Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : A randomized controlled trial

Laparoscopic colectomy has been proved to be both technically and oncologically feasible. However, the approach has been criticized for its procedural complexity and long operative time as a result of the loss of tactile feedback and absence of depth perception. The advent of hand-access devices off...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of surgery 2007-11, Vol.246 (5), p.728-733
Hauptverfasser: CHI CHIU CHUNG, NG, Dennis Chung Kei, TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng, WAI LUN TANG, YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay, CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan, WONG, James Cheuk Hoo, LI, Michael Ka Wah
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 733
container_issue 5
container_start_page 728
container_title Annals of surgery
container_volume 246
creator CHI CHIU CHUNG
NG, Dennis Chung Kei
TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng
WAI LUN TANG
YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay
CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan
WONG, James Cheuk Hoo
LI, Michael Ka Wah
description Laparoscopic colectomy has been proved to be both technically and oncologically feasible. However, the approach has been criticized for its procedural complexity and long operative time as a result of the loss of tactile feedback and absence of depth perception. The advent of hand-access devices offered a potential solution to these problems. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with open colectomy (OC) in the management of right-sided colonic cancer. Adult patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma of cancer or ascending colon were recruited. Patients were excluded if they presented with surgical emergencies, had synchronous tumors on work-up, or when the tumor was larger than 6.5 cm in any dimension or preoperative imaging. Recruited patients were randomized to undergo either HALC or OC by the same surgical team. Outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, as well as disease recurrence and patient survival. Eighty-one patients (HALC = 41, OC = 40) were successfully recruited. The 2 groups were matched for age, gender distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in the distribution of tumors and the final histopathological staging. HALC took significantly longer than OC (110 min vs. 97.5 minutes, P = 0.003) but resulted in significantly less blood loss (35 mL vs. 50 mL, P = 0.005). Patients after HALC experienced significantly less pain, required significantly less parenteral and enteral analgesia, recovered faster, and was associated with a shorter length of stay (7 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.004). With median follow-up of 28 to 30 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5-year survival rates remained similar (83% vs. 74%, P = 0.90). HALC retained the same short-term benefits of the pure laparoscopic approach. The technique is associated with a slightly increased but acceptable operative time. Aside as a useful adjunct in complex laparoscopic procedures, the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique is also a useful, if not more effective, alternative for patients with right-sided colonic cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318123fbdf
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68443804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68443804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-31a1c832a84421f04ea889c6137a98a0612b99916d617e233a315bc076cf172d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9LwzAYh4Mobk6_gUgvequ-b5Klibcx1AkDD_65ljRNtZIuNemE-emNbDDwlPfwPD_IQ8g5wjWCKm6el7NrqACZZSiRsqaqmwMyximVOSKHQzIGAJZzxeiInMT4CYBcQnFMRlgoIVHQMXlb6FWd6xjbONg6c7rXwUfj-9Zk3zbEdcx8b1dZaN8_hsx4Z83gu012m82ykFTftT_JM341BO9cOofQandKjhrtoj3bvRPyen_3Ml_ky6eHx_lsmRsq-ZAz1Ggko1pyTrEBbrWUyghkhVZSg0BaKaVQ1AILSxnTDKeVgUKYBgtaswm52u72wX-tbRzKro3GOqdX1q9jKdIwk8ATyLegSd-LwTZlH9pOh02JUP71LFPP8n_PpF3s9tdVZ-u9tAuYgMsdoKPRrklNTBv3nKKsEKDYLw38fys</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68443804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : A randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>CHI CHIU CHUNG ; NG, Dennis Chung Kei ; TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng ; WAI LUN TANG ; YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay ; CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan ; WONG, James Cheuk Hoo ; LI, Michael Ka Wah</creator><creatorcontrib>CHI CHIU CHUNG ; NG, Dennis Chung Kei ; TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng ; WAI LUN TANG ; YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay ; CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan ; WONG, James Cheuk Hoo ; LI, Michael Ka Wah</creatorcontrib><description>Laparoscopic colectomy has been proved to be both technically and oncologically feasible. However, the approach has been criticized for its procedural complexity and long operative time as a result of the loss of tactile feedback and absence of depth perception. The advent of hand-access devices offered a potential solution to these problems. