A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK
OBJECTIVE To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Ins...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2007-12, Vol.100 (6), p.1277-1281 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1281 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1277 |
container_title | BJU international |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Mistry, Tina Jones, Rob W.A. Dannatt, Erica Prasad, Krishna K. Stockdale, Andrew D. |
description | OBJECTIVE
To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded.
RESULTS
Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%.
CONCLUSION
The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68464387</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68464387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EovyugLyBXcM4zsdZsADEvxIbKrGzJs4EUiVpsVOgO47AGTkJDi2wxRuPPG_GM48xLiAQ_hxNAhEl0TAS8BCEAGkAqUhU8LbGtn4T6z8xZMmAbTs3AfAPSbzJBiJVMcg03GLnJ77p5_vHgtByS52duhmZrnohjvOi6vi05DNqq5q4wdaQ5Q22-EgNtR2vWt49ER_f7rKNEmtHe6t7h40vzu_Proaju8vrs5PR0MgsVcMyjCOMFRWSIC_ygmIQShYhAeaGikTlKUZgcgxlGWVRrAwaFCANEIZ5JOUOO1z2ndnp85xcp5vKGaprbGk6dzpRfmOpUg-qJWj8Qs5SqWe2atAutADdK9QT3dvRvSndK9TfCvWbL91f_THPGyr-ClfOPHCwAtAZrEvrvVTuj8uSDMK4546X3Ku3t_j3APr0ZtxH8gukZI1v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68464387</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mistry, Tina ; Jones, Rob W.A. ; Dannatt, Erica ; Prasad, Krishna K. ; Stockdale, Andrew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Tina ; Jones, Rob W.A. ; Dannatt, Erica ; Prasad, Krishna K. ; Stockdale, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE
To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded.
RESULTS
Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%.
CONCLUSION
The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17850372</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; audit ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy ; Humans ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Male ; Medical Audit ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; penile cancer ; Penile Neoplasms - mortality ; Penile Neoplasms - pathology ; Penile Neoplasms - therapy ; Penis - surgery ; radiotherapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Factors ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2007-12, Vol.100 (6), p.1277-1281</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2007.07168.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1464-410X.2007.07168.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19690252$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17850372$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Rob W.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannatt, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Krishna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockdale, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><title>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE
To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded.
RESULTS
Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%.
CONCLUSION
The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>audit</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Audit</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>penile cancer</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Penile Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Penis - surgery</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtOwzAQQC0EovyugLyBXcM4zsdZsADEvxIbKrGzJs4EUiVpsVOgO47AGTkJDi2wxRuPPG_GM48xLiAQ_hxNAhEl0TAS8BCEAGkAqUhU8LbGtn4T6z8xZMmAbTs3AfAPSbzJBiJVMcg03GLnJ77p5_vHgtByS52duhmZrnohjvOi6vi05DNqq5q4wdaQ5Q22-EgNtR2vWt49ER_f7rKNEmtHe6t7h40vzu_Proaju8vrs5PR0MgsVcMyjCOMFRWSIC_ygmIQShYhAeaGikTlKUZgcgxlGWVRrAwaFCANEIZ5JOUOO1z2ndnp85xcp5vKGaprbGk6dzpRfmOpUg-qJWj8Qs5SqWe2atAutADdK9QT3dvRvSndK9TfCvWbL91f_THPGyr-ClfOPHCwAtAZrEvrvVTuj8uSDMK4546X3Ku3t_j3APr0ZtxH8gukZI1v</recordid><startdate>200712</startdate><enddate>200712</enddate><creator>Mistry, Tina</creator><creator>Jones, Rob W.A.</creator><creator>Dannatt, Erica</creator><creator>Prasad, Krishna K.</creator><creator>Stockdale, Andrew D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200712</creationdate><title>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</title><author>Mistry, Tina ; Jones, Rob W.A. ; Dannatt, Erica ; Prasad, Krishna K. ; Stockdale, Andrew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3978-f254a58ed3e0bdbde50183d2e0abced68b7a40cba23f49458caca103c0ea2b433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>audit</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Audit</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>penile cancer</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Penile Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Penis - surgery</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mistry, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Rob W.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dannatt, Erica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Krishna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stockdale, Andrew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mistry, Tina</au><au>Jones, Rob W.A.</au><au>Dannatt, Erica</au><au>Prasad, Krishna K.</au><au>Stockdale, Andrew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2007-12</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1277</spage><epage>1281</epage><pages>1277-1281</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVE
To audit the penile cancer workload, management and outcome within a regional cancer network serving a population of ≈ 1 million in the West Midlands (UK), comparing these data to that published by the British Association of Urological Surgeons National Cancer Registry, the UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence and the European Associations of Urology guidelines.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients diagnosed with or treated for penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network over a 10‐year period were identified retrospectively, and data relating to histology, local treatment, lymph node management, outcome and survival were recorded.
RESULTS
Data were obtained for 65 patients; 61 (94%) had histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis, equating to ≈ 0.6 cases per 100 000 population per year. Their mean age at diagnosis was 63 years. Of SCCs, 86% were located on the glans and/or foreskin. Thirty‐six patients had conservative primary local therapy, mostly for T0 or T1 disease. The 5‐year relapse‐free survival after radiotherapy was 63%, although survival after salvage penectomy was 75% at 4 years. Forty‐seven patients had lymph node surveillance; 11 developed lymph node disease and had lymph node dissection (LND) with or with no radiotherapy, but survival was poor. Primary inguinal LND with or without radiotherapy was used in eight patients, and was associated with a good survival, although three were found to have negative histology after LND. Survival was strongly influenced by T and N stage at presentation and the 5‐year survival for the whole group was 71%.
CONCLUSION
The workload, incidence and overall mortality from penile cancer within the Arden Cancer Network are in line with those in the rest of the UK. Rates of conservative therapy were good in this group and associated with good survival. Survival could be improved by identifying and aggressively treating those patients at high risk of lymph node disease.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17850372</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4096 |
ispartof | BJU international, 2007-12, Vol.100 (6), p.1277-1281 |
issn | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68464387 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over audit Biological and medical sciences Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - mortality Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - secondary Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - therapy Humans Lymphatic Metastasis Male Medical Audit Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Neoplasm Staging Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases penile cancer Penile Neoplasms - mortality Penile Neoplasms - pathology Penile Neoplasms - therapy Penis - surgery radiotherapy Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome |
title | A 10‐year retrospective audit of penile cancer management in the UK |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A03%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%2010%E2%80%90year%20retrospective%20audit%20of%20penile%20cancer%20management%20in%20the%20UK&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Mistry,%20Tina&rft.date=2007-12&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1277&rft.epage=1281&rft.pages=1277-1281&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07168.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68464387%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68464387&rft_id=info:pmid/17850372&rfr_iscdi=true |