Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry

To understand the bone resorption process on the basis of the morphology of bone resorption lacunae, the inner surface of parietal bones in juvenile mice was exposed with a treatment of ultrasonic waves or NaOCl treatment and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bone resorption lacuna...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of Histology and Cytology 2005, Vol.68(2), pp.103-113
Hauptverfasser: Ren, Shumei, Takano, Hiroko, Abe, Kazuhiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 113
container_issue 2
container_start_page 103
container_title Archives of Histology and Cytology
container_volume 68
creator Ren, Shumei
Takano, Hiroko
Abe, Kazuhiro
description To understand the bone resorption process on the basis of the morphology of bone resorption lacunae, the inner surface of parietal bones in juvenile mice was exposed with a treatment of ultrasonic waves or NaOCl treatment and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bone resorption lacunae were divided into two types (I and II) according to differences in morphological features of their walls; the wall of type I lacunae was covered with loose collagen fibrils, while that of type II lacunae was smooth with almost no fibrillar structures. Collagen fibrils in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves differed in appearance from those treated with NaOCl; the collagen fibrils were thin and displayed a smooth surface in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, while they were thick and showed a rough surface in those treated with NaOCl—probably because superficial uncalcified collagen fibrils were digested with the chemical. The results indicated that type I lacunae occupied 77% of all of the bone resorption lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, but 51% of those treated with NaOCl. This finding led to the idea that type I lacunae can be subdivided into two: lacunae (Ia), covered with partially calcified fibrils as well as superficial uncalcified fibrils; and lacunae (Ib), covered only with uncalcified fibrils. The presence of uncalcified fibrils in the bone resorption lacunae was further confirmed by backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of SEM. Histochemistry for acid phosphatase or immuno-histochemistry for cathepsin B or carbonic anhydrase in combination with SEM revealed that type I lacunae were located under osteoclasts but type II lacunae were not. These findings indicate that type I lacunae are in the process of bone resorption by osteoclasts, while type II lacunae are in the final stage of bone resorption and free from osteoclasts. Bone resorption may thus proceed in the order of Ia, Ib, and II.
doi_str_mv 10.1679/aohc.68.103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68445619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17371096</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-fc8f93b5a295b7b27946ef20a097a0158bf7ad8bf58734f7b441ccf1723f091f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpaLZpT70XQSGX4q3Gki3r1hL6EQj0kp6NrB3FXmzJleQUn_KvV9tdttBLLzMI_fRG8x4hb4BtoZbqg_a92dbNFhh_RjbAhSpAgnxONkyBKJSoq0vyMsY9Y7zkJbwgl1AzqURVb8jT_S9P0zpjpN7SzjukAaMPcxq8o6M2i9NIB0dTj3TyS0Q66zBg0uMfOlId84tH1CPuaLfSaLRzg3ugOKJJIYtMgwk-Gj-vVLsd7YeYvOlxyj2sr8iF1WPE16d-RX58-Xx_8624-_719ubTXWFqDqmwprGKd5UuVdXJrsy_r9GWTDMlNYOq6azUu1yrRnJhZScEGGNBltxmFyy_ItdH3Tn4nwvG1Ob5BsdRO8xbtXUjsh-g_guC5BKYqjP47h9w75fg8hItCKGAN6VqMvX-SB08iAFtO4dh0mFtgbWH-NpDfHl8PvNMvz1pLt2Eu7_sKa8MfDwC-5j0A54BHdJgRjyLlceSNc9XptehRcd_A_inrzw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1449138298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>J-STAGE (Japan Science &amp; Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ren, Shumei ; Takano, Hiroko ; Abe, Kazuhiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Shumei ; Takano, Hiroko ; Abe, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><description>To understand the bone resorption process on the basis of the morphology of bone resorption lacunae, the inner surface of parietal bones in juvenile mice was exposed with a treatment of ultrasonic waves or NaOCl treatment and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bone resorption lacunae were divided into two types (I and II) according to differences in morphological features of their walls; the wall of type I lacunae was covered with loose collagen fibrils, while that of type II lacunae was smooth with almost no fibrillar structures. Collagen fibrils in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves differed in appearance from those treated with NaOCl; the collagen fibrils were thin and displayed a smooth surface in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, while they were thick and showed a rough surface in those treated with NaOCl—probably because superficial uncalcified collagen fibrils were digested with the chemical. The results indicated that type I lacunae occupied 77% of all of the bone resorption lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, but 51% of those treated with NaOCl. This finding led to the idea that type I lacunae can be subdivided into two: lacunae (Ia), covered with partially calcified fibrils as well as superficial uncalcified fibrils; and lacunae (Ib), covered only with uncalcified fibrils. The presence of uncalcified fibrils in the bone resorption lacunae was further confirmed by backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of SEM. Histochemistry for acid phosphatase or immuno-histochemistry for cathepsin B or carbonic anhydrase in combination with SEM revealed that type I lacunae were located under osteoclasts but type II lacunae were not. These findings indicate that type I lacunae are in the process of bone resorption by osteoclasts, while type II lacunae are in the final stage of bone resorption and free from osteoclasts. Bone resorption may thus proceed in the order of Ia, Ib, and II.