The Management and Outcome of Patients with Germ-cell Tumours Treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre Between 1988 and 2002

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to review the outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre over the past 15 years, and to see whether there had been any changes over three 5-year cohorts. Patients referred with gonadal and extra-gonadal primary germ-ce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) 2005-09, Vol.17 (6), p.435-440
Hauptverfasser: Howard, G.C.W., Conkey, D.S., Peoples, S., McLaren, D.B., Hargreave, T.B., Tulloch, D.N., Walker, W., Kerr, G.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 440
container_issue 6
container_start_page 435
container_title Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
container_volume 17
creator Howard, G.C.W.
Conkey, D.S.
Peoples, S.
McLaren, D.B.
Hargreave, T.B.
Tulloch, D.N.
Walker, W.
Kerr, G.R.
description The aim of this retrospective analysis was to review the outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre over the past 15 years, and to see whether there had been any changes over three 5-year cohorts. Patients referred with gonadal and extra-gonadal primary germ-cell tumours, between 1988 and 2002, were identified from the departmental database, and survival by stage and prognostic group was analysed. The proportion of patients with stage I seminoma has significantly increased. The good prognosis of patients with early stage disease is confirmed, with the outcome for some groups of patients being better than expected. There is a non-significant trend to improved results over the three 5-year cohorts. The outcome for patients with stage IV seminoma is worse than would be expected, but numbers are small. The poor prognosis of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours who fall into the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) poor-prognostic group is confirmed. Failure of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours to achieve a complete response to initial therapy is shown to be a poor prognostic indicator.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clon.2005.03.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68563627</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S093665550500141X</els_id><sourcerecordid>68563627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-f9d95ce0145a73fbaaf4e0d26753df050ab3c8757aa8664599578b3e84bdde583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha2qqCy0f6CHyqfeEuw4dmypF1hRQALBYTlbjj1hvdo4YDtF5dfX212JG6eRRu-9mfch9J2SmhIqzja13U6hbgjhNWE1ofQTWtCWsapRkn5GC6KYqATn_BidpLQhhDRSqi_omAraqkZ2C_S2WgO-M8E8wQghYxMcvp-znUbA04AfTPZlnfCrz2t8BXGsLGy3eDWP0xwTXkUwGRz2AecSdOl86Of4tMZLEyxEvCzmCPgC8itAwFRJ-f9E-bn5io4Gs03w7TBP0ePvy9Xyurq9v7pZnt9WlvE2V4NyilsgtOWmY0NvzNACcY3oOHMD4cT0zMqOd8ZIIVquFO9kz0C2vXPAJTtFP_e5z3F6mSFlPfq0a2ECTHPSQnLBRNMVYbMX2jilFGHQz9GPJv7VlOgdcb3RO-J6R1wTpgvxYvpxSJ_7Edy75YC4CH7tBVA6_vEQdbKFqQXnI9is3eQ_yv8HtgyRKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68563627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Management and Outcome of Patients with Germ-cell Tumours Treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre Between 1988 and 2002</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Howard, G.C.W. ; Conkey, D.S. ; Peoples, S. ; McLaren, D.B. ; Hargreave, T.B. ; Tulloch, D.N. ; Walker, W. ; Kerr, G.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Howard, G.C.W. ; Conkey, D.S. ; Peoples, S. ; McLaren, D.B. ; Hargreave, T.B. ; Tulloch, D.N. ; Walker, W. ; Kerr, G.R.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this retrospective analysis was to review the outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre over the past 15 years, and to see whether there had been any changes over three 5-year cohorts. Patients referred with gonadal and extra-gonadal primary germ-cell tumours, between 1988 and 2002, were identified from the departmental database, and survival by stage and prognostic group was analysed. The proportion of patients with stage I seminoma has significantly increased. The good prognosis of patients with early stage disease is confirmed, with the outcome for some groups of patients being better than expected. There is a non-significant trend to improved results over the three 5-year cohorts. The outcome for patients with stage IV seminoma is worse than would be expected, but numbers are small. The poor prognosis of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours who fall into the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) poor-prognostic group is confirmed. Failure of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours to achieve a complete response to initial therapy is shown to be a poor prognostic indicator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-2981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2005.03.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16149287</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Combined Modality Therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Germ-cell tumours ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - mortality ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - pathology ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - therapy ; prognostic group ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate ; testicular cancer ; Testicular Neoplasms - mortality ; Testicular Neoplasms - pathology ; Testicular Neoplasms - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2005-09, Vol.17 (6), p.435-440</ispartof><rights>2005 The Royal College of Radiologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-f9d95ce0145a73fbaaf4e0d26753df050ab3c8757aa8664599578b3e84bdde583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-f9d95ce0145a73fbaaf4e0d26753df050ab3c8757aa8664599578b3e84bdde583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S093665550500141X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16149287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howard, G.C.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conkey, D.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peoples, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreave, T.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulloch, D.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, G.R.