Delivery of Calcium Hydroxide: Comparison of Four Filling Techniques
This study compared the weight and radiographic appearance of Ca(OH) 2 delivered into standardized, minimally and fully prepared canals using (a) an injection system, (b) an endodontic Flex-O file rotated counter-clockwise, (c) a lentulo spiral, and (d) a .04 rotary NiTi file rotated in reverse. Two...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2006-07, Vol.32 (7), p.680-682 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 682 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 7 |
| container_start_page | 680 |
| container_title | Journal of endodontics |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Simcock, Richard M. Hicks, M. Lamar |
| description | This study compared the weight and radiographic appearance of Ca(OH)
2 delivered into standardized, minimally and fully prepared canals using (a) an injection system, (b) an endodontic Flex-O file rotated counter-clockwise, (c) a lentulo spiral, and (d) a .04 rotary NiTi file rotated in reverse. Two extracted human second mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared to an MAF #25 or an MAF #40. A weight measurement and radiograph were made for each filling. Three independent examiners evaluated the radiographs. Regardless of technique, only about 45% of the optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 was delivered into the minimally prepared canal. Radiographically the filling quality was only 1 to 2 (10 scale). In contrast, all delivery techniques delivered near optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 in the completely prepared canal with a radiographic filling quality of 8.8 to 9.3. The results indicate that complete instrumentation is needed to obtain near optimal delivery of Ca(OH)
2. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joen.2006.01.009 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68566988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099239906000501</els_id><sourcerecordid>68566988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-36c850d907d7d280d56efbd556035b02bf564cf10a2f6a7718779f8cd245dc133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFb_gAfJyVvibDb7EfEirVVB8KLnJd2d6JYkW3ebYv-9CS148zQwPO87zEPIFYWMAhW3q2zlsctyAJEBzQDKIzKhSqqUcV4ck8mwKdOcleUZOY9xBUAlY_KUnFEhS1YomJD5HBu3xbBLfJ3Mqsa4vk2edzb4H2fxLpn5dl0FF303Agvfh2ThmsZ1n8k7mq_OffcYL8hJXTURLw9zSj4Wj--z5_T17ell9vCaGsaLTcqEURxsCdJKmyuwXGC9tJwLYHwJ-bLmojA1hSqvRSXl8Iosa2VsXnBrKGNTcrPvXQc_3t3o1kWDTVN16PuoheJClEoNYL4HTfAxBqz1Ori2CjtNQY_u9EqP7vToTgPVg6khdH1o75ct2r_IQdYA3O8BHH7cOgw6GoedQesCmo223v3X_wvaXX9E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68566988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delivery of Calcium Hydroxide: Comparison of Four Filling Techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Simcock, Richard M. ; Hicks, M. Lamar</creator><creatorcontrib>Simcock, Richard M. ; Hicks, M. Lamar</creatorcontrib><description>This study compared the weight and radiographic appearance of Ca(OH)
2 delivered into standardized, minimally and fully prepared canals using (a) an injection system, (b) an endodontic Flex-O file rotated counter-clockwise, (c) a lentulo spiral, and (d) a .04 rotary NiTi file rotated in reverse. Two extracted human second mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared to an MAF #25 or an MAF #40. A weight measurement and radiograph were made for each filling. Three independent examiners evaluated the radiographs. Regardless of technique, only about 45% of the optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 was delivered into the minimally prepared canal. Radiographically the filling quality was only 1 to 2 (10 scale). In contrast, all delivery techniques delivered near optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 in the completely prepared canal with a radiographic filling quality of 8.8 to 9.3. The results indicate that complete instrumentation is needed to obtain near optimal delivery of Ca(OH)
2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.01.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16793480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bicuspid ; Ca(OH) 2 delivery ; Calcium Hydroxide - administration & dosage ; complete instrumentation needed for near optimal delivery ; Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Radiography ; Root Canal Filling Materials ; Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation ; Root Canal Obturation - methods ; Root Canal Preparation ; testing of four techniques</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2006-07, Vol.32 (7), p.680-682</ispartof><rights>2006 American Association of Endodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-36c850d907d7d280d56efbd556035b02bf564cf10a2f6a7718779f8cd245dc133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-36c850d907d7d280d56efbd556035b02bf564cf10a2f6a7718779f8cd245dc133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239906000501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16793480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simcock, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, M. Lamar</creatorcontrib><title>Delivery of Calcium Hydroxide: Comparison of Four Filling Techniques</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>This study compared the weight and radiographic appearance of Ca(OH)
