Correlation of laboratory and production freeze drying cycles

The purpose of this study was to develop the correlation of cycle parameters between a laboratory and a production freeze-dryer. With the established correlation, key cycle parameters obtained using a laboratory dryer may be converted to those for a production dryer with minimal experimental efforts...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of pharmaceutics 2005-09, Vol.302 (1), p.56-67
Hauptverfasser: Kuu, Wei Y., Hardwick, Lisa M., Akers, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue 1
container_start_page 56
container_title International journal of pharmaceutics
container_volume 302
creator Kuu, Wei Y.
Hardwick, Lisa M.
Akers, Michael J.
description The purpose of this study was to develop the correlation of cycle parameters between a laboratory and a production freeze-dryer. With the established correlation, key cycle parameters obtained using a laboratory dryer may be converted to those for a production dryer with minimal experimental efforts. In order to develop the correlation, it was important to consider the contributions from the following freeze-drying components: (1) the dryer, (2) the vial, and (3) the formulation. The critical parameters for the dryer are the shelf heat transfer coefficient and shelf surface radiation emissivity. The critical parameters for the vial are the vial bottom heat transfer coefficients (the contact parameter K cs and separation distance ℓ v), and vial top heat transfer coefficient. The critical parameter of the formulation is the dry layer mass transfer coefficient. The above heat and mass transfer coefficients were determined by freeze-drying experiments in conjunction with mathematical modeling. With the obtained heat and mass transfer coefficients, the maximum product temperature, T bmax, during primary drying was simulated using a primary drying subroutine as a function of the shelf temperature and chamber pressure. The required shelf temperature and chamber pressure, in order to perform a successful cycle run without product collapse, were then simulated based on the resulting values of T bmax. The established correlation approach was demonstrated by the primary drying of the model formulation 5% mannitol solution. The cycle runs were performed using a LyoStar™ dryer as the laboratory dryer and a BOC Edwards™ dryer as the production dryer. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for 5% mannitol is expressed as R pN = 0.7313 + 17.19 ℓ, where ℓ is the receding dry layer thickness. After demonstrating the correlation approach using the model formulation 5% mannitol, a practical comparison study was performed for the actual product, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) formulation. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for the LDH formulation is expressed as R pN = 4.344 + 10.85 ℓ. The operational templates T bmax and primary drying time were also generated by simulation. The cycle run for the LDH formulation using the Edwards™ production dryer verified that the cycle developed in a laboratory freeze-dryer was transferable at the production scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.06.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68556626</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378517305004503</els_id><sourcerecordid>68556626</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c5bac06908a49d03b52bfeb802cf3cb320a3f994b4b1512d5d1f9ce425e5af63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJaLZJfkKLL8nNzkiyZOsQQlj6BYFechf6GLVavNZW8ga2vz7eriHHnOYwzzvz8hDymUJDgcq7TRM3uz8mbxsGIBqQDTD2gaxo3_Gat508IyvgXV8L2vEL8qmUDQBIRvlHckElKCUprMj9OuWMg5liGqsUqsHYlM2U8qEyo692Ofm9-78MGfEfVj4f4vi7cgc3YLki58EMBa-XeUmev319Xv-on359_7l-fKpdK9RUO2GNA6mgN63ywK1gNqDtgbnAneUMDA9Ktba1VFDmhadBOWyZQGGC5Jfk9nR2rvN3j2XS21gcDoMZMe2Llr0QUrIjKE6gy6mUjEHvctyafNAU9FGb3uhFmz5q0yD1rG3OfVke7O0W_Vtq8TQDNwtgijNDyGZ0sbxxHWWqp2rmHk4czjZeImZdXMTRoY8Z3aR9iu9UeQWnYI6L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68556626</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of laboratory and production freeze drying cycles</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kuu, Wei Y. ; Hardwick, Lisa M. ; Akers, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuu, Wei Y. ; Hardwick, Lisa M. ; Akers, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to develop the correlation of cycle parameters between a laboratory and a production freeze-dryer. With the established correlation, key cycle parameters obtained using a laboratory dryer may be converted to those for a production dryer with minimal experimental efforts. In order to develop the correlation, it was important to consider the contributions from the following freeze-drying components: (1) the dryer, (2) the vial, and (3) the formulation. The critical