Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique

Objectives The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler. Design A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2005-09, Vol.42 (5), p.539-547
Hauptverfasser: Hutchison, B. Lynne, Hutchison, Luke A. D., Thompson, John M. D., Mitchell, Ed A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 547
container_issue 5
container_start_page 539
container_title The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal
container_volume 42
creator Hutchison, B. Lynne
Hutchison, Luke A. D.
Thompson, John M. D.
Mitchell, Ed A.
description Objectives The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler. Design A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics. Participants Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old. Interventions Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program. Main Outcome Measures The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly. Results The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly. Conclusions The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%.
doi_str_mv 10.1597/04-059r.1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68567360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1597_04-059r.1</sage_id><sourcerecordid>68567360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMovhf-AQkuBBfVZJpXlzo-YUCFcR1u07SNdJIxaRfz763MyICu7uXy3XMOB6EzSq4pL-QNYRnhRbymO-iQcsYzykWxO-6E80wILg7QUUqfhEw4nah9dEAFZYXK5SEy7wP43tXOQO-Cx6HGbx00Lhi7bKFbYfAVvotg2tXvxXn84uvxK-GP5HyDAd-7xvXQ4bc29KGJsGydwXNrWu--BnuC9mrokj3dzGM0f3yYT5-z2evTy_R2lpmc0T4zhpgqV8wQIRUoaUo-niiXZW6gLEVRSGoJGFFJYBNbgSA1cKWUZIwXNj9Gl2vZZQyja-r1wiVjuw68DUPSQnEhc0FG8OIP-BmG6MdoekJYkTOS8xG6WkMmhpSirfUyugXElaZE_7SuCdM_rWs6sucbwaFc2GpLbmreRkvQ2K3bf6VvwQ6JaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204934035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Hutchison, B. Lynne ; Hutchison, Luke A. D. ; Thompson, John M. D. ; Mitchell, Ed A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, B. Lynne ; Hutchison, Luke A. D. ; Thompson, John M. D. ; Mitchell, Ed A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler. Design A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics. Participants Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old. Interventions Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program. Main Outcome Measures The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly. Results The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly. Conclusions The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-6656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1597/04-059r.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16149837</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPJOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Cephalometry - instrumentation ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Dentistry ; Ethnic Groups ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Infant ; Male ; Photography - methods ; Photography - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skull - abnormalities ; Skull - pathology ; Software ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-09, Vol.42 (5), p.539-547</ispartof><rights>2005 American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1597/04-059r.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1597/04-059r.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149837$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, B. Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, John M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Ed A.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</title><title>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</title><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><description>Objectives The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler. Design A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics. Participants Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old. Interventions Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program. Main Outcome Measures The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly. Results The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly. Conclusions The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cephalometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photography - methods</subject><subject>Photography - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skull - abnormalities</subject><subject>Skull - pathology</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1055-6656</issn><issn>1545-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMovhf-AQkuBBfVZJpXlzo-YUCFcR1u07SNdJIxaRfz763MyICu7uXy3XMOB6EzSq4pL-QNYRnhRbymO-iQcsYzykWxO-6E80wILg7QUUqfhEw4nah9dEAFZYXK5SEy7wP43tXOQO-Cx6HGbx00Lhi7bKFbYfAVvotg2tXvxXn84uvxK-GP5HyDAd-7xvXQ4bc29KGJsGydwXNrWu--BnuC9mrokj3dzGM0f3yYT5-z2evTy_R2lpmc0T4zhpgqV8wQIRUoaUo-niiXZW6gLEVRSGoJGFFJYBNbgSA1cKWUZIwXNj9Gl2vZZQyja-r1wiVjuw68DUPSQnEhc0FG8OIP-BmG6MdoekJYkTOS8xG6WkMmhpSirfUyugXElaZE_7SuCdM_rWs6sucbwaFc2GpLbmreRkvQ2K3bf6VvwQ6JaA</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Hutchison, B. Lynne</creator><creator>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</creator><creator>Thompson, John M. D.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Ed A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</title><author>Hutchison, B. Lynne ; Hutchison, Luke A. D. ; Thompson, John M. D. ; Mitchell, Ed A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cephalometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cephalometry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photography - methods</topic><topic>Photography - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skull - abnormalities</topic><topic>Skull - pathology</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, B. Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, John M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Ed A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutchison, B. Lynne</au><au>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</au><au>Thompson, John M. D.</au><au>Mitchell, Ed A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</atitle><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>547</epage><pages>539-547</pages><issn>1055-6656</issn><eissn>1545-1569</eissn><coden>CPJOEG</coden><abstract>Objectives The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler. Design A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics. Participants Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old. Interventions Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program. Main Outcome Measures The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly. Results The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly. Conclusions The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16149837</pmid><doi>10.1597/04-059r.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-6656
ispartof The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-09, Vol.42 (5), p.539-547
issn 1055-6656
1545-1569
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68567360
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Case-Control Studies
Cephalometry - instrumentation
Cephalometry - methods
Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data
Dentistry
Ethnic Groups
Female
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Infant
Male
Photography - methods
Photography - statistics & numerical data
Reproducibility of Results
Skull - abnormalities
Skull - pathology
Software
Time Factors
title Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A17%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20Plagiocephaly%20and%20Brachycephaly%20in%20Infants%20Using%20a%20Digital%20Photographic%20Technique&rft.jtitle=The%20Cleft%20palate-craniofacial%20journal&rft.au=Hutchison,%20B.%20Lynne&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=547&rft.pages=539-547&rft.issn=1055-6656&rft.eissn=1545-1569&rft.coden=CPJOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1597/04-059r.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68567360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204934035&rft_id=info:pmid/16149837&rft_sage_id=10.1597_04-059r.1&rfr_iscdi=true