Annular height-to-commissural width ratio of annulolasty rings in vivo

A "saddle-shaped" mitral annulus with an optimal ratio between annular height and commissural diameter may reduce leaflet and chordal stress and is purported to be conserved across mammalian species. Whether annuloplasty rings maintain this relationship is unknown. Twenty-three adult sheep...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-08, Vol.112 (9), p.I423-I428
Hauptverfasser: TIMEK, Tomasz A, GLASSON, Julie R, LAI, David T, LIANG, David, DAUGHTERS, George T, INGELS, Neil B, MILLER, D. Craig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A "saddle-shaped" mitral annulus with an optimal ratio between annular height and commissural diameter may reduce leaflet and chordal stress and is purported to be conserved across mammalian species. Whether annuloplasty rings maintain this relationship is unknown. Twenty-three adult sheep underwent implantation of radiopaque markers on the left ventricle and mitral annulus. Eight animals underwent implantation of a Carpentier-Edwards Physio ring, 7 underwent a Medtronic Duran flexible ring, and 8 served as controls. Animals were studied with biplane videofluoroscopy 7 to 10 days postoperatively. Annular height and commissural width (CW) were determined from 3D marker coordinates, and annular height:CW ratio (AHWCR) was calculated. Annular height was similar in Control and Duran animals but significantly lower in the Physio group at end diastole (8.4+/-3.8, 6.7+/-2.3, and 3.4+/-0.6 mm, respectively, for Control, Duran, and Physio; ANOVA=0.005) and at end systole (14.5+/-6.2, 10.5+/-5.5, and 5.8+/-2.5 mm, respectively, for Control, Duran, and Physio; ANOVA=0.004). Both ring groups reduced CW significantly relative to Control. AHCWR did not differ between Control and Duran but was lower in Physio (23+/-11%, 24+/-7%, and 12+/-2% at end diastole and 42+/-17%, 37+/-17%, and 21+/-10% at end systole, respectively, for Control, Duran, and Physio, respectively; ANOVA
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.525485