Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes
Aim To compare the anatomical and functional success of primary scleral buckling, performed either alone or in combination with vitrectomy, for primary retinal detachment (RD) in phakic eyes and in eyes had undergone uneventful phacoemulsification and had received posterior chamber lens implantation...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2005-08, Vol.19 (8), p.891-898 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 898 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 891 |
| container_title | Eye (London) |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Halberstadt, M Chatterjee-Sanz, N Brandenberg, L Koerner-Stiefbold, U Koerner, F Garweg, J G |
| description | Aim
To compare the anatomical and functional success of primary scleral buckling, performed either alone or in combination with vitrectomy, for primary retinal detachment (RD) in phakic eyes and in eyes had undergone uneventful phacoemulsification and had received posterior chamber lens implantations.
Methods
A total of 243 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. In all, 165 phakic and 78 pseudophakic individuals with primary RD underwent scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy and were followed up for 6 months. Pre-, intra- and postoperative findings including anatomical success, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), complications, and the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), macular pucker, or secondary cataracts were recorded. Cases requiring more than one surgical intervention were defined having failed, although further surgical intervention might have led to success.
Results
At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, the anatomical success was similar in phakic (88.98%) and pseudophakic (87.65%) eyes (log rank=0.310). The corresponding results after scleral buckling with vitrectomy were 82.13 and 77.63% for phakic and pseudophakic eyes, respectively (log rank=0.799). At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, BCVA was similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes (0.62±0.30
vs
0.70±0.29;
P
=0.227). Likewise, after scleral buckling with vitrectomy, BCVA did not differ significantly (
P
=0.322) between phakic (0.34±0.32) and pseudophakic eyes (0.50±0.27).
Conclusion
The anatomical and functional outcome of primary retinal reattachment surgery, involving scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy, is similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sj.eye.6701687 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68452613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>971771761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e298f7d509673b5d989b824c3ffed6279b92618e93fa1b5bd6b707a0191450943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7jh69SiNoLeeTdL59CaLX7CgBwVvIZ1O7_Y4nYyp9GH-vbVOw4DgKZB66k3VE0JeMrpjtDPXsN_FU9wpTZky-hHZMKFVK4UUj8mGWklbzvnPK_IMYE8pFjV9Sq6Y7IzlWmzI3bcyzb6cmhLrlPwBT1-rD_dzTLWBpdzFcnrX-ORrnqeAgE9DMy4p1Ck_8HmpIc-xmVJzvPe_pvAXOEJchrxe4IDwnDwZ_QHii_Xckh8fP3y_-dzefv305eb9bRtER2sbuTWjHiS1Sne9HKyxveEidOMYB8W17S1XzETbjZ71sh9Ur6n2lFkmsEl0W_L2nHss-fcSobp5ghAPB59iXsApIyQmdAi-_gfc56XgRuA4M6iHoqQt2Z2hUDJAiaM7nnU5Rt2Dfwd7h-u51T82vFpTl36OwwVfhSPwZgU8oM2x-BQmuHCYI43iyF2fOcBSwk-4jPefp_8AtrCfPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218389015</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Halberstadt, M ; Chatterjee-Sanz, N ; Brandenberg, L ; Koerner-Stiefbold, U ; Koerner, F ; Garweg, J G</creator><creatorcontrib>Halberstadt, M ; Chatterjee-Sanz, N ; Brandenberg, L ; Koerner-Stiefbold, U ; Koerner, F ; Garweg, J G</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To compare the anatomical and functional success of primary scleral buckling, performed either alone or in combination with vitrectomy, for primary retinal detachment (RD) in phakic eyes and in eyes had undergone uneventful phacoemulsification and had received posterior chamber lens implantations.
Methods
A total of 243 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. In all, 165 phakic and 78 pseudophakic individuals with primary RD underwent scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy and were followed up for 6 months. Pre-, intra- and postoperative findings including anatomical success, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), complications, and the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), macular pucker, or secondary cataracts were recorded. Cases requiring more than one surgical intervention were defined having failed, although further surgical intervention might have led to success.
