Robots and Rodents: Children's Inferences About Living and Nonliving Kinds

This study tests the firm distinction children are said to make between living and nonliving kinds. Three, 4-, and 5year-old children and adults reasoned about whether items that varied on 3 dimensions (alive, face, behavior) had a range of properties (biological, psychological, perceptual, artifact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child development 2007-11, Vol.78 (6), p.1675-1688
Hauptverfasser: Jipson, Jennifer L., Gelman, Susan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1688
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1675
container_title Child development
container_volume 78
creator Jipson, Jennifer L.
Gelman, Susan A.
description This study tests the firm distinction children are said to make between living and nonliving kinds. Three, 4-, and 5year-old children and adults reasoned about whether items that varied on 3 dimensions (alive, face, behavior) had a range of properties (biological, psychological, perceptual, artifact, novel, proper names). Findings demonstrate that by 4 years of age, children make clear distinctions between prototypical living and nonliving kinds regardless of the property under consideration. Even 3-year-olds distinguish prototypical living and nonliving kinds when asked about biological properties. When reasoning about nonbiological properties for the full range of items, however, even 5-year-olds and adults occasionally rely on facial features. Thus, the living/nonliving distinction may have more narrow consequences than previously acknowledged.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68492540</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ778859</ericid><jstor_id>4620731</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4620731</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6835-f10d1434ad2aa7a23791fceda3fa83429991c1ca7954f1d38090bfe4ccb4e8283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAGyAUIQGrBP8ltlkgDaVTplQDqqAsLddxICG1BzuBztvjNFUrsRm88b063z269gEgQTBD8bxuMkQLlvIC0wxDyDKIoMiz3T0wOQr3wQRCKFIiMDwDj0JoYosLQR6CM8QE5wTRCVis3MZ1IVG2TFauNLYLb5Lpj7otvbGvQnJlKxMrbUJysXF9lyzr37X9vuevnW3H7mNty_AYPKhUG8yTw30Ovl7Ovkw_pMtP86vpxTLVBSd5WiFYIkqoKrFSTGHCBKq0KRWpFCcUCyGQRloxkdMKlYRDATeVoVpvqOGYk3PwcvS98e5Xb0Int3XQpm2VNa4PsuBU4JzCO8Gc4fgf_G5HUrC4GacRfP4P2Lje2_haiQRnSCCII8RHSHsXgjeVvPH1VvlbiaAc4pONHFKSQ0pyiE_u45O7OPrs4N9vtqY8DR7yisCLA6CCVm3lldV1OHEiz4XIReSejpzxtT7KswVjnO_lt6P8p27N7X_vJ6fvZ-uhPPk3oXP-aEALDBlBUU5HuQ6d2R1l5X_KghGWy2_Xc7lYfX43X12u5Zr8BeHN1b4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198719102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robots and Rodents: Children's Inferences About Living and Nonliving Kinds</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jipson, Jennifer L. ; Gelman, Susan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jipson, Jennifer L. ; Gelman, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study tests the firm distinction children are said to make between living and nonliving kinds. Three, 4-, and 5year-old children and adults reasoned about whether items that varied on 3 dimensions (alive, face, behavior) had a range of properties (biological, psychological, perceptual, artifact, novel, proper names). Findings demonstrate that by 4 years of age, children make clear distinctions between prototypical living and nonliving kinds regardless of the property under consideration. Even 3-year-olds distinguish prototypical living and nonliving kinds when asked about biological properties. When reasoning about nonbiological properties for the full range of items, however, even 5-year-olds and adults occasionally rely on facial features. Thus, the living/nonliving distinction may have more narrow consequences than previously acknowledged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-3920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17988314</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CHDEAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>Adults ; Age ; Animals ; Attribution theory ; Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biology ; Child ; Child Development ; Child psychology ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Classification ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Development ; Cognitive Processes ; Concept Formation ; Culture ; Developmental psychology ; Differences ; Differentiation ; Early Childhood Education ; Emotions ; Empirical Articles ; Everyday life ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Identification ; Inferences ; Life ; Male ; Objects ; Physical Characteristics ; Pronouns ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reality Testing ; Reasoning ; Recognition ; Robotics ; Robots ; Rodentia ; Sensors ; Social research ; Studies ; Stuffed animals ; Thinking ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Child development, 2007-11, Vol.78 (6), p.1675-1688</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 The Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Nov/Dec 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6835-f10d1434ad2aa7a23791fceda3fa83429991c1ca7954f1d38090bfe4ccb4e8283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6835-f10d1434ad2aa7a23791fceda3fa83429991c1ca7954f1d38090bfe4ccb4e8283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4620731$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4620731$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,30976,30977,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ778859$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19559959$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17988314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jipson, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Robots and Rodents: Children's Inferences About Living and Nonliving Kinds</title><title>Child development</title><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><description>This study tests the firm distinction children are said to make between living and nonliving kinds. Three, 4-, and 5year-old children and adults reasoned about whether items that varied on 3 dimensions (alive, face, behavior) had a range of properties (biological, psychological, perceptual, artifact, novel, proper names). Findings demonstrate that by 4 years of age, children make clear distinctions between prototypical living and nonliving kinds regardless of the property under consideration. Even 3-year-olds distinguish prototypical living and nonliving kinds when asked about biological properties. When reasoning about nonbiological properties for the full range of items, however, even 5-year-olds and adults occasionally rely on facial features. Thus, the living/nonliving distinction may have more narrow consequences than previously acknowledged.