parameters for the dryer are the shelf heat transfer coefficient and shelf surface radiation emissivity. The critical parameters for the vial are the vial bottom heat transfer coefficients (the contact parameter K cs and separation distance ℓ v), and vial top heat transfer coefficient. The critical parameter of the formulation is the dry layer mass transfer coefficient. The above heat and mass transfer coefficients were determined by freeze-drying experiments in conjunction with mathematical modeling. With the obtained heat and mass transfer coefficients, the maximum product temperature, T bmax, during primary drying was simulated using a primary drying subroutine as a function of the shelf temperature and chamber pressure. The required shelf temperature and chamber pressure, in order to perform a successful cycle run without product collapse, were then simulated based on the resulting values of T bmax. The established correlation approach was demonstrated by the primary drying of the model formulation 5% mannitol solution. The cycle runs were performed using a LyoStar™ dryer as the laboratory dryer and a BOC Edwards™ dryer as the production dryer. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for 5% mannitol is expressed as R pN = 0.7313 + 17.19 ℓ, where ℓ is the receding dry layer thickness. After demonstrating the correlation approach using the model formulation 5% mannitol, a practical comparison study was performed for the actual product, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) formulation. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for the LDH formulation is expressed as R pN = 4.344 + 10.85 ℓ. The operational templates T bmax and primary drying time were also generated by simulation. The cycle run for the LDH formulation using the Edwards™ production dryer verified that the cycle developed in a laboratory freeze-dryer was transferable at the production scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5173</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.06.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16099610</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJPHDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>5% Mannitol ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Collapsing temperature ; Correlation ; Cycle parameters ; Drug Packaging - methods ; Drug Packaging - standards ; Dry layer mass transfer resistance ; Freeze Drying - methods ; Freeze Drying - standards ; General pharmacology ; Heat transfer coefficient ; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - analysis ; Lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) ; Mannitol - analysis ; Mass transfer coefficient ; Medical sciences ; Micro-collapse ; Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Powell's optimization algorithm ; Primary drying subroutine ; Radiation emissivity ; Technology, Pharmaceutical - instrumentation ; Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods ; Temperature ; Volatilization</subject><ispartof>International journal of pharmaceutics, 2005-09, Vol.302 (1), p.56-67</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c5bac06908a49d03b52bfeb802cf3cb320a3f994b4b1512d5d1f9ce425e5af63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c5bac06908a49d03b52bfeb802cf3cb320a3f994b4b1512d5d1f9ce425e5af63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378517305004503$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17129819$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16099610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuu, Wei Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardwick, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of laboratory and production freeze drying cycles</title><title>International journal of pharmaceutics</title><addtitle>Int J Pharm</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to develop the correlation of cycle parameters between a laboratory and a production freeze-dryer. With the established correlation, key cycle parameters obtained using a laboratory dryer may be converted to those for a production dryer with minimal experimental efforts. In order to develop the correlation, it was important to consider the contributions from the following freeze-drying components: (1) the dryer, (2) the vial, and (3) the formulation. The critical parameters for the dryer are the shelf heat transfer coefficient and shelf surface radiation emissivity. The critical parameters for the vial are the vial bottom heat transfer coefficients (the contact parameter K cs and separation distance ℓ v), and vial top heat transfer coefficient. The critical parameter of the formulation is the dry layer mass transfer coefficient. The above heat and mass transfer coefficients were determined by freeze-drying experiments in conjunction with mathematical modeling. With the obtained heat and mass transfer coefficients, the maximum product temperature, T bmax, during primary drying was simulated using a primary drying subroutine as a function of the shelf temperature and chamber pressure. The required shelf temperature and chamber pressure, in order to perform a successful cycle run without product collapse, were then simulated based on the resulting values of T bmax. The established correlation approach was demonstrated by the primary drying of the model formulation 5% mannitol solution. The cycle runs were performed using a LyoStar™ dryer as the laboratory dryer and a BOC Edwards™ dryer as the production dryer. