The targets of CAPRI rounds 6-12
Six protein–protein complexes and two homodimeric proteins involved in a variety of biological processes were offered as targets to CAPRI by crystallographers in Rounds 6–12. CAPRI predictor groups had to predict their structure by docking the free proteins, which they did with a degree of success t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2007-12, Vol.69 (4), p.699-703 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 703 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 699 |
| container_title | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics |
| container_volume | 69 |
| creator | Janin, Joël |
| description | Six protein–protein complexes and two homodimeric proteins involved in a variety of biological processes were offered as targets to CAPRI by crystallographers in Rounds 6–12. CAPRI predictor groups had to predict their structure by docking the free proteins, which they did with a degree of success that depended largely on the amplitude of the conformation changes. In one case at least, the prediction pointed to alternative possibilities of interactions in the crystal of a complex, showing that docking methods have value even when there is an experimental structure. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/prot.21689 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68549829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68549829</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-48c041d43362b8b9236e125769188939f99eadd50c61c4f7b6e3ffce2c8cbde43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwkAURidGI4hu_AGmKxcmg_No57FEokhCgCCG5aSd3mq1UJ1po_x7i0Xdubqb853kHoTOKelTQtj1myurPqNC6QPUpURLTCgPD1GXKCUxj1TUQSfevxBChObiGHWoFJJqRbooWD5DUMXuCSoflFkwHMwX48CV9Sb1gcCUnaKjLC48nO1vDz3e3S6H93gyG42Hgwm2XEQah8qSkKYh54IlKtGMC6AskkJTpTTXmdYQp2lErKA2zGQigGeZBWaVTVIIeQ9dtt7mm_cafGXWubdQFPEGytoboaJQK6Yb8KoFrSu9d5CZN5evY7c1lJhdD7PrYb57NPDF3lona0j_0H2ABqAt8JEXsP1HZeaL2fJHittN7iv4_N3E7tUIyWVkVtORuZlOFg8rNTeCfwE3pXc_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68549829</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The targets of CAPRI rounds 6-12</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Janin, Joël</creator><creatorcontrib>Janin, Joël</creatorcontrib><description>Six protein–protein complexes and two homodimeric proteins involved in a variety of biological processes were offered as targets to CAPRI by crystallographers in Rounds 6–12. CAPRI predictor groups had to predict their structure by docking the free proteins, which they did with a degree of success that depended largely on the amplitude of the conformation changes. In one case at least, the prediction pointed to alternative possibilities of interactions in the crystal of a complex, showing that docking methods have value even when there is an experimental structure. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-3585</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0134</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/prot.21689</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17671980</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; blind prediction ; community-wide experiments ; Computational Biology - methods ; Computer Simulation ; Crystallography, X-Ray - methods ; Databases, Protein ; Dimerization ; homodimers ; Humans ; Molecular Conformation ; Protein Binding ; Protein Conformation ; protein docking ; Protein Interaction Mapping ; protein-protein complexes ; protein-protein interaction ; Proteins - chemistry ; Proteomics - methods ; Software</subject><ispartof>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2007-12, Vol.69 (4), p.699-703</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-48c041d43362b8b9236e125769188939f99eadd50c61c4f7b6e3ffce2c8cbde43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-48c041d43362b8b9236e125769188939f99eadd50c61c4f7b6e3ffce2c8cbde43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fprot.21689$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fprot.21689$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17671980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Janin, Joël</creatorcontrib><title>The targets of CAPRI rounds 6-12</title><title>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><description>Six protein–protein complexes and two homodimeric proteins involved in a variety of biological processes were offered as targets to CAPRI by crystallographers in Rounds 6–12. CAPRI predictor groups had to predict their structure by docking the free proteins, which they did with a degree of success that depended largely on the amplitude of the conformation changes. In one case at least, the prediction pointed to alternative possibilities of interactions in the crystal of a complex, showing that docking methods have value even when there is an experimental structure. