Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models

Robustness to perturbation is an important characteristic of genetic regulatory systems, but the relationship between robustness and model dynamics has not been clearly quantified. We propose a method for quantifying both robustness and dynamics in terms of state-space structures, for Boolean models...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of theoretical biology 2007-12, Vol.249 (4), p.749-765
Hauptverfasser: Willadsen, Kai, Wiles, Janet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 765
container_issue 4
container_start_page 749
container_title Journal of theoretical biology
container_volume 249
creator Willadsen, Kai
Wiles, Janet
description Robustness to perturbation is an important characteristic of genetic regulatory systems, but the relationship between robustness and model dynamics has not been clearly quantified. We propose a method for quantifying both robustness and dynamics in terms of state-space structures, for Boolean models of genetic regulatory systems. By investigating existing models of the Drosophila melanogaster segment polarity network and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-cycle network, we show that the structure of attractor basins can yield insight into the underlying decision making required of the system, and also the way in which the system maximises its robustness. In particular, gene networks implementing decisions based on a few genes have simple state-space structures, and their attractors are robust by virtue of their simplicity. Gene networks with decisions that involve many interacting genes have correspondingly more complicated state-space structures, and robustness cannot be achieved through the structure of the attractor basins, but is achieved by larger attractor basins that dominate the state space. These different types of robustness are demonstrated by the two models: the D. melanogaster segment polarity network is robust due to simple attractor basins that implement decisions based on spatial signals; the S. cerevisiae cell-cycle network has a complicated state-space structure, and is robust only due to a giant attractor basin that dominates the state space.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68543398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022519307004237</els_id><sourcerecordid>19885299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e613e19c56d4fd05495ad03c0d17ad95b8b913cf93d1af8bfc3fab2fb8ffcdda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMobk7_gAfpyVvrl6bpGvCiw6kwEETPIU2-jJaumUkq7N_bsYE3PX3v4Xlf-B5CrilkFGh512ZtrJssB5hnIDKA4oRMKQieVrygp2QKkOcpp4JNyEUILQCIgpXnZELngpUMxJQs3109hNhjCInqTRKiipiGrdI4Zj_oOHhMnE0enetQ9ckae0w8rodORed3ycYZ7MIlObOqC3h1vDPyuXz6WLykq7fn18XDKtWs4jHFkjKkQvPSFNYALwRXBpgGQ-fKCF5XtaBMW8EMVbaqrWZW1bmtK2u1MYrNyO1hd-vd14Ahyk0TNHad6tENQZbj54yJ6l-QiqriuRAjmB9A7V0IHq3c-maj_E5SkHvNspV7zXKvWYKQo-axdHNcH-oNmt_K0esI3B-A0Q1-N-hl0A32Gk3jUUdpXPPX_g_0fpAj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19885299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Willadsen, Kai ; Wiles, Janet</creator><creatorcontrib>Willadsen, Kai ; Wiles, Janet</creatorcontrib><description>Robustness to perturbation is an important characteristic of genetic regulatory systems, but the relationship between robustness and model dynamics has not been clearly quantified. We propose a method for quantifying both robustness and dynamics in terms of state-space structures, for Boolean models of genetic regulatory systems. By investigating existing models of the Drosophila melanogaster segment polarity network and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-cycle network, we show that the structure of attractor basins can yield insight into the underlying decision making required of the system, and also the way in which the system maximises its robustness. In particular, gene networks implementing decisions based on a few genes have simple state-space structures, and their attractors are robust by virtue of their simplicity. Gene networks with decisions that involve many interacting genes have correspondingly more complicated state-space structures, and robustness cannot be achieved through the structure of the attractor basins, but is achieved by larger attractor basins that dominate the state space. These different types of robustness are demonstrated by the two models: the D. melanogaster segment polarity network is robust due to simple attractor basins that implement decisions based on spatial signals; the S. cerevisiae cell-cycle network has a complicated state-space structure, and is robust only due to a giant attractor basin that dominates the state space.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5193</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17936309</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Boolean model ; Cell Cycle - genetics ; Drosophila melanogaster ; Drosophila melanogaster - genetics ; Gene regulatory network ; Gene Regulatory Networks ; Genes, Fungal ; Genes, Insect ; Models, Genetic ; Robustness ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - cytology ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics</subject><ispartof>Journal of theoretical biology, 2007-12, Vol.249 (4), p.749-765</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e613e19c56d4fd05495ad03c0d17ad95b8b913cf93d1af8bfc3fab2fb8ffcdda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e613e19c56d4fd05495ad03c0d17ad95b8b913cf93d1af8bfc3fab2fb8ffcdda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17936309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willadsen, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiles, Janet</creatorcontrib><title>Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models</title><title>Journal of theoretical biology</title><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><description>Robustness to perturbation is an important characteristic of genetic regulatory systems, but the relationship between robustness and model dynamics has not been clearly quantified. We propose a method for quantifying both robustness and dynamics in terms of state-space structures, for Boolean models of genetic regulatory systems. By investigating existing models of the Drosophila melanogaster segment polarity network and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-cycle network, we