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for 5% mannitol is expressed as R pN = 0.7313 + 17.19 ℓ, where ℓ is the receding dry layer thickness. After demonstrating the correlation approach using the model formulation 5% mannitol, a practical comparison study was performed for the actual product, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) formulation. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for the LDH formulation is expressed as R pN = 4.344 + 10.85 ℓ. The operational templates T bmax and primary drying time were also generated by simulation. The cycle run for the LDH formulation using the Edwards™ production dryer verified that the cycle developed in a laboratory freeze-dryer was transferable at the production scale.</description><subject>5% Mannitol</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Collapsing temperature</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Cycle parameters</subject><subject>Drug Packaging - methods</subject><subject>Drug Packaging - standards</subject><subject>Dry layer mass transfer resistance</subject><subject>Freeze Drying - methods</subject><subject>Freeze Drying - standards</subject><subject>General pharmacology</subject><subject>Heat transfer coefficient</subject><subject>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - analysis</subject><subject>Lactose dehydrogenase (LDH)</subject><subject>Mannitol - analysis</subject><subject>Mass transfer coefficient</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Micro-collapse</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Powell's optimization algorithm</subject><subject>Primary drying subroutine</subject><subject>Radiation emissivity</subject><subject>Technology, Pharmaceutical - instrumentation</subject><subject>Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Volatilization</subject><issn>0378-5173</issn><issn>1873-3476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJaLZJfkKLL8nNzkiyZOsQQlj6BYFechf6GLVavNZW8ga2vz7eriHHnOYwzzvz8hDymUJDgcq7TRM3uz8mbxsGIBqQDTD2gaxo3_Gat508IyvgXV8L2vEL8qmUDQBIRvlHckElKCUprMj9OuWMg5liGqsUqsHYlM2U8qEyo692Ofm9-78MGfEfVj4f4vi7cgc3YLki58EMBa-XeUmev319Xv-on359_7l-fKpdK9RUO2GNA6mgN63ywK1gNqDtgbnAneUMDA9Ktba1VFDmhadBOWyZQGGC5Jfk9nR2rvN3j2XS21gcDoMZMe2Llr0QUrIjKE6gy6mUjEHvctyafNAU9FGb3uhFmz5q0yD1rG3OfVke7O0W_Vtq8TQDNwtgijNDyGZ0sbxxHWWqp2rmHk4czjZeImZdXMTRoY8Z3aR9iu9UeQWnYI6L</recordid><startdate>20050930</startdate><enddate>20050930</enddate><creator>Kuu, Wei Y.</creator><creator>Hardwick, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Akers, Michael J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050930</creationdate><title>Correlation of laboratory and production freeze drying cycles</title><author>Kuu, Wei Y. ; Hardwick, Lisa M. ; Akers, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-c5bac06908a49d03b52bfeb802cf3cb320a3f994b4b1512d5d1f9ce425e5af63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>5% Mannitol</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Collapsing temperature</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Cycle parameters</topic><topic>Drug Packaging - methods</topic><topic>Drug Packaging - standards</topic><topic>Dry layer mass transfer resistance</topic><topic>Freeze Drying - methods</topic><topic>Freeze Drying - standards</topic><topic>General pharmacology</topic><topic>Heat transfer coefficient</topic><topic>L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - analysis</topic><topic>Lactose dehydrogenase (LDH)</topic><topic>Mannitol - analysis</topic><topic>Mass transfer coefficient</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Micro-collapse</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Powell's optimization algorithm</topic><topic>Primary drying subroutine</topic><topic>Radiation emissivity</topic><topic>Technology, Pharmaceutical - instrumentation</topic><topic>Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Volatilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuu, Wei Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardwick, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akers, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of pharmaceutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuu, Wei Y.