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0914-9465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-1717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1679/aohc.68.103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16079456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan: International Society of Histology and Cytology</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone Resorption - pathology ; Carbonic Anhydrases - analysis ; Cathepsin B - analysis ; Immunohistochemistry ; Mice ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Models, Biological ; Osteoblasts - drug effects ; Osteoblasts - pathology ; Osteoblasts - ultrastructure ; Osteogenesis - drug effects ; Parietal Bone - chemistry ; Parietal Bone - pathology ; Parietal Bone - ultrastructure ; Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology ; Ultrasonics</subject><ispartof>Archives of Histology and Cytology, 2005, Vol.68(2), pp.103-113</ispartof><rights>2005 by International Society of Histology and Cytology</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-fc8f93b5a295b7b27946ef20a097a0158bf7ad8bf58734f7b441ccf1723f091f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-fc8f93b5a295b7b27946ef20a097a0158bf7ad8bf58734f7b441ccf1723f091f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1883,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16079456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Shumei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><title>Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry</title><title>Archives of Histology and Cytology</title><addtitle>Arch. Histol. Cytol.</addtitle><description>To understand the bone resorption process on the basis of the morphology of bone resorption lacunae, the inner surface of parietal bones in juvenile mice was exposed with a treatment of ultrasonic waves or NaOCl treatment and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bone resorption lacunae were divided into two types (I and II) according to differences in morphological features of their walls; the wall of type I lacunae was covered with loose collagen fibrils, while that of type II lacunae was smooth with almost no fibrillar structures. Collagen fibrils in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves differed in appearance from those treated with NaOCl; the collagen fibrils were thin and displayed a smooth surface in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, while they were thick and showed a rough surface in those treated with NaOCl—probably because superficial uncalcified collagen fibrils were digested with the chemical. The results indicated that type I lacunae occupied 77% of all of the bone resorption lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, but 51% of those treated with NaOCl. This finding led to the idea that type I lacunae can be subdivided into two: lacunae (Ia), covered with partially calcified fibrils as well as superficial uncalcified fibrils; and lacunae (Ib), covered only with uncalcified fibrils. The presence of uncalcified fibrils in the bone resorption lacunae was further confirmed by backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of SEM. Histochemistry for acid phosphatase or immuno-histochemistry for cathepsin B or carbonic anhydrase in combination with SEM revealed that type I lacunae were located under osteoclasts but type II lacunae were not. These findings indicate that type I lacunae are in the process of bone resorption by osteoclasts, while type II lacunae are in the final stage of bone resorption and free from osteoclasts. Bone resorption may thus proceed in the order of Ia, Ib, and II.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Resorption - pathology</subject><subject>Carbonic Anhydrases - analysis</subject><subject>Cathepsin B - analysis</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - drug effects</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - pathology</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - drug effects</subject><subject>Parietal Bone - chemistry</subject><subject>Parietal Bone - pathology</subject><subject>Parietal Bone - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</subject><subject>Ultrasonics</subject><issn>0914-9465</issn><issn>1349-1717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1r3DAQxUVpaLZpT70XQSGX4q3Gki3r1hL6EQj0kp6NrB3FXmzJleQUn_KvV9tdttBLLzMI_fRG8x4hb4BtoZbqg_a92dbNFhh_RjbAhSpAgnxONkyBKJSoq0vyMsY9Y7zkJbwgl1AzqURVb8jT_S9P0zpjpN7SzjukAaMPcxq8o6M2i9NIB0dTj3TyS0Q66zBg0uMfOlId84tH1CPuaLfSaLRzg3ugOKJJIYtMgwk-Gj-vVLsd7YeYvOlxyj2sr8iF1WPE16d-RX58-Xx_8624-_719ubTXWFqDqmwprGKd5UuVdXJrsy_r9GWTDMlNYOq6azUu1yrRnJhZScEGGNBltxmFyy_ItdH3Tn4nwvG1Ob5BsdRO8xbtXUjsh-g_guC5BKYqjP47h9w75fg8hItCKGAN6VqMvX-SB08iAFtO4dh0mFtgbWH-NpDfHl8PvNMvz1pLt2Eu7_sKa8MfDwC-5j0A54BHdJgRjyLlceSNc9XptehRcd_A_inrzw</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Ren, Shumei</creator><creator>Takano, Hiroko</creator><creator>Abe, Kazuhiro</creator><general>International