Discrepancies between catheter tip and tissue temperature in cooled-tip ablation : Relevance to guiding left atrial ablation

It is not known whether catheter tip temperatures with a cooled-tip ablation can be reliably extrapolated to estimate actual tissue temperatures. The relationship between catheter tip temperatures, tissue temperatures, power, and microbubble formation is not known. Nine dogs underwent 111 radiofrequ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2005-08, Vol.112 (7), p.954-960
Hauptverfasser: BRUCE, G. Keith, BUNCH, T. Jared, MILTON, Mark A, SARABANDA, Alvaro, JOHNSON, Susan B, PACKER, Douglas L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:It is not known whether catheter tip temperatures with a cooled-tip ablation can be reliably extrapolated to estimate actual tissue temperatures. The relationship between catheter tip temperatures, tissue temperatures, power, and microbubble formation is not known. Nine dogs underwent 111 radiofrequency energy deliveries at the pulmonary vein ostia with a cooled-tip catheter. Catheter tip and tissue temperatures were markedly discrepant. Catheter tip temperature plateaus at 36 degrees C to 39 degrees C with increasing power, whereas tissue temperature increases to a mean of 75+/-3 degrees C at 45 W (maximum temperature >100 degrees C). Seventy-two energy deliveries were performed, titrating power to microbubble formation guided by intracardiac echocardiography. Type I and II microbubble formation occurred in 45 (63%) and 19 (26%) ablations, respectively. Type I microbubble emergence occurred at lower powers (21+/-8 versus 26+/-4 W; P=0.05), catheter tip temperatures (38+/-5 degrees C versus 48+/-10 degrees C; P=0.02), and tissue temperatures (65+/-19 degrees C versus 81+/-9 degrees C; P
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.492439