Results
At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, the anatomical success was similar in phakic (88.98%) and pseudophakic (87.65%) eyes (log rank=0.310). The corresponding results after scleral buckling with vitrectomy were 82.13 and 77.63% for phakic and pseudophakic eyes, respectively (log rank=0.799). At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, BCVA was similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes (0.62±0.30
vs
0.70±0.29;
P
=0.227). Likewise, after scleral buckling with vitrectomy, BCVA did not differ significantly (
P
=0.322) between phakic (0.34±0.32) and pseudophakic eyes (0.50±0.27).
Conclusion
The anatomical and functional outcome of primary retinal reattachment surgery, involving scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy, is similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701687</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15389274</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EYEEEC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aphakia, Postcataract - complications ; Biological and medical sciences ; clinical-study ; Female ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Ophthalmology ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Pseudophakia - complications ; Retinal Detachment - complications ; Retinal Detachment - pathology ; Retinal Detachment - surgery ; Retinopathies ; Retrospective Studies ; Scleral Buckling - adverse effects ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity ; Vitrectomy - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2005-08, Vol.19 (8), p.891-898</ispartof><rights>Royal College of Ophthalmologists 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e298f7d509673b5d989b824c3ffed6279b92618e93fa1b5bd6b707a0191450943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e298f7d509673b5d989b824c3ffed6279b92618e93fa1b5bd6b707a0191450943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sj.eye.6701687$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sj.eye.6701687$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17015862$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15389274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Halberstadt, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee-Sanz, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandenberg, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerner-Stiefbold, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerner, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garweg, J G</creatorcontrib><title>Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Aim
To compare the anatomical and functional success of primary scleral buckling, performed either alone or in combination with vitrectomy, for primary retinal detachment (RD) in phakic eyes and in eyes had undergone uneventful phacoemulsification and had received posterior chamber lens implantations.
Methods
A total of 243 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. In all, 165 phakic and 78 pseudophakic individuals with primary RD underwent scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy and were followed up for 6 months. Pre-, intra- and postoperative findings including anatomical success, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), complications, and the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), macular pucker, or secondary cataracts were recorded. Cases requiring more than one surgical intervention were defined having failed, although further surgical intervention might have led to success.
Results
At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, the anatomical success was similar in phakic (88.98%) and pseudophakic (87.65%) eyes (log rank=0.310). The corresponding results after scleral buckling with vitrectomy were 82.13 and 77.63% for phakic and pseudophakic eyes, respectively (log rank=0.799). At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, BCVA was similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes (0.62±0.30
vs
0.70±0.29;
P
=0.227). Likewise, after scleral buckling with vitrectomy, BCVA did not differ significantly (
P
=0.322) between phakic (0.34±0.32) and pseudophakic eyes (0.50±0.27).
Conclusion
The anatomical and functional outcome of primary retinal reattachment surgery, involving scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy, is similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aphakia, Postcataract - complications</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical-study</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Pseudophakia - complications</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - complications</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - pathology</subject><subject>Retinal Detachment - surgery</subject><subject>Retinopathies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Scleral Buckling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><subject>Vitrectomy - adverse effects</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7jh69SiNoLeeTdL59CaLX7CgBwVvIZ1O7_Y4nYyp9GH-vbVOw4DgKZB66k3VE0JeMrpjtDPXsN_FU9wpTZky-hHZMKFVK4UUj8mGWklbzvnPK_IMYE8pFjV9Sq6Y7IzlWmzI3bcyzb6cmhLrlPwBT1-rD_dzTLWBpdzFcnrX-ORrnqeAgE9DMy4p1Ck_8HmpIc-xmVJzvPe_pvAXOEJchrxe4IDwnDwZ_QHii_Xckh8fP3y_-dzefv305eb9bRtER2sbuTWjHiS1Sne9HKyxveEidOMYB8W17S1XzETbjZ71sh9Ur6n2lFkmsEl0W_L2nHss-fcSobp5ghAPB59iXsApIyQmdAi-_gfc56XgRuA4M6iHoqQt2Z2hUDJAiaM7nnU5Rt2Dfwd7h-u51T82vFpTl36OwwVfhSPwZgU8oM2x-BQmuHCYI43iyF2fOcBSwk-4jPefp_8AtrCfPg</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Halberstadt, M</creator><creator>Chatterjee-Sanz, N</creator><creator>Brandenberg, L</creator><creator>Koerner-Stiefbold, U</creator><creator>Koerner, F</creator><creator>Garweg, J