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with open colectomy (OC) in the management of right-sided colonic cancer. Adult patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma of cancer or ascending colon were recruited. Patients were excluded if they presented with surgical emergencies, had synchronous tumors on work-up, or when the tumor was larger than 6.5 cm in any dimension or preoperative imaging. Recruited patients were randomized to undergo either HALC or OC by the same surgical team. Outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, as well as disease recurrence and patient survival. Eighty-one patients (HALC = 41, OC = 40) were successfully recruited. The 2 groups were matched for age, gender distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in the distribution of tumors and the final histopathological staging. HALC took significantly longer than OC (110 min vs. 97.5 minutes, P = 0.003) but resulted in significantly less blood loss (35 mL vs. 50 mL, P = 0.005). Patients after HALC experienced significantly less pain, required significantly less parenteral and enteral analgesia, recovered faster, and was associated with a shorter length of stay (7 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.004). With median follow-up of 28 to 30 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5-year survival rates remained similar (83% vs. 74%, P = 0.90). HALC retained the same short-term benefits of the pure laparoscopic approach. The technique is associated with a slightly increased but acceptable operative time. Aside as a useful adjunct in complex laparoscopic procedures, the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique is also a useful, if not more effective, alternative for patients with right-sided colonic cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1140</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318123fbdf</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17968162</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANSUA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carcinoma - mortality ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Carcinoma - surgery ; Colectomy - methods ; Colonic Neoplasms - mortality ; Colonic Neoplasms - pathology ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; Endoscopy ; Equipment Design ; Female ; General aspects ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Annals of surgery, 2007-11, Vol.246 (5), p.728-733</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-31a1c832a84421f04ea889c6137a98a0612b99916d617e233a315bc076cf172d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19237609$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17968162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CHI CHIU CHUNG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NG, Dennis Chung Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAI LUN TANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, James Cheuk Hoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI, Michael Ka Wah</creatorcontrib><title>Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Annals of surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><description>Laparoscopic colectomy has been proved to be both technically and oncologically feasible. However, the approach has been criticized for its procedural complexity and long operative time as a result of the loss of tactile feedback and absence of depth perception. The advent of hand-access devices offered a potential solution to these problems. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with open colectomy (OC) in the management of right-sided colonic cancer. Adult patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma of cancer or ascending colon were recruited. Patients were excluded if they presented with surgical emergencies, had synchronous tumors on work-up, or when the tumor was larger than 6.5 cm in any dimension or preoperative imaging. Recruited patients were randomized to undergo either HALC or OC by the same surgical team. Outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, as well as disease recurrence and patient survival. Eighty-one patients (HALC = 41, OC = 40) were successfully recruited. The 2 groups were matched for age, gender distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in the distribution of tumors and the final histopathological staging. HALC took significantly longer than OC (110 min vs. 97.5 minutes, P = 0.003) but resulted in significantly less blood loss (35 mL vs. 50 mL, P = 0.005). Patients after HALC experienced significantly less pain, required significantly less parenteral and enteral analgesia, recovered faster, and was associated with a shorter length of stay (7 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.004). With median follow-up of 28 to 30 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5-year survival rates remained similar (83% vs. 74%, P = 0.90). HALC retained the same short-term benefits of the pure laparoscopic approach. The technique is associated with a slightly increased but acceptable operative time. Aside as a useful adjunct in complex laparoscopic procedures, the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique is also a useful, if not more effective, alternative for patients with right-sided colonic cancer.