Assessment of the Intensity of Behavioural Traits and Ovulation between Synchronized and Non-synchronized Cows
Contents Thirty cyclic, non‐suckled Brahman cows were divided into three groups, all of which were synchronized sequentially with CIDR‐B and observed continuously for 100 h to determine different behavioural oestrus signs. Twenty‐four hours after implant withdrawal, all synchronized cows in the grou...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Reproduction in domestic animals 2007-12, Vol.42 (6), p.566-570 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 570 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 566 |
| container_title | Reproduction in domestic animals |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Forster, K Galina, CS Maquivar, M Van der Laan, G Arnoni, R Verduzco, A |
| description | Contents
Thirty cyclic, non‐suckled Brahman cows were divided into three groups, all of which were synchronized sequentially with CIDR‐B and observed continuously for 100 h to determine different behavioural oestrus signs. Twenty‐four hours after implant withdrawal, all synchronized cows in the group, together with all other cows displaying oestrus, were subjected to intensive ultrasonographic observations (every 6 h for 120 h) to pinpoint the moment of ovulation. In the first group, oestrus and ovulation response was 60% (6/10), in the second 44% (4/9) showed oestrus and six ovulated, and in the third group oestrus and ovulation were 80% (8/10). Significant differences were observed between the second and third groups (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00820.x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68466326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68466326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-2c5e7f8c7ce8da29be44c72dc430680f1b81978d5f6bf1e2207c5c34476546fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwFVCEBG8J_hfbkXjpCoxJZZNgCIkXy3FuVJfUGXaytnx6nLXaEE_4xdb171ydew9CGcEFSeftuiCcVTkuGSkoxqLAWFFc7B6h2f3HYzTDFRO5kEKdoGcxrjEmpZLyKTohspICCzJDfh4jxLgBP2R9mw0ryC78AD66YT8VzmBlbl0_BtNl18G4IWbGN9nV7diZwfU-q2HYAvjs697bVei9-w3NHXLZ-zz-XVz02_gcPWlNF-HF8T5F3z5-uF58ypdX5xeL-TK3XBCcU1uCbJWVFlRjaFUD51bSxnKGhcItqRWppGrKVtQtAUqxtKVlnEtRctE27BS9OfS9Cf2vEeKgNy5a6DrjoR-jFooLwahI4Kt_wHUa1idvmhImuUw7S5A6QDb0MQZo9U1wGxP2mmA9BaLXetq7nvaup0D0XSB6l6Qvj_3HegPNg_CYQAJeHwETrenaYLx18YGrKKFYTR7eHbit62D_3wb0l_fz9Ejy_CB3cYDdvdyEn1pIJkv9_fJc_1gmR1R91pz9Ad5jtZk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213747015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the Intensity of Behavioural Traits and Ovulation between Synchronized and Non-synchronized Cows</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Forster, K ; Galina, CS ; Maquivar, M ; Van der Laan, G ; Arnoni, R ; Verduzco, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Forster, K ; Galina, CS ; Maquivar, M ; Van der Laan, G ; Arnoni, R ; Verduzco, A</creatorcontrib><description>Contents
Thirty cyclic, non‐suckled Brahman cows were divided into three groups, all of which were synchronized sequentially with CIDR‐B and observed continuously for 100 h to determine different behavioural oestrus signs. Twenty‐four hours after implant withdrawal, all synchronized cows in the group, together with all other cows displaying oestrus, were subjected to intensive ultrasonographic observations (every 6 h for 120 h) to pinpoint the moment of ovulation. In the first group, oestrus and ovulation response was 60% (6/10), in the second 44% (4/9) showed oestrus and six ovulated, and in the third group oestrus and ovulation were 80% (8/10). Significant differences were observed between the second and third groups (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in the duration of oestrus, time when oestrus was displayed after implant withdrawal, time of ovulation and onset of oestrus, end of oestrus to ovulation, and intensity of oestrus on a point scale. The relationship between duration of oestrus and time of ovulation was r2 = 0.16. Ovulation, on average, was 32.1 ± 14.5 h after the onset of oestrus, 22.3 ± 16.5 h after the end of oestrus, and 91.8 ± 16.7 after implant withdrawal, although no significant differences were observed. One non‐synchronized animal showed oestrous activity in the second group but failed to ovulate. In the third group, 8 animals showed oestrus, 4 with high concentrations of progesterone. Of the other four one ovulated. In conclusion, oestrous behaviour is not necessarily the best marker to predict the time when ovulation takes place due to variation in the length of the oestrous period and the possible integration of non‐ovulatory animals into sexually active groups.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0936-6768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0531</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00820.