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Attribution theory</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child psychology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Differences</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Early Childhood Education</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Empirical Articles</subject><subject>Everyday life</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Inferences</subject><subject>Life</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Objects</subject><subject>Physical Characteristics</subject><subject>Pronouns</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reality Testing</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Recognition</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Rodentia</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Stuffed animals</subject><subject>Thinking</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0009-3920</issn><issn>1467-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAGyAUIQGrBP8ltlkgDaVTplQDqqAsLddxICG1BzuBztvjNFUrsRm88b063z269gEgQTBD8bxuMkQLlvIC0wxDyDKIoMiz3T0wOQr3wQRCKFIiMDwDj0JoYosLQR6CM8QE5wTRCVis3MZ1IVG2TFauNLYLb5Lpj7otvbGvQnJlKxMrbUJysXF9lyzr37X9vuevnW3H7mNty_AYPKhUG8yTw30Ovl7Ovkw_pMtP86vpxTLVBSd5WiFYIkqoKrFSTGHCBKq0KRWpFCcUCyGQRloxkdMKlYRDATeVoVpvqOGYk3PwcvS98e5Xb0Int3XQpm2VNa4PsuBU4JzCO8Gc4fgf_G5HUrC4GacRfP4P2Lje2_haiQRnSCCII8RHSHsXgjeVvPH1VvlbiaAc4pONHFKSQ0pyiE_u45O7OPrs4N9vtqY8DR7yisCLA6CCVm3lldV1OHEiz4XIReSejpzxtT7KswVjnO_lt6P8p27N7X_vJ6fvZ-uhPPk3oXP-aEALDBlBUU5HuQ6d2R1l5X_KghGWy2_Xc7lYfX43X12u5Zr8BeHN1b4</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>Jipson, Jennifer L.</creator><creator>Gelman, Susan A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishers</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Robots and Rodents: Children's Inferences About Living and Nonliving Kinds</title><author>Jipson, Jennifer L. ; Gelman, Susan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6835-f10d1434ad2aa7a23791fceda3fa83429991c1ca7954f1d38090bfe4ccb4e8283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Attribution theory</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child psychology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Differences</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Early Childhood Education</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Empirical Articles</topic><topic>Everyday life</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Inferences</topic><topic>Life</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Objects</topic><topic>Physical Characteristics</topic><topic>Pronouns</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reality Testing</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Recognition</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Rodentia</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Stuffed animals</topic><topic>Thinking</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jipson, Jennifer L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelman, Susan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Child development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jipson, Jennifer L.</au><au>Gelman, Susan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ778859</ericid><atitle>Robots and Rodents: Children's Inferences About Living and Nonliving Kinds</atitle><jtitle>Child development</jtitle><addtitle>Child Dev</addtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1675</spage><epage>1688</epage><pages>1675-1688</pages><issn>0009-3920</issn><eissn>1467-8624</eissn><coden>CHDEAW</coden><abstract>This study tests the firm distinction children are said to make between living and nonliving kinds. Three, 4-, and 5year-old children and adults reasoned about whether items that varied on 3 dimensions (alive, face, behavior) had a range of properties (biological, psychological, perceptual, artifact, novel, proper names). Findings demonstrate that by 4 years of age, children make clear distinctions between prototypical living and nonliving kinds regardless of the property under consideration. Even 3-year-olds distinguish prototypical living and nonliving kinds when asked about biological properties. When reasoning about nonbiological properties for the full range of items, however, even 5-year-olds and adults occasionally rely on facial features. Thus, the living/nonliving distinction may have more narrow consequences than previously acknowledged.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>17988314</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-3920
ispartof Child development, 2007-11, Vol.78 (6), p.1675-1688
issn 0009-3920
1467-8624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68492540
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE; Education Source; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adults
Age
Animals
Attribution theory
Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Biology
Child
Child Development
Child psychology
Child, Preschool
Children
Classification
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Development
Cognitive Processes
Concept Formation
Culture
Developmental psychology
Differences
Differentiation
Early Childhood Education
Emotions
Empirical Articles
Everyday life
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Identification
Inferences
Life
Male
Objects
Physical Characteristics
Pronouns
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reality Testing
Reasoning
Recognition
Robotics
Robots
Rodentia
Sensors
Social research
Studies
Stuffed animals
Thinking
Young Children
title Robots and Rodents: Children's Inferences About Living and Nonliving Kinds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A51%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robots%20and%20Rodents:%20Children's%20Inferences%20About%20Living%20and%20Nonliving%20Kinds&rft.jtitle=Child%20development&rft.au=Jipson,%20Jennifer%20L.&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1675&rft.epage=1688&rft.pages=1675-1688&rft.issn=0009-3920&rft.eissn=1467-8624&rft.coden=CHDEAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01095.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4620731%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198719102&rft_id=info:pmid/17988314&rft_ericid=EJ778859&rft_jstor_id=4620731&rfr_iscdi=true