Society of Histology and Cytology</general><general>Japan Science and Technology Agency</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry</title><author>Ren, Shumei ; Takano, Hiroko ; Abe, Kazuhiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c631t-fc8f93b5a295b7b27946ef20a097a0158bf7ad8bf58734f7b441ccf1723f091f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Resorption - pathology</topic><topic>Carbonic Anhydrases - analysis</topic><topic>Cathepsin B - analysis</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - drug effects</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - pathology</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - drug effects</topic><topic>Parietal Bone - chemistry</topic><topic>Parietal Bone - pathology</topic><topic>Parietal Bone - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology</topic><topic>Ultrasonics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Shumei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Hiroko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abe, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of Histology and Cytology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Shumei</au><au>Takano, Hiroko</au><au>Abe, Kazuhiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry</atitle><jtitle>Archives of Histology and Cytology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch. Histol. Cytol.</addtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>103-113</pages><issn>0914-9465</issn><eissn>1349-1717</eissn><abstract>To understand the bone resorption process on the basis of the morphology of bone resorption lacunae, the inner surface of parietal bones in juvenile mice was exposed with a treatment of ultrasonic waves or NaOCl treatment and examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The bone resorption lacunae were divided into two types (I and II) according to differences in morphological features of their walls; the wall of type I lacunae was covered with loose collagen fibrils, while that of type II lacunae was smooth with almost no fibrillar structures. Collagen fibrils in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves differed in appearance from those treated with NaOCl; the collagen fibrils were thin and displayed a smooth surface in type I lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, while they were thick and showed a rough surface in those treated with NaOCl—probably because superficial uncalcified collagen fibrils were digested with the chemical. The results indicated that type I lacunae occupied 77% of all of the bone resorption lacunae treated with ultrasonic waves, but 51% of those treated with NaOCl. This finding led to the idea that type I lacunae can be subdivided into two: lacunae (Ia), covered with partially calcified fibrils as well as superficial uncalcified fibrils; and lacunae (Ib), covered only with uncalcified fibrils. The presence of uncalcified fibrils in the bone resorption lacunae was further confirmed by backscattered electron (BSE) imaging of SEM. Histochemistry for acid phosphatase or immuno-histochemistry for cathepsin B or carbonic anhydrase in combination with SEM revealed that type I lacunae were located under osteoclasts but type II lacunae were not. These findings indicate that type I lacunae are in the process of bone resorption by osteoclasts, while type II lacunae are in the final stage of bone resorption and free from osteoclasts. Bone resorption may thus proceed in the order of Ia, Ib, and II.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pub>International Society of Histology and Cytology</pub><pmid>16079456</pmid><doi>10.1679/aohc.68.103</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0914-9465
ispartof Archives of Histology and Cytology, 2005, Vol.68(2), pp.103-113
issn 0914-9465
1349-1717
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68445619
source MEDLINE; J-STAGE (Japan Science & Technology Information Aggregator, Electronic) Freely Available Titles - Japanese; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Bone Resorption - pathology
Carbonic Anhydrases - analysis
Cathepsin B - analysis
Immunohistochemistry
Mice
Microscopy, Confocal
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Models, Biological
Osteoblasts - drug effects
Osteoblasts - pathology
Osteoblasts - ultrastructure
Osteogenesis - drug effects
Parietal Bone - chemistry
Parietal Bone - pathology
Parietal Bone - ultrastructure
Sodium Hypochlorite - pharmacology
Ultrasonics
title Two types of bone resorption lacunae in the mouse parietal bones as revealed by scanning electron microscopy and histochemistry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T19%3A31%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20types%20of%20bone%20resorption%20lacunae%20in%20the%20mouse%20parietal%20bones%20as%20revealed%20by%20scanning%20electron%20microscopy%20and%20histochemistry&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20Histology%20and%20Cytology&rft.au=Ren,%20Shumei&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=103-113&rft.issn=0914-9465&rft.eissn=1349-1717&rft_id=info:doi/10.1679/aohc.68.103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17371096%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1449138298&rft_id=info:pmid/16079456&rfr_iscdi=true