Clinical Evaluation of Partial‐ and Full‐Mouth Scaling in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis
Background: Full‐mouth scaling (FMS) is claimed by some researchers to be superior to standard scaling and root planing (SRP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of two modalities of non‐surgical periodontal therapy for patients with chronic periodontitis. Methods: In a p...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of periodontology (1970) 2007-11, Vol.78 (11), p.2135-2142 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2142 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 2135 |
| container_title | Journal of periodontology (1970) |
| container_volume | 78 |
| creator | Knöfler, Gerhild U. Purschwitz, Regina E. Jentsch, Holger F.R. |
| description | Background: Full‐mouth scaling (FMS) is claimed by some researchers to be superior to standard scaling and root planing (SRP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of two modalities of non‐surgical periodontal therapy for patients with chronic periodontitis.
Methods: In a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, 37 subjects with chronic periodontitis were treated by SRP in two quadrants at 4‐week intervals (N = 20) or by FMS (N = 17). Clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at premolar and molar teeth at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.
Results: Both therapies resulted in significant improvements of all clinical variables. After 12 months, CAL at pockets with PDs of 4 to 6 mm was reduced significantly from 4.5 ± 0.8 mm to 3.4 ± 1.0 mm with SRP and from 4.7 ± 0.9 mm to 3.8 ± 1.1 mm with FMS (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1902/jop.2007.070010 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68459503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68459503</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4375-a9cfec57c9e4c397e5f33bcbebf1e46cb8b81fcf4206566b6c2bdaece016b4fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMuOEzEQRS0EYsLAmh3yBnadKT_aHS9RlOGhQUQwrC3bbROPnHaw3aDZ8Ql8I1-Co0SaJauqks69JR2EXhJYEgn06i4dlhRgWMIAQOARWhDJWcfEAI_RAoDSjnFJL9CzUu7aSTiDp-iCDHIAsYIFGtcxTMHqiDc_dZx1DWnCyeOtzjXo-Pf3H6ynEV_P8bh_SnPd4a8ND9N3HCZcdw7fZqfr3k31mFvvcmp9eOtySGOaaqihPEdPvI7FvTjPS_TtenO7ft_dfH73Yf32prOcDX2npfXO9oOVjlsmB9d7xow1znjiuLBmZVbEW88piF4IIyw1o3bWARGGe8Mu0ZtT7yGnH7MrVe1DsS5GPbk0FyVWvJc9sAZenUCbUynZeXXIYa_zvSKgjmJVE6uOYtVJbEu8OlfPZu_GB_5ssgGvz4AuzY_PerKhPHCSchBMNq4_cb9CdPf_-6s-bjdfKGE9-wcBhpTk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68459503</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Evaluation of Partial‐ and Full‐Mouth Scaling in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Knöfler, Gerhild U. ; Purschwitz, Regina E. ; Jentsch, Holger F.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knöfler, Gerhild U. ; Purschwitz, Regina E. ; Jentsch, Holger F.R.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Full‐mouth scaling (FMS) is claimed by some researchers to be superior to standard scaling and root planing (SRP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of two modalities of non‐surgical periodontal therapy for patients with chronic periodontitis.
Methods: In a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, 37 subjects with chronic periodontitis were treated by SRP in two quadrants at 4‐week intervals (N = 20) or by FMS (N = 17). Clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at premolar and molar teeth at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.
Results: Both therapies resulted in significant improvements of all clinical variables. After 12 months, CAL at pockets with PDs of 4 to 6 mm was reduced significantly from 4.5 ± 0.8 mm to 3.4 ± 1.0 mm with SRP and from 4.7 ± 0.9 mm to 3.8 ± 1.1 mm with FMS (P <0.001). PD decreased from 4.4 ± 0.6 mm to 3.3 ± 0.9 mm in the SRP group and from 4.5 ± 0.7 mm to 3.5 ± 1.0 mm in the FMS group (P <0.001). BOP was reduced from 63.6% ± 45.3% to 29.0% ± 42.6% in the SRP group and from 59.6% ± 43.8% to 28.6% ± 38.3% in the FMS group (P <0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to CAL gain, PD, and BOP reduction.