</creatorcontrib><title>The Management and Outcome of Patients with Germ-cell Tumours Treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre Between 1988 and 2002</title><title>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</title><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><description>The aim of this retrospective analysis was to review the outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre over the past 15 years, and to see whether there had been any changes over three 5-year cohorts. Patients referred with gonadal and extra-gonadal primary germ-cell tumours, between 1988 and 2002, were identified from the departmental database, and survival by stage and prognostic group was analysed. The proportion of patients with stage I seminoma has significantly increased. The good prognosis of patients with early stage disease is confirmed, with the outcome for some groups of patients being better than expected. There is a non-significant trend to improved results over the three 5-year cohorts. The outcome for patients with stage IV seminoma is worse than would be expected, but numbers are small. The poor prognosis of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours who fall into the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) poor-prognostic group is confirmed. Failure of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours to achieve a complete response to initial therapy is shown to be a poor prognostic indicator.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Germ-cell tumours</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - therapy</subject><subject>prognostic group</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>testicular cancer</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0936-6555</issn><issn>1433-2981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFP3DAQha2qqCy0f6CHyqfeEuw4dmypF1hRQALBYTlbjj1hvdo4YDtF5dfX212JG6eRRu-9mfch9J2SmhIqzja13U6hbgjhNWE1ofQTWtCWsapRkn5GC6KYqATn_BidpLQhhDRSqi_omAraqkZ2C_S2WgO-M8E8wQghYxMcvp-znUbA04AfTPZlnfCrz2t8BXGsLGy3eDWP0xwTXkUwGRz2AecSdOl86Of4tMZLEyxEvCzmCPgC8itAwFRJ-f9E-bn5io4Gs03w7TBP0ePvy9Xyurq9v7pZnt9WlvE2V4NyilsgtOWmY0NvzNACcY3oOHMD4cT0zMqOd8ZIIVquFO9kz0C2vXPAJTtFP_e5z3F6mSFlPfq0a2ECTHPSQnLBRNMVYbMX2jilFGHQz9GPJv7VlOgdcb3RO-J6R1wTpgvxYvpxSJ_7Edy75YC4CH7tBVA6_vEQdbKFqQXnI9is3eQ_yv8HtgyRKA</recordid><startdate>20050901</startdate><enddate>20050901</enddate><creator>Howard, G.C.W.</creator><creator>Conkey, D.S.</creator><creator>Peoples, S.</creator><creator>McLaren, D.B.</creator><creator>Hargreave, T.B.</creator><creator>Tulloch, D.N.</creator><creator>Walker, W.</creator><creator>Kerr, G.R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050901</creationdate><title>The Management and Outcome of Patients with Germ-cell Tumours Treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre Between 1988 and 2002</title><author>Howard, G.C.W. ; Conkey, D.S. ; Peoples, S. ; McLaren, D.B. ; Hargreave, T.B. ; Tulloch, D.N. ; Walker, W. ; Kerr, G.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-f9d95ce0145a73fbaaf4e0d26753df050ab3c8757aa8664599578b3e84bdde583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Germ-cell tumours</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - therapy</topic><topic>prognostic group</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>testicular cancer</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howard, G.C.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conkey, D.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peoples, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaren, D.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreave, T.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulloch, D.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kerr, G.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howard, G.C.W.</au><au>Conkey, D.S.</au><au>Peoples, S.</au><au>McLaren, D.B.</au><au>Hargreave, T.B.</au><au>Tulloch, D.N.</au><au>Walker, W.</au><au>Kerr, G.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Management and Outcome of Patients with Germ-cell Tumours Treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre Between 1988 and 2002</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)</addtitle><date>2005-09-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>435-440</pages><issn>0936-6555</issn><eissn>1433-2981</eissn><abstract>The aim of this retrospective analysis was to review the outcome of patients with germ-cell tumours treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre over the past 15 years, and to see whether there had been any changes over three 5-year cohorts. Patients referred with gonadal and extra-gonadal primary germ-cell tumours, between 1988 and 2002, were identified from the departmental database, and survival by stage and prognostic group was analysed. The proportion of patients with stage I seminoma has significantly increased. The good prognosis of patients with early stage disease is confirmed, with the outcome for some groups of patients being better than expected. There is a non-significant trend to improved results over the three 5-year cohorts. The outcome for patients with stage IV seminoma is worse than would be expected, but numbers are small. The poor prognosis of patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours who fall into the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) poor-prognostic group is confirmed. Failure of patients with metastatic non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours to achieve a complete response to initial therapy is shown to be a poor prognostic indicator.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16149287</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clon.2005.03.011</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0936-6555
ispartof Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2005-09, Vol.17 (6), p.435-440
issn 0936-6555
1433-2981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68563627
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Combined Modality Therapy
Disease-Free Survival
Germ-cell tumours
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - mortality
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - pathology
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - therapy
prognostic group
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
testicular cancer
Testicular Neoplasms - mortality
Testicular Neoplasms - pathology
Testicular Neoplasms - therapy
Treatment Outcome
title The Management and Outcome of Patients with Germ-cell Tumours Treated in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre Between 1988 and 2002
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T20%3A06%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Management%20and%20Outcome%20of%20Patients%20with%20Germ-cell%20Tumours%20Treated%20in%20the%20Edinburgh%20Cancer%20Centre%20Between%201988%20and%202002&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oncology%20(Royal%20College%20of%20Radiologists%20(Great%20Britain))&rft.au=Howard,%20G.C.W.&rft.date=2005-09-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=435-440&rft.issn=0936-6555&rft.eissn=1433-2981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clon.2005.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68563627%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68563627&rft_id=info:pmid/16149287&rft_els_id=S093665550500141X&rfr_iscdi=true