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17976061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravaginal ; Animal behavior ; Animal reproduction ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cattle ; Cattle - physiology ; Drug Implants ; Estrus Detection - methods ; Estrus Synchronization - physiology ; Female ; Females ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Mammalian reproduction. General aspects ; Ovarian Follicle - cytology ; Ovarian Follicle - diagnostic imaging ; Ovarian Follicle - drug effects ; Ovulation - drug effects ; Ovulation - physiology ; Ovulation Induction - methods ; Ovulation Induction - veterinary ; Progesterone Congeners - pharmacology ; Random Allocation ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - drug effects ; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Ultrasonography ; Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><ispartof>Reproduction in domestic animals, 2007-12, Vol.42 (6), p.566-570</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2007 The Authors. Journal compilation 2007 Blackwell Verlag</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-2c5e7f8c7ce8da29be44c72dc430680f1b81978d5f6bf1e2207c5c34476546fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-2c5e7f8c7ce8da29be44c72dc430680f1b81978d5f6bf1e2207c5c34476546fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0531.2006.00820.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1439-0531.2006.00820.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19212085$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17976061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forster, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galina, CS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maquivar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Laan, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnoni, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verduzco, A</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Intensity of Behavioural Traits and Ovulation between Synchronized and Non-synchronized Cows</title><title>Reproduction in domestic animals</title><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><description>Contents
Thirty cyclic, non‐suckled Brahman cows were divided into three groups, all of which were synchronized sequentially with CIDR‐B and observed continuously for 100 h to determine different behavioural oestrus signs. Twenty‐four hours after implant withdrawal, all synchronized cows in the group, together with all other cows displaying oestrus, were subjected to intensive ultrasonographic observations (every 6 h for 120 h) to pinpoint the moment of ovulation. In the first group, oestrus and ovulation response was 60% (6/10), in the second 44% (4/9) showed oestrus and six ovulated, and in the third group oestrus and ovulation were 80% (8/10). Significant differences were observed between the second and third groups (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in the duration of oestrus, time when oestrus was displayed after implant withdrawal, time of ovulation and onset of oestrus, end of oestrus to ovulation, and intensity of oestrus on a point scale. The relationship between duration of oestrus and time of ovulation was r2 = 0.16. Ovulation, on average, was 32.1 ± 14.5 h after the onset of oestrus, 22.3 ± 16.5 h after the end of oestrus, and 91.8 ± 16.7 after implant withdrawal, although no significant differences were observed. One non‐synchronized animal showed oestrous activity in the second group but failed to ovulate. In the third group, 8 animals showed oestrus, 4 with high concentrations of progesterone. Of the other four one ovulated. In conclusion, oestrous behaviour is not necessarily the best marker to predict the time when ovulation takes place due to variation in the length of the oestrous period and the possible integration of non‐ovulatory animals into sexually active groups.</description><subject>Administration, Intravaginal</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle - physiology</subject><subject>Drug Implants</subject><subject>Estrus Detection - methods</subject><subject>Estrus Synchronization - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Mammalian reproduction. General aspects</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - cytology</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</subject><subject>Ovulation - drug effects</subject><subject>Ovulation - physiology</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - methods</subject><subject>Ovulation Induction - veterinary</subject><subject>Progesterone Congeners - pharmacology</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - drug effects</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Vertebrates: reproduction</subject><issn>0936-6768</issn><issn>1439-0531</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkV9v0zAUxS0EYmXwFVCEBG8J_hfbkXjpCoxJZZNgCIkXy3FuVJfUGXaytnx6nLXaEE_4xdb171ydew9CGcEFSeftuiCcVTkuGSkoxqLAWFFc7B6h2f3HYzTDFRO5kEKdoGcxrjEmpZLyKTohspICCzJDfh4jxLgBP2R9mw0ryC78AD66YT8VzmBlbl0_BtNl18G4IWbGN9nV7diZwfU-q2HYAvjs697bVei9-w3NHXLZ-zz-XVz02_gcPWlNF-HF8T5F3z5-uF58ypdX5xeL-TK3XBCcU1uCbJWVFlRjaFUD51bSxnKGhcItqRWppGrKVtQtAUqxtKVlnEtRctE27BS9OfS9Cf2vEeKgNy5a6DrjoR-jFooLwahI4Kt_wHUa1idvmhImuUw7S5A6QDb0MQZo9U1wGxP2mmA9BaLXetq7nvaup0D0XSB6l6Qvj_3HegPNg_CYQAJeHwETrenaYLx18YGrKKFYTR7eHbit62D_3wb0l_fz9Ejy_CB3cYDdvdyEn1pIJkv9_fJc_1gmR1R91pz9Ad5jtZk</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Forster, K</creator><creator>Galina, CS</creator><creator>Maquivar, M</creator><creator>Van der Laan, G</creator><creator>Arnoni, R</creator><creator>Verduzco, A</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Intensity of Behavioural Traits and Ovulation between Synchronized and Non-synchronized Cows</title><author>Forster, K ; Galina, CS ; Maquivar, M ; Van der Laan, G ; Arnoni, R ; Verduzco, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4610-2c5e7f8c7ce8da29be44c72dc430680f1b81978d5f6bf1e2207c5c34476546fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravaginal</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle - physiology</topic><topic>Drug Implants</topic><topic>Estrus Detection - methods</topic><topic>Estrus Synchronization - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Mammalian reproduction. General aspects</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - cytology</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ovarian Follicle - drug effects</topic><topic>Ovulation - drug effects</topic><topic>Ovulation - physiology</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - methods</topic><topic>Ovulation Induction - veterinary</topic><topic>Progesterone Congeners - pharmacology</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - drug effects</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Vertebrates: reproduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forster, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galina, CS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maquivar, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van der Laan, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnoni, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verduzco, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forster, K</au><au>Galina, CS</au><au>Maquivar, M</au><au>Van der Laan, G</au><au>Arnoni, R</au><au>Verduzco, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Intensity of Behavioural Traits and Ovulation between Synchronized and Non-synchronized Cows</atitle><jtitle>Reproduction in domestic animals</jtitle><addtitle>Reprod Domest Anim</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>566</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>566-570</pages><issn>0936-6768</issn><eissn>1439-0531</eissn><abstract>Contents
Thirty cyclic, non‐suckled Brahman cows were divided into three groups, all of which were synchronized sequentially with CIDR‐B and observed continuously for 100 h to determine different behavioural oestrus signs. Twenty‐four hours after implant withdrawal, all synchronized cows in the group, together with all other cows displaying oestrus, were subjected to intensive ultrasonographic observations (every 6 h for 120 h) to pinpoint the moment of ovulation. In the first group, oestrus and ovulation response was 60% (6/10), in the second 44% (4/9) showed oestrus and six ovulated, and in the third group oestrus and ovulation were 80% (8/10). Significant differences were observed between the second and third groups (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in the duration of oestrus, time when oestrus was displayed after implant withdrawal, time of ovulation and onset of oestrus, end of oestrus to ovulation, and intensity of oestrus on a point scale. The relationship between duration of oestrus and time of ovulation was r2 = 0.16. Ovulation, on average, was 32.1 ± 14.5 h after the onset of oestrus, 22.3 ± 16.5 h after the end of oestrus, and 91.8 ± 16.7 after implant withdrawal, although no significant differences were observed. One non‐synchronized animal showed oestrous activity in the second group but failed to ovulate. In the third group, 8 animals showed oestrus, 4 with high concentrations of progesterone. Of the other four one ovulated. In conclusion, oestrous behaviour is not necessarily the best marker to predict the time when ovulation takes place due to variation in the length of the oestrous period and the possible integration of non‐ovulatory animals into sexually active groups.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17976061</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00820.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0936-6768 |
| ispartof | Reproduction in domestic animals, 2007-12, Vol.42 (6), p.566-570 |
| issn | 0936-6768 1439-0531 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68466326 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Administration, Intravaginal Animal behavior Animal reproduction Animals Biological and medical sciences Cattle Cattle - physiology Drug Implants Estrus Detection - methods Estrus Synchronization - physiology Female Females Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Mammalian reproduction. General aspects Ovarian Follicle - cytology Ovarian Follicle - diagnostic imaging Ovarian Follicle - drug effects Ovulation - drug effects Ovulation - physiology Ovulation Induction - methods Ovulation Induction - veterinary Progesterone Congeners - pharmacology Random Allocation Sexual Behavior, Animal - drug effects Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology Ultrasonography Vertebrates: reproduction |
| title | Assessment of the Intensity of Behavioural Traits and Ovulation between Synchronized and Non-synchronized Cows |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T05%3A35%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Intensity%20of%20Behavioural%20Traits%20and%20Ovulation%20between%20Synchronized%20and%20Non-synchronized%20Cows&rft.jtitle=Reproduction%20in%20domestic%20animals&rft.au=Forster,%20K&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=566&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=566-570&rft.issn=0936-6768&rft.eissn=1439-0531&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00820.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68466326%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213747015&rft_id=info:pmid/17976061&rfr_iscdi=true |