Conclusion: Both therapy modalities have the same positive influence on clinical outcome at premolar and molar teeth with PDs of 4 to 6 mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.070010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17970680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago, IL: American Academy of Periodontology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Dental Scaling - methods ; Dentistry ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology ; Female ; Humans ; Infection control ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Non tumoral diseases ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology ; Periodontal Attachment Loss - therapy ; periodontal disease ; Periodontal Pocket - therapy ; Periodontitis - therapy ; randomized clinical trial ; Root Planing - methods ; therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of periodontology (1970), 2007-11, Vol.78 (11), p.2135-2142</ispartof><rights>2007 American Academy of Periodontology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4375-a9cfec57c9e4c397e5f33bcbebf1e46cb8b81fcf4206566b6c2bdaece016b4fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4375-a9cfec57c9e4c397e5f33bcbebf1e46cb8b81fcf4206566b6c2bdaece016b4fb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1902%2Fjop.2007.070010$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1902%2Fjop.2007.070010$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19240639$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knöfler, Gerhild U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purschwitz, Regina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jentsch, Holger F.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Evaluation of Partial‐ and Full‐Mouth Scaling in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis</title><title>Journal of periodontology (1970)</title><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><description>Background: Full‐mouth scaling (FMS) is claimed by some researchers to be superior to standard scaling and root planing (SRP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of two modalities of non‐surgical periodontal therapy for patients with chronic periodontitis.
Methods: In a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, 37 subjects with chronic periodontitis were treated by SRP in two quadrants at 4‐week intervals (N = 20) or by FMS (N = 17). Clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at premolar and molar teeth at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.
Results: Both therapies resulted in significant improvements of all clinical variables. After 12 months, CAL at pockets with PDs of 4 to 6 mm was reduced significantly from 4.5 ± 0.8 mm to 3.4 ± 1.0 mm with SRP and from 4.7 ± 0.9 mm to 3.8 ± 1.1 mm with FMS (P <0.001). PD decreased from 4.4 ± 0.6 mm to 3.3 ± 0.9 mm in the SRP group and from 4.5 ± 0.7 mm to 3.5 ± 1.0 mm in the FMS group (P <0.001). BOP was reduced from 63.6% ± 45.3% to 29.0% ± 42.6% in the SRP group and from 59.6% ± 43.8% to 28.6% ± 38.3% in the FMS group (P <0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to CAL gain, PD, and BOP reduction.
Conclusion: Both therapy modalities have the same positive influence on clinical outcome at premolar and molar teeth with PDs of 4 to 6 mm.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Dental Scaling - methods</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</subject><subject>Periodontal Attachment Loss - therapy</subject><subject>periodontal disease</subject><subject>Periodontal Pocket - therapy</subject><subject>Periodontitis - therapy</subject><subject>randomized clinical trial</subject><subject>Root Planing - methods</subject><subject>therapy</subject><issn>0022-3492</issn><issn>1943-3670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMuOEzEQRS0EYsLAmh3yBnadKT_aHS9RlOGhQUQwrC3bbROPnHaw3aDZ8Ql8I1-Co0SaJauqks69JR2EXhJYEgn06i4dlhRgWMIAQOARWhDJWcfEAI_RAoDSjnFJL9CzUu7aSTiDp-iCDHIAsYIFGtcxTMHqiDc_dZx1DWnCyeOtzjXo-Pf3H6ynEV_P8bh_SnPd4a8ND9N3HCZcdw7fZqfr3k31mFvvcmp9eOtySGOaaqihPEdPvI7FvTjPS_TtenO7ft_dfH73Yf32prOcDX2npfXO9oOVjlsmB9d7xow1znjiuLBmZVbEW88piF4IIyw1o3bWARGGe8Mu0ZtT7yGnH7MrVe1DsS5GPbk0FyVWvJc9sAZenUCbUynZeXXIYa_zvSKgjmJVE6uOYtVJbEu8OlfPZu_GB_5ssgGvz4AuzY_PerKhPHCSchBMNq4_cb9CdPf_-6s-bjdfKGE9-wcBhpTk</recordid><startdate>200711</startdate><enddate>200711</enddate><creator>Knöfler, Gerhild U.</creator><creator>Purschwitz, Regina E.</creator><creator>Jentsch, Holger F.R.