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laparoscopes</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0003-4932</issn><issn>1528-1140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9LwzAYh4Mobk6_gUgvequ-b5Klibcx1AkDD_65ljRNtZIuNemE-emNbDDwlPfwPD_IQ8g5wjWCKm6el7NrqACZZSiRsqaqmwMyximVOSKHQzIGAJZzxeiInMT4CYBcQnFMRlgoIVHQMXlb6FWd6xjbONg6c7rXwUfj-9Zk3zbEdcx8b1dZaN8_hsx4Z83gu012m82ykFTftT_JM341BO9cOofQandKjhrtoj3bvRPyen_3Ml_ky6eHx_lsmRsq-ZAz1Ggko1pyTrEBbrWUyghkhVZSg0BaKaVQ1AILSxnTDKeVgUKYBgtaswm52u72wX-tbRzKro3GOqdX1q9jKdIwk8ATyLegSd-LwTZlH9pOh02JUP71LFPP8n_PpF3s9tdVZ-u9tAuYgMsdoKPRrklNTBv3nKKsEKDYLw38fys</recordid><startdate>20071101</startdate><enddate>20071101</enddate><creator>CHI CHIU CHUNG</creator><creator>NG, Dennis Chung Kei</creator><creator>TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng</creator><creator>WAI LUN TANG</creator><creator>YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay</creator><creator>CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan</creator><creator>WONG, James Cheuk Hoo</creator><creator>LI, Michael Ka Wah</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071101</creationdate><title>Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : A randomized controlled trial</title><author>CHI CHIU CHUNG ; NG, Dennis Chung Kei ; TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng ; WAI LUN TANG ; YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay ; CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan ; WONG, James Cheuk Hoo ; LI, Michael Ka Wah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-31a1c832a84421f04ea889c6137a98a0612b99916d617e233a315bc076cf172d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laparoscopes</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CHI CHIU CHUNG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NG, Dennis Chung Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WAI LUN TANG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, James Cheuk Hoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LI, Michael Ka Wah</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CHI CHIU CHUNG</au><au>NG, Dennis Chung Kei</au><au>TSANG, Wilson Wen Chieng</au><au>WAI LUN TANG</au><au>YAU, Kevin Kwok Kay</au><au>CHEUNG, Hester Yui Shan</au><au>WONG, James Cheuk Hoo</au><au>LI, Michael Ka Wah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Annals of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Surg</addtitle><date>2007-11-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>246</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>728</spage><epage>733</epage><pages>728-733</pages><issn>0003-4932</issn><eissn>1528-1140</eissn><coden>ANSUA5</coden><abstract>Laparoscopic colectomy has been proved to be both technically and oncologically feasible. However, the approach has been criticized for its procedural complexity and long operative time as a result of the loss of tactile feedback and absence of depth perception. The advent of hand-access devices offered a potential solution to these problems. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with open colectomy (OC) in the management of right-sided colonic cancer. Adult patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma of cancer or ascending colon were recruited. Patients were excluded if they presented with surgical emergencies, had synchronous tumors on work-up, or when the tumor was larger than 6.5 cm in any dimension or preoperative imaging. Recruited patients were randomized to undergo either HALC or OC by the same surgical team. Outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, as well as disease recurrence and patient survival. Eighty-one patients (HALC = 41, OC = 40) were successfully recruited. The 2 groups were matched for age, gender distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in the distribution of tumors and the final histopathological staging. HALC took significantly longer than OC (110 min vs. 97.5 minutes, P = 0.003) but resulted in significantly less blood loss (35 mL vs. 50 mL, P = 0.005). Patients after HALC experienced significantly less pain, required significantly less parenteral and enteral analgesia, recovered faster, and was associated with a shorter length of stay (7 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.004). With median follow-up of 28 to 30 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5-year survival rates remained similar (83% vs. 74%, P = 0.90). HALC retained the same short-term benefits of the pure laparoscopic approach. The technique is associated with a slightly increased but acceptable operative time. Aside as a useful adjunct in complex laparoscopic procedures, the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique is also a useful, if not more effective, alternative for patients with right-sided colonic cancer.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>17968162</pmid><doi>10.1097/SLA.0b013e318123fbdf</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-4932
ispartof Annals of surgery, 2007-11, Vol.246 (5), p.728-733
issn 0003-4932
1528-1140
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68443804
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Carcinoma - mortality
Carcinoma - pathology
Carcinoma - surgery
Colectomy - methods
Colonic Neoplasms - mortality
Colonic Neoplasms - pathology
Colonic Neoplasms - surgery
Digestive system. Abdomen
Endoscopy
Equipment Design
Female
General aspects
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Laparoscopes
Laparoscopy
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
title Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open right colectomy : A randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A27%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hand-assisted%20laparoscopic%20versus%20open%20right%20colectomy%20:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20surgery&rft.au=CHI%20CHIU%20CHUNG&rft.date=2007-11-01&rft.volume=246&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=728&rft.epage=733&rft.pages=728-733&rft.issn=0003-4932&rft.eissn=1528-1140&rft.coden=ANSUA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318123fbdf&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68443804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68443804&rft_id=info:pmid/17968162&rfr_iscdi=true