A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion

We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ear, nose, & throat journal nose, & throat journal, 2007-09, Vol.86 (9), p.552-554
Hauptverfasser: Diacova, Svetlana, McDonald, Thomas J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 554
container_issue 9
container_start_page 552
container_title Ear, nose, & throat journal
container_volume 86
creator Diacova, Svetlana
McDonald, Thomas J.
description We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/014556130708600909
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68451374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A169824149</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_014556130708600909</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A169824149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90k1r3DAQBmBRWppN2j_QQxE95OZEkj9kHZclbQoJ6WF7NmN5vKtgS1tJTth7fnjl7kL6EYoOAvl5B2k8hHzg7IJzKS8ZL8qy4jmTrK4YU0y9IguuCpHJUojXZDGDbBYn5DSEe8bSQcXfkhMulZw_LsjTkq7cuANvgrPU9fRuitqNGGjvhsE9Gruh630C1oXoxj1dTy3SbwNoHNFG6nzK24D-AaJ5QDoihMn_int6CxY2R5cqRxNNoLfYGaCPJm7pVd9PwTj7jrzpYQj4_rifke-fr9ar6-zm7svX1fIm06VgMdMFL5SQueS5BgHAcgW8ldjrssxZ0XbIhW7LGjVXCrq6zHmdQ6GlElhp1eZn5PxQd-fdjwlDbEYTNA4DWHRTaKq6KHkuiwQ__QXv3eRtulsjmCpSr-s6oeyANjBgY2zvoge9QYseBmexN-l4yStVi_niyV-84NPqcDT6xcD5b4EtwhC3wQ1TTC0Lf0JxgNq7EDz2zc6bEfy-4ayZR6X5d1RS6OPxjVM7YvccOc5GApcHENJPfG7Af0r-BBrbxfk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209400988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Diacova, Svetlana ; McDonald, Thomas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Diacova, Svetlana ; McDonald, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-5613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/014556130708600909</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17970145</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENTJDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Care and treatment ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Comparative analysis ; Ear diseases ; Eardrum ; Ears &amp; hearing ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medical care surveys ; Middle Ear Ventilation ; Myringoplasty - methods ; Otitis media with effusion ; Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery ; Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy ; Patient outcomes ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tympanic Membrane</subject><ispartof>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal, 2007-09, Vol.86 (9), p.552-554</ispartof><rights>2007 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Medquest Communications Inc. Sep 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014556130708600909$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014556130708600909$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21946,27832,27903,27904,44924,45312</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/014556130708600909?utm_source=summon&amp;utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970145$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diacova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</title><title>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</title><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><description><![CDATA[We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.]]></description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Ear diseases</subject><subject>Eardrum</subject><subject>Ears &amp; hearing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care surveys</subject><subject>Middle Ear Ventilation</subject><subject>Myringoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Otitis media with effusion</subject><subject>Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery</subject><subject>Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tympanic Membrane</subject><issn>0145-5613</issn><issn>1942-7522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp90k1r3DAQBmBRWppN2j_QQxE95OZEkj9kHZclbQoJ6WF7NmN5vKtgS1tJTth7fnjl7kL6EYoOAvl5B2k8hHzg7IJzKS8ZL8qy4jmTrK4YU0y9IguuCpHJUojXZDGDbBYn5DSEe8bSQcXfkhMulZw_LsjTkq7cuANvgrPU9fRuitqNGGjvhsE9Gruh630C1oXoxj1dTy3SbwNoHNFG6nzK24D-AaJ5QDoihMn_int6CxY2R5cqRxNNoLfYGaCPJm7pVd9PwTj7jrzpYQj4_rifke-fr9ar6-zm7svX1fIm06VgMdMFL5SQueS5BgHAcgW8ldjrssxZ0XbIhW7LGjVXCrq6zHmdQ6GlElhp1eZn5PxQd-fdjwlDbEYTNA4DWHRTaKq6KHkuiwQ__QXv3eRtulsjmCpSr-s6oeyANjBgY2zvoge9QYseBmexN-l4yStVi_niyV-84NPqcDT6xcD5b4EtwhC3wQ1TTC0Lf0JxgNq7EDz2zc6bEfy-4ayZR6X5d1RS6OPxjVM7YvccOc5GApcHENJPfG7Af0r-BBrbxfk</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Diacova, Svetlana</creator><creator>McDonald, Thomas J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</title><author>Diacova, Svetlana ; McDonald, Thomas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Ear diseases</topic><topic>Eardrum</topic><topic>Ears &amp; hearing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care surveys</topic><topic>Middle Ear Ventilation</topic><topic>Myringoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Otitis media with effusion</topic><topic>Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery</topic><topic>Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tympanic Membrane</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diacova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diacova, Svetlana</au><au>McDonald, Thomas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</atitle><jtitle>Ear, nose, &amp; throat journal</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>552-554</pages><issn>0145-5613</issn><eissn>1942-7522</eissn><coden>ENTJDO</coden><abstract><![CDATA[We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.]]></abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17970145</pmid><doi>10.1177/014556130708600909</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0145-5613
ispartof Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2007-09, Vol.86 (9), p.552-554
issn 0145-5613
1942-7522
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68451374
source Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024
subjects Adolescent
Care and treatment
Child
Child, Preschool
Comparative analysis
Ear diseases
Eardrum
Ears & hearing
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Medical care surveys
Middle Ear Ventilation
Myringoplasty - methods
Otitis media with effusion
Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery
Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy
Patient outcomes
Retrospective Studies
Statistics
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Tympanic Membrane
title A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Outcomes%20following%20Tympanostomy%20Tube%20Placement%20or%20Conservative%20measures%20for%20Management%20of%20Otitis%20Media%20with%20Effusion&rft.jtitle=Ear,%20nose,%20&%20throat%20journal&rft.au=Diacova,%20Svetlana&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=552-554&rft.issn=0145-5613&rft.eissn=1942-7522&rft.coden=ENTJDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/014556130708600909&rft_dat=%3Cgale_AFRWT%3EA169824149%3C/gale_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209400988&rft_id=info:pmid/17970145&rft_galeid=A169824149&rft_sage_id=10.1177_014556130708600909&rfr_iscdi=true