G</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes</title><author>Halberstadt, M ; Chatterjee-Sanz, N ; Brandenberg, L ; Koerner-Stiefbold, U ; Koerner, F ; Garweg, J G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-e298f7d509673b5d989b824c3ffed6279b92618e93fa1b5bd6b707a0191450943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aphakia, Postcataract - complications</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical-study</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Pseudophakia - complications</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - complications</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - pathology</topic><topic>Retinal Detachment - surgery</topic><topic>Retinopathies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Scleral Buckling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><topic>Vitrectomy - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Halberstadt, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterjee-Sanz, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brandenberg, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerner-Stiefbold, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koerner, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garweg, J G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Halberstadt, M</au><au>Chatterjee-Sanz, N</au><au>Brandenberg, L</au><au>Koerner-Stiefbold, U</au><au>Koerner, F</au><au>Garweg, J G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>898</epage><pages>891-898</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><coden>EYEEEC</coden><abstract>Aim
To compare the anatomical and functional success of primary scleral buckling, performed either alone or in combination with vitrectomy, for primary retinal detachment (RD) in phakic eyes and in eyes had undergone uneventful phacoemulsification and had received posterior chamber lens implantations.
Methods
A total of 243 consecutive patients were included in this retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. In all, 165 phakic and 78 pseudophakic individuals with primary RD underwent scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy and were followed up for 6 months. Pre-, intra- and postoperative findings including anatomical success, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), complications, and the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), macular pucker, or secondary cataracts were recorded. Cases requiring more than one surgical intervention were defined having failed, although further surgical intervention might have led to success.
Results
At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, the anatomical success was similar in phakic (88.98%) and pseudophakic (87.65%) eyes (log rank=0.310). The corresponding results after scleral buckling with vitrectomy were 82.13 and 77.63% for phakic and pseudophakic eyes, respectively (log rank=0.799). At 6 months after scleral buckling alone, BCVA was similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes (0.62±0.30
vs
0.70±0.29;
P
=0.227). Likewise, after scleral buckling with vitrectomy, BCVA did not differ significantly (
P
=0.322) between phakic (0.34±0.32) and pseudophakic eyes (0.50±0.27).
Conclusion
The anatomical and functional outcome of primary retinal reattachment surgery, involving scleral buckling alone or in combination with vitrectomy, is similar in phakic and pseudophakic eyes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>15389274</pmid><doi>10.1038/sj.eye.6701687</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0950-222X |
| ispartof | Eye (London), 2005-08, Vol.19 (8), p.891-898 |
| issn | 0950-222X 1476-5454 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68452613 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adult Aged Aphakia, Postcataract - complications Biological and medical sciences clinical-study Female Humans Laboratory Medicine Male Medical sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Miscellaneous Ophthalmology Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Pseudophakia - complications Retinal Detachment - complications Retinal Detachment - pathology Retinal Detachment - surgery Retinopathies Retrospective Studies Scleral Buckling - adverse effects Surgery Surgical Oncology Treatment Outcome Visual Acuity Vitrectomy - adverse effects |
| title | Primary retinal reattachment surgery: anatomical and functional outcome in phakic and pseudophakic eyes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A48%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20retinal%20reattachment%20surgery:%20anatomical%20and%20functional%20outcome%20in%20phakic%20and%20pseudophakic%20eyes&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Halberstadt,%20M&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=898&rft.pages=891-898&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft.coden=EYEEEC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sj.eye.6701687&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E971771761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218389015&rft_id=info:pmid/15389274&rfr_iscdi=true |