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>blind prediction</subject><subject>community-wide experiments</subject><subject>Computational Biology - methods</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Crystallography, X-Ray - methods</subject><subject>Databases, Protein</subject><subject>Dimerization</subject><subject>homodimers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Molecular Conformation</subject><subject>Protein Binding</subject><subject>Protein Conformation</subject><subject>protein docking</subject><subject>Protein Interaction Mapping</subject><subject>protein-protein complexes</subject><subject>protein-protein interaction</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Proteomics - methods</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0887-3585</issn><issn>1097-0134</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwkAURidGI4hu_AGmKxcmg_No57FEokhCgCCG5aSd3mq1UJ1po_x7i0Xdubqb853kHoTOKelTQtj1myurPqNC6QPUpURLTCgPD1GXKCUxj1TUQSfevxBChObiGHWoFJJqRbooWD5DUMXuCSoflFkwHMwX48CV9Sb1gcCUnaKjLC48nO1vDz3e3S6H93gyG42Hgwm2XEQah8qSkKYh54IlKtGMC6AskkJTpTTXmdYQp2lErKA2zGQigGeZBWaVTVIIeQ9dtt7mm_cafGXWubdQFPEGytoboaJQK6Yb8KoFrSu9d5CZN5evY7c1lJhdD7PrYb57NPDF3lona0j_0H2ABqAt8JEXsP1HZeaL2fJHittN7iv4_N3E7tUIyWVkVtORuZlOFg8rNTeCfwE3pXc_</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Janin, Joël</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>The targets of CAPRI rounds 6-12</title><author>Janin, Joël</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-48c041d43362b8b9236e125769188939f99eadd50c61c4f7b6e3ffce2c8cbde43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>blind prediction</topic><topic>community-wide experiments</topic><topic>Computational Biology - methods</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Crystallography, X-Ray - methods</topic><topic>Databases, Protein</topic><topic>Dimerization</topic><topic>homodimers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Molecular Conformation</topic><topic>Protein Binding</topic><topic>Protein Conformation</topic><topic>protein docking</topic><topic>Protein Interaction Mapping</topic><topic>protein-protein complexes</topic><topic>protein-protein interaction</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Proteomics - methods</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Janin, Joël</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Janin, Joël</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The targets of CAPRI rounds 6-12</atitle><jtitle>Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Proteins</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>699</spage><epage>703</epage><pages>699-703</pages><issn>0887-3585</issn><eissn>1097-0134</eissn><abstract>Six protein–protein complexes and two homodimeric proteins involved in a variety of biological processes were offered as targets to CAPRI by crystallographers in Rounds 6–12. CAPRI predictor groups had to predict their structure by docking the free proteins, which they did with a degree of success that depended largely on the amplitude of the conformation changes. In one case at least, the prediction pointed to alternative possibilities of interactions in the crystal of a complex, showing that docking methods have value even when there is an experimental structure. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>17671980</pmid><doi>10.1002/prot.21689</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0887-3585 |
| ispartof | Proteins, structure, function, and bioinformatics, 2007-12, Vol.69 (4), p.699-703 |
| issn | 0887-3585 1097-0134 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68549829 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Algorithms blind prediction community-wide experiments Computational Biology - methods Computer Simulation Crystallography, X-Ray - methods Databases, Protein Dimerization homodimers Humans Molecular Conformation Protein Binding Protein Conformation protein docking Protein Interaction Mapping protein-protein complexes protein-protein interaction Proteins - chemistry Proteomics - methods Software |
| title | The targets of CAPRI rounds 6-12 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T07%3A10%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20targets%20of%20CAPRI%20rounds%206-12&rft.jtitle=Proteins,%20structure,%20function,%20and%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Janin,%20Jo%C3%ABl&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=703&rft.pages=699-703&rft.issn=0887-3585&rft.eissn=1097-0134&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/prot.21689&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68549829%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68549829&rft_id=info:pmid/17671980&rfr_iscdi=true |