Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge
[...]only the rebreathe method can be used with the Digidoser. [...]the 2 dosimeters produced similar results for MCTs even though the Digidoser could not be calibrated.
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2007-11, Vol.120 (5), p.1218-1219 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1219 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1218 |
| container_title | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology |
| container_volume | 120 |
| creator | Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD Khan, Yasmeen R., MD Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD Spencer, Terry, MD |
| description | [...]only the rebreathe method can be used with the Digidoser. [...]the 2 dosimeters produced similar results for MCTs even though the Digidoser could not be calibrated. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.020 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68478476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0091674907012031</els_id><sourcerecordid>3239209931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-29dd953b965f4cccbdff7fd5da501f9f2e9015f4740efcc2338175f5e61d0a403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV2LEzEUhoO4uHX1D3ghA8LezezJxyQNiCBl_YAFL9TrkCYnNuPMpCat0H9vhhYW9kIIJCHPezh5DiFvKHQUqLwbusG62DEA1YHsgMEzsqKgVSvXrH9OVgCatlIJfU1eljJAvfO1fkGuqZJcCcVXRGzStLc5ljQ3KTSs8anECQ-YS7M9NfW0s26Xxjhj43Z2HHH-ha_IVbBjwdeX_Yb8_HT_Y_Olffj2-evm40PrBFeHlmnvdc-3WvZBOOe2PgQVfO9tDzTowFADrU9KAAbnGOdrqvrQo6QerAB-Q27Pdfc5_TliOZgpFofjaGdMx2LkWqi6ZAXfPQGHdMxz7c3QHoRSknJRKXamXE6lZAxmn-Nk88lQMItRM5jFqFmMGpCmGq2ht5fSx-2E_jFyUViB92cAq4m_EbMpLuLs0MeM7mB8iv-v_-FJ3FXZ0dnxN56wPP7DFGbAfF9muowUFNAap_wfknyamA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504776134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD ; Khan, Yasmeen R., MD ; Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD ; Spencer, Terry, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD ; Khan, Yasmeen R., MD ; Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD ; Spencer, Terry, MD</creatorcontrib><description>[...]only the rebreathe method can be used with the Digidoser. [...]the 2 dosimeters produced similar results for MCTs even though the Digidoser could not be calibrated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17637473</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergy and Immunology ; Bronchial Provocation Tests - instrumentation ; Bronchial Provocation Tests - standards ; Bronchoconstrictor Agents - administration & dosage ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Methacholine Chloride - administration & dosage ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers - standards ; Regression analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2007-11, Vol.120 (5), p.1218-1219</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology</rights><rights>2007 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Nov 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-29dd953b965f4cccbdff7fd5da501f9f2e9015f4740efcc2338175f5e61d0a403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-29dd953b965f4cccbdff7fd5da501f9f2e9015f4740efcc2338175f5e61d0a403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674907012031$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17637473$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Yasmeen R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Terry, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge</title><title>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><description>[...]only the rebreathe method can be used with the Digidoser. [...]the 2 dosimeters produced similar results for MCTs even though the Digidoser could not be calibrated.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Bronchial Provocation Tests - instrumentation</subject><subject>Bronchial Provocation Tests - standards</subject><subject>Bronchoconstrictor Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Methacholine Chloride - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers - standards</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><issn>0091-6749</issn><issn>1097-6825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV2LEzEUhoO4uHX1D3ghA8LezezJxyQNiCBl_YAFL9TrkCYnNuPMpCat0H9vhhYW9kIIJCHPezh5DiFvKHQUqLwbusG62DEA1YHsgMEzsqKgVSvXrH9OVgCatlIJfU1eljJAvfO1fkGuqZJcCcVXRGzStLc5ljQ3KTSs8anECQ-YS7M9NfW0s26Xxjhj43Z2HHH-ha_IVbBjwdeX_Yb8_HT_Y_Olffj2-evm40PrBFeHlmnvdc-3WvZBOOe2PgQVfO9tDzTowFADrU9KAAbnGOdrqvrQo6QerAB-Q27Pdfc5_TliOZgpFofjaGdMx2LkWqi6ZAXfPQGHdMxz7c3QHoRSknJRKXamXE6lZAxmn-Nk88lQMItRM5jFqFmMGpCmGq2ht5fSx-2E_jFyUViB92cAq4m_EbMpLuLs0MeM7mB8iv-v_-FJ3FXZ0dnxN56wPP7DFGbAfF9muowUFNAap_wfknyamA</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD</creator><creator>Khan, Yasmeen R., MD</creator><creator>Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD</creator><creator>Spencer, Terry, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge</title><author>Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD ; Khan, Yasmeen R., MD ; Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD ; Spencer, Terry, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c437t-29dd953b965f4cccbdff7fd5da501f9f2e9015f4740efcc2338175f5e61d0a403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Bronchial Provocation Tests - instrumentation</topic><topic>Bronchial Provocation Tests - standards</topic><topic>Bronchoconstrictor Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Methacholine Chloride - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers - standards</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, Yasmeen R., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Terry, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hendeles, Leslie, PharmD</au><au>Khan, Yasmeen R., MD</au><au>Shuster, Jonathan J., PhD</au><au>Spencer, Terry, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge</atitle><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1218</spage><epage>1219</epage><pages>1218-1219</pages><issn>0091-6749</issn><eissn>1097-6825</eissn><abstract>[...]only the rebreathe method can be used with the Digidoser. [...]the 2 dosimeters produced similar results for MCTs even though the Digidoser could not be calibrated.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17637473</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.020</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-6749 |
| ispartof | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2007-11, Vol.120 (5), p.1218-1219 |
| issn | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68478476 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | Adult Allergy and Immunology Bronchial Provocation Tests - instrumentation Bronchial Provocation Tests - standards Bronchoconstrictor Agents - administration & dosage Female Humans Male Methacholine Chloride - administration & dosage Nebulizers and Vaporizers - standards Regression analysis |
| title | Comparison of 2 dosimeters by methacholine challenge |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A05%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%202%20dosimeters%20by%20methacholine%20challenge&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology&rft.au=Hendeles,%20Leslie,%20PharmD&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1218&rft.epage=1219&rft.pages=1218-1219&rft.issn=0091-6749&rft.eissn=1097-6825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaci.2007.06.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3239209931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504776134&rft_id=info:pmid/17637473&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0091674907012031&rfr_iscdi=true |