show that the structure of attractor basins can yield insight into the underlying decision making required of the system, and also the way in which the system maximises its robustness. In particular, gene networks implementing decisions based on a few genes have simple state-space structures, and their attractors are robust by virtue of their simplicity. Gene networks with decisions that involve many interacting genes have correspondingly more complicated state-space structures, and robustness cannot be achieved through the structure of the attractor basins, but is achieved by larger attractor basins that dominate the state space. These different types of robustness are demonstrated by the two models: the D. melanogaster segment polarity network is robust due to simple attractor basins that implement decisions based on spatial signals; the S. cerevisiae cell-cycle network has a complicated state-space structure, and is robust only due to a giant attractor basin that dominates the state space.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Boolean model</subject><subject>Cell Cycle - genetics</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster</subject><subject>Drosophila melanogaster - genetics</subject><subject>Gene regulatory network</subject><subject>Gene Regulatory Networks</subject><subject>Genes, Fungal</subject><subject>Genes, Insect</subject><subject>Models, Genetic</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - cytology</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics</subject><issn>0022-5193</issn><issn>1095-8541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFLwzAYhoMobk7_gAfpyVvrl6bpGvCiw6kwEETPIU2-jJaumUkq7N_bsYE3PX3v4Xlf-B5CrilkFGh512ZtrJssB5hnIDKA4oRMKQieVrygp2QKkOcpp4JNyEUILQCIgpXnZELngpUMxJQs3109hNhjCInqTRKiipiGrdI4Zj_oOHhMnE0enetQ9ckae0w8rodORed3ycYZ7MIlObOqC3h1vDPyuXz6WLykq7fn18XDKtWs4jHFkjKkQvPSFNYALwRXBpgGQ-fKCF5XtaBMW8EMVbaqrWZW1bmtK2u1MYrNyO1hd-vd14Ahyk0TNHad6tENQZbj54yJ6l-QiqriuRAjmB9A7V0IHq3c-maj_E5SkHvNspV7zXKvWYKQo-axdHNcH-oNmt_K0esI3B-A0Q1-N-hl0A32Gk3jUUdpXPPX_g_0fpAj</recordid><startdate>20071221</startdate><enddate>20071221</enddate><creator>Willadsen, Kai</creator><creator>Wiles, Janet</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071221</creationdate><title>Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models</title><author>Willadsen, Kai ; Wiles, Janet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e613e19c56d4fd05495ad03c0d17ad95b8b913cf93d1af8bfc3fab2fb8ffcdda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Boolean model</topic><topic>Cell Cycle - genetics</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster</topic><topic>Drosophila melanogaster - genetics</topic><topic>Gene regulatory network</topic><topic>Gene Regulatory Networks</topic><topic>Genes, Fungal</topic><topic>Genes, Insect</topic><topic>Models, Genetic</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - cytology</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willadsen, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiles, Janet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willadsen, Kai</au><au>Wiles, Janet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models</atitle><jtitle>Journal of theoretical biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Theor Biol</addtitle><date>2007-12-21</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>249</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>749</spage><epage>765</epage><pages>749-765</pages><issn>0022-5193</issn><eissn>1095-8541</eissn><abstract>Robustness to perturbation is an important characteristic of genetic regulatory systems, but the relationship between robustness and model dynamics has not been clearly quantified. We propose a method for quantifying both robustness and dynamics in terms of state-space structures, for Boolean models of genetic regulatory systems. By investigating existing models of the Drosophila melanogaster segment polarity network and the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-cycle network, we show that the structure of attractor basins can yield insight into the underlying decision making required of the system, and also the way in which the system maximises its robustness. In particular, gene networks implementing decisions based on a few genes have simple state-space structures, and their attractors are robust by virtue of their simplicity. Gene networks with decisions that involve many interacting genes have correspondingly more complicated state-space structures, and robustness cannot be achieved through the structure of the attractor basins, but is achieved by larger attractor basins that dominate the state space. These different types of robustness are demonstrated by the two models: the D. melanogaster segment polarity network is robust due to simple attractor basins that implement decisions based on spatial signals; the S. cerevisiae cell-cycle network has a complicated state-space structure, and is robust only due to a giant attractor basin that dominates the state space.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17936309</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5193
ispartof Journal of theoretical biology, 2007-12, Vol.249 (4), p.749-765
issn 0022-5193
1095-8541
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68543398
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animals
Boolean model
Cell Cycle - genetics
Drosophila melanogaster
Drosophila melanogaster - genetics
Gene regulatory network
Gene Regulatory Networks
Genes, Fungal
Genes, Insect
Models, Genetic
Robustness
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae - cytology
Saccharomyces cerevisiae - genetics
title Robustness and state-space structure of Boolean gene regulatory models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T07%3A25%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robustness%20and%20state-space%20structure%20of%20Boolean%20gene%20regulatory%20models&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20theoretical%20biology&rft.au=Willadsen,%20Kai&rft.date=2007-12-21&rft.volume=249&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=749&rft.epage=765&rft.pages=749-765&rft.issn=0022-5193&rft.eissn=1095-8541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19885299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19885299&rft_id=info:pmid/17936309&rft_els_id=S0022519307004237&rfr_iscdi=true