</creator><general>American Academy of Periodontology</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200711</creationdate><title>Clinical Evaluation of Partial‐ and Full‐Mouth Scaling in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis</title><author>Knöfler, Gerhild U. ; Purschwitz, Regina E. ; Jentsch, Holger F.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4375-a9cfec57c9e4c397e5f33bcbebf1e46cb8b81fcf4206566b6c2bdaece016b4fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Dental Scaling - methods</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology</topic><topic>Periodontal Attachment Loss - therapy</topic><topic>periodontal disease</topic><topic>Periodontal Pocket - therapy</topic><topic>Periodontitis - therapy</topic><topic>randomized clinical trial</topic><topic>Root Planing - methods</topic><topic>therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knöfler, Gerhild U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purschwitz, Regina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jentsch, Holger F.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knöfler, Gerhild U.</au><au>Purschwitz, Regina E.</au><au>Jentsch, Holger F.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Evaluation of Partial‐ and Full‐Mouth Scaling in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><date>2007-11</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2135</spage><epage>2142</epage><pages>2135-2142</pages><issn>0022-3492</issn><eissn>1943-3670</eissn><abstract>Background: Full‐mouth scaling (FMS) is claimed by some researchers to be superior to standard scaling and root planing (SRP). The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of two modalities of non‐surgical periodontal therapy for patients with chronic periodontitis.
Methods: In a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study, 37 subjects with chronic periodontitis were treated by SRP in two quadrants at 4‐week intervals (N = 20) or by FMS (N = 17). Clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) were recorded at premolar and molar teeth at baseline and after 6 and 12 months.
Results: Both therapies resulted in significant improvements of all clinical variables. After 12 months, CAL at pockets with PDs of 4 to 6 mm was reduced significantly from 4.5 ± 0.8 mm to 3.4 ± 1.0 mm with SRP and from 4.7 ± 0.9 mm to 3.8 ± 1.1 mm with FMS (P <0.001). PD decreased from 4.4 ± 0.6 mm to 3.3 ± 0.9 mm in the SRP group and from 4.5 ± 0.7 mm to 3.5 ± 1.0 mm in the FMS group (P <0.001). BOP was reduced from 63.6% ± 45.3% to 29.0% ± 42.6% in the SRP group and from 59.6% ± 43.8% to 28.6% ± 38.3% in the FMS group (P <0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to CAL gain, PD, and BOP reduction.
Conclusion: Both therapy modalities have the same positive influence on clinical outcome at premolar and molar teeth with PDs of 4 to 6 mm.</abstract><cop>Chicago, IL</cop><pub>American Academy of Periodontology</pub><pmid>17970680</pmid><doi>10.1902/jop.2007.070010</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3492 |
| ispartof | Journal of periodontology (1970), 2007-11, Vol.78 (11), p.2135-2142 |
| issn | 0022-3492 1943-3670 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68459503 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Adult Aged Biological and medical sciences Chronic Disease Dental Scaling - methods Dentistry Epidemiologic Methods Facial bones, jaws, teeth, parodontium: diseases, semeiology Female Humans Infection control Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Non tumoral diseases Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology Periodontal Attachment Loss - therapy periodontal disease Periodontal Pocket - therapy Periodontitis - therapy randomized clinical trial Root Planing - methods therapy |
| title | Clinical Evaluation of Partial‐ and Full‐Mouth Scaling in the Treatment of Chronic Periodontitis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T10%3A16%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Evaluation%20of%20Partial%E2%80%90%20and%20Full%E2%80%90Mouth%20Scaling%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Chronic%20Periodontitis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontology%20(1970)&rft.au=Kn%C3%B6fler,%20Gerhild%20U.&rft.date=2007-11&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2135&rft.epage=2142&rft.pages=2135-2142&rft.issn=0022-3492&rft.eissn=1943-3670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1902/jop.2007.070010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68459503%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68459503&rft_id=info:pmid/17970680&rfr_iscdi=true |