henry J</creator><creator>Monahan, John</creator><creator>Robbins, Pamela Clark</creator><creator>Petrila, John</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers</general><general>American Psychological Law Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Patterns of Practice in Mental Health Courts</title><author>Redlich, Allison D ; Steadman, Henry J ; Monahan, John ; Robbins, Pamela Clark ; Petrila, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a439t-801faf8ba7a72f2f92c7c6cd18d053cf35beead8f75afed0882809beed4d89743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adjudication</topic><topic>Community Facilities</topic><topic>Convictions</topic><topic>Court hearings & proceedings</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Criminal Offenders</topic><topic>Criminal sanctions</topic><topic>Criminal sentences</topic><topic>Defendants</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Felons</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imprisonment</topic><topic>Jails</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental Health</topic><topic>Mental health care</topic><topic>Mental health law</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Mental illness</topic><topic>Mentally Ill Offenders</topic><topic>Noncompliance</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration</topic><topic>Prisons</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Supervision</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redlich, Allison D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steadman, Henry J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monahan, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robbins, Pamela Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrila, John</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redlich, Allison D</au><au>Steadman, Henry J</au><au>Monahan, John</au><au>Robbins, Pamela Clark</au><au>Petrila, John</au><au>Wiener, Richard L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patterns of Practice in Mental Health Courts: A National Survey</atitle><jtitle>Law and human behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Law Hum Behav</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>347</spage><epage>362</epage><pages>347-362</pages><issn>0147-7307</issn><eissn>1573-661X</eissn><abstract>Mental health courts (MHCs) represent an important new development at the interface of the criminal justice and mental health systems. MHCs are criminal courts for persons with mental illness that were in part created to divert this population from jail/prison into community treatment. MHCs are proliferating rapidly despite limited knowledge regarding their characteristics or their efficacy. We surveyed the entire population of adult MHCs in the United States, n = 90. In the past 8 years, MHCs have been created in 34 states, with an aggregate current caseload of 7,560 clients in MHCs nationally. Most courts (92%) reported using jail as a sanction for noncompliance, if only rarely. Further, jail sanction use was significantly predicted by increased judicial supervision and number of felons in the court. Implications for MHCs and social monitoring are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16775775</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10979-006-9036-x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-7307 |
ispartof | Law and human behavior, 2006-06, Vol.30 (3), p.347-362 |
issn | 0147-7307 1573-661X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68583375 |
source | MEDLINE; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; SpringerNature Journals; APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adjudication Community Facilities Convictions Court hearings & proceedings Courts Criminal Justice Criminal Offenders Criminal sanctions Criminal sentences Defendants Disorders Effectiveness Felons Health surveys Human Humans Imprisonment Jails Judges & magistrates Medical treatment Mental Disorders Mental Health Mental health care Mental health law Mental Health Services - organization & administration Mental illness Mentally Ill Offenders Noncompliance Practice Patterns, Physicians' - organization & administration Prisons Problem solving Sanctions Studies Substance abuse treatment Supervision Surveys and Questionnaires United States |
title | Patterns of Practice in Mental Health Courts: A National Survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T06%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patterns%20of%20Practice%20in%20Mental%20Health%20Courts:%20A%20National%20Survey&rft.jtitle=Law%20and%20human%20behavior&rft.au=Redlich,%20Allison%20D&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=362&rft.pages=347-362&rft.issn=0147-7307&rft.eissn=1573-661X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10979-006-9036-x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4499479%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204168744&rft_id=info:pmid/16775775&rft_jstor_id=4499479&rfr_iscdi=true |