A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion
We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ear, nose, & throat journal nose, & throat journal, 2007-09, Vol.86 (9), p.552-554 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 554 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 552 |
container_title | Ear, nose, & throat journal |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Diacova, Svetlana McDonald, Thomas J. |
description | We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/014556130708600909 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68451374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A169824149</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_014556130708600909</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A169824149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90k1r3DAQBmBRWppN2j_QQxE95OZEkj9kHZclbQoJ6WF7NmN5vKtgS1tJTth7fnjl7kL6EYoOAvl5B2k8hHzg7IJzKS8ZL8qy4jmTrK4YU0y9IguuCpHJUojXZDGDbBYn5DSEe8bSQcXfkhMulZw_LsjTkq7cuANvgrPU9fRuitqNGGjvhsE9Gruh630C1oXoxj1dTy3SbwNoHNFG6nzK24D-AaJ5QDoihMn_int6CxY2R5cqRxNNoLfYGaCPJm7pVd9PwTj7jrzpYQj4_rifke-fr9ar6-zm7svX1fIm06VgMdMFL5SQueS5BgHAcgW8ldjrssxZ0XbIhW7LGjVXCrq6zHmdQ6GlElhp1eZn5PxQd-fdjwlDbEYTNA4DWHRTaKq6KHkuiwQ__QXv3eRtulsjmCpSr-s6oeyANjBgY2zvoge9QYseBmexN-l4yStVi_niyV-84NPqcDT6xcD5b4EtwhC3wQ1TTC0Lf0JxgNq7EDz2zc6bEfy-4ayZR6X5d1RS6OPxjVM7YvccOc5GApcHENJPfG7Af0r-BBrbxfk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>209400988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Diacova, Svetlana ; McDonald, Thomas J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Diacova, Svetlana ; McDonald, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-5613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1942-7522</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/014556130708600909</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17970145</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENTJDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Care and treatment ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Comparative analysis ; Ear diseases ; Eardrum ; Ears & hearing ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Medical care surveys ; Middle Ear Ventilation ; Myringoplasty - methods ; Otitis media with effusion ; Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery ; Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy ; Patient outcomes ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Tympanic Membrane</subject><ispartof>Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2007-09, Vol.86 (9), p.552-554</ispartof><rights>2007 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2007 Sage Publications, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Medquest Communications Inc. Sep 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/014556130708600909$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/014556130708600909$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21946,27832,27903,27904,44924,45312</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/014556130708600909?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17970145$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diacova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</title><title>Ear, nose, & throat journal</title><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><description><![CDATA[We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.]]></description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Ear diseases</subject><subject>Eardrum</subject><subject>Ears & hearing</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care surveys</subject><subject>Middle Ear Ventilation</subject><subject>Myringoplasty - methods</subject><subject>Otitis media with effusion</subject><subject>Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery</subject><subject>Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tympanic Membrane</subject><issn>0145-5613</issn><issn>1942-7522</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp90k1r3DAQBmBRWppN2j_QQxE95OZEkj9kHZclbQoJ6WF7NmN5vKtgS1tJTth7fnjl7kL6EYoOAvl5B2k8hHzg7IJzKS8ZL8qy4jmTrK4YU0y9IguuCpHJUojXZDGDbBYn5DSEe8bSQcXfkhMulZw_LsjTkq7cuANvgrPU9fRuitqNGGjvhsE9Gruh630C1oXoxj1dTy3SbwNoHNFG6nzK24D-AaJ5QDoihMn_int6CxY2R5cqRxNNoLfYGaCPJm7pVd9PwTj7jrzpYQj4_rifke-fr9ar6-zm7svX1fIm06VgMdMFL5SQueS5BgHAcgW8ldjrssxZ0XbIhW7LGjVXCrq6zHmdQ6GlElhp1eZn5PxQd-fdjwlDbEYTNA4DWHRTaKq6KHkuiwQ__QXv3eRtulsjmCpSr-s6oeyANjBgY2zvoge9QYseBmexN-l4yStVi_niyV-84NPqcDT6xcD5b4EtwhC3wQ1TTC0Lf0JxgNq7EDz2zc6bEfy-4ayZR6X5d1RS6OPxjVM7YvccOc5GApcHENJPfG7Af0r-BBrbxfk</recordid><startdate>20070901</startdate><enddate>20070901</enddate><creator>Diacova, Svetlana</creator><creator>McDonald, Thomas J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070901</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</title><author>Diacova, Svetlana ; McDonald, Thomas J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-c4149273713ca2aa039a1b7efc55304bde12cb58ec199ad853183a4c792e6c9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Ear diseases</topic><topic>Eardrum</topic><topic>Ears & hearing</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care surveys</topic><topic>Middle Ear Ventilation</topic><topic>Myringoplasty - methods</topic><topic>Otitis media with effusion</topic><topic>Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery</topic><topic>Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tympanic Membrane</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diacova, Svetlana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Ear, nose, & throat journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diacova, Svetlana</au><au>McDonald, Thomas J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion</atitle><jtitle>Ear, nose, & throat journal</jtitle><addtitle>Ear Nose Throat J</addtitle><date>2007-09-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>552-554</pages><issn>0145-5613</issn><eissn>1942-7522</eissn><coden>ENTJDO</coden><abstract><![CDATA[We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.]]></abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>17970145</pmid><doi>10.1177/014556130708600909</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0145-5613 |
ispartof | Ear, nose, & throat journal, 2007-09, Vol.86 (9), p.552-554 |
issn | 0145-5613 1942-7522 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68451374 |
source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Adolescent Care and treatment Child Child, Preschool Comparative analysis Ear diseases Eardrum Ears & hearing Female Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Male Medical care surveys Middle Ear Ventilation Myringoplasty - methods Otitis media with effusion Otitis Media with Effusion - surgery Otitis Media with Effusion - therapy Patient outcomes Retrospective Studies Statistics Surgery Treatment Outcome Tympanic Membrane |
title | A Comparison of Outcomes following Tympanostomy Tube Placement or Conservative measures for Management of Otitis Media with Effusion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T22%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Outcomes%20following%20Tympanostomy%20Tube%20Placement%20or%20Conservative%20measures%20for%20Management%20of%20Otitis%20Media%20with%20Effusion&rft.jtitle=Ear,%20nose,%20&%20throat%20journal&rft.au=Diacova,%20Svetlana&rft.date=2007-09-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=552-554&rft.issn=0145-5613&rft.eissn=1942-7522&rft.coden=ENTJDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/014556130708600909&rft_dat=%3Cgale_AFRWT%3EA169824149%3C/gale_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=209400988&rft_id=info:pmid/17970145&rft_galeid=A169824149&rft_sage_id=10.1177_014556130708600909&rfr_iscdi=true |