A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK

OBJECTIVE To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Ins...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2007-12, Vol.100 (6), p.1277-1281
Hauptverfasser: Mistry, Tina, Jones, Rob W.A., Dannatt, Erica, Prasad, Krishna K., Stockdale, Andrew D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1281
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1277
container_title BJU international
container_volume 100
creator Mistry, Tina
Jones, Rob W.A.
Dannatt, Erica
Prasad, Krishna K.
Stockdale, Andrew D.
description OBJECTIVE To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded. RESULTS Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%. CONCLUSION The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68464387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68464387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EovyugLyBXcM4zsdZsADEvxIbKrGzJs4EUiVpsVOgO47AGTkJDi2wxRuPPG_GM48xLiAQ_hxNAhEl0TAS8BCEAGkAqUhU8LbGtn4T6z8xZMmAbTs3AfAPSbzJBiJVMcg03GLnJ77p5_vHgtByS52duhmZrnohjvOi6vi05DNqq5q4wdaQ5Q22-EgNtR2vWt49ER_f7rKNEmtHe6t7h40vzu_Proaju8vrs5PR0MgsVcMyjCOMFRWSIC_ygmIQShYhAeaGikTlKUZgcgxlGWVRrAwaFCANEIZ5JOUOO1z2ndnp85xcp5vKGaprbGk6dzpRfmOpUg-qJWj8Qs5SqWe2atAutADdK9QT3dvRvSndK9TfCvWbL91f_THPGyr-ClfOPHCwAtAZrEvrvVTuj8uSDMK4546X3Ku3t_j3APr0ZtxH8gukZI1v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68464387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mistry, Tina ; Jones, Rob W.A. ; Dannatt, Erica ; Prasad, Krishna K. ; Stockdale, Andrew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Tina ; Jones, Rob W.A. ; Dannatt, Erica ; Prasad, Krishna K. ; Stockdale, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded. RESULTS Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%. CONCLUSION The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17850372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; audit ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; penile cancer ; Penile Neoplasms - mortality ; Penile Neoplasms - pathology ; Penile Neoplasms - therapy ; Penis - surgery ; radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2007-12, Vol.100 (6), p.1277-1281</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2007.07168.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2007.07168.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19690252$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17850372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Rob W.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannatt, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Krishna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockdale, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><title>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded. RESULTS Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%. CONCLUSION The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>audit</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>penile cancer</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Penis - surgery</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EovyugLyBXcM4zsdZsADEvxIbKrGzJs4EUiVpsVOgO47AGTkJDi2wxRuPPG_GM48xLiAQ_hxNAhEl0TAS8BCEAGkAqUhU8LbGtn4T6z8xZMmAbTs3AfAPSbzJBiJVMcg03GLnJ77p5_vHgtByS52duhmZrnohjvOi6vi05DNqq5q4wdaQ5Q22-EgNtR2vWt49ER_f7rKNEmtHe6t7h40vzu_Proaju8vrs5PR0MgsVcMyjCOMFRWSIC_ygmIQShYhAeaGikTlKUZgcgxlGWVRrAwaFCANEIZ5JOUOO1z2ndnp85xcp5vKGaprbGk6dzpRfmOpUg-qJWj8Qs5SqWe2atAutADdK9QT3dvRvSndK9TfCvWbL91f_THPGyr-ClfOPHCwAtAZrEvrvVTuj8uSDMK4546X3Ku3t_j3APr0ZtxH8gukZI1v</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Mistry, Tina</creator><creator>Jones, Rob W.A.</creator><creator>Dannatt, Erica</creator><creator>Prasad, Krishna K.</creator><creator>Stockdale, Andrew D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</title><author>Mistry, Tina ; Jones, Rob W.A. ; Dannatt, Erica ; Prasad, Krishna K. ; Stockdale, Andrew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>audit</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>penile cancer</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Penis - surgery</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Rob W.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannatt, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Krishna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockdale, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mistry, Tina</au><au>Jones, Rob W.A.</au><au>Dannatt, Erica</au><au>Prasad, Krishna K.</au><au>Stockdale, Andrew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1277</spage><epage>1281</epage><pages>1277-1281</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded. RESULTS Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%. CONCLUSION The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17850372</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2007-12, Vol.100 (6), p.1277-1281
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68464387
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
audit
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy
Humans
Lymphatic Metastasis
Male
Medical Audit
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Neoplasm Staging
Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases
penile cancer
Penile Neoplasms - mortality
Penile Neoplasms - pathology
Penile Neoplasms - therapy
Penis - surgery
radiotherapy
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome
title A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A03%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%2010%E2%80%90year%20retrospective%20audit%20of%20penile%20cancer%20management%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Mistry,%20Tina&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1277&rft.epage=1281&rft.pages=1277-1281&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68464387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68464387&rft_id=info:pmid/17850372&rfr_iscdi=true