2 delivered into standardized, minimally and fully prepared canals using (a) an injection system, (b) an endodontic Flex-O file rotated counter-clockwise, (c) a lentulo spiral, and (d) a .04 rotary NiTi file rotated in reverse. Two extracted human second mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared to an MAF #25 or an MAF #40. A weight measurement and radiograph were made for each filling. Three independent examiners evaluated the radiographs. Regardless of technique, only about 45% of the optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 was delivered into the minimally prepared canal. Radiographically the filling quality was only 1 to 2 (10 scale). In contrast, all delivery techniques delivered near optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 in the completely prepared canal with a radiographic filling quality of 8.8 to 9.3. The results indicate that complete instrumentation is needed to obtain near optimal delivery of Ca(OH)
2.</description><subject>Bicuspid</subject><subject>Ca(OH) 2 delivery</subject><subject>Calcium Hydroxide - administration & dosage</subject><subject>complete instrumentation needed for near optimal delivery</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - methods</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation</subject><subject>testing of four techniques</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFb_gAfJyVvibDb7EfEirVVB8KLnJd2d6JYkW3ebYv-9CS148zQwPO87zEPIFYWMAhW3q2zlsctyAJEBzQDKIzKhSqqUcV4ck8mwKdOcleUZOY9xBUAlY_KUnFEhS1YomJD5HBu3xbBLfJ3Mqsa4vk2edzb4H2fxLpn5dl0FF303Agvfh2ThmsZ1n8k7mq_OffcYL8hJXTURLw9zSj4Wj--z5_T17ell9vCaGsaLTcqEURxsCdJKmyuwXGC9tJwLYHwJ-bLmojA1hSqvRSXl8Iosa2VsXnBrKGNTcrPvXQc_3t3o1kWDTVN16PuoheJClEoNYL4HTfAxBqz1Ori2CjtNQY_u9EqP7vToTgPVg6khdH1o75ct2r_IQdYA3O8BHH7cOgw6GoedQesCmo223v3X_wvaXX9E</recordid><startdate>20060701</startdate><enddate>20060701</enddate><creator>Simcock, Richard M.</creator><creator>Hicks, M. Lamar</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060701</creationdate><title>Delivery of Calcium Hydroxide: Comparison of Four Filling Techniques</title><author>Simcock, Richard M. ; Hicks, M. Lamar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-36c850d907d7d280d56efbd556035b02bf564cf10a2f6a7718779f8cd245dc133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bicuspid</topic><topic>Ca(OH) 2 delivery</topic><topic>Calcium Hydroxide - administration & dosage</topic><topic>complete instrumentation needed for near optimal delivery</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - methods</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation</topic><topic>testing of four techniques</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simcock, Richard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hicks, M. Lamar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simcock, Richard M.</au><au>Hicks, M. Lamar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delivery of Calcium Hydroxide: Comparison of Four Filling Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2006-07-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>680</spage><epage>682</epage><pages>680-682</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>This study compared the weight and radiographic appearance of Ca(OH)
2 delivered into standardized, minimally and fully prepared canals using (a) an injection system, (b) an endodontic Flex-O file rotated counter-clockwise, (c) a lentulo spiral, and (d) a .04 rotary NiTi file rotated in reverse. Two extracted human second mandibular premolars with single canals were prepared to an MAF #25 or an MAF #40. A weight measurement and radiograph were made for each filling. Three independent examiners evaluated the radiographs. Regardless of technique, only about 45% of the optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 was delivered into the minimally prepared canal. Radiographically the filling quality was only 1 to 2 (10 scale). In contrast, all delivery techniques delivered near optimal weight of Ca(OH)
2 in the completely prepared canal with a radiographic filling quality of 8.8 to 9.3. The results indicate that complete instrumentation is needed to obtain near optimal delivery of Ca(OH)
2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16793480</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2006.01.009</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
| ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 2006-07, Vol.32 (7), p.680-682 |
| issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68566988 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Bicuspid Ca(OH) 2 delivery Calcium Hydroxide - administration & dosage complete instrumentation needed for near optimal delivery Dental Pulp Cavity - diagnostic imaging Dentistry Humans Radiography Root Canal Filling Materials Root Canal Obturation - instrumentation Root Canal Obturation - methods Root Canal Preparation testing of four techniques |
| title | Delivery of Calcium Hydroxide: Comparison of Four Filling Techniques |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A13%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delivery%20of%20Calcium%20Hydroxide:%20Comparison%20of%20Four%20Filling%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Simcock,%20Richard%20M.&rft.date=2006-07-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=680&rft.epage=682&rft.pages=680-682&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2006.01.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68566988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68566988&rft_id=info:pmid/16793480&rft_els_id=S0099239906000501&rfr_iscdi=true |