Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique
Objectives The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler. Design A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2005-09, Vol.42 (5), p.539-547 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 547 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 539 |
container_title | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Hutchison, B. Lynne Hutchison, Luke A. D. Thompson, John M. D. Mitchell, Ed A. |
description | Objectives
The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler.
Design
A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics.
Participants
Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old.
Interventions
Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program.
Main Outcome Measures
The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly.
Results
The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly.
Conclusions
The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1597/04-059r.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68567360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1597_04-059r.1</sage_id><sourcerecordid>68567360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMovhf-AQkuBBfVZJpXlzo-YUCFcR1u07SNdJIxaRfz763MyICu7uXy3XMOB6EzSq4pL-QNYRnhRbymO-iQcsYzykWxO-6E80wILg7QUUqfhEw4nah9dEAFZYXK5SEy7wP43tXOQO-Cx6HGbx00Lhi7bKFbYfAVvotg2tXvxXn84uvxK-GP5HyDAd-7xvXQ4bc29KGJsGydwXNrWu--BnuC9mrokj3dzGM0f3yYT5-z2evTy_R2lpmc0T4zhpgqV8wQIRUoaUo-niiXZW6gLEVRSGoJGFFJYBNbgSA1cKWUZIwXNj9Gl2vZZQyja-r1wiVjuw68DUPSQnEhc0FG8OIP-BmG6MdoekJYkTOS8xG6WkMmhpSirfUyugXElaZE_7SuCdM_rWs6sucbwaFc2GpLbmreRkvQ2K3bf6VvwQ6JaA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204934035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Hutchison, B. Lynne ; Hutchison, Luke A. D. ; Thompson, John M. D. ; Mitchell, Ed A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, B. Lynne ; Hutchison, Luke A. D. ; Thompson, John M. D. ; Mitchell, Ed A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler.
Design
A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics.
Participants
Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old.
Interventions
Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program.
Main Outcome Measures
The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly.
Results
The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly.
Conclusions
The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-6656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-1569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1597/04-059r.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16149837</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CPJOEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Case-Control Studies ; Cephalometry - instrumentation ; Cephalometry - methods ; Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data ; Dentistry ; Ethnic Groups ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Infant ; Male ; Photography - methods ; Photography - statistics & numerical data ; Reproducibility of Results ; Skull - abnormalities ; Skull - pathology ; Software ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-09, Vol.42 (5), p.539-547</ispartof><rights>2005 American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association</rights><rights>Copyright Alliance Communications Group, A Division of Allen Press, Inc. Sep 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1597/04-059r.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1597/04-059r.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149837$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, B. Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, John M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Ed A.</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</title><title>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</title><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><description>Objectives
The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler.
Design
A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics.
Participants
Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old.
Interventions
Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program.
Main Outcome Measures
The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly.
Results
The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly.
Conclusions
The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%.</description><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cephalometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photography - methods</subject><subject>Photography - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Skull - abnormalities</subject><subject>Skull - pathology</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1055-6656</issn><issn>1545-1569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNplkEtLxDAUhYMovhf-AQkuBBfVZJpXlzo-YUCFcR1u07SNdJIxaRfz763MyICu7uXy3XMOB6EzSq4pL-QNYRnhRbymO-iQcsYzykWxO-6E80wILg7QUUqfhEw4nah9dEAFZYXK5SEy7wP43tXOQO-Cx6HGbx00Lhi7bKFbYfAVvotg2tXvxXn84uvxK-GP5HyDAd-7xvXQ4bc29KGJsGydwXNrWu--BnuC9mrokj3dzGM0f3yYT5-z2evTy_R2lpmc0T4zhpgqV8wQIRUoaUo-niiXZW6gLEVRSGoJGFFJYBNbgSA1cKWUZIwXNj9Gl2vZZQyja-r1wiVjuw68DUPSQnEhc0FG8OIP-BmG6MdoekJYkTOS8xG6WkMmhpSirfUyugXElaZE_7SuCdM_rWs6sucbwaFc2GpLbmreRkvQ2K3bf6VvwQ6JaA</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Hutchison, B. Lynne</creator><creator>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</creator><creator>Thompson, John M. D.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Ed A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</title><author>Hutchison, B. Lynne ; Hutchison, Luke A. D. ; Thompson, John M. D. ; Mitchell, Ed A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-cc0cd384c0678a87cb5cc0157b3cabb69971e0ac6d7a42eda60fa588874459e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cephalometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photography - methods</topic><topic>Photography - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Skull - abnormalities</topic><topic>Skull - pathology</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, B. Lynne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, John M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Ed A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hutchison, B. Lynne</au><au>Hutchison, Luke A. D.</au><au>Thompson, John M. D.</au><au>Mitchell, Ed A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique</atitle><jtitle>The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal</jtitle><addtitle>Cleft Palate Craniofac J</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>539</spage><epage>547</epage><pages>539-547</pages><issn>1055-6656</issn><eissn>1545-1569</eissn><coden>CPJOEG</coden><abstract>Objectives
The aims of the study were: (1) to develop a technique to quantify plagiocephaly that is safe, accurate, objective, easy to use, well tolerated, and inexpensive; and (2) to compare this method with tracings from a flexicurve ruler.
Design
A case-control study of 31 case infants recruited from outpatient plagiocephaly clinics and 29 control infants recruited from other pediatric outpatient clinics.
Participants
Infants in the study had been diagnosed with nonsynostotic plagiocephaly or brachycephaly and were between 2 and 12 months old.
Interventions
Infants’ head shapes were measured using (a) digital photographs of a head circumference band and (b) a flexicurve ruler. Flexicurve tracings were scanned, and both the digital photos and the scanned flexicurve tracings were analyzed using a custom-written computer program.
Main Outcome Measures
The oblique cranial length ratio was used to quantify cranial asymmetry, and the cephalic index was used to quantify the degree of brachycephaly.
Results
The infants tolerated the photo technique better than the flexicurve. Also, mothers preferred the photo technique. There was less within-subject variance for the photos than for the flexicurve measurements. The results suggested that an oblique cranial length ratio of ≥ 106% can define plagiocephaly and that a cephalic index of ≥ 93% can define brachycephaly.
Conclusions
The photographic technique was better accepted and more repeatable than the flexicurve measuring system. We propose that “normal” head shape is indicated in infants with both an oblique cranial length ratio of less than 106% and a cephalic index of less than 93%.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>16149837</pmid><doi>10.1597/04-059r.1</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1055-6656 |
ispartof | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal, 2005-09, Vol.42 (5), p.539-547 |
issn | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68567360 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Case-Control Studies Cephalometry - instrumentation Cephalometry - methods Cephalometry - statistics & numerical data Dentistry Ethnic Groups Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Infant Male Photography - methods Photography - statistics & numerical data Reproducibility of Results Skull - abnormalities Skull - pathology Software Time Factors |
title | Quantification of Plagiocephaly and Brachycephaly in Infants Using a Digital Photographic Technique |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T00%3A17%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20Plagiocephaly%20and%20Brachycephaly%20in%20Infants%20Using%20a%20Digital%20Photographic%20Technique&rft.jtitle=The%20Cleft%20palate-craniofacial%20journal&rft.au=Hutchison,%20B.%20Lynne&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=539&rft.epage=547&rft.pages=539-547&rft.issn=1055-6656&rft.eissn=1545-1569&rft.coden=CPJOEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1597/04-059r.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68567360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204934035&rft_id=info:pmid/16149837&rft_sage_id=10.1597_04-059r.1&rfr_iscdi=true |