</au><au>Hardwick, Lisa M.</au><au>Akers, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of laboratory and production freeze drying cycles</atitle><jtitle>International journal of pharmaceutics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pharm</addtitle><date>2005-09-30</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>302</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>56-67</pages><issn>0378-5173</issn><eissn>1873-3476</eissn><coden>IJPHDE</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to develop the correlation of cycle parameters between a laboratory and a production freeze-dryer. With the established correlation, key cycle parameters obtained using a laboratory dryer may be converted to those for a production dryer with minimal experimental efforts. In order to develop the correlation, it was important to consider the contributions from the following freeze-drying components: (1) the dryer, (2) the vial, and (3) the formulation. The critical parameters for the dryer are the shelf heat transfer coefficient and shelf surface radiation emissivity. The critical parameters for the vial are the vial bottom heat transfer coefficients (the contact parameter K cs and separation distance ℓ v), and vial top heat transfer coefficient. The critical parameter of the formulation is the dry layer mass transfer coefficient. The above heat and mass transfer coefficients were determined by freeze-drying experiments in conjunction with mathematical modeling. With the obtained heat and mass transfer coefficients, the maximum product temperature, T bmax, during primary drying was simulated using a primary drying subroutine as a function of the shelf temperature and chamber pressure. The required shelf temperature and chamber pressure, in order to perform a successful cycle run without product collapse, were then simulated based on the resulting values of T bmax. The established correlation approach was demonstrated by the primary drying of the model formulation 5% mannitol solution. The cycle runs were performed using a LyoStar™ dryer as the laboratory dryer and a BOC Edwards™ dryer as the production dryer. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for 5% mannitol is expressed as R pN = 0.7313 + 17.19 ℓ, where ℓ is the receding dry layer thickness. After demonstrating the correlation approach using the model formulation 5% mannitol, a practical comparison study was performed for the actual product, the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) formulation. The determined normalized dried layer mass transfer resistance for the LDH formulation is expressed as R pN = 4.344 + 10.85 ℓ. The operational templates T bmax and primary drying time were also generated by simulation. The cycle run for the LDH formulation using the Edwards™ production dryer verified that the cycle developed in a laboratory freeze-dryer was transferable at the production scale.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>16099610</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.06.022</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-5173
ispartof International journal of pharmaceutics, 2005-09, Vol.302 (1), p.56-67
issn 0378-5173
1873-3476
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68556626
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 5% Mannitol
Algorithms
Biological and medical sciences
Collapsing temperature
Correlation
Cycle parameters
Drug Packaging - methods
Drug Packaging - standards
Dry layer mass transfer resistance
Freeze Drying - methods
Freeze Drying - standards
General pharmacology
Heat transfer coefficient
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase - analysis
Lactose dehydrogenase (LDH)
Mannitol - analysis
Mass transfer coefficient
Medical sciences
Micro-collapse
Pharmaceutical technology. Pharmaceutical industry
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Powell's optimization algorithm
Primary drying subroutine
Radiation emissivity
Technology, Pharmaceutical - instrumentation
Technology, Pharmaceutical - methods
Temperature
Volatilization
title Correlation of laboratory and production freeze drying cycles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A23%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20laboratory%20and%20production%20freeze%20drying%20cycles&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20pharmaceutics&rft.au=Kuu,%20Wei%20Y.&rft.date=2005-09-30&rft.volume=302&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=56-67&rft.issn=0378-5173&rft.eissn=1873-3476&rft.coden=IJPHDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.06.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68556626%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68556626&rft_id=info:pmid/16099610&rft_els_id=S0378517305004503&rfr_iscdi=true